Category Archives: Excessive force

CA8: Dog sniff at apt door was reasonable under existing precedent

A drug dog sniff at defendant’s apartment door was reasonable under well-established circuit precedent. There’s no evidence the dog’s nose went under the door. United States v. Peck, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 5710 (8th Cir. Mar. 12, 2025). Plaintiff’s condition … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Excessive force, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA8: Dog sniff at apt door was reasonable under existing precedent

OR: Petr’s post-conviction 4A denied for lack of specifics and context

Defendant’s post-conviction Fourth Amendment claim was properly denied for not telling the court what evidence was improperly admitted, where it appears in the record, and how it affected the outcome. Zyst v. Kelly, 338 Or App 597 (Mar. 12, 2025). … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on OR: Petr’s post-conviction 4A denied for lack of specifics and context

CA5: The affidavit for SW was more than “bare bones” and the GFE applied

The affidavit for the warrant wasn’t “bare bones.” It alleged facts and nexus could be inferred, even if probable cause couldn’t be fully shown. Therefore, the good faith exception applied. United States v. Norman, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 4908 (5th … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA5: The affidavit for SW was more than “bare bones” and the GFE applied

CrimProf Blog: A Hidden Seizure Issue in Barnes v. Felix

CrimProf Blog: A Hidden Seizure Issue in Barnes v. Felix by Michael J.Z. Mannheimer:

Posted in Excessive force, Seizure | Comments Off on CrimProf Blog: A Hidden Seizure Issue in Barnes v. Felix

OR: Cell phone warrant was sufficiently particular to prevent a general rummaging

For this cell phone search, “As explained above, however, the first and fourth search categories are sufficiently specific, and defendant conceded below that the third category is sufficiently specific. Further, the sixth category’s command to search for location information—as circumscribed … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Particularity | Comments Off on OR: Cell phone warrant was sufficiently particular to prevent a general rummaging

TN: That officer can’t tell difference between hemp and marijuana doesn’t mean there wasn’t PC from plain smell

The fact the officer can’t tell the difference between hemp and marijuana doesn’t mean there wasn’t probable cause by plain smell. The stop was justified by the community caretaking function because he was asleep at an intersection. State v. Jones, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on TN: That officer can’t tell difference between hemp and marijuana doesn’t mean there wasn’t PC from plain smell

CA9: Use of Taser in dart-mode wasn’t excessive force because it was justified

“An officer’s use of a Taser in dart-mode ‘constitute[s] an intermediate, significant level of force.’ … But under the Graham factors, Officer Swindling’s brief Taser use was justified under the circumstances. First, Sharif had assaulted his daughter’s mother; stolen a … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Particularity | Comments Off on CA9: Use of Taser in dart-mode wasn’t excessive force because it was justified

TN: Ptf’s actions at DV call justified officers’ greater force

The totality of the circumstances, including the nature of the domestic violence call, appellant’s armed presence near the scene, his rapid movement towards the officers while armed, and the short timeframe, made the officers’ use of deadly force objectively reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Excessive force, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on TN: Ptf’s actions at DV call justified officers’ greater force

TN: Domestic and road rage call is a “serious crime” when evaluating officer’s use of force

When evaluating an officer’s use of force in responding to a domestic and road rage call involving a weapon, it is considered a serious crime. The use of force here was reasonable. Holland v. Cheatham Cty., 2025 Tenn. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: Domestic and road rage call is a “serious crime” when evaluating officer’s use of force

N.D.Ga.: USMJ’s credibility determinations on search issue aren’t subject to de novo review

The USMJ’s credibility determinations on a search issue aren’t subject to de novo review before the USDJ. United States v. Messer, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11783 (N.D. Ga. Jan. 23, 2025).* Collective knowledge supported reasonable suspicion here to extend the … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Excessive force, Immigration arrests, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: USMJ’s credibility determinations on search issue aren’t subject to de novo review

CA7: Even if police potentially escalated the situation, ptf’s use of a gun justified deadly force

Even if the officers failed to properly announce themselves and even if the defendants’ actions exacerbated the possibility of a dangerous confrontation, Ancheta’s action, the use of his gun, was an intervening cause of the deadly force. The defendants escalated … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Consent, Excessive force, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on CA7: Even if police potentially escalated the situation, ptf’s use of a gun justified deadly force

CA3: Conviction for threats by internet justified supervised release condition of computer monitoring

Where defendant was convicted of making threats over the internet to a Congressman, a two year computer monitoring condition was reasonable and did not violate the First and Fourth Amendment. United States v. Hall, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 1109 (3d … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Excessive force, Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search, Strip search | Comments Off on CA3: Conviction for threats by internet justified supervised release condition of computer monitoring

Reason: “the Supreme Court’s oral argument yesterday in Barnes v. Felix will be noteworthy.”

Reason: Prof. Robert Leider on the arguments in Barnes v. Felix by Will Baude: Professor Robert Leider, who writes in both constitutional law and criminal law, passed along these comments on the Supreme Court’s recent oral argument in an excessive … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Reason: “the Supreme Court’s oral argument yesterday in Barnes v. Felix will be noteworthy.”

S.D.Ala.: Failure to timely make SW return under state law not a 4A issue

The fact the search warrant paperwork wasn’t returned on time which made it void under state law isn’t relevant under the Fourth Amendment in federal court. Jackson v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 235912 (S.D. Ala. Dec. 4, 2024), … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonableness, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d), Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.Ala.: Failure to timely make SW return under state law not a 4A issue

N.D.Cal.: Violation of CalECPA has nothing to do with federal rights

Violation of CalECPA has nothing to do with federal rights. United States v. Wenger, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1331 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2025). At the time of the warrant, it was not established that the accused had to have … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Violation of CalECPA has nothing to do with federal rights

CA5: Ptf’s excessive force claim arising from a traffic stop expands Bivens

Plaintiff’s shooting during a traffic stop gone bad is an expansion of Bivens and is rejected. Hernandez v. Causey, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 32527 (5th Cir. Dec. 23, 2024). Defendant had standing to contest the search of his room at … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Excessive force, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: Ptf’s excessive force claim arising from a traffic stop expands Bivens

MT: Search of electronics under SW needs to start by SW expiration, not be completed

The search warrant for numerous electronic devices (phones and tablets) was served within ten days but the search couldn’t be completed for longer than that. The grant of the motion to suppress because of the delay is reversed. The warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MT: Search of electronics under SW needs to start by SW expiration, not be completed

CA8: Takedown was lawful, assault thereafter wasn’t

Plaintiff’s takedown was lawful, but not the assault after he was down. “It is even more clearly established now. A suspect’s ‘right[] to be free from excessive force [is] violated if officers choke, kick, or punch [him] when [he is] … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Takedown was lawful, assault thereafter wasn’t

E.D.Mo.: Squatter owner had knowledge of still had no standing

Defendant was essentially a squatter who was wrongfully on the premises and had no standing. The owner lived on the second floor, and he squatted on the first floor for months. The building was condemned. His claim the owner’s tolerating … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Squatter owner had knowledge of still had no standing

NY3: No REP in SHU surveillance

Defendant was in a special housing unit in a NY state prison. He knew he was under constant surveillance. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in admissions he made caught on video. People v. Ashcroft, 2024 NY Slip Op … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Prison and jail searches, Surveillance technology, Warrant papers | Comments Off on NY3: No REP in SHU surveillance