Category Archives: Custody

N.D.Ohio: Dog sniff during initial records check did not extend the stop

The stop was not extended by the drug dog that arrived almost immediately and the sniff was done while the records check was going on. Alternatively, there was reasonable suspicion for it. United States v. Billips, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Dog sniff, Excessive force, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Dog sniff during initial records check did not extend the stop

W.D.Pa.: ALPR hit on stolen vehicle was RS for stop

A U-Haul van was reported stolen by them, and the LPN was entered into the ALPR database. It showed up near Pittsburgh, and that was reasonable suspicion to pull it over. United States v. Lewis, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177108 … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automatic license plate readers, Custody, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: ALPR hit on stolen vehicle was RS for stop

E.D.Pa.: Voluntary statement during search that “everything is mine” was admissible

Voluntary statement from the handcuffed defendant during the search of his house when he saw his handcuffed girlfriend crying that “everything is mine” were admissible. United States v. Espinosa, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160387 (E.D. Pa. July 20, 2026). Defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Custody, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Voluntary statement during search that “everything is mine” was admissible

DC: Def seized when blocked on sidewalk not just when taken down

Defendant was seized when he was blocked by officers when he was walking, not just when he was taken down to the sidewalk. Greer v. United States, 2026 D.C. App. LEXIS 168 (May 14, 2026). Defendant was stopped because his … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Inventory, Seizure | Comments Off on DC: Def seized when blocked on sidewalk not just when taken down

TN: RS didn’t develop to continue stop; second stop based on first suppressed

Defendant was subjected to two stops. The first was for suspicion of disorderly conduct, but no arrest was made and he was released because no further reasonable suspicion developed. A second stop was based on the first, and there still … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: RS didn’t develop to continue stop; second stop based on first suppressed

D.N.D.: ALPR not a search

ALPR not a search. United States v. Lawrence, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56945 (D.N.D. Mar. 18, 2026). Failure to show materiality for Franks requires the court to also consider the elements of the crime being investigated. United States v. Engler, … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Burden of pleading, Custody, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.N.D.: ALPR not a search

MI: Def not in custody during execution of DNA warrant where she chose to talk

In a 25-year-old cold case of a buried infant, officers got a warrant for defendant’s DNA. She argued she was in custody for purposes of her statement given at the time, but she wasn’t. The officers were clear on that. … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, DNA, Pretext, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MI: Def not in custody during execution of DNA warrant where she chose to talk

WA: SW at 6 am, ziptied, questioned, but told he wasn’t under arrest is still custody

Defendant was in custody for Miranda when a warrant was executed at his house at 6 am and he was taken outside, separated from his family, and ziptied but told he was not under arrest. State v. Magana-Arevalo, 2026 Wash. … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Custody, Franks doctrine, Seizure | Comments Off on WA: SW at 6 am, ziptied, questioned, but told he wasn’t under arrest is still custody

D.S.C.: Alleged unauthorized officers executing SW under state law not a 4A violation

Plaintiff’s claim unauthorized officers executed the search warrant under state law isn’t a Fourth Amendment violation. Richard v. Jeffcoat, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1512 (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2026). Based on the search warrant, “The government may not disclose [at trial] … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Custody, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Alleged unauthorized officers executing SW under state law not a 4A violation

M.D.Ala.: No REP from ALPR on public roads

No reasonable expectation of privacy from Automatic License Plate Readers on public roads under Carpenter. United States v. Slaybaugh, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146107 (M.D. Ala. July 10, 2025). A mere passenger has no standing in the car he’s riding … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Custody, Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: No REP from ALPR on public roads

S.D.N.Y.: Def wasn’t “in custody” when SW for CP was executed at his apartment and he talked to police

Defendant’s NYC apartment was the subject of a search warrant for child pornography. Once inside, he was told repeatedly that he was not under arrest and was free to leave. He continued talking, and he wasn’t in custody for Miranda … Continue reading

Posted in Custody | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Def wasn’t “in custody” when SW for CP was executed at his apartment and he talked to police

S.D.N.Y.:The fact that the Government intends to prove that the property belongs to Defendant does not establish standing

“The fact that the Government intends to prove that the property belongs to Defendant does not establish standing. See, United States v. Watson, 404 F.3d 163, 166 (2d Cir. 2005) (‘[D]efendant could not challenge the search of a residence merely … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Custody, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.:The fact that the Government intends to prove that the property belongs to Defendant does not establish standing

N.D.Ga.: The immediately apparent prong of plain view requires PC

The immediately apparent prong of plain view requires probable cause for being apparent. United States v. Brown, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52652 (N.D. Ga. Jan. 30, 2025), adopted, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50975 (N.D. Ga. Mar. 20, 2025). “In this … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: The immediately apparent prong of plain view requires PC

TX14: Def’s furtive movements with cell phone can justify exigency to seize it

Defendant’s furtive movements supported exigency that he could attempt to erase things on his cell phone thus justifying its warrantless seizure. Igboji v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 1021 (Tex. App. – Houston (14th Dist.) Feb. 20, 2025) (unpublished), on … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Custody, Emergency / exigency, Standing | Comments Off on TX14: Def’s furtive movements with cell phone can justify exigency to seize it

D.Me.: 4A doesn’t require that the search warrant be shown before execution

The Fourth Amendment doesn’t require that the search warrant be shown before execution. United States v. Tarr, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26832 (D. Me. Feb. 14, 2025).* During execution of a search warrant for a business, defendant wasn’t in custody … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Me.: 4A doesn’t require that the search warrant be shown before execution

D.P.R.: Statement taken in violation of Miranda likely usable for impeachment

Defendant’s statement allegedly in violation of Miranda that the government doesn’t intend to use may be used for impeachment if the defendant contradicts them under Harris. United States v. Cardona, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22757 (D.P.R. Feb. 6, 2025). Inferences … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Exclusionary rule, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Statement taken in violation of Miranda likely usable for impeachment

D.P.R.: State nighttime search rule on state warrant inapplicable in federal court

The fact a state nighttime search warrant doesn’t comply with state law doesn’t matter in federal court. It’s whether Rule 41 and the Fourth Amendment were complied with. Then, the defendant has to show prejudice. Also, the fact defendant had … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Issue preclusion, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on D.P.R.: State nighttime search rule on state warrant inapplicable in federal court

WY: Courthouse entry search valid under “special needs”

Defendant entered a courthouse, and the metal detector went off on a small can on him which he opened on request revealing meth. These searches are valid as “special needs.” Russell v. State, 2024 WY 126, 2024 Wyo. LEXIS 128 … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Special needs | Comments Off on WY: Courthouse entry search valid under “special needs”

MA: Three SWs building on each other to ultimate PC

Here there were three search warrants. The second built on the first, and the third on the second, leading to a computer search that was founded on defendant disposing of a body. “When considering the foregoing details together, there was … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Body cameras, Custody, Probable cause | Comments Off on MA: Three SWs building on each other to ultimate PC

S.D.Ill.: Code enforcement officer’s entry to construction site to stop work was not a “search”

A code enforcement officer’s entry onto plaintiff’s construction site to stop work in violation of the city code was not a Fourth Amendment search. And it was otherwise reasonable. Kindle v. Eisert, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 198527 (S.D. Ill. Oct. … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Custody, Probation / Parole search, Search | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Code enforcement officer’s entry to construction site to stop work was not a “search”