Category Archives: Warrant execution

N.D.Iowa: Protective sweep during SW execution not confined by the warrant, if otherwise justified

While the question is close here, the protective sweep of defendant’s house during a search warrant was reasonable on the totality. Essentially, the search warrant doesn’t define the scope of a justified protective sweep. “[T]he Fourth Amendment permits law enforcement … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inevitable discovery, Protective sweep, Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Protective sweep during SW execution not confined by the warrant, if otherwise justified

TX3: It was a fair inference for PC that evidence of def’s social media posts were on his phone

Defendant was a suspect in a driveby shooting. Because defendant’s social media showed firearms, it was a fair inference that evidence of the offense or the social media posts would be on his phone. Therefore, there was probable cause for … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on TX3: It was a fair inference for PC that evidence of def’s social media posts were on his phone

Reason: The FBI Wrongly Raided a Georgia Family’s Home. Now Their Case Is Going to the Supreme Court.

Reason: The FBI Wrongly Raided a Georgia Family’s Home. Now Their Case Is Going to the Supreme Court. by Billy Binion (“A federal court ruled Trina Martin could not sue the government after agents burst into her home and held … Continue reading

Posted in Federal Tort Claims Act, Warrant execution | Comments Off on Reason: The FBI Wrongly Raided a Georgia Family’s Home. Now Their Case Is Going to the Supreme Court.

CA9: 71-day delay for iPhone SW was reasonable where software update was involved

71-day delay in getting search warrant to access defendant’s cell phone was reasonable where the delay was attributed to waiting for a software update for their device because the iPhone was a newer model. United States v. Powell, 2025 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA9: 71-day delay for iPhone SW was reasonable where software update was involved

CA9: No QI for nearly destroying a house in a search for a person to arrest

Summary judgment and qualified immunity were properly denied where officers searching for someone other than the plaintiff in plaintiff’s house [apparently] gratuitously nearly destroyed it, breaking all windows, toilets, leaving water running in the house, appliances, furniture, and a car … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA9: No QI for nearly destroying a house in a search for a person to arrest

PA: For crime of obstructing a search, def didn’t have to see SW to know there was one when he was told

Defendant’s conviction for obstructing a search is affirmed. He was not entitled to a jury instruction that he had to have seen or read the warrant first where it was not disputed that he knew there was a warrant. Commonwealth … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Ineffective assistance, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on PA: For crime of obstructing a search, def didn’t have to see SW to know there was one when he was told

D.D.C.: Under Grubbs, a geofence de-anonymizer SW can’t be challenged before execution

Google responded to a series of search warrants for information and finally objected to a warrant to de-anonymize the information it previously provided. It can’t challenge the warrant before execution under Grubbs. Google LLC v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Under Grubbs, a geofence de-anonymizer SW can’t be challenged before execution

D.P.R.: Defense counsel’s agreement to accept a SW was waiver of Rule 41 service requirements

Defense counsel’s acceptance of a warrant was a waiver of the service requirements for a warrant in Rule 41. It was also otherwise valid. United States v. Reynoso, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40555 (D.P.R. Mar. 4, 2025). “The search and … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Defense counsel’s agreement to accept a SW was waiver of Rule 41 service requirements

KS: In responding to SW, out-of-state social media company’s authentication statement substantially complied with state law

In responding to a search warrant request, the social media company provided Rule 901 authentication for that state “under penalty of perjury,” but under the law of the United States not the State of Kansas. It was under penalty of … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Pretext, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on KS: In responding to SW, out-of-state social media company’s authentication statement substantially complied with state law

Reason: Colorado SWAT Team Raids Wrong Apartment, Locks Innocent Family in Police Car

Reason: Colorado SWAT Team Raids Wrong Apartment, Locks Innocent Family in Police Car by Emma Camp (“A Denver SWAT team burst into the wrong family’s apartment, holding several women and children at gunpoint before locking them in a police car … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on Reason: Colorado SWAT Team Raids Wrong Apartment, Locks Innocent Family in Police Car

D.Me.: 4A doesn’t require that the search warrant be shown before execution

The Fourth Amendment doesn’t require that the search warrant be shown before execution. United States v. Tarr, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26832 (D. Me. Feb. 14, 2025).* During execution of a search warrant for a business, defendant wasn’t in custody … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Me.: 4A doesn’t require that the search warrant be shown before execution

GA: SW for blood BAC doesn’t also allow search for drugs

A search warrant for blood BAC doesn’t also allow search for drugs. State v. Johnson, 2025 Ga. App. LEXIS 18 (Jan. 28, 2025). Defendant was on supervised release and the search of his cell phone producing child pornography was reasonable. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Particularity, Probation / Parole search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on GA: SW for blood BAC doesn’t also allow search for drugs

CA6: SW for safe 5 days after seizing it was a reasonable delay

The seizure of defendant’s safe was with probable cause. Getting a warrant to search it five days later was reasonable. United States v. Grundy, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 1526 (6th Cir. Jan. 22, 2025).* The totality of circumstances showed probable … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probable cause, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA6: SW for safe 5 days after seizing it was a reasonable delay

NJ: Search not suppressed because bodycam wasn’t turned on

New Jersey has a bodycam directive that was apparently violated by the officers not turning theirs on before a search. Failure to turn on the bodycams was not a constitutional violation, and the court refuses to suppress. In addition, “the … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Issue preclusion, Knock and announce, Nexus, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NJ: Search not suppressed because bodycam wasn’t turned on

The Guardian: Kentucky police fatally shoot man while serving warrant at wrong home

The Guardian: Kentucky police fatally shoot man while serving warrant at wrong home by Emily Swanson (“Police in Kentucky recently shot a man to death in his home while they executed a search warrant that appears to have been intended … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on The Guardian: Kentucky police fatally shoot man while serving warrant at wrong home

TN: SW didn’t say blood to be taken and seized could be tested, but it could be under common sense reading

“Although the warrant did not specifically state that the blood was to be ‘tested,’ ‘analyzed,’ or ‘examined’ for such intoxicants, a logical, commonsense reading of the warrant shows that the warrant was meant to authorize such analysis because an intoxicating … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on TN: SW didn’t say blood to be taken and seized could be tested, but it could be under common sense reading

NV: No suppression for a delayed return of SW

State law says that the product of search warrants can be suppressed when they were wrongfully executed. That says nothing about a delayed return, and the search won’t be suppressed for that reason. Alvarez v. State, 2024 Nev. LEXIS 69 … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on NV: No suppression for a delayed return of SW

D.Mass.: 17-day delay between seizure and SW was reasonable

“[T]he government’s seventeen-day delay between the warrantless seizure of Thompson’s property and the issuance of the search warrants was reasonable. The first factor favors the government because seventeen days—eleven of which were business days—is relatively short and far shorter than … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Mass.: 17-day delay between seizure and SW was reasonable

MT: Search of electronics under SW needs to start by SW expiration, not be completed

The search warrant for numerous electronic devices (phones and tablets) was served within ten days but the search couldn’t be completed for longer than that. The grant of the motion to suppress because of the delay is reversed. The warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MT: Search of electronics under SW needs to start by SW expiration, not be completed

OH10: Foundation for Facebook exhibits provided by seizing officer

The evidentiary foundation for Facebook messages under rule 901 was established by the officer obtaining the Facebook warrant. State v. Lathon, 2024-Ohio-5886, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 4539 (10th Dist. Dec. 18, 2024). Officers had neither probable cause nor reasonable suspicion … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH10: Foundation for Facebook exhibits provided by seizing officer