Category Archives: Informant hearsay

CA6: CI’s lie to get into def’s house to video him making a drug deal with the CI didn’t violate 4A

The informant’s lie to get into defendant’s house to video him making a drug deal with the CI didn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. See Lewis v. United States, 385 U.S. 206, 210 (1966). United States v. Warick, 2026 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: CI’s lie to get into def’s house to video him making a drug deal with the CI didn’t violate 4A

GA: No REP in what a security camera saw that def installed in friends’ house when he was there sexually assaulting their daughter

Defendant was a friend of the family, and he came over to install an additional security camera inside the house. Later, that camera caught him sexually assaulting one of the girls. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy despite spending … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Knock and talk, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on GA: No REP in what a security camera saw that def installed in friends’ house when he was there sexually assaulting their daughter

S.D.Fla.: Inventory that omitted “miscellaneous personal items” was not unreasonable

A “clumsy” inventory that omitted “miscellaneous personal items” was not an unreasonable inventory. No level of specificity is required. United States v. Samuels, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96304 (S.D. Fla. May 1, 2026). The CSAM search warrant here for ten … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Inventory, Overbreadth | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Inventory that omitted “miscellaneous personal items” was not unreasonable

CA4: The fact that ptf charged with witness intimidation didn’t do it again wasn’t material for Franks

Defendant was charged with witness intimidation for contact with a witness in a criminal case of his. That charge was later dropped, and he sued. Defendants didn’t violate Franks by not mentioning that he never did it again. That’s not … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA4: The fact that ptf charged with witness intimidation didn’t do it again wasn’t material for Franks

E.D.Va.: Search incident could be done on FTA arrest

Defendant was arrested on a state Capias for FTA issued in open court. The search incident to the arrest was valid. United States v. Barnhart, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91284 (E.D. Va. Apr. 24, 2026). Defendant’s conviction is affirmed. There … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Overbreadth, Search incident | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Search incident could be done on FTA arrest

CA10: Disagreement over spelling of street name didn’t make warrant fail particularity; GFE at least would apply

“The warrant authorized a search of 10 McGinnis Street, Eufaula, OK 74432. The correct address, Mr. Davis said, was 10 Meginnis Street, Eufaula, OK 74432. And beyond the address, the warrant contained no description of the house.” The suppression hearing … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Particularity, Protective sweep, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA10: Disagreement over spelling of street name didn’t make warrant fail particularity; GFE at least would apply

D.Idaho: Not unreasonable for PO to hand over def’s cell phone to LEO for extraction after RS developed from Snapchat app

Defendant missed a PO visit, and they went to his house. There, they got his cell phone and looked at his Snapchat app finding messages between him and a 14 year old. It was not unreasonable for them to hand … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Cell phones, Community caretaking function, Informant hearsay, Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Not unreasonable for PO to hand over def’s cell phone to LEO for extraction after RS developed from Snapchat app

D.Me.: Entering passcode into cell phone to see if it works is not a search

Defendant’s cell phone was seized and a warrant obtained to search it, but it was protected by a passcode and the phone was not searched. So, a couple of months later, they tried again with a new warrant. The information … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, DNA, Informant hearsay, Mail and packages, Prison and jail searches, Search | Comments Off on D.Me.: Entering passcode into cell phone to see if it works is not a search

D.D.C.: Video surveillance of public housing hallways is like a pole camera with no REP

Plaintiff sued a public housing project which has sophisticated video surveillance but only in common areas. The court holds that it doesn’t rise to the level of the mosaic theory and is more akin to a pole camera. Pondexter-Moore v. … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Informant hearsay, Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Video surveillance of public housing hallways is like a pole camera with no REP

E.D.Tenn.: CI’s being incorrect about which drug was involved wasn’t material

The CI’s being incorrect about which drug was involved isn’t really a Franks violation. United States v. Mooneyham, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67746 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 30, 2026). Plaintiff reasonably believed that one of the officers was sitting on him … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity, Search | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: CI’s being incorrect about which drug was involved wasn’t material

