Category Archives: Warrant execution

N.D.Ga.: Slight delay in searching a cell phone of a person in custody who couldn’t possess it was reasonable

Because he’s in custody, defendant has a diminished expectation of getting his cell phone back. The slight delay in getting a warrant has no case law cited in support, not that it matters. United States v. Holloman, 2026 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Probable cause, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Slight delay in searching a cell phone of a person in custody who couldn’t possess it was reasonable

Cal.2d: NDO in SW to Microsoft doesn’t violate state statute or 1A

A nondisclosure order in a search warrant to an electronic service provider does not violate state law or the First Amendment. Microsoft Corp. v. Superior Court, 2026 Cal. App. LEXIS 17 (2d Dist. Jan. 14, 2026):

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Nondisclosure order, Warrant execution | Comments Off on Cal.2d: NDO in SW to Microsoft doesn’t violate state statute or 1A

W.D.Pa.: SW for gun 11 days after a shooting wasn’t stale

The search warrant for a gun involved in shooting was not stale 11 days after the shooting. Firearms are durable and not consumables. United States v. Williams, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4950 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 12, 2026). The warrant for … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Staleness, Waiver, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: SW for gun 11 days after a shooting wasn’t stale

E.D.Ky.: DTF stop on interstate wasn’t pretextual when it was objectively reasonable for overtinting

It doesn’t matter that DTF officers were on the interstate and ordered defendant’s stop for a window tint violation because there was objective justification for it. The rest of the stop was with reasonable suspicion for the drug dog. United … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext, Probable cause, Reasonableness, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: DTF stop on interstate wasn’t pretextual when it was objectively reasonable for overtinting

D.S.C.: Alleged unauthorized officers executing SW under state law not a 4A violation

Plaintiff’s claim unauthorized officers executed the search warrant under state law isn’t a Fourth Amendment violation. Richard v. Jeffcoat, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1512 (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2026). Based on the search warrant, “The government may not disclose [at trial] … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Custody, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Alleged unauthorized officers executing SW under state law not a 4A violation

D.N.J.: Someone doesn’t have to be home to execute a SW

It isn’t a proper Fourth Amendment challenge for a warrant not to be executed because no one is home. Rodriguez-Ferreira v. Sweeney, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 560 (D.N.J. Jan. 5, 2026). Defense counsel objected to the search warrant twice on … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d), Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Someone doesn’t have to be home to execute a SW

CA11: ALPR showing short round trip to Atlanta supported stop with RS

On plain error review, it can’t be said there was no reasonable suspicion whatsoever essentially based on a license plate reader that the car’s round trip to Atlanta was suspiciously short. Thus, “we cannot say that the district court committed … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA11: ALPR showing short round trip to Atlanta supported stop with RS

IN: Failure to execute social media warrant in 10 days per statute did not require suppression where PC still existed

The search warrant on defendant’s social media accounts took longer to be executed than the ten days state statute provided for, but that wasn’t reason to exclude the product of the search. Despite the statutory violation, the real question is … Continue reading

Posted in Social media warrants, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on IN: Failure to execute social media warrant in 10 days per statute did not require suppression where PC still existed

S.D.Fla.: Murder for hire scheme was exigency for entry; SW issued a day late not automatically stale

A murder for hire scheme was exigency for a warrantless search. Here, the officers thought the firearm would be moved imminently on December 31, 2024, but the warrant wasn’t signed until after midnight January 1, 2025. It wasn’t automatically stale, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Murder for hire scheme was exigency for entry; SW issued a day late not automatically stale

M.D.Fla.: In a false arrest case, the sheriff involved admitted no 4A training

In this false arrest case, the sheriff admitted he had no training in the Fourth Amendment. Harris v. Breeden, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 225584 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 17, 2025). The frisk here was without reasonable suspicion, including the bag defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standing, Stop and frisk, Warrant execution | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: In a false arrest case, the sheriff involved admitted no 4A training

CA6: Entrapment is not a defense to a search warrant

Entrapment is not a defense to a search warrant, so CoA denied. Neeley v. United States, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 29144 (6th Cir. Nov. 5, 2025). The motion to suppress for lack of jurisdiction to serve warrants is denied. It’s … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA6: Entrapment is not a defense to a search warrant

GA: SW to photograph a tattoo was reasonable

A search warrant to photograph a tattoo was reasonable. Here, a sex assault assailant was described as having a particular tattoo, and defendant was the suspect. They found a matching tattoo. Grier v. State, 2025 Ga. App. LEXIS 484 (Oct. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness, Seizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on GA: SW to photograph a tattoo was reasonable

LA: Forensic search of cell phone can occur any time before trial

The forensic search of a cell phone can occur anytime between seizure and trial and still be timely. State v. Lowry, 2025 La. LEXIS 1481 (La. Oct. 25, 2025). 2255 ineffective assistance of counsel challenge for Franks violation fails for … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on LA: Forensic search of cell phone can occur any time before trial

W.D.Ky.: No requirement cell phone search protocol be specified in the SW

There is no requirement in the Sixth Circuit for a cell phone search protocol to be specified in the search warrant. United States v. Lanham, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202782 (W.D. Ky. Oct. 14, 2025). There was probable cause defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: No requirement cell phone search protocol be specified in the SW

PA: Yelling “Hey, fellas” to defs who fled was not a seizure

“Based upon our review of the record and the applicable authority, we conclude that Officer Crist calling out ‘hey, fellas’ to Stoney and Holmes did not amount to a seizure for Fourth Amendment purposes, as it did not amount to … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Seizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on PA: Yelling “Hey, fellas” to defs who fled was not a seizure

CA7: No property damage claim from executing SW

Relying on Johnson v. Manitowoc County, 635 F.3d 331 (7th Cir. 2011), plaintiff’s claim for property damage from executing a search warrant is foreclosed. Hadley v. City of South Bend, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 26040 (7th Cir. Oct. 7, 2025). … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Pretext, Private search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA7: No property damage claim from executing SW

A flashbang thrown into an occupied crib:

Reason: ‘Botched’ Drug Raids Show How Prohibition Invites Senseless Violence by Jacob Sullum (“The war on drugs authorizes police conduct that otherwise would be readily recognized as criminal.”)

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on A flashbang thrown into an occupied crib:

CA8: While the driver wasn’t the owner with the suspended license, RS separately developed to continue the stop

The officer had reasonable suspicion that the owner of the vehicle had a suspended DL, but that dissipated when he saw the driver wasn’t the same gender as the owner. But, reasonable suspicion was developing the driver was under the … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA8: While the driver wasn’t the owner with the suspended license, RS separately developed to continue the stop

W.D.Wash.: No 4A right to personal service of a SW

In this 2254, petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim that defense counsel didn’t object that the search warrant was not personally served on him wasn’t a constitutional requirement. Also barred by Stone. Witkowski v. Bennett, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126262 … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: No 4A right to personal service of a SW

CO: Three-day delay between seizure of defendant’s car and getting SW for it was reasonable

Three-day delay between seizure of defendant’s car and getting a warrant to search was reasonable. People v. Mills, 2025 CO 47, 2025 Colo. LEXIS 572 (June 30, 2025). Defendant’s cell phone was linked to his prostitution/human trafficking case, so there … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CO: Three-day delay between seizure of defendant’s car and getting SW for it was reasonable