Category Archives: Warrant execution

VA: Statutory requirement to provide SW papers only applies to “places of abode”

Defendant sold drugs in a store in a controlled buy. The statute on providing a warrant and affidavit to the occupant only applies to places of abode. Blow v. Commonwealth, 2026 Va. LEXIS 29 (Apr. 16, 2026). A narcotics officer … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on VA: Statutory requirement to provide SW papers only applies to “places of abode”

W.D.N.Y.: No IAC for not challenging search without standing

“In view of Dunnigan’s self-professed lack of any interest in or connection to the premises searched, Dunnigan’s attorney cannot be faulted for failing to challenge a search for which his client lacked standing to challenge.” United States v. Dunnigan, 2026 … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Plain view, feel, smell, Seizure, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: No IAC for not challenging search without standing

D.D.C.: It took the govt years to search def’s computers, and the court has to balance that huge delay with the truth-seeking function in resolving it

In a fraud case, the government took years to search the computers. A second warrant was obtained for some. The government doesn’t get to undo the delay by a new warrant, but the deterrence rationale of the exclusionary rule applies. … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine, Inventory, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.D.C.: It took the govt years to search def’s computers, and the court has to balance that huge delay with the truth-seeking function in resolving it

LA4: Bodycams of warrant execution could be considered where not in evidence but parties agreed court could look

The court asked to see the bodycams about execution of the search warrant, and both sides agreed but they weren’t put into evidence. The court could still consider them. There was probable cause for a vehicle search because it was … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings, Warrant execution | Comments Off on LA4: Bodycams of warrant execution could be considered where not in evidence but parties agreed court could look

MD: Waiting 20 days to get cell phone SW after seizure was reasonable here

Police seized defendant’s cell phone and sought to have it examined. It went into the queue at the forensic unit, and, when it was ready to be searched, they then sought a warrant. They waited because they believed there was … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MD: Waiting 20 days to get cell phone SW after seizure was reasonable here

AP: Rapper Afroman wins lawsuit against police over mocking their 2022 raid in viral music videos

AP: Rapper Afroman wins lawsuit against police over mocking their 2022 raid in viral music videos by Maryclaire Dale (“The Grammy-nominated rapper Afroman won a defamation lawsuit filed by seven Ohio sheriff’s deputies who sued him over music videos in … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on AP: Rapper Afroman wins lawsuit against police over mocking their 2022 raid in viral music videos

D.Utah: Ex parte SW process should not be used for access to tribal lands without adversary proceedings

An ex parte search warrant isn’t appropriate to resolve an unresolved question of law about whether an Indian Tribe can condition access to tribal lands without an “assess permit.” An adversary proceeding is required. In re Search Warrant Application in … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Utah: Ex parte SW process should not be used for access to tribal lands without adversary proceedings

E.D.Cal.: Excessive damage in executing writ of possession can state claim

Excessive damage in executing a writ of possession can state a Fourth Amendment claim. Dayton v. Fairfield Mobile Home, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41228 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2026). Vehicle finance company’s Fourth Amendment claim against the village’s retention of … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Qualified immunity, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Excessive damage in executing writ of possession can state claim

E.D.Va.: WaPo SW: gov’t squandered deference by failing to cite Privacy Protection Act

WaPo reporter search warrant: The government failed to even acknowledge the Privacy Protection Act of 1980 in its warrant application. “The government’s conduct has disturbed that baseline posture of deference” that it always gets. In re Search of the Real … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: WaPo SW: gov’t squandered deference by failing to cite Privacy Protection Act

E.D.Mo.: Such is the risk of a no-knock warrant

“This case arises from an officer shooting the target of a search warrant. Detective Thomas Strode obtained a warrant to search Don Clark’s residence for illegal guns and drugs. As officers entered without knocking, Clark shot at the officers but … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Knock and announce, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Such is the risk of a no-knock warrant

OR: Accidentally omitted warrant from email results in suppressing search despite finding of PC and particularity

The officer emailed to the magistrate the affidavit for warrant and he thought the warrant, too. The magistrate emailed back saying she found probable cause and authorized the search. A day or two later, the officer realized the warrant was … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on OR: Accidentally omitted warrant from email results in suppressing search despite finding of PC and particularity

AL: Trial court erred in finding cell phone SW didn’t provide for seizure and then search

The search warrant for defendant’s cell phone authorized both seizure and search of the phone, and the trial court was clearly erroneous in concluding that it did not permit a search, too. (The officer admitted working off a template cell … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Warrant execution | Comments Off on AL: Trial court erred in finding cell phone SW didn’t provide for seizure and then search

E.D.Mich.: This is how federal officers treat minor victims?

In executing a sex trafficking warrant in the wintertime (Detroit, 1/14/25), the minor victim they’d pinged for her whereabouts was handcuffed and left outside for a while. It was never apparent until inside the third floor was someone’s separate residence. … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: This is how federal officers treat minor victims?

D.Md.: Premature filing of FTCA case over a search denies jurisdiction

Because plaintiff filed his FTCA case before the six-month window was up, the court lacks jurisdiction over it. There is also a Bivens claim for execution of a search warrant which the court finds different than Bivens. Wood v. United … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Federal Tort Claims Act, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Md.: Premature filing of FTCA case over a search denies jurisdiction

MI: Def not in custody during execution of DNA warrant where she chose to talk

In a 25-year-old cold case of a buried infant, officers got a warrant for defendant’s DNA. She argued she was in custody for purposes of her statement given at the time, but she wasn’t. The officers were clear on that. … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, DNA, Pretext, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MI: Def not in custody during execution of DNA warrant where she chose to talk

N.D.Ga.: 28-day delay in getting SW for phones wasn’t unreasonable here

Defendant was driving a car with a fraudulent VIN but claimed he knew nothing about that, having borrowed the car. Other things in the car added to probable cause to believe he was involved in frauds, and that ultimately led … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: 28-day delay in getting SW for phones wasn’t unreasonable here

AR: Asking for SW before opening the door is not obstructing governmental operations

Asking for a search warrant before opening the door is not obstructing governmental operations. The motion for directed verdict should have been granted. This is not active resistance. Keeton v. State, 2026 Ark. App. 53 (Jan. 28, 2026). The Heck … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonableness, Waiver, Warrant execution | Comments Off on AR: Asking for SW before opening the door is not obstructing governmental operations

CA4: Def’s pants transported from hospital to jail were searched, and inevitable discovery applies

Defendant’s pants were transported from the hospital to the jail, and inevitable discovery covers their search. United States v. Gibbins, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 1432 (4th Cir. Jan. 21, 2026). The warrant for five cell phones was executed within the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Inevitable discovery, Prison and jail searches, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA4: Def’s pants transported from hospital to jail were searched, and inevitable discovery applies

D.Colo.: Large volume of emails can be seized for later narrowing search and still be particular

The email warrant was particular enough. While a large volume of information was provided by Google, it was then particularly searched, and that satisfies Rule 41 and the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Garcia, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9434 (D. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Cell phones, E-mail, Particularity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Colo.: Large volume of emails can be seized for later narrowing search and still be particular

UT: State used SW to get defense expert’s computer data; ordered destroyed, but case not dismissed

The state used a search warrant to access the defense expert’s work product in a sex case. The court held hearings and found that the attorney-client work product was not accessed by the state but ordered the data product of … Continue reading

Posted in FISA, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on UT: State used SW to get defense expert’s computer data; ordered destroyed, but case not dismissed