Category Archives: Cell phones

VI: Despite ubiquity of cell phones, nexus has to be shown to alleged crime

The suppression of the cell phone is affirmed. The telephonic warrant omitted to mention what it was that the police were seizing. The ubiquity of cell phones isn’t carte blanche to seize any cell phone in a defendant’s possession. There … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on VI: Despite ubiquity of cell phones, nexus has to be shown to alleged crime

RI: Challenge to one sentence of 8-page cell phone records SW fails; totality has to be considered

Defendant’s challenge to the search warrant for his cell phone records focused on one sentence adding nothing to the calculus. On the totality, the 8-page affidavit showed probable cause for the cell phone records. State v. Pinkerton, 2026 R.I. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on RI: Challenge to one sentence of 8-page cell phone records SW fails; totality has to be considered

W.D.N.Y.: Emergency disclosure requests in Buffalo Tops grocery shooting were valid

The emergency disclosure requests (EDRs) for information about the 2022 allegedly racially motivated Tops grocery store shooting in Buffalo were valid. Officers were looking for potential co-conspirators. United States v. Gendron, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109541 (W.D.N.Y. May 18, 2026). … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Emergency disclosure requests in Buffalo Tops grocery shooting were valid

VI: Cell phone SW didn’t show nexus to crime; possession alone not enough

There was a lack of nexus to cell phone to this alleged crime which voids the search warrant for it, and the good faith exception does not apply. Just having a cell phone on one’s person doesn’t link it to … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on VI: Cell phone SW didn’t show nexus to crime; possession alone not enough

LA5: SW for cell phone including “cloud based storage accessible by the device” not overbroad

The search warrant for defendant’s cell phone included “or within cloud based storage accessible by the device.” The warrant was not overbroad. State v. Pampas, 2026 La. App. LEXIS 848 (La. App. 5 Cir May 5, 2026). Defense counsel’s failure … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance, Overbreadth, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA5: SW for cell phone including “cloud based storage accessible by the device” not overbroad

S.D.Cal.: Refusal to submit to warrant to show face to open cell phone was admissible at trial

Defendant’s refusal to comply with a search warrant for biometric opening of his cell phone (here, a face scan) was admissible at trial to show consciousness of guilt. “Given that ‘[i]t is today universally conceded that the fact of an … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Admissibility of evidence, Cell phones, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Refusal to submit to warrant to show face to open cell phone was admissible at trial

NY Columbia Co.: Alleged excessive nervousness when multiple police cars arrive at a traffic stop doesn’t add to RS

Defendant’s alleged excessive nervousness wasn’t visible on the video. And, even if he was, that’s a reasonable response to multiple police cars showing up for a routine traffic stop. No reasonable suspicion to continue the stop. People v. Thomas, 2026 … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Cell phones | Comments Off on NY Columbia Co.: Alleged excessive nervousness when multiple police cars arrive at a traffic stop doesn’t add to RS

W.D.N.Y.: Civil discovery dispute denies access to other employees’ cell phones as 4A issue

In an employment action against a city, plaintiff sought discovery of messages on cell phones. Making the city seek them raises Fourth Amendment concerns under O’Connor v. Ortega. Reynolds v. City of Rochester, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93293 (W.D.N.Y. Apr. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Civil discovery dispute denies access to other employees’ cell phones as 4A issue

E.D.Va.: Search incident could be done on FTA arrest

Defendant was arrested on a state Capias for FTA issued in open court. The search incident to the arrest was valid. United States v. Barnhart, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91284 (E.D. Va. Apr. 24, 2026). Defendant’s conviction is affirmed. There … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Overbreadth, Search incident | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Search incident could be done on FTA arrest

E.D.Mich.: Possible 5A violation in obtaining cell phone passcode mooted by inevitable discovery; they’d get into it anyway

