Category Archives: Stop and frisk

E.D.Mich.: Second SW for cell phone data retained by govt was valid

This is a second motion to suppress a cell phone search, the first having been denied. A copy of the phone remains with the government, the phone having been returned. The first warrant to review the contents was for human … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell, Stop and frisk, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Second SW for cell phone data retained by govt was valid

S.D.N.Y.: Stop on an NYPD I-card showing PC was reasonable

NYPD uses “I-cards” (investigation cards) which can show facts supporting probable cause. This investigation was “closed,” but the I-card still was around, and officers used it to stop and question defendant. He refused to identify himself and he ended up … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Consent, Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Probable cause, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Stop on an NYPD I-card showing PC was reasonable

E.D.Tenn.: Frisk of bag was reasonable, too

On the totality, there was reasonable suspicion for defendant’s Terry stop and then a frisk of his bag. United States v. Brooks, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231135 (E.D. Tenn. Oct. 8, 2026).* “The Court finds that Cruz’s claim fails because, … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Scope of search, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Frisk of bag was reasonable, too

CA5: Bogus traffic stop can’t support frisk

Plaintiff plausibly alleged a bogus traffic stop and so the frisk lacked reasonable suspicion and violated the Fourth Amendment. This is clearly established law. Rosales v. Lewis, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 29016 (5th Cir. Sep. 22, 2026). (Reason article here.) … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA5: Bogus traffic stop can’t support frisk

GA: No case says SW required to ask for cell phone password

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not arguing that a warrant was required for a request for a cell phone password. No case anywhere says that’s required. Reynolds v. State, 2026 Ga. LEXIS 303 (Sep. 22, 2026). The inventory search of … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Inventory, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on GA: No case says SW required to ask for cell phone password

D.P.R.: 4A violation doesn’t lead to dismissal of indictment

“Defendant cites no authority to the effect that a Fourth Amendment violation requires automatic dismissal of the indictment. Instead, he attempts to tie the alleged violations into his greater theory of outrageous government conduct under Rochin, Russell and Twigg. However, … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.P.R.: 4A violation doesn’t lead to dismissal of indictment

CA7: Smoking marijuana in public is still an arrestable offense; def’s backpack could be searched incident to it

Smoking marijuana in public is still an arrestable offense, and defendant’s backpack could be searched incident to it. United States v. Worku, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 23239 (7th Cir. Aug. 4, 2026).* Because the stop and frisk was reasonable, the … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Search incident, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA7: Smoking marijuana in public is still an arrestable offense; def’s backpack could be searched incident to it

FL3: Frisk can occur immediately after stop

The stop was with reasonable suspicion, and the frisk can occur immediately. The trial court’s holding it couldn’t has no support in law. State v. Lyles, 2026 Fla. App. LEXIS 5911 (Fla. 3d DCA Aug. 5, 2026). The CI was … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on FL3: Frisk can occur immediately after stop

Philadelphia Inquirer: Two Philadelphia police officers stopped hundreds of Black men on the street. Lawyers say the stops were illegal and racially biased.

Philadelphia Inquirer: Two Philadelphia police officers stopped hundreds of Black men on the street. Lawyers say the stops were illegal and racially biased. by Jillian Kramer (“Prosecutors have dismissed at least 24 firearms cases after defense lawyers challenged the legality … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Pretext, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on Philadelphia Inquirer: Two Philadelphia police officers stopped hundreds of Black men on the street. Lawyers say the stops were illegal and racially biased.

AtL: Sotomayor Apologizes For Possibly Hurting Kavanaugh’s Feelings Over The Racial Profiling He Invented

Above the Law: Sotomayor Apologizes For Possibly Hurting Kavanaugh’s Feelings Over The Racial Profiling He Invented by Joe Patrice

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on AtL: Sotomayor Apologizes For Possibly Hurting Kavanaugh’s Feelings Over The Racial Profiling He Invented

OH10: Parole search of cell phone can occur even when it’s taken from the property room at jail

Defendant was in jail, and his PO went to the jail and got his phone from the property room to search it. This was a reasonable search under his parole search condition. State ex rel. Woodard v. Hoying, 2026-Ohio-1351 (10th … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH10: Parole search of cell phone can occur even when it’s taken from the property room at jail

VA: Second frisk was still with RS

Defendant’s second frisk was valid, despite a prior frisk not finding anything. “We have no doubt that the situation here presented such circumstances, on the heels of a possible armed robbery with suspects on the scene and the whereabouts of … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Privileges, Standing, Stop and frisk, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on VA: Second frisk was still with RS

M.D.Fla.: In a false arrest case, the sheriff involved admitted no 4A training

In this false arrest case, the sheriff admitted he had no training in the Fourth Amendment. Harris v. Breeden, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 225584 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 17, 2025). The frisk here was without reasonable suspicion, including the bag defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standing, Stop and frisk, Warrant execution | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: In a false arrest case, the sheriff involved admitted no 4A training

E.D.Mich.: Frisk that went inside defendant’s pants was unreasonable

A frisk that went inside defendant’s pants was unreasonable. United States v. Davis, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202764 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 20, 2025). When a stop revealed a holster when the defendant got out of the vehicle, a further intrusion … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Frisk that went inside defendant’s pants was unreasonable

D.D.C.: Handcuffing def resisting patdown didn’t make it an arrest

Officers had reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop and patdown. His resistance justified handcuffs, and it still did not become an arrest until the gun was found. United States v. Gatling, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 171825 (D.D.C. Sep. 2, 2025)*:

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Handcuffing def resisting patdown didn’t make it an arrest

ATL: a “search so obviously unconstitutional that a ‘high school student’ would know it’s illegal”

ATL: Federal Judge Slams The ‘Lawlessness’ Of Trump’s D.C. Takeover by Kathryn Rubino. These guys think they have Art. II license to violate the law?

Posted in Immigration arrests, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on ATL: a “search so obviously unconstitutional that a ‘high school student’ would know it’s illegal”

OH5: Trial court erred in finding no standing when the state didn’t even raise it

The trial court erred in finding no standing when the state didn’t even raise it. State v. Reynolds, 2025-Ohio-2347, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS 2332 (5th Dist. July 2, 2025). During the stop, the driver could be ordered out of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Standing, Stop and frisk, Waiver | Comments Off on OH5: Trial court erred in finding no standing when the state didn’t even raise it

MA: Defendant fled his allegedly illegal stop, so he can’t argue attenuation when he discarded contraband in flight

The trial court erred in applying the attenuation doctrine here. Defendant claimed he was illegally stopped, but he fled and discarded contraband in flight. Commonwealth v. Diaz, 2025 Mass. LEXIS 300 (June 27, 2025). This geofence warrant was supported by … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Franks doctrine, geofence, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MA: Defendant fled his allegedly illegal stop, so he can’t argue attenuation when he discarded contraband in flight

D.N.H.: Extended border search of men on bicycles was valid

Defendant was stopped on a bicycle with backpack and bedroll with another in New Hampshire by a CBP officer who suspected they’d illegally crossed the border. They admitted they had. Suspecting they were involved with human smugglers, the officers searched … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.N.H.: Extended border search of men on bicycles was valid

S.D.Tex.: Judge shopping SW request noted, and denied again

It appears to this USMJ that the government is judge shopping. After denial of a warrant request, the government reapplied which was first assigned to another USMJ who transferred it here. Rejected again for the same reason. Defect not cured. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonableness, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Judge shopping SW request noted, and denied again