Monthly Archives: September 2024

AK: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil cases

The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil cases in Alaska. Alaska R.E. 412. O’Brien v. Delaplain, 2024 Alas. LEXIS 99 n.35(Sep. 27, 2024). The officer’s observations on a table near the door from outside the dwelling during a knock-and-talk provided … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Exclusionary rule, Knock and talk, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AK: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil cases

D.Minn.: A cell phone tracking order was permitted where there was an arrest warrant for defendant

“Despite a dearth of binding precedent, this Court is satisfied that the existence of an active arrest warrant provides a sufficient basis for a magistrate judge to find probable cause to issue a tracking warrant allowing law enforcement to monitor … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Inventory, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on D.Minn.: A cell phone tracking order was permitted where there was an arrest warrant for defendant

N.D.Okla.: Pipe on console of MMJ card holder not PC for plain view

A pipe on the car console of a MMJ card holder was not “immediately apparent” it was incriminating for plain view. United States v. Vasquez, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174528 (N.D. Okla. Sep. 25, 2024). Plaintiff filed his Fourth Amendment … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Strip search, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Pipe on console of MMJ card holder not PC for plain view

AR & PA: Def’s statements at time of search used at trial

Defendant’s DNA was taken by warrant at the jail, and his admissions about the offense during that captured on bodycam were admitted at trial. There was no questioning; it was voluntary. Torres v. State, 2024 Ark. App. 457 (Sep. 25, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Custody, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on AR & PA: Def’s statements at time of search used at trial

N.D.Tex.: GFE applies, but PC, too

The affidavit for the warrant here is more than “bare bones” so the good faith exception applies. “Even if the good-faith exception did not apply, the warrant is still valid because it is supported by probable cause.” United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: GFE applies, but PC, too

FL4: REP in Facebook private messages

(1) Florida’s 4th DCA finds a reasonable expectation of privacy in Facebook private messages as analogous to cell phone text messages. (2) When the records were seized under a warrant for a theft, they couldn’t be searched for evidence of … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Scope of search, Social media warrants | Comments Off on FL4: REP in Facebook private messages

M.D.Pa.: No constitutional requirement to get arrest warrant for misdemeanor committed in officer’s presence

There is no constitutional requirement for an officer to get an arrest warrant to arrest based on a misdemeanor committed in his presence. The common law says the officer can. United States v. Alvarez, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 172609 (M.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Community caretaking function, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: No constitutional requirement to get arrest warrant for misdemeanor committed in officer’s presence

OR: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to criminally dangerous person civil commitments

Neither the state nor federal exclusionary rule does not apply in criminal dangerous person civil commitments. State v. T.L.B. (In re T.L.B.), 335 Or. App. 225 (Sep. 25, 2024). The officer here saw defendant walking at night in a neighborhood … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Consent, Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to criminally dangerous person civil commitments

PA: The Rule of Law here counsels against suppression for a jurisdictional violation

A stop outside the officer’s jurisdiction in violation of statute should not lead to suppression of evidence. The rule of law counsels against suppression. The jurisdictional statutes are for accountabiliy. Commonwealth v. Eakin, 2024 PA Super 222, 2024 Pa. Super. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on PA: The Rule of Law here counsels against suppression for a jurisdictional violation

NE: Not IAC to not challenge state’s obtaining phone records

It was settled in this state long ago that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in third-party cell phone records. Therefore, defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging it. State v. Rush, 317 Neb. 622 (Sep. 20, 2024).* On … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on NE: Not IAC to not challenge state’s obtaining phone records

Security Boulevard: Virginia Court Strikes Down Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs)

A trial court, so not binding: Security Boulevard: An Unexamined Life – Virginia Court Strikes Down Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) by Mark Rasch

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Security Boulevard: Virginia Court Strikes Down Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs)

D.D.C.: Even if electronic search protocol is a const’l requirement, GFE applies

The lack of an electronics search protocol in the warrant, even if it was constitutionally required, doesn’t even have to be decided because of the good faith exception. “Okafor suggests that the Constitution might nonetheless demand that a warrant specify … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Emergency / exigency, Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Even if electronic search protocol is a const’l requirement, GFE applies

CT: Exigency shown for animal control entry

“Our scrupulous examination of the entire record supports the court’s conclusion that the officers had reasonable cause to believe that the dogs contained within the barn were in imminent harm and neglected, or cruelly treated.” City of Middletown v. Wagner, … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Emergency / exigency, Waiver | Comments Off on CT: Exigency shown for animal control entry

D.Minn.: Even if stop was without RS, eluding police gave it

Even if there was no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop, his new offense of eluding the police justified it. United States v. Denton, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170669 (D. Minn. Sep. 23, 2024).* The affidavit for this warrant shows probable … Continue reading

Posted in Independent source, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Even if stop was without RS, eluding police gave it

D.Or.: The reporting requirements of the Corporate Transparency Act of 2021 do not violate the 4A or 5A

The reporting requirements of the Corporate Transparency Act of 2021 31 U.S.C. § 5336 do not violate the Fourth or Fifth Amendment under California Bankers Assn. v. Shutlz. Firestone v. Yellen, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170085 (D. Or. Sep. 20, … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Or.: The reporting requirements of the Corporate Transparency Act of 2021 do not violate the 4A or 5A

NYT: N.Y.P.D. Unwilling to Discipline Officers for Stop and Frisk, Report Says

NYT: N.Y.P.D. Unwilling to Discipline Officers for Stop and Frisk, Report Says by Benjamin Weiser & Maria Cramer (“The department’s discipline for illegal street detentions is lax at every level, according to an extraordinary review ordered by a federal judge.”) … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on NYT: N.Y.P.D. Unwilling to Discipline Officers for Stop and Frisk, Report Says

NACDL CLE: Artificial Justice: AI, Tech and Criminal Defense (Oct. 7-8)

NACDL CLE: Artificial Justice: AI, Tech and Criminal Defense, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC, October 7-8 from NACDL’s Fourth Amendment Center and Georgetown:

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on NACDL CLE: Artificial Justice: AI, Tech and Criminal Defense (Oct. 7-8)

IL: No REP in ER trauma room

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a hospital ER trauma room, even though there is under state precedent in a single bedroom. People v. Turner, 2024 IL 129208, 2024 Ill. LEXIS 469 (Sept. 19, 2024). Defendant argued that … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on IL: No REP in ER trauma room

IL: With MJ decrim, smell of MJ no longer PC

With decriminalization of small amounts of marijuana, the smell of marijuana in a car is no longer probable cause to search. People v. Redmond, 2024 IL 129201, 2024 Ill. LEXIS 464 (Sep. 19, 2024). Defendant claimed the gun in the … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on IL: With MJ decrim, smell of MJ no longer PC

WY: Dog sniff of already parked car didn’t require RS

Defendant left his car at a convenience store’s gas pumps for 30-40 minutes. The police dog sniff while it was parked was not unreasonable. It was not a stop to be extended. Labbe v. State, 2024 WY 99, 2024 Wyo. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WY: Dog sniff of already parked car didn’t require RS