D.Neb.: SW for property not overbroad and sought in GF; it objectively was a single-family home

The officers did their due diligence before the search warrant and saw only that defendant’s property was a single-family dwelling. That’s how it appeared, that’s what public records said. Therefore, they searched in good faith. United States v. Rice, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168016 (D. Neb. Sep. 18, 2024), adopting 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169301 (D. Neb. July 31, 2024).

This case involved the boarding of a vessel in Dade County, Florida by MDPD and shortly thereafter by the Coast Guard. The opening of a cabin door by MDPD officers revealed transported migrants. The CG would have found them anyway, and that’s inevitable discovery. United States v. Campton, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168174 (S.D. Fla. Sep. 18, 2024).*

The information in this drug case affidavit wasn’t stale. While some of the information was 15 months old, it was an ongoing operation with the most recent the day before the warrant was sought. United States v. Barnes, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168433 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 18, 2024).*

Reasonableness of traffic stops are determined by Terry. There was reasonable suspicion for this one. United States v. Batiste, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168409 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 13, 2024),* adopted, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167276 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 17, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Inevitable discovery, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Staleness. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.