Category Archives: Excessive force

CO: Not 4A or state constitutional violation for govt to access def’s computer via peer-to-peer sharing with BitTorrent software

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in files on his computer that were open for peer-to-peer sharing. Therefore, when the government used BitTorrent to access his computer, it did not violate the Fourth Amendment or the state constitution. People … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Excessive force, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CO: Not 4A or state constitutional violation for govt to access def’s computer via peer-to-peer sharing with BitTorrent software

CA10: Tribal and state court SWs: state judge wanted more information, but that didn’t make tribal warrant lack PC

Defendant lived on tribal lands with a co-occupant who was not Native American. Officers obtained two search warrants: one from a tribal court and one from a state court. The applications were identical. The state judge, however, wanted more information, … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA10: Tribal and state court SWs: state judge wanted more information, but that didn’t make tribal warrant lack PC

CA5: Officer’s touching parent’s arm to get her through a school door for four seconds was de minimis

In a school grounds dispute, a parent’s arm was grabbed for four seconds to move her through a doorway. “Under the circumstances, we cannot say that such de minimis force was ‘clearly’ excessive and unreasonable. … Dupuy knew that the … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on CA5: Officer’s touching parent’s arm to get her through a school door for four seconds was de minimis

MS: Def consented to entry to look for his missing mother

Police entry onto defendant’s house and yard because his mother, who he lived with, was missing, and relatives called the police. After looking in the house for her, they found her decapitated in the back yard, then they got a … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MS: Def consented to entry to look for his missing mother

VA: 12 second question about drugs didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop that was going to take a while anyway

This was a traffic stop, and defendant had a suspended license. She was able to call her son to come to drive her and the car home, and she would not be arrested. The officer’s taking 12 seconds to ask … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on VA: 12 second question about drugs didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop that was going to take a while anyway

VA: Statutory requirement to provide SW papers only applies to “places of abode”

Defendant sold drugs in a store in a controlled buy. The statute on providing a warrant and affidavit to the occupant only applies to places of abode. Blow v. Commonwealth, 2026 Va. LEXIS 29 (Apr. 16, 2026). A narcotics officer … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on VA: Statutory requirement to provide SW papers only applies to “places of abode”

CA4: PIT maneuver with unmarked car for detectives making a stop could be excessive force

Using an unmarked police car to stop plaintiff with a PIT maneuver requested by detectives without warning here raised sufficient factual disputes that the officers do not get summary judgment nor qualified immunity on an excessive force claim in his … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Dog sniff, Excessive force, Nexus, Seizure | Comments Off on CA4: PIT maneuver with unmarked car for detectives making a stop could be excessive force

OH8: Seeing gun magazine justified protective sweep of car for gun it could belong to

Defendant was pulled over and officers could see the magazine to a gun. They asked if he had a gun in the car and he said “I don’t admit to that.” He said it was home. He was a known … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Protective sweep | Comments Off on OH8: Seeing gun magazine justified protective sweep of car for gun it could belong to

D.D.C.: Video surveillance of public housing hallways is like a pole camera with no REP

Plaintiff sued a public housing project which has sophisticated video surveillance but only in common areas. The court holds that it doesn’t rise to the level of the mosaic theory and is more akin to a pole camera. Pondexter-Moore v. … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Informant hearsay, Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Video surveillance of public housing hallways is like a pole camera with no REP

MS: By denying living at the place searched, def lacked standing to challenge its search

By denying living at the place searched, defendant lacked standing to challenge its search. Armstrong v. State, 2026 Miss. App. LEXIS 151 (Mar. 31, 2026). In addition, “Bailey’s non-compliance with the deputies’ commands and expressions of suicidal intent—with an alleged … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on MS: By denying living at the place searched, def lacked standing to challenge its search

E.D.Tenn.: CI’s being incorrect about which drug was involved wasn’t material

The CI’s being incorrect about which drug was involved isn’t really a Franks violation. United States v. Mooneyham, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67746 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 30, 2026). Plaintiff reasonably believed that one of the officers was sitting on him … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity, Search | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: CI’s being incorrect about which drug was involved wasn’t material

NY Co.: Pulling def out of his doorway when he opened his door was not a violation of Payton

Pulling defendant out of his doorway when he opened his door was not a violation of Payton. People v. Honyghan, 2026 NYLJ LEXIS 435 (N.Y. Co. Mar. 18, 2026). “The arresting officers’ body-worn camera videos reveal that Plaintiff was visibly … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NY Co.: Pulling def out of his doorway when he opened his door was not a violation of Payton

NC: Informant doesn’t need “track record” to be creditable

The informant doesn’t need a “track record” to be credited as a source of information. State v. Vandergrift, 2026 N.C. App. LEXIS 202 (Mar. 18, 2026). Police responded to a stolen ATM report and found defendant near an ATM in … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NC: Informant doesn’t need “track record” to be creditable

CA8: Non-lethal force during George Floyd curfew violating disturbance was reasonable

During the George Floyd riots, the day after a Minneapolis’s third police precinct was burned down, there was another protest around the fifth precinct in violation of a city-wide curfew. Plaintiff was shot in the head with a nonlethal projectile … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA8: Non-lethal force during George Floyd curfew violating disturbance was reasonable

N.D.Cal.: Recognizes $800 per hour for 10-year lawyer in civil rights case

In a discovery fee sanctions case in a First Amendment case, the USMJ notes that $395-450 per hour was reasonable, noting that seven months ago the court approved $800 in a First and Fourth Amendment case. Goldberg v. Teachbk, Inc., … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Recognizes $800 per hour for 10-year lawyer in civil rights case

CA11: QI in excessive force cases can be raised for the first time mid-trial

Qualified immunity in excessive force cases can be raised for the first time mid-trial without it being waived. Edwards v. Grubbs, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 7500 (11th Cir. Mar. 13, 2026). “However, Groth must show not only that the officers … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on CA11: QI in excessive force cases can be raised for the first time mid-trial

CA7: Use of force during book-in here was subject to QI

Officers get qualified immunity for arrestee who was alleged to have resisted booking and was removed, while handcuffed behind his back, to an intake cell with a concrete bed, and he hit the floor with his face when “pushed” down. … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Use of force during book-in here was subject to QI

CA8: Crowd dispersal was not a seizure

Police actions in dispersing a crowd were not a seizure, even using less than lethal force. Perkins v. City of Des Moines, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 6528 (8th Cir. Mar. 5, 2026).* CBP officer’s conviction for excessive force on a … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on CA8: Crowd dispersal was not a seizure

TN: Failure to allege what should have been suppressed defeats IAC claim

Failure to allege what should have been suppressed if a motion to suppress had been filed is fatal to an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Coyne v. State, 2026 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 104 (Mar. 3, 2026). Qualified immunity denied: … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: Failure to allege what should have been suppressed defeats IAC claim

W.D.Pa.: Younger doctrine didn’t apply when plaintiff’s criminal case was over

Younger doctrine didn’t apply when plaintiff’s criminal case was over. Harris v. Trent, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42416 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 2, 2026). “Here, assuming the factual disputes in Franke’s favor, the relevant question is whether it was clearly established … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Younger doctrine didn’t apply when plaintiff’s criminal case was over