Category Archives: Franks doctrine

NY2: Franks claim has to be fully developed; it’s more than just a false statement

Franks claim fails for failure to show how the alleged false statements undermined the probable cause. “The defendant failed to meet his burden of controverting the warrant, as he failed to analyze, must less establish, that after the excise of … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on NY2: Franks claim has to be fully developed; it’s more than just a false statement

M.D.Tenn.: Failure to mention in a warrant application that CI was getting leniency is not a Franks violation

Failure to mention in a warrant application that the CI was getting leniency is not a Franks violation. (It’s practically common knowledge they probably are.) Robinson v. United States, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174791 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 27, 2022):

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: Failure to mention in a warrant application that CI was getting leniency is not a Franks violation

NV: Protective sweep doesn’t require a prior arrest and state didn’t articulate the RS of potential danger for it

“While we hold that a protective sweep does not require a prior arrest, we conclude that the district court correctly concluded that the search performed here was not a lawful protective sweep because it was not based on articulable facts … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Protective sweep, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on NV: Protective sweep doesn’t require a prior arrest and state didn’t articulate the RS of potential danger for it

CA5: Car could be towed and inventoried rather than left at gas pumps

Officers observed two traffic violations and stopped him at gas pumps. An old arrest warrant surfaced. Leaving the car at the gas pump was not reasonable–it could be towed and inventoried. United States v. Walker, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 26405 … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: Car could be towed and inventoried rather than left at gas pumps

E.D.Va.: Defense counsel’s failure to file a motion to suppress not a ground to withdraw a guilty plea

It is settled in most courts that failure to pursue a motion to suppress is a ground to set aside a guilty plea. United States v. Foster, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170198 (E.D. Va. Sep. 20, 2022).* [People plead guilty … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Defense counsel’s failure to file a motion to suppress not a ground to withdraw a guilty plea

IL: Smell of burnt MJ in a car in a recreational use state not PC

“We hold that the smell of the burnt cannabis, without any corroborating factors, is not enough to establish probable cause to search the vehicle, and the court did not err in granting the motion to suppress. This finding comports with … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Hot pursuit, Particularity, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on IL: Smell of burnt MJ in a car in a recreational use state not PC

Cal.4th: SW papers for cell site simulators remain under seal because CIs are identified in there

EFF sued for access to search warrant materials that led to use of cell site simulators. The court finds that the protection of named CIs in the papers still needs to be protected, and they remain under seal. Electronic Frontier … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site simulators, Franks doctrine, Reasonableness, Staleness, Warrant papers | Comments Off on Cal.4th: SW papers for cell site simulators remain under seal because CIs are identified in there

DC: Tracking def off his WMATA fair card was like Knotts and reasonable

Police use of information off of defendant’s WMATA fare card first to find him to arrest him for a robbery on a train and then to place him on a train at the time of the robbery was reasonable. This … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, DNA, Franks doctrine, GPS / Tracking Data, Probable cause | Comments Off on DC: Tracking def off his WMATA fair card was like Knotts and reasonable

OH11: Driver not matching owner of car not RS

Just because the driver isn’t the owner doesn’t mean the car is stolen. See Kansas v. Glover. This was extending the stop without reasonable suspicion. State v. Dunlap, 2022-Ohio-3007, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 2828 (11th Dist. Aug. 29, 2022); State … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH11: Driver not matching owner of car not RS

W.D.Pa.: A request to show hands requires RS

The facts not being in dispute, no hearing was required on defendant’s motion to suppress. A request to show hands required reasonable suspicion. United States v. Chambers, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148692 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 19, 2022). Defendant alluded to … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Motion to suppress, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: A request to show hands requires RS

MI: No RS for getting def out of car for a frisk

Defendant’s stop was justified, but getting him out of the vehicle for a frisk was not. Suppressed. People v. Turner, 2022 Mich. App. LEXIS 4943 (Aug. 18, 2022) (2-1). On the totality, defendant consented to an interview in his own … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Franks doctrine, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MI: No RS for getting def out of car for a frisk

D.N.J.: Holding a vehicle 4 days before searching it was not unreasonable

“While law enforcement held the Durango for four days after the seizure before searching it pursuant to a warrant, this delay did not render the continuing seizure of the Durango unreasonable. See Donahue, 764 F.3d at 300-01 (collecting cases and … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Independent source | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Holding a vehicle 4 days before searching it was not unreasonable

W.D.N.Y.: 4A doesn’t protect a jail cell shakedown search; procedural due process does not apply

Defendant’s jail cell was subjected to a shakedown search, and it was reasonable. His claim of procedural due process safeguards come from civil cases and don’t apply. United States v. Arrington, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142770 (W.D.N.Y. Aug. 10, 2022). … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: 4A doesn’t protect a jail cell shakedown search; procedural due process does not apply

D.V.I.: Boat without lights at night is subject to stop

A boat operating at night without lights in U.S. Customs waters violates federal law and it is subject to stop. United States v. Romero-Amaro, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140477 (D.V.I. Aug. 8, 2022). In the tire chalking case, nominal damages … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.V.I.: Boat without lights at night is subject to stop

CA5: An intimidating police presence is not a seizure

An intimidating police presence is not a seizure. Tyson v. Cty. of Sabine, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 20902 (5th Cir. July 28, 2022). Defense counsel can’t be ineffective for not taking depositions in his criminal case to develop his search … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Seizure | Comments Off on CA5: An intimidating police presence is not a seizure

TX finally approves of anticipatory warrants

Texas high court finally approves of anticipatory warrants. Parker v. State, 2022 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 470 (July 27, 2022). On his motion for reconsideration, defendant’s Franks challenge still fails. There’s probable cause without the challenged information. “Courts long have … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on TX finally approves of anticipatory warrants

D.Md.: Cell phone dump on a SW wasn’t shown to be overbroad

A cell phone dump after a search warrant wasn’t necessarily overbroad, and didn’t show it. “More particularity was impractical, and was not required.” United States v. Nelson, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125994 (D. Md. July 15, 2022). Officers who used … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Overbreadth, Social media warrants | Comments Off on D.Md.: Cell phone dump on a SW wasn’t shown to be overbroad

DE: People inside isn’t exigency for nighttime SW

The justification for a nighttime search warrant was insufficient as a matter of law. The mere presence of people in the house is not exigency. State v. Harrison, 2022 Del. Super. LEXIS 302 (July 14, 2022). The USMJ found defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Cell site simulators, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Nighttime search | Comments Off on DE: People inside isn’t exigency for nighttime SW

CA8: Omission of a fact not yet known is not a Franks violation

A detective’s omission of a critical fact that was not yet known is not a Franks violation. “What is undisputed, at least at this point, is that Detective Bowles did not actually know that the fire captain had described the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA8: Omission of a fact not yet known is not a Franks violation

S.D.Ind.: Inordinate delay in producing cell phone search discovery doesn’t justify dismissal

The government’s untimely discovery response to defendant’s repeated requests for the product of his cell phone search doesn’t warrant dismissal of the indictment. Probable cause was shown for the cell phone search, and the motion to suppress is denied. United … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: Inordinate delay in producing cell phone search discovery doesn’t justify dismissal