Category Archives: Stop and frisk

N.D.Ala.: Imprecision in the SW affidavit isn’t a Franks violation

Imprecision in the affiant investigator’s words doesn’t equate to recklessness for Franks purposes. United States v. Tubbs, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73473 (N.D.Ala. Mar. 14, 2022).* Defendant’s alleged Franks violation wasn’t even material based on all the evidence that the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: Imprecision in the SW affidavit isn’t a Franks violation

DC: Possession of a knife doesn’t mean RS for possession of a firearm

A warrant for premises found a visitor there, and the record shows nothing about why he was searched and the trial court upheld it. “As discussed, the factors the trial court relied upon to validate the patdown of Mr. Bingman—his … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk, Voluntariness | Comments Off on DC: Possession of a knife doesn’t mean RS for possession of a firearm

MS: Open fields covered by state const.; warrant required for administrative search

A warrant is required for administrative searches under the Mississippi constitution, which also protects all land owned by the complainant, including open fields. Plain view is inapplicable here. The exclusionary rule applies to this administrative search and seizure. Okhuysen v. … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Open fields, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MS: Open fields covered by state const.; warrant required for administrative search

D.Conn.: CI was personally involved in info he provided, and he was further corroborated by an unrelated wiretap

The CI here was untested for prior reliability, but the information was detailed and had the CI’s personal involvement. Moreover, an unrelated wiretap provided some corroboration of the CI’s involvement. This probable cause finding is not a close call. If … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.Conn.: CI was personally involved in info he provided, and he was further corroborated by an unrelated wiretap

N.D.Fla.: § 2241 habeas can’t be used to review another USDJ’s denial of a motion to suppress

A defendant can’t use a 2241 habeas as a way to appeal denial of a motion to suppress by another district judge. Butler v. Cook, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 247876 (N.D.Fla. Nov. 30, 2021). Controlled buys from defendant a few … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Probable cause, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on N.D.Fla.: § 2241 habeas can’t be used to review another USDJ’s denial of a motion to suppress

MA: Driver’s and passenger’s conduct during traffic stop helped create RS for frisk of passenger in backseat

During a traffic stop, the driver and front seat passenger were argumentative and threatening for a fight. The officers surmised that this was a distraction from the vehicle because it could have a firearm in it. On the totality, there … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MA: Driver’s and passenger’s conduct during traffic stop helped create RS for frisk of passenger in backseat

CA6: Officer routinely asking “about drugs, weapons, and dead bodies” during traffic stops doesn’t unreasonably extend them

Officer “Mathieson testified that it is his habit to ask about drugs, weapons, and dead bodies during traffic stops. In any event, police officers are permitted to stop a vehicle for a traffic violation and look for evidence of a … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA6: Officer routinely asking “about drugs, weapons, and dead bodies” during traffic stops doesn’t unreasonably extend them

TX2: Unlawful stop-and-frisk leads to suppression of patdown and search and abandonment during flight

Defendant’s stop was without reasonable suspicion. His alleged consent was not voluntary and his flight and abandonment were not attenuated but were caused by the illegal stop and frisk. Massey v. State, 2021 Tex. App. LEXIS 9820 (Tex. App. – … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Attenuation, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on TX2: Unlawful stop-and-frisk leads to suppression of patdown and search and abandonment during flight

IL: Def’s stop and obtaining DL was permitted by Terry so alleged illegal arrest is moot point

Officers had sufficient information for a Terry stop. They arrested defendant and got his DL and identifiers. Even if the arrest was illegal, the Terry stop would not have been and the same information would have been available. Therefore, there … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Arrest or entry on arrest, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IL: Def’s stop and obtaining DL was permitted by Terry so alleged illegal arrest is moot point

N.D.Ind.: Arrestee left out in cold in t-shirt stated 4A claim

Plaintiff states a Fourth Amendment claim that he was arrested and left outside in the snow in jeans and a t-shirt for more than 30 minutes. Bolin v. Prater, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 225777 (N.D.Ind. Nov. 23, 2021). Leaving drugs … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Arrestee left out in cold in t-shirt stated 4A claim

