Category Archives: Computer and cloud searches

Cal.2d: NDO in SW to Microsoft doesn’t violate state statute or 1A

A nondisclosure order in a search warrant to an electronic service provider does not violate state law or the First Amendment. Microsoft Corp. v. Superior Court, 2026 Cal. App. LEXIS 17 (2d Dist. Jan. 14, 2026):

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Nondisclosure order, Warrant execution | Comments Off on Cal.2d: NDO in SW to Microsoft doesn’t violate state statute or 1A

D.S.D.: No standing in employer’s laptop

2255 petitioner fails on standing to contest of search of this laptop. Based on all the court can see, including the PSR description, the laptop belonged to his employer, not him. All the electronic devices of the employer were seized. … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Probation / Parole search, Standing, Waiver | Comments Off on D.S.D.: No standing in employer’s laptop

WaPo: Your chatbot keeps a file on you. Here’s how to delete it.

WaPo: Your chatbot keeps a file on you. Here’s how to delete it. by Geoffrey A. Fowler (“A clickable guide to fixing the complicated privacy settings from ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot, Gemini and Meta AI. … Try this: Log in to … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Social media warrants | Comments Off on WaPo: Your chatbot keeps a file on you. Here’s how to delete it.

CNS: North Carolina man asks Fourth Circuit to nix child porn flagged by Google algorithm

CNS: North Carolina man asks Fourth Circuit to nix child porn flagged by Google algorithm by Steve Garrison (“A North Carolina man convicted of possessing child pornography asked the Fourth Circuit on Friday to toss out evidence that Google automatically … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on CNS: North Carolina man asks Fourth Circuit to nix child porn flagged by Google algorithm

D.D.C.: Electronic evidence seized in one investigation of Comey cannot be searched years later for evidence in another; return ordered under Rule 41(g)

When the government retained electronic evidence obtained from a lawyer under a warrant, concluded the investigation, and then, years later, searched the information again in a different investigation, the remedy here was order of immediate return to the lawyer and … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Overbreadth, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Electronic evidence seized in one investigation of Comey cannot be searched years later for evidence in another; return ordered under Rule 41(g)

Reason: CBP Agents Held This U.S. Citizen for Hours Until He Agreed To Let Them Search His Electronic Devices

Reason: CBP Agents Held This U.S. Citizen for Hours Until He Agreed To Let Them Search His Electronic Devices by Jacob Sullum (“A federal lawsuit argues that the agency’s policy of perusing travelers’ personal data without a warrant or probable … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on Reason: CBP Agents Held This U.S. Citizen for Hours Until He Agreed To Let Them Search His Electronic Devices

D.D.C.: Warrantless computer search ordered stopped

An attorney whose computer was seized and copied gets a TRO against further searches on a prima facie showing of its warrantless search. Richman v. United States, Civil Misc. Action No. 25-0170 (CKK) (D.D.C. Dec. 6, 2025):

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Warrantless computer search ordered stopped

E.D.Mo.: Neither RS nor PC required for electronics search at border

Neither reasonable suspicion or probable cause is required for a border search of electronic equipment. Here, it was at Newark airport. United States v. Bill, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 234680 (E.D. Mo. Dec. 2, 2025). Defendant who had 19 prior … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Issue preclusion, Seizure, Voluntariness | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Neither RS nor PC required for electronics search at border

Above the Law: Washington Post Analysis Shows We Are Talking Too Much And Getting Questionable Advice From LLMs — And It May All Be Discoverable [How about the subject of a search warrant?]

Above the Law: Washington Post Analysis Shows We Are Talking Too Much And Getting Questionable Advice From LLMs — And It May All Be Discoverable by Stephen Embry (“It’s incumbent on all of us to do all we can to … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on Above the Law: Washington Post Analysis Shows We Are Talking Too Much And Getting Questionable Advice From LLMs — And It May All Be Discoverable [How about the subject of a search warrant?]

E.D.Mich.: Seeing handgun reasonably led to handcuffing to see if def had permit on him

Officers suspected defendant was carrying a weapon, and they saw it as they approached. Under state law, he had to have the permit on him. “So, were the officers’ following actions (handcuffing Pettes and putting him in the squad car) … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Seeing handgun reasonably led to handcuffing to see if def had permit on him

ChatGPT query found in cell phone search described the crime

KOLR: ChatGPT, cell data help arrest Springfield teen for MSU parking lot vandalism by Kathryn Skopec

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on ChatGPT query found in cell phone search described the crime

CA2: Warrantless search of ptf’s Uber app history was a 4A violation

Warrantless search of a cell phone to access plaintiff’s Uber history stated a Fourth Amendment claim. Etere v. Nassau Cty., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 25753 (2d Cir. Oct. 3, 2025). Even if defense counsel was ineffective for not challenging the … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA2: Warrantless search of ptf’s Uber app history was a 4A violation

OR: PC for one computer isn’t PC for another

The computer search here wasn’t authorized by the probable cause showing, and it wasn’t harmless error. Probable cause for one device doesn’t permit search of all. State v. Schult, 343 Or. App. 376 (Sep. 10, 2025). “Here, Boudreau’s Franks argument … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on OR: PC for one computer isn’t PC for another

MA: 123-day delay between cell phone seizure and SW was unreasonable here

Balancing the interests involved, the trial court found that the 123-day delay between seizure of defendant’s cell phone and seeking a search warrant for it was unreasonable. On de novo review, “That notwithstanding, there is no Massachusetts precedent upholding as … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Nexus, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness | Comments Off on MA: 123-day delay between cell phone seizure and SW was unreasonable here

TX7: Odor of MJ is PC; that’s TX precedent, and out of state cases don’t carry any weight

The odor of cannabis is still probable cause in Texas. “Emerging case law” in other states doesn’t matter because of Texas precedent. Parras v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 5954 (Tex. App. – Amarillo Aug. 8, 2025). Defendant had no … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Plain view, feel, smell, Standing | Comments Off on TX7: Odor of MJ is PC; that’s TX precedent, and out of state cases don’t carry any weight

D.N.H.: Extended border search of men on bicycles was valid

Defendant was stopped on a bicycle with backpack and bedroll with another in New Hampshire by a CBP officer who suspected they’d illegally crossed the border. They admitted they had. Suspecting they were involved with human smugglers, the officers searched … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.N.H.: Extended border search of men on bicycles was valid

WaPo: Scanning technology is coming to detect child porn. Here’s what it means

WaPo: Scanning technology is coming to detect child porn. Here’s what it means by Shira Ovide:

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Digital privacy | Comments Off on WaPo: Scanning technology is coming to detect child porn. Here’s what it means

S.D.Cal.: Second look at computer for CP based on court order was reasonable and in good faith

Defendant’s computer was seized and searched for child pornography. After the initial warrant, the government applied for permission to reexamine the computer media. The second look was justified, and the good faith exception applies because it involves reliance on a … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception, Issue preclusion, Scope of search | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Second look at computer for CP based on court order was reasonable and in good faith

E.D.Va.: Subpoena for times connected to IP address is not for transactional information and thus is valid

A subpoena is sufficient for IP information that only showed when connected, but not where connected (transactional information). In re United States for Non Disclosure Ord. Under 18 U.S.C. § 2705B Relating to Grand Jury Subpoena, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Subpoena for times connected to IP address is not for transactional information and thus is valid

CA11: Border searches of electronic devices need no RS

Border searches of electronic devices need no reasonable suspicion, unlike intensive searches of the body. Riley did not change that. United States v. Pulido, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 8264 (11th Cir. Apr. 8, 2025). Later acquired information can’t be used … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: Border searches of electronic devices need no RS