Category Archives: Cell phones

N.D.Ga.: Slight delay in searching a cell phone of a person in custody who couldn’t possess it was reasonable

Because he’s in custody, defendant has a diminished expectation of getting his cell phone back. The slight delay in getting a warrant has no case law cited in support, not that it matters. United States v. Holloman, 2026 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Probable cause, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Slight delay in searching a cell phone of a person in custody who couldn’t possess it was reasonable

D.Mass.: Cell site tower dump governed by Carpenter, but GFE applies here because there’s almost no case anywhere else

A cell site tower dump to see who was there at the time of the crime is governed by Carpenter, but the law is completely unclear and the good faith exception saves it. United States v. McDonald, 2026 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Cell site tower dump governed by Carpenter, but GFE applies here because there’s almost no case anywhere else

D.Idaho: Ping information not stale

The ping information warrant here was not stale. United States v. Torres, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4593 (D. Idaho Jan. 9, 2026). [It also seems like it would never get stale. It is information not subject to change; if anything, … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Cell phones, Cell site location information, Pretext, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Ping information not stale

CA6: Random and isolated interference with prisoner mail doesn’t state a claim

Random and isolated interference with prisoner mail doesn’t state a claim for relief. Malicious interference would, but that’s not alleged. Tucker v. Horn, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 531 (6th Cir. Jan. 8, 2026). Not search case, but defendant was suspected … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Random and isolated interference with prisoner mail doesn’t state a claim

404 Media: Inside ICE’s Tool to Monitor Phones in Entire Neighborhoods

404 Media: Inside ICE’s Tool to Monitor Phones in Entire Neighborhoods by Joseph Cox (“A social media and phone surveillance system ICE bought access to is designed to monitor a city neighborhood or block for mobile phones, track the movements … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on 404 Media: Inside ICE’s Tool to Monitor Phones in Entire Neighborhoods

CA9: In school seizure of plaintiff’s cell phone for 30 minutes was not unreasonable

In school seizure of plaintiff’s cell phone for 30 minutes was not unreasonable and “not excessively intrusive.” McGuire v. Roseville Joint Union High Sch. Dist., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 172 (9th Cir. Jan. 6, 2026). “Valdivia counters that [the officer’s] … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, School searches | Comments Off on CA9: In school seizure of plaintiff’s cell phone for 30 minutes was not unreasonable

MA: Facebook selfie supported SW for def’s cell phone

A Facebook photo that appeared to be a selfie on defendant’s Facebook account wearing the shirt witnesses to the shooting describe supported a search warrant for defendant’s cell phone. Commonwealth v. Carleton, 2026 Mass. LEXIS 1 (Jan. 5, 2026). Plaintiff … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones | Comments Off on MA: Facebook selfie supported SW for def’s cell phone

CA10: Protective sweep of car was valid despite presence of six officers; def would get back in car

There was reasonable suspicion enough potential for dangerousness for a protective sweep of defendant’s car. “The district court’s dangerousness analysis relied on four factors: (1) Raban’s gang affiliation, (2) the high-crime and rival-gang neighborhood, (3) Armstrong’s presence, and (4) Raban’s … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Cell phones, Probable cause, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA10: Protective sweep of car was valid despite presence of six officers; def would get back in car

MI: Officer seeing def drunk an hour before he was driving was a reasonable conclusion

The district court erred in suppressing by finding no probable cause for a stop. “Because we conclude that Officer Prater’s observations of defendant in a drunken state no more than one hour before the stop furnished the officer with reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MI: Officer seeing def drunk an hour before he was driving was a reasonable conclusion

C.D.Ill.: Easily entered iPhone moots how passcode was obtained

Even if the passcode was obtained unreasonably, this iPhone would have been gotten into anyway. The officer had done it before on these earlier models, and that’s inevitable discovery. United States v. Fassero, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 265273 (C.D. Ill. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Inventory, Neutral and detached magistrate, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Easily entered iPhone moots how passcode was obtained

CA9: Taking too long to get SW for phone violated clearly established law

The officer here violated clearly established law by taking too long to apply for a warrant to search plaintiff’s cell phone. Plaintiff promptly sought its return, but that was denied because the officer hadn’t got a warrant yet. Langham v. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Taking too long to get SW for phone violated clearly established law

NC: No standing in someone else’s cell phone pinged to find defendant

Defendant used someone else’s cell phone and officers pinged it to find him. He had no standing for the borrowed phone. After arrest, he admitted the shooting in a jail call. “Defendant’s temporary use of the phone does not automatically … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on NC: No standing in someone else’s cell phone pinged to find defendant

D.D.C.: Arrest on a warrant where defendant fled justified search incident

Defendant had a warrant for his arrest. He was seen by police, and he fled. When he was tackled to the ground and handcuffed, the officers rolled him over finding a gun in his waistband. It was a valid search … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Informant hearsay, Search incident | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Arrest on a warrant where defendant fled justified search incident

E.D.Pa.: Cell phone can’t be seized on RS and exigency then wait four days to get a SW

“The question before this Court today is whether a police officer who conducts a Terry stop can seize the smartphone of a suspect without a warrant and hold it for four days before obtaining a warrant, where the suggested exigency … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Cell phone can’t be seized on RS and exigency then wait four days to get a SW

W.D.Wash.: PC was shown for cell phone data for particular number and any number switched to, if provider knows it

Probable cause was shown for phone records for both the number sought and any number the provider knew that the owner had changed to, even without identifying it. And, good faith applied: “Therefore, even if the continuity provision within the … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Particularity | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: PC was shown for cell phone data for particular number and any number switched to, if provider knows it

E.D.Wis.: Putting iPhone in airplane mode was reasonable, even if it was a search

Even if the officer putting defendant’s cell phone in airplane mode to protect the contents was a search, it was reasonable. Also, it yielded no evidence to suppress. United States v. Schroeder, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 256464 (E.D. Wis. Dec. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Putting iPhone in airplane mode was reasonable, even if it was a search

Reason: CBP Agents Held This U.S. Citizen for Hours Until He Agreed To Let Them Search His Electronic Devices

Reason: CBP Agents Held This U.S. Citizen for Hours Until He Agreed To Let Them Search His Electronic Devices by Jacob Sullum (“A federal lawsuit argues that the agency’s policy of perusing travelers’ personal data without a warrant or probable … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on Reason: CBP Agents Held This U.S. Citizen for Hours Until He Agreed To Let Them Search His Electronic Devices

AR: Defendant claiming they were searching her place was sufficient for probation search waiver

The premises was subject to defendant’s search waiver on file. At court she disputed the state proved it was her place, but, at the time of the search, she and a friend said that it was her place. Inside, her … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Probation / Parole search, Strip search | Comments Off on AR: Defendant claiming they were searching her place was sufficient for probation search waiver

D.D.C.: 1/6 pardonee doesn’t state claim under FTCA for having to go to trial

Plaintiff has a 1/6 pardon. She sued over things the government did to obtain her conviction. She fails to state a claim under the FTCA for alleged disclosure of private information during the trial. “Although the FTCA waives the United … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Attenuation, Cell phones, Federal Tort Claims Act, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on D.D.C.: 1/6 pardonee doesn’t state claim under FTCA for having to go to trial

E.D.Mo.: Neither RS nor PC required for electronics search at border

Neither reasonable suspicion or probable cause is required for a border search of electronic equipment. Here, it was at Newark airport. United States v. Bill, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 234680 (E.D. Mo. Dec. 2, 2025). Defendant who had 19 prior … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Issue preclusion, Seizure, Voluntariness | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Neither RS nor PC required for electronics search at border