Category Archives: Qualified immunity

D.V.I.: Flyover of curtilage from navigable airspace was reasonable

Officers did a flyover of defendant’s home from navigable airspace and saw a marijuana grow. While he had a subjective reasonable expectation of privacy in the curtilage, not from 2000′. United States v. Flavius, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92974 (D.V.I. … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Inevitable discovery, Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.V.I.: Flyover of curtilage from navigable airspace was reasonable

M.D.Ga.: No right to challenge SW before execution

It isn’t apparent that there’s a right to challenge a search warrant before it is executed. (Rule 17 covers motions to quash subpoenas.) Even if there was, defendant doesn’t carry his burden. United States v. Crumpton, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Franks doctrine, Motion to suppress, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Ga.: No right to challenge SW before execution

CA6: Officer observing “forced” baptism of drug offender as 1A & 4A violation gets QI for failure to intervene

A police officer was also a preacher. After a marijuana arrest, he elected to baptize the offender in an Ohio lake. He called Goforth, another officer, to attend, and that officer video recorded it. Later, the offender sued for a … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Officer observing “forced” baptism of drug offender as 1A & 4A violation gets QI for failure to intervene

CA9: SW application made “under penalty of perjury” satisfies the “oath or affirmation” requirement

A search warrant application made “under penalty of perjury” satisfies the “oath or affirmation” requirement. United States v. Morrow, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 11933 (9th Cir. May 16, 2023). Defendant prevailed on the merits of his honest services wire fraud … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Oath or affirmation, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: SW application made “under penalty of perjury” satisfies the “oath or affirmation” requirement

W.D.Wash.: Younger abstention bars suit over state prosecution and search

Plaintiff’s federal suit over his state search and prosecution is barred by Younger abstention. There’s no showing he can’t raise those issues in state court. Bailey v. City of Olympia Prosecutor, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80175 (W.D. Wash. May 8, … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Younger abstention bars suit over state prosecution and search

E.D.Wis.: “Whistleblower” is still a CI whose story must be corroborated

A business fraud “whistleblower”’s statement was too conclusory to show probable cause. Franks hearing granted. United States v. Schampers, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68205 (E.D. Wis. Apr. 19, 2023). Defendant was driving back and forth between Plattsburgh NY and Burlington … Continue reading

Posted in General warrant, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: “Whistleblower” is still a CI whose story must be corroborated

E.D.Tenn.: Mislabeling SW attachments not worthy of exclusion

Accidental reverse numbering of Attachments A and B didn’t make the search warrant void. United States v. Deakins, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60866 (E.D. Tenn. Apr. 6, 2023).* Plaintiff’s claim that the Director of National Intelligence violates the Fourth Amendment … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Particularity, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Mislabeling SW attachments not worthy of exclusion

WA: Renter of hotel room could consent to search of room with co-occupants, but not of co-occupant’s stuff

“Here, Giberson was a guest in Goedker’s motel room. As a result, Goedker as the person renting the room had authority to give consent for law enforcement to search the room. … And even though Giberson was present, because he … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Scope of search | Comments Off on WA: Renter of hotel room could consent to search of room with co-occupants, but not of co-occupant’s stuff

OH7: Officer seeing sawed-off shotgun in car door justified questions under Quarles

Defendant was stopped and got out of his car, and in the door was a sawed off shotgun. Questions about the gun next to him were legitimate under Quarles. State v. Anderson, 2023-Ohio-945, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 922 (7th Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH7: Officer seeing sawed-off shotgun in car door justified questions under Quarles

D.N.M.: Three days of warrantless real time CSLI was reasonable because of exigency

Three days of real time CSLI was obtained by the police because of a missing child, and it was reasonable as exigency. United States v. Torres, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44017 (D.N.M. Mar. 15, 2023).* No qualified immunity for Tasing … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Three days of warrantless real time CSLI was reasonable because of exigency

WA: Stop to inquire of paying transit fare violated state constitution

Defendant’s freedom under the state constitution to not be interfered with in his private affairs was violated by a stop and inquiry whether he had paid a transit fare. He provided a false name that led to his prosecution for … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Qualified immunity, Seizure, State constitution | Comments Off on WA: Stop to inquire of paying transit fare violated state constitution

CA5: Videos alone show no QI

Based on the videos alone, there was excessive force and qualified immunity is denied. Ducksworth v. Landrum, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 5807 (5th Cir. Mar. 10, 2023):

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Videos alone show no QI

CA8: GFE applies to dog sniff at apt door before law changed

Defendant’s apartment door was subjected to a dog sniff at his apartment door before the court limited it in United States v. Perez, 46 F.4th 691 (8th Cir. 2022). The good faith exception applies. United States v. Hines, 2023 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: GFE applies to dog sniff at apt door before law changed

S.D.Ind.: 911 response to stabbing call had report of others inside; that was exigency

The officer arrived at plaintiff’s house because of a 911 call about a stabbing. A man who had been stabbed was outside and he said it happened inside and there were others. That justified the officer’s entry into the house. … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Strip search | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: 911 response to stabbing call had report of others inside; that was exigency

CA9: “Clearly established law” in one sentence

“Cardenas has not identified any case holding that police officers violated the Fourth Amendment by making an arrest under similar circumstances, and we are not aware of any such case.” Cardenas v. Saladen, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 5091 (9th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: “Clearly established law” in one sentence

N.D.Cal.: Key fob on parolee’s person means car under his control even if elsewhere

Defendant parolee was a passenger in a car and he had his car key fob on him. The car, albeit not there, was still “under his control” for a parole search, relying on United States v. Cervantes, 859 F.3d 1175 … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Key fob on parolee’s person means car under his control even if elsewhere

CA11: Inventory applied even if automobile exception not satisfied

The search of defendant’s car would have happened as a result of an inventory search whether or not the automobile exception applied. Therefore, inevitable discovery was satisfied. United States v. Russell, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 3820 (11th Cir. Feb. 17, … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Qualified immunity, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA11: Inventory applied even if automobile exception not satisfied

W.D.N.Y.: 108-day delay in SW for cell phone was unreasonable

An unreasonable 108-day delay in retrieving defendant’s cell phone from local police after the DEA adopted the case required suppression of the search of the phone. United States v. Adams, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23973 (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 13, 2023). Officers … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: 108-day delay in SW for cell phone was unreasonable

CA6: Being a drug dealer is not per se nexus to one’s home; more required

Defendant was a drug dealer, but the affidavit for warrant did nothing to show a reason to believe (nexus) that drugs would be found at his house. No case in this circuit supports nexus on these facts. Moreover, the information … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff, Nexus, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Being a drug dealer is not per se nexus to one’s home; more required

GA: BOLO for aggressive driver in gray car didn’t support stop

There was no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop for being an “aggressive driver in a gray car.” The trial court properly suppressed. State v. Glanton, 2023 Ga. App. LEXIS 55 (Feb. 3, 2023). (“In considering these factors we find (1) … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GA: BOLO for aggressive driver in gray car didn’t support stop