Category Archives: Social media warrants

E.D.Va.: Govt showed exigency for access to public Facebook messages in terrorism investigation

The court assumes defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in his private Facebook messages, but holds he did not in his non-private ones. Still, the government successfully argued that it had exigent circumstances for Facebook to reveal messages under … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Social media warrants | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Govt showed exigency for access to public Facebook messages in terrorism investigation

WI: Social media TOS agreements show no REP in CP

The Terms of Service agreements of social media platforms state that they are required by law to report child pornography. Therefore, there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in one’s files that are child pornography. State v. Gasper, 2024 Wisc. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Social media warrants | Comments Off on WI: Social media TOS agreements show no REP in CP

FL4: REP in Facebook private messages

(1) Florida’s 4th DCA finds a reasonable expectation of privacy in Facebook private messages as analogous to cell phone text messages. (2) When the records were seized under a warrant for a theft, they couldn’t be searched for evidence of … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Scope of search, Social media warrants | Comments Off on FL4: REP in Facebook private messages

D.Conn.: LEO accessing public social media accounts doesn’t implicate 4A

A prison security official’s accessing a potential visitor’s social media accounts to determine whether the visitor is some kind of security threat doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. Lawrence v. Zack, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161377 (D. Conn. Sep. 9, 2024). … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Exclusionary rule, Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Social media warrants | Comments Off on D.Conn.: LEO accessing public social media accounts doesn’t implicate 4A

D.Kan.: Reinstalling a deleted app to an iPhone to get to def’s account exceeded the scope of consent to search the phone

Defendant consented to a search of his iPhone, but here the officer reinstalled the Telegram app and then used it to search defendant’s Telegram account, finding child porn. All this exceeded his consent. There is no case in point because … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Scope of search, Social media warrants | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Reinstalling a deleted app to an iPhone to get to def’s account exceeded the scope of consent to search the phone

NY Kings: Jurisdiction of the issuing magistrate didn’t matter here

“The fact that the warrant was signed by Justice Tully as an Acting Supreme Court Justice is irrelevant; Justice Tully was authorized to issue the search warrant regardless of whether she was sitting as a Criminal Court Judge or as … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Neutral and detached magistrate, Social media warrants | Comments Off on NY Kings: Jurisdiction of the issuing magistrate didn’t matter here

D.Mass.: No discovery of covert Shapchat accounts for lack of materiality

Officers set up covert Snapchat accounts to communicate with defendant. He’s not entitled to discovery about that for Brady or Franks purposes because he can’t show materiality. United States v. Stroup, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132483 (D. Mass. July 26, … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Social media warrants, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Mass.: No discovery of covert Shapchat accounts for lack of materiality

Reason: Internet Preservation and the Fourth Amendment—Case Updates, Part I

Reason, The Volokh Conspiracy: Internet Preservation and the Fourth Amendment—Case Updates, Part I by Orin S. Kerr (“The first of two rulings, and why I find it unpersuasive.”):

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Social media warrants | Comments Off on Reason: Internet Preservation and the Fourth Amendment—Case Updates, Part I

CA6: No REP from ATF getting access to def’s Instagram posts with false name

Defendant is a felon who posted to Instagram pictures of him firing guns. The ATF got access to his account, and he had no reasonable expectation of privacy in it, even where the ATF agent used a fake name to … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Social media warrants | Comments Off on CA6: No REP from ATF getting access to def’s Instagram posts with false name

MN: Jail call to delete Facebook pages because of incriminating information was PC for SW

Defendant told a person he called from jail to delete his Facebook accounts because of potentially incriminating evidence on it. The state showed probable cause and particularity for the Facebook warrant. State v. Sardina-Padilla, 2024 Minn. LEXIS 307 (June 12, … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Cell site location information, Probable cause, Social media warrants, Waiver | Comments Off on MN: Jail call to delete Facebook pages because of incriminating information was PC for SW

CA4: Alleged dirty cop involved in SW but not at trial wasn’t enough for new trial

