Category Archives: Prison and jail searches

W.D.Pa.: SW for gun 11 days after a shooting wasn’t stale

The search warrant for a gun involved in shooting was not stale 11 days after the shooting. Firearms are durable and not consumables. United States v. Williams, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4950 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 12, 2026). The warrant for … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Staleness, Waiver, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: SW for gun 11 days after a shooting wasn’t stale

CA6: Random and isolated interference with prisoner mail doesn’t state a claim

Random and isolated interference with prisoner mail doesn’t state a claim for relief. Malicious interference would, but that’s not alleged. Tucker v. Horn, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 531 (6th Cir. Jan. 8, 2026). Not search case, but defendant was suspected … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Random and isolated interference with prisoner mail doesn’t state a claim

CA9: Evidence seized by state not taken or used by feds not subject to Rule 41(g)

State officers seized defendant’s Rolex watch in a search, and there was a federal prosecution, but the watch was never part of it nor evidence of anything. Thus, Rule 41(g) affords him no relief here. There’s no constructive federal possession … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Nexus, Prison and jail searches, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA9: Evidence seized by state not taken or used by feds not subject to Rule 41(g)

CA2: Merely having knowledge of prison strip searches doesn’t make that prison official potentially liable

Merely having knowledge of prison strip searches doesn’t make that prison official potentially liable. Baltas v. Jones, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 32676 (2d Cir. Dec. 15, 2025)*:

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on CA2: Merely having knowledge of prison strip searches doesn’t make that prison official potentially liable

D.D.C.: 1/6 pardonee doesn’t state claim under FTCA for having to go to trial

Plaintiff has a 1/6 pardon. She sued over things the government did to obtain her conviction. She fails to state a claim under the FTCA for alleged disclosure of private information during the trial. “Although the FTCA waives the United … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Attenuation, Cell phones, Federal Tort Claims Act, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on D.D.C.: 1/6 pardonee doesn’t state claim under FTCA for having to go to trial

AZ: Driving just under speed limit in left lane was RS when cars were passing on right

Driving a little too slow in the left lane and not attempting to pull over as cars on the right were passing was reasonable suspicion for a stop. State v. Alvarez-Soto, 2025 Ariz. LEXIS 373 (Nov. 28, 2025), vacating 258 … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AZ: Driving just under speed limit in left lane was RS when cars were passing on right

KS: KHP power for administrative searches of truck can’t be delegated to sheriffs

Under Kansas statute, only KHP officers can randomly stop regulated trucks for inspection, and it can’t be delegated to county sheriffs by an MOU. “There is no dispute here that regulation of commercial motor carriers triggers a substantial government interest.” … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches, Waiver | Comments Off on KS: KHP power for administrative searches of truck can’t be delegated to sheriffs

N.D.Ill.: Without seeing the video of the occurrence referred to in SW affidavit, court can’t find PC

The affidavit for warrant refers to a video of an occurrence, but, without seeing the video, the USMJ can’t decide probable cause for the warrant. Otherwise, it’s ratifying the officer’s conclusions, mentioning being a “rubber stamp.” In re Search of … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Warrant papers | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Without seeing the video of the occurrence referred to in SW affidavit, court can’t find PC

W.D.Tex.: Frequency of cell searches not a 4A claim

“Plaintiff complains of cell searches that are unscheduled or more frequent than she believes they should be. Such a claim does not state a constitutional violation. Even assuming that TDCJ policy dictates the frequency of searches, additional searches are not … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Frequency of cell searches not a 4A claim

S.D.N.Y.: Accidental seizure of attorney-client jail calls doesn’t lead to exclusion of non-legal calls

Use of plaintiff’s non-privileged prison calls as evidence was not a Fourth Amendment violation. The fact attorney-client calls were also seized but were segregated and not used as evidence doesn’t state a claim. Criscuolo v. Brandow, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Accidental seizure of attorney-client jail calls doesn’t lead to exclusion of non-legal calls

E.D.Mich.: No REP in a contraband cell phone in prison

There is no standing in a contraband cell phone in prison. United States v. Pouncy, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202490 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 14, 2025). The trial court properly limited the time frame of this warrant when an overbreadth challenge … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Overbreadth, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: No REP in a contraband cell phone in prison

S.D.N.Y.: Legal mail can be copied for inmate to guard against disguised legal mail

Prisons can copy legal mail in presence of the inmate to guard against contraband coming in disguised as legal mail. Prisoners’ Legal Servs. of N.Y. v. United States Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 195443 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 5, … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Consent, Informant hearsay, Mail and packages, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Legal mail can be copied for inmate to guard against disguised legal mail

C.D.Cal.: Handcuffing an inmate is not a 4A violation

“Plaintiff’s only purported basis for a Fourth Amendment claim is a vague assertion that ‘handcuff/restraints = false report.’ (Compl. at 6). Liberally construed, this appears to suggest that Plaintiff allegedly was seized without sufficient cause. In the prison context, however, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Prison and jail searches, Warrant papers | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Handcuffing an inmate is not a 4A violation

D.Alaska: Sharing cell phone gives standing

Defendant shared the iPhone of another person, so he had standing to contest its search. United States v. Powers, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 192621 (D. Alaska Sep. 30, 2025). Defendants don’t get qualified immunity. The jury could conclude that more … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on D.Alaska: Sharing cell phone gives standing

D.D.C.: Arrest on outdated warrant doesn’t depend on its underlying validity

Plaintiff’s arrest on an outdated warrant doesn’t depend on the underlying validity of the warrant. Here, the warrant wasn’t purged from the system before plaintiff’s stop and arrest. Otero v. District of Columbia, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185918 (D.D.C. Sep. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Arrest on outdated warrant doesn’t depend on its underlying validity

E.D.Cal.: Excessive prison strip search sufficiently alleged

Prison strip search: “Here, liberally construed, it appears plaintiff may be able to state a Fourth Amendment claim against the defendants who stripped plaintiff naked where it is alleged that plaintiff was brought to the ASU from the program office … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Excessive prison strip search sufficiently alleged

UT: Parole absconder’s purse could be searched

The officer said he searched the passenger’s purse in the car as part of the inventory and not as a search incident. In any event, she was a parole absconder, and it could be searched for that reason. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on UT: Parole absconder’s purse could be searched

W.D.N.C.: Court order issued under the SCA was sufficient as a substitute for a warrant

A court order issued under the Stored Communications Act was sufficient as a substitute for a warrant. United States v. Whittaker, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169034 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 7, 2025). “Therefore, in addition to Agent Namey’s experience and explanation, the … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Stored Communications Act, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Court order issued under the SCA was sufficient as a substitute for a warrant

CA11: RS required for a prison visitor’s strip search; out of circuit authority can be considered in whether the law is clearly established

Reasonable suspicion is required for a prison visitor’s strip search. Out of circuit authority can be considered in whether the law is clearly established. Here it essentially was. Gilmore v. Ga. Dept. of Corr., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 17209 (11th … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Strip search | Comments Off on CA11: RS required for a prison visitor’s strip search; out of circuit authority can be considered in whether the law is clearly established

N.D.Ga.: No REP in a prison inmate’s cell phone

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in the use of a cell phone in prison. United States v. Brandt, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129412 (N.D. Ga. June 13, 2025). This line in defendant’s PSR leads to denial of his … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonableness, Standards of review | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: No REP in a prison inmate’s cell phone