N.D.Iowa: Motion for return of property after final administrative seizure denied

Defendant’s motion for return of seized cash comes after administrative forfeiture became final. Denied. United States v. Mims, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27957 (N.D. Iowa Feb. 11, 2026).*

Defendant didn’t seek resolution of his motion to suppress, so the trial court never got to rule. Waived for appeal. People v. Jones, 2026 NY Slip Op 00664 (4th Dept. Feb. 11, 2026).* (Sentence was seven years ago, January 2019.)

“Approaching the inquiry practically, as we are required to do, these circumstances create ‘a fair probability that evidence of a crime’ would be found in the residence. … Evans—a person with a known drug trafficking history—entered Cody’s home to get away from police and came out shortly thereafter covered in a white powder Kay recognized as drugs. As Cody concedes, Evans likely tampered with evidence inside the home, which is a felony. Officers therefore reasonably believed that evidence of Evans’s criminal activity was located in the residence.” State v. Cody, 2026 Ohio App. LEXIS 521 (1st Dist. Feb. 11, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Forfeiture, Probable cause, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.