An alleged dirty cop who didn’t testify at trial and was part of obtaining the search warrant was not enough to get a new trial. United States v. Banks, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 14273 (4th Cir. June 12, 2024). The … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Probable cause, Social media warrants | Comments Off on CA4: Alleged dirty cop involved in SW but not at trial wasn’t enough for new trial

DC: Accepting a law license is consent to trust account subpoenas

Being a lawyer with a trust account, lawyer’s consent to subpoenas for their trust account. The lawyer’s argument that it’s an unreasonable search is frivolous. In re Doman, 2024 D.C. App. LEXIS 191 (May 16, 2024). Defendant didn’t show standing … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Consent, Franks doctrine, Social media warrants, Standing | Comments Off on DC: Accepting a law license is consent to trust account subpoenas

D.Kan.: Preservation request under SCA isn’t a search or seizure

A preservation request under 18 U.S.C. § 2703(f) for defendant’s Snapchat account isn’t an unreasonable search or seizure. Even if, “suppression would not be warranted because the FBI acted in good faith reliance on the Stored Communications Act. As a … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Social media warrants, Standards of review, Voluntariness | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Preservation request under SCA isn’t a search or seizure

GFR: Feds Demand Identity Of YouTube Users Who Watched Certain Videos

Giant Freakin Robot: Feds Demand Identity Of YouTube Users Who Watched Certain Videos by April Ryder (“Federal authorities in the U.S. have ordered that Google hand over tens of thousands of names, addresses, phone numbers, and user activity information for … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Social media warrants | Comments Off on GFR: Feds Demand Identity Of YouTube Users Who Watched Certain Videos

Kerr: “Terms of Service have little or no effect on Fourth Amendment rights.”

Orin Kerr, Terms of Service and Fourth Amendment Rights, 172 U. Pa. L. Rev. 287 (2024):

Posted in Social media warrants | Comments Off on Kerr: “Terms of Service have little or no effect on Fourth Amendment rights.”

D.Utah: Facebook account SW was properly limited to time and to crime under investigation and not overbroad

This Facebook account warrant was properly limited. “First, both warrants here were limited to a time period of about one year, from December 11, 2020, to November 17, 2021. As a result, neither warrant allowed the government to search everything … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Social media warrants, Waiver, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.Utah: Facebook account SW was properly limited to time and to crime under investigation and not overbroad

D.Idaho: What’s “full and fair opportunity” under Stone?

“Powell does not specify a particular test for determining whether a state provided a defendant with an opportunity for full and fair litigation of a Fourth Amendment claim. To aid in determination of this question, federal district courts in the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Qualified immunity, Social media warrants | Comments Off on D.Idaho: What’s “full and fair opportunity” under Stone?

CA8: Affiant officer’s belief that criminals brag about crimes on social media allows cell phone search in a gun case

“We conclude the affidavit adequately established probable cause that Ivey’s cell phone would contain evidence of a firearms offense. Officers found the phone in Ivey’s possession while he was located in a vehicle with a gun under his seat. The … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Dog sniff, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Social media warrants, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: Affiant officer’s belief that criminals brag about crimes on social media allows cell phone search in a gun case

Cal.5: Defective notice of Facebook warrant under CalECPA doesn’t require suppression

Defendant’s Facebook account was accessed by a search warrant issued under CalECPA. The notice provision was not complied with by the state, but the court declines to suppress here. The standard for suppression in CalECPA is the same as for … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Informant hearsay, Social media warrants, Warrant execution | Comments Off on Cal.5: Defective notice of Facebook warrant under CalECPA doesn’t require suppression

D.C.Cir. denies rehearing en banc in Trump Twitter SW case

The D.C. Cir. denied rehearing from the Twitter account search warrant for former President Trump’s account, In re Sealed Case, 77 F.4th 815 (D.C. Cir. July 18, 2023) (corrected and unredacted version), in In re Search of Info. Stored at … Continue reading

Posted in Social media warrants | Comments Off on D.C.Cir. denies rehearing en banc in Trump Twitter SW case