Author Archives: Hall

D.Colo.: Large volume of emails can be seized for later narrowing search and still be particular

The email warrant was particular enough. While a large volume of information was provided by Google, it was then particularly searched, and that satisfies Rule 41 and the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Garcia, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9434 (D. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Cell phones, E-mail, Particularity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Colo.: Large volume of emails can be seized for later narrowing search and still be particular

UT: State used SW to get defense expert’s computer data; ordered destroyed, but case not dismissed

The state used a search warrant to access the defense expert’s work product in a sex case. The court held hearings and found that the attorney-client work product was not accessed by the state but ordered the data product of … Continue reading

Posted in FISA, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on UT: State used SW to get defense expert’s computer data; ordered destroyed, but case not dismissed

E.D.Mo.: Refusal to promptly ID oneself justified handcuffing during brief investigative detention

Responding to a call, defendant fairly matched the description. When he would not identify himself, it was reasonable to handcuff him for a few minutes while it was sorted out. United States v. Troupe, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9010 (E.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Refusal to promptly ID oneself justified handcuffing during brief investigative detention

OH2: Dog handler’s testimony of dog certification was sufficient to show reliability

The dog handler’s testimony that the dog was certified before this sniff was sufficient to show the dog was reliable. State v. Murphy, 2026-Ohio-143 (2d Dist. Jan. 13, 2026). Search warrants can be based on hearsay. Mendenhall v. City & … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Informant hearsay, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH2: Dog handler’s testimony of dog certification was sufficient to show reliability

NY Queens: SW issuing court can narrow time to execute to avoid children at home

The court was asked to issue a search warrant for execution 6 am to 9 pm. The court required 9-2 so children won’t be around. The officer agreed, the ADA did not. This explains why that’s a reasonable restriction. Matter … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NY Queens: SW issuing court can narrow time to execute to avoid children at home

WI: SnapChat’s view of 16 sec. CSAM video coming through it was private search

SnapChat viewing a 16-second video that came through its system was a private search. It was not unreasonable for officers to view it too without a warrant when SnapChat sent it to the police. Then that led to a warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on WI: SnapChat’s view of 16 sec. CSAM video coming through it was private search

ME: No REP in the shower area of a day homeless resource center

Defendant used a homeless resource center by day for taking showers. He was not an overnight guest and had no standing in the shower dressing area. State v. Zackaria, 2026 ME 2, 2026 Me. LEXIS 2 (Jan. 13, 2026). Officers … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search, Standing | Comments Off on ME: No REP in the shower area of a day homeless resource center

WA: SW at 6 am, ziptied, questioned, but told he wasn’t under arrest is still custody

Defendant was in custody for Miranda when a warrant was executed at his house at 6 am and he was taken outside, separated from his family, and ziptied but told he was not under arrest. State v. Magana-Arevalo, 2026 Wash. … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Custody, Franks doctrine, Seizure | Comments Off on WA: SW at 6 am, ziptied, questioned, but told he wasn’t under arrest is still custody

NM: Name on an older warrant list wasn’t individualized suspicion when stop occurred

The officer believed defendant’s name was on an old warrant list they get from the magistrates once every week or two. The age of the list denied individualized suspicion. It wasn’t checked before the stop (even though it turned out … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NM: Name on an older warrant list wasn’t individualized suspicion when stop occurred

SCOTUS grants cert in geofence case, Chatrie v. United States

Chatrie v. United States, 25-112 (cert. granted Jan. 16, 2026). Question presented:

Posted in geofence | Comments Off on SCOTUS grants cert in geofence case, Chatrie v. United States

The Intercept: FBI Raid on WaPo Reporter’s Home Was Based on Sham Pretext

The Intercept: FBI Raid on WaPo Reporter’s Home Was Based on Sham Pretext (“On Wednesday morning, the FBI raided the home of Washington Post journalist Hannah Natanson in an alarming escalation of the Trump administration’s war on press freedom. The … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on The Intercept: FBI Raid on WaPo Reporter’s Home Was Based on Sham Pretext

N.D.Ga.: Slight delay in searching a cell phone of a person in custody who couldn’t possess it was reasonable

Because he’s in custody, defendant has a diminished expectation of getting his cell phone back. The slight delay in getting a warrant has no case law cited in support, not that it matters. United States v. Holloman, 2026 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Probable cause, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Slight delay in searching a cell phone of a person in custody who couldn’t possess it was reasonable

D.Kan.: Search incident of a car after DUI arrest was reasonable under Gant

Search incident of a car after DUI arrest was reasonable under Gant. United States v. Peralta, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7341 (D. Kan. Jan. 13, 2026). [It could also be argued that the automobile exception would work here, too, when … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Search incident, Strip search | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Search incident of a car after DUI arrest was reasonable under Gant

Cal.2d: NDO in SW to Microsoft doesn’t violate state statute or 1A

A nondisclosure order in a search warrant to an electronic service provider does not violate state law or the First Amendment. Microsoft Corp. v. Superior Court, 2026 Cal. App. LEXIS 17 (2d Dist. Jan. 14, 2026):

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Nondisclosure order, Warrant execution | Comments Off on Cal.2d: NDO in SW to Microsoft doesn’t violate state statute or 1A

MA: Missing juvenile in BOLO was subject to community caretaking function

On a traffic stop, the juvenile was recognized from a BOLO as missing. That then involved the community caretaking function. Commonwealth v. Demos D., 2026 Mass. LEXIS 6 (Jan. 13, 2026). There was reasonable suspicion for stopping plaintiff where he … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MA: Missing juvenile in BOLO was subject to community caretaking function

E.D.Mo.: Search for shell casings in curtilage exceeded community caretaking function entry

A shotspotter alert brought the police to this house, and the police went around looking for signs of anyone that might be injured. Within 20 seconds it was apparent there wasn’t, but then they looked for spent shell casings in … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Community caretaking function, Curtilage | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Search for shell casings in curtilage exceeded community caretaking function entry

4A reasonableness

If a law enforcement officer is never trained on the Fourth Amendment, does he or she get the benefit of the good faith exception or reasonableness? Don’t both require some “understanding” by definition? See Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on 4A reasonableness

SCOTUS: Case v. Montana: community caretaking function doesn’t rely on PC

Brigham City’s “objectively reasonable basis for believing” someone inside needs emergency assistance doesn’t mean probable cause. That’s best left to criminal investigations. Case v. Montana, 2026 U.S. LEXIS 432 (Jan. 14, 2026). Syllabus by the Court:

Posted in Community caretaking function, Reasonableness | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Case v. Montana: community caretaking function doesn’t rely on PC

VA: Refusal to comply with DNA warrant for 12 days was relevant evidence under 403

Defendant’s simple [nonaggressive] refusal to comply with a search warrant for his DNA for 12 days was admissible at trial. [There’s also a prior discussion that suggests harmless error.] Lee v. Commonwealth, 2026 Va. App. LEXIS 32 (Jan. 13, 2026). … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Privileges, Waiver | Comments Off on VA: Refusal to comply with DNA warrant for 12 days was relevant evidence under 403

CA8: Ricocheting bullet not a seizure

Unintended shooting target: “When an officer fires at a dog, is there a seizure of the dog’s owner when the stray bullet hits her instead? We conclude the answer is no.” Hight v. Williams,  2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 781 (8th … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Seizure | Comments Off on CA8: Ricocheting bullet not a seizure