NC: Informant doesn’t need “track record” to be creditable

The informant doesn’t need a “track record” to be credited as a source of information. State v. Vandergrift, 2026 N.C. App. LEXIS 202 (Mar. 18, 2026). Police responded to a stolen ATM report and found defendant near an ATM in … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NC: Informant doesn’t need “track record” to be creditable

CA5: No REP against license plate readers

License plate readers violate no reasonable expectation of privacy. Also, the stop was supported by reasonable suspicion. United States v. Porter, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 7888 (5th Cir. Mar. 17, 2026). The informant’s information was sufficient to show probable cause … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Search incident, Seizure | Comments Off on CA5: No REP against license plate readers

CA11: 4A doesn’t require “in the presence of the officer” for misdemeanor arrest

While Georgia law requires a misdemeanor offense be in the presence of the officer, the Fourth Amendment does not. The arrest was constitutionally valid. Middlebrooks v. Kasmar, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 5855 (11th Cir. Feb. 27, 2026). There was information … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA11: 4A doesn’t require “in the presence of the officer” for misdemeanor arrest

DC: “police had probable cause to believe that Mr. Turner’s bullet-riddled car might contain bullet fragments from the shooting”

“There can be little question that the police had probable cause to believe that Mr. Turner’s car contained evidence of a crime. Four cars parked along the street, including Mr. Turner’s Lexus, were struck by bullets in a drive-by shooting. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on DC: “police had probable cause to believe that Mr. Turner’s bullet-riddled car might contain bullet fragments from the shooting”

KY: Arrest warrant isn’t constitutionally required for a felony arrest

An arrest warrant isn’t constitutionally required for a felony arrest. Hernandez v. Commonwealth, 2026 Ky. LEXIS 7 (Feb. 19, 2026). There was no rationale entitlement to discovery of the name of the informant in this case, so defense counsel wasn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Seizure | Comments Off on KY: Arrest warrant isn’t constitutionally required for a felony arrest

CA8: No QI for nearly point black shooting protestor in eye with less than lethal device

Shooting a protestor in the eye at point blank range with a “less than lethal” device that the officers are trained on and warned can actually be lethal was excessive force. No qualified immunity. Marks v. Bauer, 2026 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: No QI for nearly point black shooting protestor in eye with less than lethal device

AL: Trial court erred in finding cell phone SW didn’t provide for seizure and then search

The search warrant for defendant’s cell phone authorized both seizure and search of the phone, and the trial court was clearly erroneous in concluding that it did not permit a search, too. (The officer admitted working off a template cell … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Warrant execution | Comments Off on AL: Trial court erred in finding cell phone SW didn’t provide for seizure and then search

OH2: Dog handler’s testimony of dog certification was sufficient to show reliability

The dog handler’s testimony that the dog was certified before this sniff was sufficient to show the dog was reliable. State v. Murphy, 2026-Ohio-143 (2d Dist. Jan. 13, 2026). Search warrants can be based on hearsay. Mendenhall v. City & … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Informant hearsay, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH2: Dog handler’s testimony of dog certification was sufficient to show reliability

E.D.N.C.: No REP in tent in homeless encampment that was trespassing on private property

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his tent in a homeless encampment on someone else’s private property. That’s “wrongful presence.” He also disclaimed the tent, but standing is enough to deny relief. United States v. Tillman, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Trespass | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: No REP in tent in homeless encampment that was trespassing on private property

D.D.C.: Arrest on a warrant where defendant fled justified search incident

Defendant had a warrant for his arrest. He was seen by police, and he fled. When he was tackled to the ground and handcuffed, the officers rolled him over finding a gun in his waistband. It was a valid search … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Informant hearsay, Search incident | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Arrest on a warrant where defendant fled justified search incident