Category Archives: § 1983 / Bivens

CA8: Def’s 20 prior arrests helped show voluntariness of consent

Despite the lack of a Miranda warning, defendant consented to the search. After all, she’d been arrested about 20 times before this one. United States v. Marr, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 15161 (8th Cir. May 28, 2026). A Bivens action … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Voluntariness | Comments Off on CA8: Def’s 20 prior arrests helped show voluntariness of consent

CAAF: GFE applies to cell phone’s geolocation data because of substantial basis for the search authorization

Defendant Air Force enlisted man at a base in Italy was convicted of burglary and entering quarters with the intent to assault and photograph what was an AFOSI, where his victim beat him up in the act. Geolocation data from … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CAAF: GFE applies to cell phone’s geolocation data because of substantial basis for the search authorization

S.D.Cal.: Refusal to submit to warrant to show face to open cell phone was admissible at trial

Defendant’s refusal to comply with a search warrant for biometric opening of his cell phone (here, a face scan) was admissible at trial to show consciousness of guilt. “Given that ‘[i]t is today universally conceded that the fact of an … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Admissibility of evidence, Cell phones, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Refusal to submit to warrant to show face to open cell phone was admissible at trial

CA9: Boat tied to a dock is a vehicle for automobile exception even if someone lives on it

A boat tied to a dock is subject to the vehicle exception even if somebody lives on it. United States v. Jones, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 11866 (9th Cir. Apr. 24, 2026). Officers don’t have to piecemeal the exigency for … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA9: Boat tied to a dock is a vehicle for automobile exception even if someone lives on it

CA4: Ptf student’s cell phone properly searched at school under T.L.O.

Plaintiff student’s cell phone was properly searched at school under T.L.O. when he was heard bragging about having explicit photographs on it at school. O.W. v. Carr, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 10241 (4th Cir. Apr. 9, 2026). Plaintiff made a … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, School searches | Comments Off on CA4: Ptf student’s cell phone properly searched at school under T.L.O.

CA10: Ptf’s dismissed murder case for overlooked exculpatory evidence was still based on PC

Plaintiff was arrested for murder of his wife, but the case was dismissed without prejudice. He claimed a civil Franks violation. There was still arguable probable cause even with that which was omitted. No claim. Morphew v. Chaffee Cty., 2026 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: Ptf’s dismissed murder case for overlooked exculpatory evidence was still based on PC

N.D.Ind.: Police arriving during ongoing 911 call justified entry on exigency

Officers arrived at the house the subject of an open 911 call during the emergency, and that authorized entry. United States v. Bray, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63142 (N.D. Ind. Mar. 25, 2026).* The court can’t tell from the body … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Emergency / exigency, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Police arriving during ongoing 911 call justified entry on exigency

C.D.Cal.: Bivens not extended to ICE workplace arrest

Bivens will not be extended to an ICE workplace arrest, per Egbert. Hernandez v. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61367 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2026):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Immigration arrests | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Bivens not extended to ICE workplace arrest

D.Haw.: No constitutional right to an “adequate police investigation”

There is no constitutional right to an “adequate police investigation.” Hawkes v. Katayama, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59452 (D. Haw. Mar. 19, 2026):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on D.Haw.: No constitutional right to an “adequate police investigation”

N.D.Cal.: Recognizes $800 per hour for 10-year lawyer in civil rights case

In a discovery fee sanctions case in a First Amendment case, the USMJ notes that $395-450 per hour was reasonable, noting that seven months ago the court approved $800 in a First and Fourth Amendment case. Goldberg v. Teachbk, Inc., … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Recognizes $800 per hour for 10-year lawyer in civil rights case

W.D.Wis.: Pro se ptf gets jury trial verdict for $550,000 for illegal search and malicious prosecution

Pro se plaintiff gets jury trial verdict for $550,000 for illegal search and malicious prosecution thereafter. The jury was free to conclude that the basis for the search was invented. Coleman v. Sperry, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52527 (W.D. Wis. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of pleading | Comments Off on W.D.Wis.: Pro se ptf gets jury trial verdict for $550,000 for illegal search and malicious prosecution

D.Kan.: Ptf’s § 1983 case stayed where filed while underlying criminal case was ongoing

Plaintiff sued while his criminal trespass case was pending in state municipal court. The action is stayed because plaintiff can raise his constitutional claims there. Younger also counsels that. Spiehs v. Allen, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35038 (D. Kan. Feb. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Ptf’s § 1983 case stayed where filed while underlying criminal case was ongoing

E.D.Pa.: Warrant not required to be shown at time of arrest

The Fourth Amendment does not require a warrant be provided at the time of arrest, and an arrest can occur with probable cause and without a warrant in felony cases. Mister v. Marino, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33508 (E.D. Pa. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Warrant not required to be shown at time of arrest

C.D.Cal.: Suit over seizure of guns on mental health order dismissed

Officers had a court order under Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code § 8100 for taking plaintiff’s guns because of a mental health hold. They came to his house but he was gone. They talked to him through his Ring doorbell. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Suit over seizure of guns on mental health order dismissed

D.N.M.: Automobile exception search fails for lack of PC

The search of defendant’s car was unreasonable under the automobile exception because there was no probable cause to believe drugs or other evidence would be found there. Also, the inventory was invalid. United States v. Lujan, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Automobile exception search fails for lack of PC

D.Colo.: Prospective relief against judge-authorized administrative warrants denied

Plaintiff was the subject of an administrative warrant issued by a neutral and detached magistrate. The request for prospective relief is denied, and the complaint is dismissed. Waldrop v. Colo. Dep’t of Agric., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27532 (D. Colo. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Administrative search, Issue preclusion, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on D.Colo.: Prospective relief against judge-authorized administrative warrants denied

NC: Temporary immobility of a car doesn’t prevent the automobile exception from applying

Temporary immobility of a car doesn’t prevent the automobile exception from applying. (This is after a remand for a probable cause finding. The court also discusses the good faith exception and the court must guard against the exception swallowing the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception, Dog sniff, Probable cause | Comments Off on NC: Temporary immobility of a car doesn’t prevent the automobile exception from applying

D.Md.: Premature filing of FTCA case over a search denies jurisdiction

Because plaintiff filed his FTCA case before the six-month window was up, the court lacks jurisdiction over it. There is also a Bivens claim for execution of a search warrant which the court finds different than Bivens. Wood v. United … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Federal Tort Claims Act, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Md.: Premature filing of FTCA case over a search denies jurisdiction

N.D.Ind.: Alleged sexual assault during citizen ride along stated 4A claim

Alleged sexual assault during a citizen ride along in a police car stated a Fourth Amendment claim. Hess v. Garcia, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22018 (N.D. Ind. Feb. 3, 2026). “Based on our precedent involving the use of pepper spray, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Pretext, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Alleged sexual assault during citizen ride along stated 4A claim

KS: Geofence warrant valid under GFE

This geofence warrant was valid by the good faith exception. State v. Mitchell-Pennington, 2026 Kan. App. LEXIS 6 (Jan. 23, 2026). The omitted facts merely clarified, not defeated, probable cause. The motion to suppress was properly denied. Urrutia v. State, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Consent, Franks doctrine, geofence, Good faith exception | Comments Off on KS: Geofence warrant valid under GFE