WY: Dog sniff of already parked car didn’t require RS

Defendant left his car at a convenience store’s gas pumps for 30-40 minutes. The police dog sniff while it was parked was not unreasonable. It was not a stop to be extended. Labbe v. State, 2024 WY 99, 2024 Wyo. LEXIS 101 (Sep. 19, 2024).

“Mr. Tapia was arrested and searched based on a brief interaction with a known drug user in a known drug area. The observing officer admitted that he was not able to hear what Ms. Rivera said to Mr. Tapia and did not see an object or money being exchanged by either of them. Their behavior, viewed in totality, was at best equivocal and susceptible of an innocent interpretation, and therefore could not form the basis for reasonable suspicion to believe that defendant had engaged in a crime.” People v. Tapia, 2024 NY Slip Op 04487 (1st Dept. Sep. 19, 2024).*

Defendant’s wife actively consented to the police search of their property. The claim he refused consent isn’t supported by the record. Lobdell v. Cty. of Spokane, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 23813 (9th Cir. Sep. 19, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.