Category Archives: Reasonable expectation of privacy

KS: Running warrants on a passed out person is reasonable

Defendant was passed out under a bridge, and the fire department and police were called. Firemen got her name and police ran a warrants check, finding one, and they arrested her. That was reasonable. State v. Willard, 2026 Kan. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on KS: Running warrants on a passed out person is reasonable

WA: Sweat patch as condition of release violated state constitution’s privacy provision

The court imposing a sweat patch on plaintiff violated his state constitutional privacy rights. Lesser intrusive measures are required. Bailey-Cobb v. Snohomish Cty. Dist. Court, 2026 Wash. App. LEXIS 1871 (Aug. 17, 2026). Plaintiff stated a claim for his severe … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, State constitution | Comments Off on WA: Sweat patch as condition of release violated state constitution’s privacy provision

CA11: SD card in a video voyeur device placed in another’s bedroom has no REP

“This appeal is about the reasonable expectation of privacy–or the lack thereof. Kenneth Mininger secretly placed video cameras in shared rooms in his ex-wife’s house. He used these cameras to record his ex-wife’s minor daughter undressing. The police examined the … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: SD card in a video voyeur device placed in another’s bedroom has no REP

GA reaffirms a constitutional right of privacy in medical records

Georgia reaffirms there is a constitutional right of privacy in medical records. Here it was a civil discovery dispute. Goodell v. Moulton, 2026 Ga. LEXIS 232 (Aug. 11, 2026):

Posted in Privileges, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on GA reaffirms a constitutional right of privacy in medical records

NY4: Payton does not apply to an arrest in a common area of an apartment building

Payton v. New York does not apply to an arrest in a common area of an apartment building. People v. Kadenhead, 2026 NY Slip Op 04680 (4th Dept. July 24, 2026). There was probable cause for defendant’s arrest on a … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY4: Payton does not apply to an arrest in a common area of an apartment building

D.Alaska: Def’s half hour detention was without RS

Defendant was detained, but not arrested, for over half an hour, and the court finds it was without reasonable suspicion, and the result should be suppressed. United States v. Vue, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158591 (D. Alaska July 17, 2026). … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Alaska: Def’s half hour detention was without RS

D.N.M.: Obtaining def’s juvenile records by subpoena is not a “search”; no REP

The government’s subpoena for defendant’s juvenile case records is granted. The government can show relevance and admissibility at trial. Defendant focuses on his Fourth Amendment claim which is rejected. No case says there is a reasonable expectation of privacy against … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Obtaining def’s juvenile records by subpoena is not a “search”; no REP

TX1: Defendant had no REP in a package of drugs he never possessed and on another person

Defendant lacked standing to suppress 4,100 grams of ketamine seized from Brown because he never possessed the package, had no reasonable expectation of privacy in package of drugs carried by Brown, and the ketamine was recovered away from him during … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on TX1: Defendant had no REP in a package of drugs he never possessed and on another person

D.D.C.: SW of house for clothing used in crime didn’t violate 4A

There was probable cause for search of defendant’s house for clothing that was worn in the crime. What happens outside the house can create an inference that what’s sought is inside. (The good faith exception would also apply.) United States … Continue reading

Posted in Airport searches, Consent, Nexus, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on D.D.C.: SW of house for clothing used in crime didn’t violate 4A

PA: Shining flashlight into hole in a shoebox was a search; there was a REP in the closed box

An officer responded to an overdose call to back up EMS. While in defendant’s house, he shined his flashlight through a manufacturer’s hole in a shoebox to look inside. This was an unreasonable search because defendant had a reasonable expectation … Continue reading

Posted in Mail and packages, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search | Comments Off on PA: Shining flashlight into hole in a shoebox was a search; there was a REP in the closed box

N.D.Ohio: Failure to serve state SW within state mandated time not 4A violation

The state search warrant in this case was not served within three days as required by Ohio law. That did not violate the Fourth Amendment, and he shows no prejudice. United States v. Calhoun, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121202 (N.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Seizure, State constitution, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Failure to serve state SW within state mandated time not 4A violation

TN: Def lived in a van left wide open in a public area, but it didn’t belong to him, so no REP as to interior

“In this case, the evidence was that, although the Defendant lived in the van, the van was registered to someone else, and the vehicle registration indicated the same. The doors to the van were wide open and it was parked … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on TN: Def lived in a van left wide open in a public area, but it didn’t belong to him, so no REP as to interior

CA8: Def’s 20 prior arrests helped show voluntariness of consent

Despite the lack of a Miranda warning, defendant consented to the search. After all, she’d been arrested about 20 times before this one. United States v. Marr, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 15161 (8th Cir. May 28, 2026). A Bivens action … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Voluntariness | Comments Off on CA8: Def’s 20 prior arrests helped show voluntariness of consent

KS: 13 days pole camera surveillance violated no REP

Pole camera observation for 13 days violated no reasonable expectation of privacy. The state’s search and seizure provision is interpreted the same as the Fourth Amendment. State v. Garrett, 2026 Kan. App. LEXIS 20 (May 22, 2026). The pictures in … Continue reading

Posted in Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on KS: 13 days pole camera surveillance violated no REP

NY1: A mental health defense waives REP in the medical records about it

When the accused raises a mental health defense, he waives any reasonable expectation of privacy in the records. S.M. v. City of N.Y., 2026 NY Slip Op 03248, 2026 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3413 (1st Dept. May 21, 2026).* “[T]he … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY1: A mental health defense waives REP in the medical records about it

GA: No REP in what a security camera saw that def installed in friends’ house when he was there sexually assaulting their daughter

Defendant was a friend of the family, and he came over to install an additional security camera inside the house. Later, that camera caught him sexually assaulting one of the girls. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy despite spending … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Knock and talk, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on GA: No REP in what a security camera saw that def installed in friends’ house when he was there sexually assaulting their daughter

MS: Def consented to entry to look for his missing mother

Police entry onto defendant’s house and yard because his mother, who he lived with, was missing, and relatives called the police. After looking in the house for her, they found her decapitated in the back yard, then they got a … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MS: Def consented to entry to look for his missing mother

N.D.Ga.: OnStar’s data collection survives motion to dismiss, at least for now

In a case over OnStar’s data collection of driving information, GM’s motion to dismiss at this stage of the litigation is denied. While there is no reasonable expectation of privacy of what is seen on the highways, more is involved … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: OnStar’s data collection survives motion to dismiss, at least for now

TX14: No REP in location information on bondsman’s GPS monitor

In the third opinion in this case, all with the same outcome, a defendant on GPS monitoring by his bondsman as a condition of release had no reasonable expectation of privacy that the information would never be given to law … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on TX14: No REP in location information on bondsman’s GPS monitor

D.D.C.: Video surveillance of public housing hallways is like a pole camera with no REP

Plaintiff sued a public housing project which has sophisticated video surveillance but only in common areas. The court holds that it doesn’t rise to the level of the mosaic theory and is more akin to a pole camera. Pondexter-Moore v. … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Informant hearsay, Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Video surveillance of public housing hallways is like a pole camera with no REP