The government obtained defendant’s cell phone passcode by questioning him. Despite the potential Fifth Amendment violation, the court finds that the cell phone would have been opened by the government’s forensics team anyway, so inevitable discovery applies. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, immigration stops, Pretext, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Possible 5A violation in obtaining cell phone passcode mooted by inevitable discovery; they’d get into it anyway

CA3: Cell phone warrant for CSAM could be broad because of possible hiding and misidentifying files

This CSAM cell phone warrant was broad, but that’s a recognition that files could have false names to hide them. It was not unreasonable. United States v. Daniels, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 11323 (3d Cir. Apr. 21, 2026):

Posted in Cell phones, Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on CA3: Cell phone warrant for CSAM could be broad because of possible hiding and misidentifying files

DC: Affidavit for SW for cell phone showed no PC or nexus to crime

The search warrant for defendant’s phone showed nothing about probable cause to believe any evidence would be on it. The mere fact he likely carried the phone with him all the time isn’t enough. (But the court concedes maybe it’s … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on DC: Affidavit for SW for cell phone showed no PC or nexus to crime

VA: 12 second question about drugs didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop that was going to take a while anyway

This was a traffic stop, and defendant had a suspended license. She was able to call her son to come to drive her and the car home, and she would not be arrested. The officer’s taking 12 seconds to ask … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on VA: 12 second question about drugs didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop that was going to take a while anyway

D.Idaho: Not unreasonable for PO to hand over def’s cell phone to LEO for extraction after RS developed from Snapchat app

Defendant missed a PO visit, and they went to his house. There, they got his cell phone and looked at his Snapchat app finding messages between him and a 14 year old. It was not unreasonable for them to hand … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Cell phones, Community caretaking function, Informant hearsay, Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Not unreasonable for PO to hand over def’s cell phone to LEO for extraction after RS developed from Snapchat app

OH10: Parole search of cell phone can occur even when it’s taken from the property room at jail

Defendant was in jail, and his PO went to the jail and got his phone from the property room to search it. This was a reasonable search under his parole search condition. State ex rel. Woodard v. Hoying, 2026-Ohio-1351 (10th … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH10: Parole search of cell phone can occur even when it’s taken from the property room at jail

CAAF: Victim’s 4A rights were at issue, too

The military court had to also consider the Fourth Amendment rights of the victim to sensitive information the accused sought access to for trial. All things considered, even if the court martial judge was wrong denying it, it was harmless … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Military searches, Nexus, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CAAF: Victim’s 4A rights were at issue, too

OH3: Cell phone search can extend to cloud storage it’s connected to

Defendant gave consent to search his cell phone, and the court notes, without deciding, that other courts have held that such consent would reach his data stored on the cloud or another server. That issue doesn’t, however, have to be … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Curtilage, Dog sniff, Scope of search | Comments Off on OH3: Cell phone search can extend to cloud storage it’s connected to

CA4: PIT maneuver with unmarked car for detectives making a stop could be excessive force

Using an unmarked police car to stop plaintiff with a PIT maneuver requested by detectives without warning here raised sufficient factual disputes that the officers do not get summary judgment nor qualified immunity on an excessive force claim in his … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Dog sniff, Excessive force, Nexus, Seizure | Comments Off on CA4: PIT maneuver with unmarked car for detectives making a stop could be excessive force

CA4: Ptf student’s cell phone properly searched at school under T.L.O.

Plaintiff student’s cell phone was properly searched at school under T.L.O. when he was heard bragging about having explicit photographs on it at school. O.W. v. Carr, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 10241 (4th Cir. Apr. 9, 2026). Plaintiff made a … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, School searches | Comments Off on CA4: Ptf student’s cell phone properly searched at school under T.L.O.

D.Me.: Entering passcode into cell phone to see if it works is not a search

Defendant’s cell phone was seized and a warrant obtained to search it, but it was protected by a passcode and the phone was not searched. So, a couple of months later, they tried again with a new warrant. The information … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, DNA, Informant hearsay, Mail and packages, Prison and jail searches, Search | Comments Off on D.Me.: Entering passcode into cell phone to see if it works is not a search