Category Archives: Third Party Doctrine

W.D.Pa.: No standing to contest civil investigative demands to third parties over medical records

Defendant had no standing to contest civil investigative demands to third parties, even involving medical records of others. United States v. Hertel & Brown Physical & Aquatic Therapy, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6437 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 13, 2025):

Posted in Privileges, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: No standing to contest civil investigative demands to third parties over medical records

E.D.Tex.: Corporate Transparency Act enjoined, but 4A claim as yet unresolved

On the balance of equities, the Eastern District of Texas enjoins the Corporate Transparency Act going into effect January 1, 2025. “[T]he CTA requires a vast array of companies to disclose otherwise private stakeholder information to FinCEN. See 31 U.S.C. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Corporate Transparency Act enjoined, but 4A claim as yet unresolved

WaPo: TSA PreCheck vs. Clear: What’s better for price and privacy?

WaPo: TSA PreCheck vs. Clear: What’s better for price and privacy? by Tatum Hunter (“Clear saves you time at the airport. Just make sure to read the fine print.” “Airport security is, by nature, at odds with individual privacy. The … Continue reading

Posted in Airport searches, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on WaPo: TSA PreCheck vs. Clear: What’s better for price and privacy?

TX1: GPS installed by dealer in a used car was owned by dealer and was not comparable to CSLI

Defendant bought a used car that the dealer had GPS installed in if necessary to recover it. The police accessed that information without a warrant to connect him to a murder. The contract for the vehicle told defendant about the … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, GPS / Tracking Data, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on TX1: GPS installed by dealer in a used car was owned by dealer and was not comparable to CSLI

E.D.Va.: Reporting requirements of Corporate Transparency Act don’t violate 4A under California Bankers

Plaintiffs challenge the Corporate Transparency Act on several grounds. As to their claim the reporting requirement violates the Fourth Amendment, there is no likelihood of success on the merits under California Bankers decided 50 years ago. Community Ass’ns Inst. v. … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Reporting requirements of Corporate Transparency Act don’t violate 4A under California Bankers

E.D.Va.: Three images from ALPR in 30 days wasn’t enough for a Carpenter violation

Police checking the database of Flock’s ALPR for defendant’s license plate revealed only three images in 30 days. The court is not inclined to hold that the mere potential of a Carpenter violation makes one. What happens hereafter might. United … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Three images from ALPR in 30 days wasn’t enough for a Carpenter violation

NPR: 23andMe is on the brink. What happens to all its DNA data?

NPR: 23andMe is on the brink. What happens to all its DNA data? by Bobby Allyn (“As 23andMe struggles for survival, customers like Wiles have one pressing question: What is the company’s plan for all the data it has collected … Continue reading

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on NPR: 23andMe is on the brink. What happens to all its DNA data?

NE: Not IAC to not challenge state’s obtaining phone records

It was settled in this state long ago that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in third-party cell phone records. Therefore, defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging it. State v. Rush, 317 Neb. 622 (Sep. 20, 2024).* On … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on NE: Not IAC to not challenge state’s obtaining phone records

D.N.J.: Fictitious tags stop justifies SI

Based on circuit authority, a stop and arrest for fictitious tags justifies a search incident on the driver. United States v. Jones, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161352 (E.D. Wis. Sep. 9, 2024), quoting United States v. Travis, 2023 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Fictitious tags stop justifies SI

Harvard Law Review: Tech Companies’ Terms of Service Agreements Could Bring New Vitality to the Fourth Amendment

Harvard Law Review: Tech Companies’ Terms of Service Agreements Could Bring New Vitality to the Fourth Amendment by Brent Skorup [that is, if they choose to do anything about it]:

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Harvard Law Review: Tech Companies’ Terms of Service Agreements Could Bring New Vitality to the Fourth Amendment

Cal.6: Cell phone SW was limited to a specific date and time for certain materials, but the search far exceeded it; suppressed, no GFE

