D.Minn.: Even if stop was without RS, eluding police gave it

Even if there was no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop, his new offense of eluding the police justified it. United States v. Denton, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170669 (D. Minn. Sep. 23, 2024).*

The affidavit for this warrant shows probable cause. It doesn’t have to be enough to convict. “Probable cause to issue a search warrant exists if the supporting affidavit provides facts sufficient to ‘lead a prudent person to believe that a search of the described premises would uncover contraband or evidence of a crime.’ … This requires more than a ‘mere suspicion’ but does not require evidence sufficient to convict.” United States v. Radick, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170236 (E.D. Okla. Aug. 27, 2024), adopted, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169182 (E.D. Okla. Sep. 19, 2024).*

The vehicle defendant was driving was uninsured. The officer acted reasonably in the stop because defendant was the same gender as the owner, and the car was parked at her house earlier. United States v. Russell, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169553 (D. Mont. Sep. 19, 2024).*

Defendant claims the search occurred before the warrant was issued, but on the totality of the record, it didn’t. United States v. Shelton, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170371 (D. Nev. Aug. 15, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Independent source, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.