OH11: No standing in father’s cell phones even when communicating with defense experts

Defendant is charged with killing his wife. He didn’t have standing to challenge a search warrant for his father’s cell phones where attorney-client privilege in their contents was asserted because the father was communicating with expert witnesses in his case. … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Privileges, Standing, Stop and frisk, Voluntariness | Comments Off on OH11: No standing in father’s cell phones even when communicating with defense experts

CA8: Merely asking for ID not a seizure

Merely asking for ID is not a seizure. “Officer Hotz’s conduct would not have communicated to a reasonable person that he could not leave. Officer Hotz was alone, she did not display a weapon, she did not touch the defendants, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Seizure, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA8: Merely asking for ID not a seizure

Cal.2: Either RS or PC required for order to put hands on hood of police car

There was neither probable cause nor reasonable suspicion to order defendant to put his hands on the hood of the police car, and it was a seizure without justification. “We conclude that there was neither probable cause to arrest appellant … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on Cal.2: Either RS or PC required for order to put hands on hood of police car

N.D.Ohio: Frisk just for “officer safety” during traffic stop was unreasonable

Defendant was stopped for having no rearview mirror inside. A frisk for weapons for “officer safety” was unwarranted. Motion to suppress granted. United States v. Jarvis, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 199592 (N.D.Ohio Oct. 18, 2021). The officer’s alleged violation of … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Frisk just for “officer safety” during traffic stop was unreasonable

TX5: Consent to a blood draw is also consent to its testing

Consent to a blood draw is also consent to its testing. Schulz v. State, 2021 Tex. App. LEXIS 7748 (Tex. App. – Dallas Sept. 21, 2021). “Citizens have long-cherished constitutional rights which deserve our protection. Law enforcement officers have difficult … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on TX5: Consent to a blood draw is also consent to its testing

NJ: After a patdown, new facts at the scene can support a second one

After a patdown, new facts at the scene can support a second one. State v. Carrillo, 2021 N.J. Super. LEXIS 123 (Sept. 17, 2021). “Here, the totality of the circumstances—Traylor’s regular use of a vehicle that was observed recently at … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on NJ: After a patdown, new facts at the scene can support a second one

OH12: Second patdown in crotch area by male officer wasn’t unreasonable

A female officer patted this male defendant down, but she did not go around the crotch area. For officer safety, a male officer followed up and did. This was reasonable, and the contraband was found by plain feel. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Stop and frisk, Waiver | Comments Off on OH12: Second patdown in crotch area by male officer wasn’t unreasonable

OH2: Old arrest for weapons charge made patdown after jaywalking stop in high crime area reasonable

Jaywalking stop in a high crime drug area led to officers finding about years’ old prior arrest for weapons. It was not unreasonable to pat defendant down. There admittedly was no other suggestion of criminality. State v. Allen, 2021-Ohio-3047 (2d … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, DNA, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH2: Old arrest for weapons charge made patdown after jaywalking stop in high crime area reasonable

EFF: Chicago Inspector General: Police Use ShotSpotter to Justify Illegal Stop-and-Frisks

EFF: Chicago Inspector General: Police Use ShotSpotter to Justify Illegal Stop-and-Frisks by Matthew Guariglia and Adam Schwartz (“[T]he OIG report finds a pattern of CPD officers detaining and frisking civilians—a dangerous and humiliating intrusion on bodily autonomy and freedom of … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on EFF: Chicago Inspector General: Police Use ShotSpotter to Justify Illegal Stop-and-Frisks

MA: SW for firearm permitted frisk of people inside for weapons

A search warrant for defendant’s premises permitted a frisk of his person for firearms when the object of the search warrant was firearms. Commonwealth v. Suggs, 2021 Mass. App. LEXIS 91 (Aug. 4, 2021). The jury verdict for choking the … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Knock and announce, Protective sweep, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MA: SW for firearm permitted frisk of people inside for weapons