The search warrant here was issued for evidence of a sexual assault of an adult. There were pretext text messages sent by the police pretending to be the victim to get an admission. When the search warrant was executed, child … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Good faith exception, Scope of search, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Cal.6: Cell phone SW was limited to a specific date and time for certain materials, but the search far exceeded it; suppressed, no GFE

The Well News: The Silent Erosion of Privacy: Why We Should Care About Financial Surveillance

The Well News: The Silent Erosion of Privacy: Why We Should Care About Financial Surveillance by John Yelland (“In today’s digital age, financial transactions are meticulously tracked by both private companies and government entities. This pervasive financial surveillance often goes … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on The Well News: The Silent Erosion of Privacy: Why We Should Care About Financial Surveillance

Reason: The Feds Are Skirting the Fourth Amendment by Buying Data

Reason: The Feds Are Skirting the Fourth Amendment by Buying Data by Joe Lancaster (“The government needs a warrant to spy on you. So agencies are paying tech companies to do it instead.”)

Posted in Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Reason: The Feds Are Skirting the Fourth Amendment by Buying Data

Air Force: Court martial access to government-owned records is not a 4A issue

Court martial access to government-owned records is not a Fourth Amendment issue. In re AG, 2024 CCA LEXIS 256 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. June 28, 2024). “Based on the foregoing, Craine was not entitled to a Franks hearing because he … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Air Force: Court martial access to government-owned records is not a 4A issue

E.D.Cal.: Motion to reconsider motion to suppress has to be consistent with original motion; new claim waived

The motion to reconsider defendant’s Fourth Amendment claim was inconsistent with the motion to reconsider. No. United States v. Garza, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112102 (E.D. Cal. June 25, 2024). Defendant’s 2255 on his Fourth Amendment is barred by Stone … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Issue preclusion, Third Party Doctrine, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Motion to reconsider motion to suppress has to be consistent with original motion; new claim waived

CA3: Getting ptf’s personal information from third parties after he was seen open carrying was not 2A or 4A violation

Plaintiff was seen open carrying on a bicycle, and the officer attempted to stop him. The officer later got information on plaintiff from a store he’d been in. None of that violated the Second or Fourth Amendment. Glover v. Fidaannd, … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA3: Getting ptf’s personal information from third parties after he was seen open carrying was not 2A or 4A violation

OH10: Alleged violation of prosecutor’s subpoena power not subject to exclusionary rule; also, subject matter was third party record

A violation of the state prosecuting attorney’s subpoena power in felony cases was not subject to the exclusionary rule. In addition, obtaining third party information from an IP address is not a search. State v. Diaw, 2024-Ohio-2237, 2024 Ohio App. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Independent source, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on OH10: Alleged violation of prosecutor’s subpoena power not subject to exclusionary rule; also, subject matter was third party record

MA: Cell phone call logs don’t require a search warrant

Cell phone call logs don’t require a search warrant to get them. “Despite the narrowing of the third-party doctrine in other contexts, it remains applicable to call detail records. Notwithstanding recent technological changes, the phone numbers an individual dials are … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Seizure, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on MA: Cell phone call logs don’t require a search warrant

Reason: Here’s How the CIA Plans To Use Your Ad Tracking Data

Reason: Here’s How the CIA Plans To Use Your Ad Tracking Data by Matthew Petti (“The intelligence community is admitting that info from data brokers is sensitive but isn’t accepting hard limits on how to use it.” “For years, the … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Reason: Here’s How the CIA Plans To Use Your Ad Tracking Data

WSJ: U.S. Spy Agencies Know Our Secrets. They Bought Them.

Wall Street Journal: U.S. Spy Agencies Know Our Secrets. They Bought Them. by Byron Tau (“Whatever the U.S. can do with commercial data, foreign governments can do too. Last week, President Biden signed an executive order to prevent certain adversary … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on WSJ: U.S. Spy Agencies Know Our Secrets. They Bought Them.