Author Archives: Hall

N.D.Iowa: RS and PC for stop and then search, so justification for drug dog is irrelevant

Based on two bases of collective knowledge, the officer had justification for a stop and a search, so the justification for the drug dog isn’t even relevant. United States v. Carter, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45275 (N.D. Iowa Mar. 5, … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: RS and PC for stop and then search, so justification for drug dog is irrelevant

D.Ariz.: Alleged perjury at state suppression hearing doesn’t overcome Stone bar

2254 petitioner’s claim the officer perjured himself during his suppression hearing doesn’t overcome the Stone bar. Soliven v. Thornell, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45209 (D. Ariz. Mar. 5, 2026). 2254 petitioner’s effort to include an “inadvertently omitted” Fourth Amendment claim … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Alleged perjury at state suppression hearing doesn’t overcome Stone bar

D.Md.: Claim for “constructive seizure” fails

Plaintiff doesn’t state a claim for a “constructive seizure” by telling someone else of a warrant being out. Gladden v. Bd. of Educ. of Harford Cty., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45075 (D. Md. Mar. 5, 2026).* Defendant’s ineffective assistance of … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Ineffective assistance, Seizure, Social media warrants | Comments Off on D.Md.: Claim for “constructive seizure” fails

Reason: Controversial Geofence Warrants Face Supreme Court Challenge

Reason: Controversial Geofence Warrants Face Supreme Court Challenge by J.D. Tuccille (“It sometimes seems technology provides a moving target for the Fourth Amendment, evolving new means of snooping on people while courts struggle to keep up. That’s the case with … Continue reading

Posted in geofence, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Reason: Controversial Geofence Warrants Face Supreme Court Challenge

NJ: Alleged mistaken year in SW affidavit not a mere typo that can be overlooked

The mistaken year here was no mere typo that can be overlooked. It was repeated three times, and it made the probable cause showing stale. State v. Harris, 2026 N.J. Super. LEXIS 35 (Mar. 5, 2026):

Posted in Staleness | Comments Off on NJ: Alleged mistaken year in SW affidavit not a mere typo that can be overlooked

CA10: Def’s mid-trial motion to suppress can’t be justified and was waiver

Defendant’s mid-trial motion to suppress can’t be justified and was waiver. United States v. Cooks, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 6547 (10th Cir. Mar. 5, 2026). Defendant’s post-verdict motion for judgment of acquittal alleging conclusory violations of the Fourth and Fifth … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Particularity, Waiver | Comments Off on CA10: Def’s mid-trial motion to suppress can’t be justified and was waiver

CA8: Crowd dispersal was not a seizure

Police actions in dispersing a crowd were not a seizure, even using less than lethal force. Perkins v. City of Des Moines, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 6528 (8th Cir. Mar. 5, 2026).* CBP officer’s conviction for excessive force on a … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on CA8: Crowd dispersal was not a seizure

D.Minn.: Def arrested away from his motorcycle couldn’t have his attached backpack inventoried

Defendant was on the patio of a bar drinking a beer, and his motorcycle was 50-100′ away with his backpack on it. He was arrested, and he’d arranged for others to take his motorcycle. The backpack was seized and searched. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Inventory, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Def arrested away from his motorcycle couldn’t have his attached backpack inventoried

ABAJ: Surveillance footage enters slapstick comedy TV genre, and that could be dangerous, lawyer says

ABAJ: Surveillance footage enters slapstick comedy TV genre, and that could be dangerous, lawyer says by Adam Banner. About halfway in:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on ABAJ: Surveillance footage enters slapstick comedy TV genre, and that could be dangerous, lawyer says

S.D.Ohio: Two on Stone

“Because Stone v. Powell prohibits this Court’s consideration of Petitioner’s Fourth Amendment claim, the Magistrate Judge’s denial of expansion of the record to include the dash cam footage is affirmed because consideration of that footage is prohibited by Stone. The … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Two on Stone

AR overrules state constitution’s pretextual arrest case from 2002; reasonableness is the key

Arkansas overrules State v. Sullivan, 348 Ark. 647, 74 S.W.3d 215 (2002), which held that a pretextual arrest violated the state constitution, holding this time that Fourth Amendment reasonableness should control. Gamble v. State, 2026 Ark. 44 (Mar. 5, 2026) … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness, State constitution | Comments Off on AR overrules state constitution’s pretextual arrest case from 2002; reasonableness is the key

CA5: Driver’s lie about having a gun on him justified a frisk of the passenger, too

Driver’s lie about having a gun on him justified a frisk of the passenger, too; Ybarra distinguished. United States v. Ducksworth, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 6255 (5th Cir. Mar. 3, 2026):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: Driver’s lie about having a gun on him justified a frisk of the passenger, too

M.D.Ala: Man with gun and body armor created exigency for warrantless entry

The suspect here was armed and wearing body armor, and there was clear exigency fully coalescing in the last 25 minutes. That justified an exigency based entry. The fact it turned out to be wrong doesn’t matter. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on M.D.Ala: Man with gun and body armor created exigency for warrantless entry

S.D.Miss.: Evanescent nature of evidence of sex crime justified warrantless entry to hotel room

A rape report and the potential evanescent nature of the evidence justified a warrantless entry into defendant’s hotel room. He also was on probation. United States v. Jones, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43102 (S.D. Miss. Mar. 3, 2026):

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on S.D.Miss.: Evanescent nature of evidence of sex crime justified warrantless entry to hotel room

404 Media: CBP Tapped Into the Online Advertising Ecosystem To Track Peoples’ Movements

404 Media: CBP Tapped Into the Online Advertising Ecosystem To Track Peoples’ Movements by Joseph Cox (“An internal DHS document obtained by 404 Media shows for the first time CBP used location data sourced from the online advertising industry to … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on 404 Media: CBP Tapped Into the Online Advertising Ecosystem To Track Peoples’ Movements

TN: Failure to allege what should have been suppressed defeats IAC claim

Failure to allege what should have been suppressed if a motion to suppress had been filed is fatal to an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Coyne v. State, 2026 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 104 (Mar. 3, 2026). Qualified immunity denied: … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: Failure to allege what should have been suppressed defeats IAC claim

CA4: Error to deny suppression motion without hearing where there’s disputed facts

The district court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress without a hearing when there were disputed facts. United States v. Moore, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 6196 (4th Cir. Mar. 3, 2026). Defendant consented orally and in writing to search … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Issue preclusion, Nexus, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA4: Error to deny suppression motion without hearing where there’s disputed facts

W.D.Pa.: Younger doctrine didn’t apply when plaintiff’s criminal case was over

Younger doctrine didn’t apply when plaintiff’s criminal case was over. Harris v. Trent, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42416 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 2, 2026). “Here, assuming the factual disputes in Franke’s favor, the relevant question is whether it was clearly established … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Younger doctrine didn’t apply when plaintiff’s criminal case was over

W.D.Ark.: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to sentencing

The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to sentencing. Owen v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42184 (W.D. Ark. Jan. 20, 2026) (recognizing rule). The officer here blocked defendant’s parked car while he was in it, so that was a stop. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to sentencing

Va.L.Rev.: Fourth Amendment Trespass and Internet Search History

Alec J.H. Block & Joseph W. Paul, Fourth Amendment Trespass and Internet Search History,111 Va. L. Rev. Online 188 (2025). Abstract:

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Trespass | Comments Off on Va.L.Rev.: Fourth Amendment Trespass and Internet Search History