Category Archives: Qualified immunity

ID: Drug dog’s touching nose on the car door was not a trespass

The drug dog’s touching his nose on the car door was not a trespass. State v. Pendleton, 2026 Ida. LEXIS 147 (Oct. 14, 2026). The search warrant for defendant’s medical records for his DUI with injury was particular. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Pretext, Qualified immunity, Trespass | Comments Off on ID: Drug dog’s touching nose on the car door was not a trespass

WI: During a traffic stop, officers can run the criminal history of passengers

During a traffic stop, officers can run the criminal history of passengers. State v. Pantle, 2026 Wisc. App. LEXIS 1138 (Oct. 14, 2026). Defendant’s conditional release search one week before the end of his term was based on reasonable suspicion … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Inventory, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WI: During a traffic stop, officers can run the criminal history of passengers

CA8: Judge gets no qualified or judicial immunity for locking up children who didn’t want to go with a parent

A judge gets no qualified or judicial immunity for ordering children locked up for refusing to leave court with a parent they didn’t want to go with. In a prior appeal, “the children were beyond his contempt power and ‘judges … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Pretext, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Judge gets no qualified or judicial immunity for locking up children who didn’t want to go with a parent

CA5: Ptf with dementia resisting police could be Tased

Plaintiff suffered from dementia and resisted the police. “We need not decide whether Jaso’s using the taser violated the Fourth Amendment. Even resolving any genuine factual disputes in the plaintiff’s favor, no precedent clearly forbade Jaso from deploying his taser … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: Ptf with dementia resisting police could be Tased

VA: NC tracking warrant validly led to conviction in VA

North Carolina officers put a warrant approved tracker on defendant’s vehicle. That out-of-state warrant led to defendant’s conviction in Virginia. The out-of-state warrant was issued on probable cause, and it didn’t violate the Fourth Amendment tracking him in Virginia. A … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception, Qualified immunity, Scope of search, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on VA: NC tracking warrant validly led to conviction in VA

CA2: Cell phone search reasonable at the border

At the border, defendant’s cell phone was first manually searched and then forensically searched. Neither was unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Robinson, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 30035 (2d Cir. Oct. 1, 2026), following United States v. Alisigwe, … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, First Amendment, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: Cell phone search reasonable at the border

CA5: Bogus traffic stop can’t support frisk

Plaintiff plausibly alleged a bogus traffic stop and so the frisk lacked reasonable suspicion and violated the Fourth Amendment. This is clearly established law. Rosales v. Lewis, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 29016 (5th Cir. Sep. 22, 2026). (Reason article here.) … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA5: Bogus traffic stop can’t support frisk

N.D.Cal.: Typo in list of crimes being investigated in affidavit for SW could be overlooked

A typo in the affidavit for warrant including murder as one of the crimes under investigation could be overlooked. United States v. Pokorny, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 217899 (N.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2026). Patdown searches are a part of institutional … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Typo in list of crimes being investigated in affidavit for SW could be overlooked

GA: Raising particularity in half of one sentence of argument isn’t a presentation of the issue

Raising particularity in half of one sentence of argument isn’t a presentation of the issue. Walker v. State, 2026 Ga. LEXIS 301 (Sep. 22, 2026). Defendant admitted that marijuana might be in the car, so the smell of marijuana which … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Particularity, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on GA: Raising particularity in half of one sentence of argument isn’t a presentation of the issue

CA3: Strip search outside of jail without SW or exigency violates 4A, but QI here

Strip search of an arrestee outside of a jail without warrant or exigency violates the Fourth Amendment, but the officer gets qualified immunity. Beatty v. Gardner, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 28373 (3d Cir. Sep. 16, 2026):

Posted in Qualified immunity, Strip search | Comments Off on CA3: Strip search outside of jail without SW or exigency violates 4A, but QI here

N.D.Ohio: Not detailed enough inventory is not unreasonable

Too detailed an inventory not unreasonable. “Lynch offers no argument to suggest that his vehicle was not properly subject to the tow policy and its accompanying inventory search. Instead, Lynch appears to take issue with the manner in which Officer … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Not detailed enough inventory is not unreasonable

CA5: Ptf’s forced drug test wasn’t justified by exigent circumstances

Plaintiff’s claim of being forced to do a drug test but not for protection of the children she cared for stated a claim and survived summary judgment. Knighton v. Benton Cty., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 23741 (5th Cir. Aug. 6, … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Ptf’s forced drug test wasn’t justified by exigent circumstances

IN Tax: 4A claim over order to enter for tax assessment moot where it didn’t happen

There was an order to enter the taxpayer’s property for an assessment; however, the entry never occurred, so the Fourth Amendment issue is moot. Bolte v. Dubois Cty. Assessor, 2026 Ind. Tax LEXIS 35 (T.C. Aug. 3, 2026). “The record … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Mootness, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN Tax: 4A claim over order to enter for tax assessment moot where it didn’t happen

MI: Suppression hearing is a critical stage of the proceedings

A suppression hearing is a critical stage of the proceedings, and defendant was unrepresented at that point due to disagreements with first retained and then appointed counsel. Remanded. The pretrial motions in general were disorganized, and the Fourth Amendment claim … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Privileges, Qualified immunity, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on MI: Suppression hearing is a critical stage of the proceedings

E.D.Mich.: State environmental inspector who entered property to look at unlicensed seawall gets QI

Plaintiff built a seawall on an inland lake without a permit. State environmental inspectors came to look and referred him for a violation of regulations. He sued in federal court for Fourth Amendment trespass. Despite it being clear the inspector … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Cell phones, Overbreadth, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: State environmental inspector who entered property to look at unlicensed seawall gets QI

LA5: Nervousness and avoiding getting on airplane to LAX (a source city) was RS

DEA and State DTF officers had reasonable suspicion to stop defendant departing the NOLA airport for LAX (a source city) when he saw them as they looked all nervous and then walked away from boarding the airplane. State v. Wells, … Continue reading →

Posted in Airport searches, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA5: Nervousness and avoiding getting on airplane to LAX (a source city) was RS

CA3: Ptf was arrested on an apparent but recalled warrant, then officers confirmed it and let him go; the arrest was reasonable

Plaintiff was arrested because the officers reasonably believed there was a warrant for his arrest. “When Vince provided documentation that the warrant had been lifted, the officers confirmed the information and released him, which was reasonable under the circumstances. Therefore, … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA3: Ptf was arrested on an apparent but recalled warrant, then officers confirmed it and let him go; the arrest was reasonable

E.D.Ark.: Facts underlying QI will be submitted to jury

In a qualified immunity order, the court decides to submit underlying fact questions to the jury to decide it. Steelman v. City of Shannon Hills, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118665 (E.D. Ark. May 29, 2026). 2255 petitioner’s claim about his … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Facts underlying QI will be submitted to jury

CA9: When a digital computer search reveals a CP hash value, officer doesn’t have to see image to have PC

A digital computer search that produces an image with a hash value that matches known child pornography is probable cause without the officer even seeing the image. United States v. Johnsen, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 14893 (9th Cir. May 26, … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Dog sniff, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: When a digital computer search reveals a CP hash value, officer doesn’t have to see image to have PC

E.D.Cal.: Just because one officer smelled tobacco in def’s pipe didn’t mean others couldn’t sniff, too

Just because one officer sniffed defendant’s pipe and smelled tobacco, that didn’t mean other officers couldn’t sniff too and come to a different conclusion. United States v. Gearheart, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109593 (E.D. Cal. May 18, 2026).* The odor … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Just because one officer smelled tobacco in def’s pipe didn’t mean others couldn’t sniff, too