Category Archives: Dog sniff

OH3: Cell phone search can extend to cloud storage it’s connected to

Defendant gave consent to search his cell phone, and the court notes, without deciding, that other courts have held that such consent would reach his data stored on the cloud or another server. That issue doesn’t, however, have to be … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Curtilage, Dog sniff, Scope of search | Comments Off on OH3: Cell phone search can extend to cloud storage it’s connected to

CA4: PIT maneuver with unmarked car for detectives making a stop could be excessive force

Using an unmarked police car to stop plaintiff with a PIT maneuver requested by detectives without warning here raised sufficient factual disputes that the officers do not get summary judgment nor qualified immunity on an excessive force claim in his … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Dog sniff, Excessive force, Nexus, Seizure | Comments Off on CA4: PIT maneuver with unmarked car for detectives making a stop could be excessive force

VA: No REP in ALPR

Flock ALPR systems can’t be compared to Carpenter’s “near perfect surveillance.” Motion to suppress properly denied. There’s no reasonable expectation of privacy of public movement on the roads. Robinson v. Commonwealth, 2026 Va. App. LEXIS 199 (Apr. 7, 2026). In … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Consent, Dog sniff, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on VA: No REP in ALPR

CA10: Ptf’s dismissed murder case for overlooked exculpatory evidence was still based on PC

Plaintiff was arrested for murder of his wife, but the case was dismissed without prejudice. He claimed a civil Franks violation. There was still arguable probable cause even with that which was omitted. No claim. Morphew v. Chaffee Cty., 2026 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: Ptf’s dismissed murder case for overlooked exculpatory evidence was still based on PC

D.D.C.: Walker stopped on street by three officers was without RS

Defendant was stopped walking and surrounded by three officers shining flashlights in his face, and all without reasonable suspicion. Only then did they discover a telling bulge from a weapon. Suppressed. United States v. Wilson, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69861 … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Walker stopped on street by three officers was without RS

ND: Dog sniff occurred before the Rodriguez moment and was reasonable

The dog sniff occurred before the Rodriguez moment and was thus reasonable. State v. Cooper, 2026 ND 68, 2026 N.D. LEXIS 99 (Mar. 12, 2026) On the totality of circumstances, there was reasonable suspicion as to defendant as the subject … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ND: Dog sniff occurred before the Rodriguez moment and was reasonable

N.D.Iowa: RS and PC for stop and then search, so justification for drug dog is irrelevant

Based on two bases of collective knowledge, the officer had justification for a stop and a search, so the justification for the drug dog isn’t even relevant. United States v. Carter, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45275 (N.D. Iowa Mar. 5, … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: RS and PC for stop and then search, so justification for drug dog is irrelevant

CA10: RS didn’t dissipate during wait for drug dog

Reasonable suspicion here once developed didn’t dissipate before the 20-30 minute wait for the drug dog. United States v. Labs, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 5789 (10th Cir. Feb. 27, 2026). By statute, “[t]he evidence admissible for meeting the State’s burden … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Forfeiture, Inventory, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: RS didn’t dissipate during wait for drug dog

N.D. Iowa: Drug dog’s 50% hit rate was reliable enough

Past cases in this circuit hold that even a drug dog’s 50% hit rate is sufficient for probable cause. “And other indications of the presence of illicit drugs can rehabilitate a less-than-reliable canine alert.” United States v. Harbach, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on N.D. Iowa: Drug dog’s 50% hit rate was reliable enough

S.D.Fla.: No dog alert shown on video

Defendant’s stop in front of his house on the curtilage was a valid stop. A dog sniff was based on reasonable suspicion but the court finds no valid alert. The search of the car came after an ambiguous statement from … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Dog sniff | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: No dog alert shown on video

CA8: Stop unreasonably extended for drug dog; denial of suppression reversed

Window tint violation should have taken 5-6 minutes, but it dragged out for 20 minutes while the drug dog was coming. The stop was overlong under Rodriguez and the motion to suppress should have been granted. United States v. Johnson, … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Dog sniff, Emergency / exigency, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Stop unreasonably extended for drug dog; denial of suppression reversed

NC: Temporary immobility of a car doesn’t prevent the automobile exception from applying

Temporary immobility of a car doesn’t prevent the automobile exception from applying. (This is after a remand for a probable cause finding. The court also discusses the good faith exception and the court must guard against the exception swallowing the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception, Dog sniff, Probable cause | Comments Off on NC: Temporary immobility of a car doesn’t prevent the automobile exception from applying

IN: The fact a drug dog could alert to hemp doesn’t mean an alert isn’t PC

The fact a drug dog can alert to hemp as well as marijuana doesn’t make the dog alert violate the Fourth Amendment. Akins v. State, 2026 Ind. App. LEXIS 39 (Feb. 6, 2026):

Posted in Dog sniff, Probable cause | Comments Off on IN: The fact a drug dog could alert to hemp doesn’t mean an alert isn’t PC

ID: Finding drugs in 43% of dog alerts doesn’t mean dog unreliable or no PC

This drug dog only found drugs in 43% of alerts. That’s still enough for probable cause. Dogs can alert where drugs have been. Lack of success doesn’t mean false hits. State v. Barritt, 2026 Ida. LEXIS 16 (Jan. 29, 2026). … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ID: Finding drugs in 43% of dog alerts doesn’t mean dog unreliable or no PC

OH2: Dog handler’s testimony of dog certification was sufficient to show reliability

The dog handler’s testimony that the dog was certified before this sniff was sufficient to show the dog was reliable. State v. Murphy, 2026-Ohio-143 (2d Dist. Jan. 13, 2026). Search warrants can be based on hearsay. Mendenhall v. City & … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Informant hearsay, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH2: Dog handler’s testimony of dog certification was sufficient to show reliability

D.D.C.: A dozen officers involved in traffic stop slow walked it for drug dog

A dozen officers purposely delayed the traffic stop for a dog sniff. “The Government has failed to show that police conducted this stop in a reasonably diligent manner. To the contrary, Officer Brennan’s decision to delegate all four warnings to … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff, Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.D.C.: A dozen officers involved in traffic stop slow walked it for drug dog

GA: REP against dog sniff at apartment door in gated complex where management let police in

A dog sniff at defendant’s apartment door seams was unreasonable, despite it being in a common area of a gated apartment building [where the general public wasn’t allowed, but management let the police in]. State v. West, 2026 Ga. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on GA: REP against dog sniff at apartment door in gated complex where management let police in

KY: Def needs to make a record on how long the drug dog extended the stop under Rodriguez

The drug dog arrived while the traffic tickets were still being written. All the record shows is that. The record doesn’t “reveal how much time elapsed between the canine’s arrival and it alerting to the odor of unlawful drugs emanating … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Dog sniff, Issue preclusion, Privileges | Comments Off on KY: Def needs to make a record on how long the drug dog extended the stop under Rodriguez

E.D.Ky.: Fact drug dog wasn’t trained on fentanyl wasn’t defect when he alerted on it and cocaine

The drug dog wasn’t trained on fentanyl but alerted on it. It was trained on cocaine and did alert on it. That doesn’t make the dog unreliable. After probable cause developed, using the key fob to open the car wasn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Fact drug dog wasn’t trained on fentanyl wasn’t defect when he alerted on it and cocaine

PR: No REP in property where def not entitled to be

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in property where the defendant isn’t entitled to be, abandoned or otherwise unoccupied. El Pueblo v. Rondón, 2025 TSPR 113 (Nov. 4, 2025). (translation by Lexis) The stop of this known felon was … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Dog sniff, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PR: No REP in property where def not entitled to be