Category Archives: Good faith exception

N.D.Tex.: Drone flyover approved by SW led to SW for residence

In a dog fighting investigation, Dallas PD [showing great respect for the rights of a homeowner] got a drone fly over warrant for residential property. Seeing dogs chained up in a dog fighting training configuration, officers obtained a search warrant … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Drones, Good faith exception, Private search | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Drone flyover approved by SW led to SW for residence

VA: NC tracking warrant validly led to conviction in VA

North Carolina officers put a warrant approved tracker on defendant’s vehicle. That out-of-state warrant led to defendant’s conviction in Virginia. The out-of-state warrant was issued on probable cause, and it didn’t violate the Fourth Amendment tracking him in Virginia. A … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception, Qualified immunity, Scope of search, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on VA: NC tracking warrant validly led to conviction in VA

TX: If electronic search was illegal, it was harmless

The court of appeals applied the wrong standard for harm analysis from an alleged Fourth Amendment violation. The alleged illegal search of his electronics didn’t have that much to do with the fact defendant was convicted of smothering his child. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Standards of review | Comments Off on TX: If electronic search was illegal, it was harmless

S.D.W.Va.: Warrantless arrest at door for CSAM didn’t support plain view seizure of cell phone

Officers came to defendant’s house without an arrest or search warrant to arrest him for a CSAM offense. He answered the door in his underwear. They asked about cell phone and saw it and seized it. Payton applies, and the … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Good faith exception, immigration stops, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Warrantless arrest at door for CSAM didn’t support plain view seizure of cell phone

CO courts can issue subpoenas for out-of-state records

Colorado courts have jurisdiction to issue subpoenas for out-of-state records. Citation of the wrong statute in the application didn’t make it void. People v. Jargowsky, 2026 COA 66 (Sep. 3, 2026). There was no probable cause for this warrant for … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Social media warrants, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on CO courts can issue subpoenas for out-of-state records

W.D.Pa.: PC for CSLI shown

Explaining how probable cause was shown for CSLI is United States v. Maragh, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 195812 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 31, 2026),* and, of course, the good faith exception would apply, too:

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: PC for CSLI shown

E.D.Mich.: Person a cell phone was given to as gift could consent to search

Defendant gave an old cell phone to his niece. On it, she found child pornography, and she took it to the police who she showed images and texts. The officer didn’t search. She had apparent authority to consent to search … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Apparent authority, Cell phones, Consent, Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Person a cell phone was given to as gift could consent to search

CA7: Officer’s warrantless view of CSAM flagged by hash value was not unreasonable

Google and others flagged apparent CSAM by hash value alone and reported them to NCMEC which forwarded them to police where the IP address was. The officer viewed the images without a warrant and found them with names suggesting they … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Officer’s warrantless view of CSAM flagged by hash value was not unreasonable

KY: Despite lack of nexus, SW sustained under GFE

A search warrant for defendant’s place was because Customs had flagged a child sex doll coming to his house. While the state supreme court held that while nexus was lacking, it remanded for determination of the good faith exception. Looking … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on KY: Despite lack of nexus, SW sustained under GFE

CA4: Affidavit for SW provided neither nexus nor timing and even failed GFE

The affidavit for warrant here provided neither nexus nor timing to address 6740. As to all around it, yes, but not there. As to timing, as to the others, yes, but all the police had as to 6740 was 13-year-old … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Staleness | Comments Off on CA4: Affidavit for SW provided neither nexus nor timing and even failed GFE

OH1: Even with MJ use being legal, driving under influence isn’t

While small amounts of marijuana are legal in Ohio, driving under the influence is not, so the smell of burnt marijuana in a vehicle is probable cause. Also, a blunt was seen in the ashtray. State v. Sawyer, 2026-Ohio-2913 (1st … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH1: Even with MJ use being legal, driving under influence isn’t

UT: Failure to include nighttime search request in SW in violation of rule didn’t require suppression

Officers applied for a search warrant that should have been for a nighttime search but omitted that, and that violated a state rule. If they’d sought permission for a nighttime search they likely would have gotten it. The trial court … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nighttime search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on UT: Failure to include nighttime search request in SW in violation of rule didn’t require suppression

M.D.Fla.: Just because bodycam shows officer on curtilage doesn’t mean it was violated

Plaintiff misunderstands Kyllo and Jardines. Just because the officer’s bodycam showed his house doesn’t mean an illegal entry onto the curtilage occurred. Corbett v. Vargas, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161409 (M.D. Fla. July 20, 2026).* Defendant wasn’t yet seized when … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Good faith exception, Independent source, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Just because bodycam shows officer on curtilage doesn’t mean it was violated

MD: Exclusionary rule will not be applied in judicial discipline proceedings

The exclusionary rule will not be applied in judicial discipline proceedings. In re Knapp, 2026 Md. LEXIS 330 (July 17, 2026). The affidavit for the warrant may have been weak, but more information was given to the issuing magistrate which … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MD: Exclusionary rule will not be applied in judicial discipline proceedings

CA4: Cell phone non-forensic border search doesn’t require individualized suspicion

“Border searches do not require a warrant to be reasonable. And if a border search is routine, individualized suspicion is not required either. But law enforcement may not conduct a nonroutine border search without individualized suspicion. Under our precedent, forensic … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Nexus, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: Cell phone non-forensic border search doesn’t require individualized suspicion

OH7: Magistrate signing SW for something outside of territorial jurisdiction not a 4A violation

A municipal court judge issuing a search warrant for something outside his or her territorial jurisdiction is a nonfundamental error that does not require suppression of the evidence. State v. Mele, 2026-Ohio-2604, 2026 Ohio App. LEXIS 2537 (7th Dist. July … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Good faith exception, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on OH7: Magistrate signing SW for something outside of territorial jurisdiction not a 4A violation

E.D.Ark.: Bivens not extended to knock-and-announce violation and shooting; FTCA applies instead

Bivens won’t be extended to an alleged knock-and-announce violation and a police shooting of the homeowner. SCOTUS should just go ahead and abandon Bivens. It proceeds as an FTCA case. Malinowski v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148126 (E.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Nexus, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Bivens not extended to knock-and-announce violation and shooting; FTCA applies instead

E.D.N.Y.: Cell phone tower dump was with GF; issue left open by Carpenter

A tower dump warrant is an issue left open in Carpenter, 585 U.S. at 316, and the police effort here was valid under the good faith exception. United States v. Campbell, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146360 (E.D.N.Y. June 30, 2026):

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Cell phone tower dump was with GF; issue left open by Carpenter

CA6: The SW affidavit here was thin, but it wasn’t completely bare bones, so GFE applies

After controlled buys from defendant’s house, two separate police departments prepared search warrants for his place, and they were presented together. One was signed. Defendant moved to suppress contending there was no probable cause and it was so lacking that … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: The SW affidavit here was thin, but it wasn’t completely bare bones, so GFE applies

CAAF: GFE applies to cell phone’s geolocation data because of substantial basis for the search authorization

Defendant Air Force enlisted man at a base in Italy was convicted of burglary and entering quarters with the intent to assault and photograph what was an AFOSI, where his victim beat him up in the act. Geolocation data from … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CAAF: GFE applies to cell phone’s geolocation data because of substantial basis for the search authorization