Category Archives: Excessive force

WI: During a traffic stop, officers can run the criminal history of passengers

During a traffic stop, officers can run the criminal history of passengers. State v. Pantle, 2026 Wisc. App. LEXIS 1138 (Oct. 14, 2026). Defendant’s conditional release search one week before the end of his term was based on reasonable suspicion … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Inventory, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WI: During a traffic stop, officers can run the criminal history of passengers

D.Kan.: Gun dislodged fleeing police dog wasn’t excludable, even if it was excessive force (which it wasn’t)

Siccing a police dog on a suspected armed and dangerous burglar that dislodged a Glock with a switch was not unreasonable. Even if it was excessive force, which it wasn’t, exclusion wouldn’t be the proper remedy. United States v. Wilhoite, … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Gun dislodged fleeing police dog wasn’t excludable, even if it was excessive force (which it wasn’t)

CA5: Ptf with dementia resisting police could be Tased

Plaintiff suffered from dementia and resisted the police. “We need not decide whether Jaso’s using the taser violated the Fourth Amendment. Even resolving any genuine factual disputes in the plaintiff’s favor, no precedent clearly forbade Jaso from deploying his taser … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: Ptf with dementia resisting police could be Tased

D.Haw.: Ex parte communications about SW issuance don’t require later recusal

The fact there were ex parte communications with a judge about a wiretap warrant doesn’t require recusal of the judge. United States v. Kobayashi, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 220121 (D. Haw. Sep. 28, 2026). Plaintiff can’t show causation for his … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstention, Excessive force, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on D.Haw.: Ex parte communications about SW issuance don’t require later recusal

CA3: Coast-to-coast collective knowledge

Investigators in Pennsylvania could rely on another investigator at UCLA and combine their information for probable cause. United States v. Carter, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 29575 (3d Cir. Sep. 25, 2026). Petitioner’s 2255 Franks challenge fails to “plausibly allege” falsity. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Collective knowledge, Excessive force, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA3: Coast-to-coast collective knowledge

GA: No case says SW required to ask for cell phone password

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not arguing that a warrant was required for a request for a cell phone password. No case anywhere says that’s required. Reynolds v. State, 2026 Ga. LEXIS 303 (Sep. 22, 2026). The inventory search of … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Inventory, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on GA: No case says SW required to ask for cell phone password

M.D.Fla.: Unidentified pills in driver’s lap may have been RS but it wasn’t PC for arrest

Defendant was stopped for speeding, and he was arrested for drugs based on unidentified pills found in his lap when the officer looked in. That might have been reasonable suspicion, but it wasn’t probable cause. Therefore, the arrest and car … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Cell phones, Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Unidentified pills in driver’s lap may have been RS but it wasn’t PC for arrest

WA: Sweat patch as condition of release violated state constitution’s privacy provision

The court imposing a sweat patch on plaintiff violated his state constitutional privacy rights. Lesser intrusive measures are required. Bailey-Cobb v. Snohomish Cty. Dist. Court, 2026 Wash. App. LEXIS 1871 (Aug. 17, 2026). Plaintiff stated a claim for his severe … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, State constitution | Comments Off on WA: Sweat patch as condition of release violated state constitution’s privacy provision

N.D.Ohio: Dog sniff during initial records check did not extend the stop

The stop was not extended by the drug dog that arrived almost immediately and the sniff was done while the records check was going on. Alternatively, there was reasonable suspicion for it. United States v. Billips, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Custody, Dog sniff, Excessive force, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Dog sniff during initial records check did not extend the stop

MT: Exigency is found in the totality of circumstances

In a domestic dispute, officers had exigent circumstances to enter on the totality of circumstances. Defendant challenged them one-by-one, but the totality applies. State v. Friscia, 2026 MT 158 (July 21, 2026). It was not reasonably subject to dispute that … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on MT: Exigency is found in the totality of circumstances

DE: Warrantless entry in DUI case unreasonable

Warrantless entry to detain a DUI suspect was unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. Claiming exigency isn’t enough. State v. Beasley, 2026 Del. C.P. LEXIS 8 (Del. C.P. June 16, 2026). This defendant has no reasonable expectation of privacy in someone … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on DE: Warrantless entry in DUI case unreasonable

CA5: Accidentally shooting the man who disarmed the shooter from a residence was not a constitutional violation

“This is a tragic case of mistaken identity. A police officer believed he was targeting a gunman who had been firing on police from a residence. Instead, he shot and badly wounded a man who had disarmed the actual shooter … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Forfeiture, Nexus, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA5: Accidentally shooting the man who disarmed the shooter from a residence was not a constitutional violation

CA3: Ptf was arrested on an apparent but recalled warrant, then officers confirmed it and let him go; the arrest was reasonable

Plaintiff was arrested because the officers reasonably believed there was a warrant for his arrest. “When Vince provided documentation that the warrant had been lifted, the officers confirmed the information and released him, which was reasonable under the circumstances. Therefore, … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA3: Ptf was arrested on an apparent but recalled warrant, then officers confirmed it and let him go; the arrest was reasonable

N.D.Ga.: PIT maneuver here was not excessive force

A PIT maneuver here was not excessive force. Defendant repeatedly refused to stop and even after attempted PIT maneuvers kept fleeing. United States v. Damons, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118141 (N.D. Ga. Apr. 2, 2026):

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: PIT maneuver here was not excessive force

W.D.N.Y.: Emergency disclosure requests in Buffalo Tops grocery shooting were valid

The emergency disclosure requests (EDRs) for information about the 2022 allegedly racially motivated Tops grocery store shooting in Buffalo were valid. Officers were looking for potential co-conspirators. United States v. Gendron, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109541 (W.D.N.Y. May 18, 2026). … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Emergency disclosure requests in Buffalo Tops grocery shooting were valid

CO: Not 4A or state constitutional violation for govt to access def’s computer via peer-to-peer sharing with BitTorrent software

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in files on his computer that were open for peer-to-peer sharing. Therefore, when the government used BitTorrent to access his computer, it did not violate the Fourth Amendment or the state constitution. People … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Excessive force, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CO: Not 4A or state constitutional violation for govt to access def’s computer via peer-to-peer sharing with BitTorrent software

CA10: Tribal and state court SWs: state judge wanted more information, but that didn’t make tribal warrant lack PC

Defendant lived on tribal lands with a co-occupant who was not Native American. Officers obtained two search warrants: one from a tribal court and one from a state court. The applications were identical. The state judge, however, wanted more information, … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA10: Tribal and state court SWs: state judge wanted more information, but that didn’t make tribal warrant lack PC

CA5: Officer’s touching parent’s arm to get her through a school door for four seconds was de minimis

In a school grounds dispute, a parent’s arm was grabbed for four seconds to move her through a doorway. “Under the circumstances, we cannot say that such de minimis force was ‘clearly’ excessive and unreasonable. … Dupuy knew that the … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on CA5: Officer’s touching parent’s arm to get her through a school door for four seconds was de minimis

MS: Def consented to entry to look for his missing mother

Police entry onto defendant’s house and yard because his mother, who he lived with, was missing, and relatives called the police. After looking in the house for her, they found her decapitated in the back yard, then they got a … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MS: Def consented to entry to look for his missing mother

VA: 12 second question about drugs didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop that was going to take a while anyway

This was a traffic stop, and defendant had a suspended license. She was able to call her son to come to drive her and the car home, and she would not be arrested. The officer’s taking 12 seconds to ask … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on VA: 12 second question about drugs didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop that was going to take a while anyway