Category Archives: Scope of search

E.D.Tenn.: Frisk of bag was reasonable, too

On the totality, there was reasonable suspicion for defendant’s Terry stop and then a frisk of his bag. United States v. Brooks, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231135 (E.D. Tenn. Oct. 8, 2026).* “The Court finds that Cruz’s claim fails because, … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Scope of search, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Frisk of bag was reasonable, too

VA: NC tracking warrant validly led to conviction in VA

North Carolina officers put a warrant approved tracker on defendant’s vehicle. That out-of-state warrant led to defendant’s conviction in Virginia. The out-of-state warrant was issued on probable cause, and it didn’t violate the Fourth Amendment tracking him in Virginia. A … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception, Qualified immunity, Scope of search, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on VA: NC tracking warrant validly led to conviction in VA

DC: Def on supervision before sentencing had no REP in GPS monitoring

Defendant was on high intensity supervision with GPS for his current conviction, but he hadn’t yet been sentenced. Officers didn’t need a warrant to obtain his GPS data. “This case involves a defendant who had been adjudicated guilty, and PSA … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search, Scope of search, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on DC: Def on supervision before sentencing had no REP in GPS monitoring

MT: Semi-conscious injured driver couldn’t consent to BAC blood draw

Defendant was seriously injured in a car wreck and was at best semi-conscious. She could not consent to a DUI blood draw. Suppression order affirmed. State v. Laroque, 2026 MT 209 (Sept. 1, 2026). The totality of circumstances showed defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, DNA, Drug or alcohol testing, Independent source, Scope of search | Comments Off on MT: Semi-conscious injured driver couldn’t consent to BAC blood draw

CA3: Officers made reasonable effort to determine whether house was multi-use

Defendant lived on the second floor of a house that was not zoned as an apartment building and had no outward appearance there were separate residences. The warrant was for the whole place. The downstairs resident wasn’t the person they … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Particularity, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA3: Officers made reasonable effort to determine whether house was multi-use

IL5: Community caretaking exception doesn’t support home searches

“Given the above precedent, we disagree with the State that the community caretaking doctrine remains a viable purpose for a warrantless entry into a home. Instead, we believe that the Caniglia decision clearly rejected the community caretaking exception outside of … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on IL5: Community caretaking exception doesn’t support home searches

M.D.Fla.: Unidentified pills in driver’s lap may have been RS but it wasn’t PC for arrest

Defendant was stopped for speeding, and he was arrested for drugs based on unidentified pills found in his lap when the officer looked in. That might have been reasonable suspicion, but it wasn’t probable cause. Therefore, the arrest and car … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Cell phones, Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Unidentified pills in driver’s lap may have been RS but it wasn’t PC for arrest

D.C.Cir.: It was reasonable for officers to conclude that evidence or instrumentalities of the crime would be found in the car used in a robbery

It was reasonable for officers to conclude that evidence or instrumentalities of the crime would be found in the car used in a robbery. A mistaken description of the location of the car in the warrant was neither intentional nor … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Automobile exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: It was reasonable for officers to conclude that evidence or instrumentalities of the crime would be found in the car used in a robbery

CA6: SW in drug case led to finding CSAM, SW was still particular

Defendant was a suspect in a drug investigation, and they got search warrants for his place and cell phones, not knowing even how many there were or what they looked like. The warrants were with probable cause. The search for … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Probable cause, Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA6: SW in drug case led to finding CSAM, SW was still particular

S.D.Tex.: A safe could be searched under a child porn SW

On a child pornography search warrant, search of a locked safe was reasonable. United States v. Villarreal-Resendiz, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174690 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 5, 2026). Stopping over the stop line was reasonable suspicion for this stop. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: A safe could be searched under a child porn SW

D.P.R.: A shed on the curtilage was within scope of SW

It was reasonable for officers to search a shed on the curtilage; it was within the scope of the search warrant. United States v. Torres-Benitez, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165162 (D.P.R. July 24, 2026). The CI said he could get … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Drug or alcohol testing, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.P.R.: A shed on the curtilage was within scope of SW

VA: SW that included “evidence of occupancy” could peruse def’s journals; that led to SW for them

In executing a search warrant in a murder case, officers looking for evidence of occupancy authorized by the warrant perused defendant’s journals. Not finding evidence of occupancy, they found other potential leads and applied for a warrant to read the … Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on VA: SW that included “evidence of occupancy” could peruse def’s journals; that led to SW for them

S.D.Fla.: SW for def’s house included his tent outside

The search warrant for defendant’s house included his tent outside. Gardner v. Miranda, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153610 (S.D. Fla. May 27, 2026). The officer had reasonable suspicion for a stop, so the “new crime” rationale the court of appeals … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: SW for def’s house included his tent outside

FL: Violation of knock-and-announce statute doesn’t require exclusion

A violation of the knock-and-announce statute for serving search warrants doesn’t require exclusion of the evidence under Hudson, which is followed. State v. Times, 2026 Fla. LEXIS 982 (June 25, 2026). “Idling” is not a crime for a passenger vehicle … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Knock and announce, Scope of search | Comments Off on FL: Violation of knock-and-announce statute doesn’t require exclusion

MD: Under Bruen, mere possession of a handgun outside the home is no longer RS; Terry stop doesn’t include looking in a bag

Bruen changed the law, and possession of a firearm outside the home is no longer reasonable suspicion for an investigative stop. Also, a Terry stop is a patdown of clothing, not looking into a bag being carried. Hicks v. State, … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on MD: Under Bruen, mere possession of a handgun outside the home is no longer RS; Terry stop doesn’t include looking in a bag

N.D.Fla.: Monitored bowel movement in prison didn’t violate 4A

In prison, “the visual strip search and the monitored bowel movement did not violate the Fourth Amendment.” McDonald v. Spears, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107383 (N.D. Fla. Apr. 6, 2026). Defendant’s consent to search his cell phone was limited and … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Immigration arrests, Prison and jail searches, Scope of search | Comments Off on N.D.Fla.: Monitored bowel movement in prison didn’t violate 4A

M.D.Ala.: Officer’s adhering to particularity wasn’t a failure to uncover Brady information

“To the contrary, this testimony confirms only that Agent Evans’s forensic examination was circumscribed by the legal boundaries of the search warrant. Cox’s attempt to equate the examiner’s adherence to those boundaries with a failure to uncover exculpatory evidence is … Continue reading →

Posted in Due process, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Officer’s adhering to particularity wasn’t a failure to uncover Brady information

OH3: Cell phone search can extend to cloud storage it’s connected to

Defendant gave consent to search his cell phone, and the court notes, without deciding, that other courts have held that such consent would reach his data stored on the cloud or another server. That issue doesn’t, however, have to be … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Curtilage, Dog sniff, Scope of search | Comments Off on OH3: Cell phone search can extend to cloud storage it’s connected to

D.D.C.: Walker stopped on street by three officers was without RS

Defendant was stopped walking and surrounded by three officers shining flashlights in his face, and all without reasonable suspicion. Only then did they discover a telling bulge from a weapon. Suppressed. United States v. Wilson, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69861 … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Walker stopped on street by three officers was without RS

W.D.Wis.: Failure to cross a trial witness about a search claim isn’t IAC

Failure to cross-examine a trial witness about a potential Fourth Amendment violation is not ineffective assistance of counsel because a jury trial is not the place to resolve a search claim. Kawleski v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70540 … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on W.D.Wis.: Failure to cross a trial witness about a search claim isn’t IAC