Category Archives: Inevitable discovery

S.D.N.Y.: Stop on an NYPD I-card showing PC was reasonable

NYPD uses “I-cards” (investigation cards) which can show facts supporting probable cause. This investigation was “closed,” but the I-card still was around, and officers used it to stop and question defendant. He refused to identify himself and he ended up … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Consent, Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Probable cause, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Stop on an NYPD I-card showing PC was reasonable

S.D.Ill.: Witness’s memory failure on the stand at trial didn’t support a Franks challenge

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not raising a Franks challenge mid-trial when a participant in the search warrant process had a memory failure on the stand as to something. Offutt v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231418 (S.D. Ill. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inevitable discovery, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Witness’s memory failure on the stand at trial didn’t support a Franks challenge

N.D.Ohio: Car in driveway was on curtilage and plain view prohibited

Defendant backed into his driveway and that was curtilage. The police had neither a warrant nor exigent circumstances to come and look at his car to justify a plain view of an open container than led to finding a gun. … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Car in driveway was on curtilage and plain view prohibited

OH2: Parking on the grass justified stop

Parking on the grass justified this stop. State v. Green, 2026-Ohio-3654 (2d Dist. Sep. 18, 2026).* On the totality, defendant’s stop was with reasonable suspicion of a traffic violation, and it was not unreasonably extended. State v. Livesay, 2026 Tenn. … Continue reading →

Posted in Custody, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on OH2: Parking on the grass justified stop

MS: Execution style murder in public in broad daylight was exigency to get suspect’s CSLI

Defendant’s allegedly committing an execution style murder in public in broad daylight was exigency to get his CSLI at that moment to locate him. Carpenter recognized exigency exceptions. Anderson v. State, 2026 Miss. App. LEXIS 406 (Sep. 15, 2026). Defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on MS: Execution style murder in public in broad daylight was exigency to get suspect’s CSLI

S.D.Fla.: SW for def’s house included his tent outside

The search warrant for defendant’s house included his tent outside. Gardner v. Miranda, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153610 (S.D. Fla. May 27, 2026). The officer had reasonable suspicion for a stop, so the “new crime” rationale the court of appeals … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: SW for def’s house included his tent outside

SC: DNA sample by SW two weeks before trial was independent of one three years earlier during investigation

Defendant wasn’t in custody in a murder investigation when officers obtained a DNA sample from him in 2019, they believed voluntarily. As the case came closer to trial, the defense moved to suppress it because he’d lawyered up, so they … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Independent source, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on SC: DNA sample by SW two weeks before trial was independent of one three years earlier during investigation

MS: Def consented to entry to look for his missing mother

Police entry onto defendant’s house and yard because his mother, who he lived with, was missing, and relatives called the police. After looking in the house for her, they found her decapitated in the back yard, then they got a … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MS: Def consented to entry to look for his missing mother

ID: Inevitable discovery doesn’t always require independent investigation

“[W]e hold that a finding that there was a lawful separate or independent investigation underway is not a per se requirement in every case for the inevitable discovery doctrine to apply. While a separate, untainted investigation may be the simplest … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Probable cause | Comments Off on ID: Inevitable discovery doesn’t always require independent investigation

E.D.N.Y.: Inevitable discovery doesn’t cure errors

Defendant’s cell phone was unreasonably seized and the contents suppressed. Inevitable discovery isn’t as broad as the government argues. United States v. Patchiav, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47106 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 7, 2026)*:

Posted in Cell phones, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Inevitable discovery doesn’t cure errors

D.N.M.: Impoundment of backpack not shown proper under police procedures

The impoundment of defendant’s car and his backpack from an apartment complex parking lot was not shown to be within the standardized procedures of the department. That’s the government’s burden. Motion to suppress granted. United States v. Majedi, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Impoundment of backpack not shown proper under police procedures

CA4: Def’s pants transported from hospital to jail were searched, and inevitable discovery applies

Defendant’s pants were transported from the hospital to the jail, and inevitable discovery covers their search. United States v. Gibbins, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 1432 (4th Cir. Jan. 21, 2026). The warrant for five cell phones was executed within the … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Inevitable discovery, Prison and jail searches, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA4: Def’s pants transported from hospital to jail were searched, and inevitable discovery applies

D.N.M.: Running LPN after handcuffing failed inevitable discovery

On the totality, defendant’s stop was without reasonable suspicion. Only after he was handcuffed did an officer run the LPN finding a warrant. The government fails on inevitable discovery here. United States v. Warner, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 210974 (D.N.M. … Continue reading →

Posted in Discovery, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Running LPN after handcuffing failed inevitable discovery

S.D.N.Y.: Incomplete series for Netflix was subject of SW

Netflix contracted with defendant to make a series. When it fell through after paying him $44M, they believed they’d been defrauded. The search warrant for what had been completed of the series was potential evidence and properly sought under the … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Inevitable discovery, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Incomplete series for Netflix was subject of SW

CA2: RS for stop for not pulling over for emergency vehicle

Stop was valid for failing to move over for an emergency vehicle on the side of the road. United States v. Overton, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 25125 (2d Cir. Sep. 29, 2025).* Smell of marijuana from defendant’s car was probable … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Inevitable discovery, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: RS for stop for not pulling over for emergency vehicle

S.D.Ill.: Search of room adjoining arrest wasn’t valid as SI or protective sweep

Defendant had standing as an occasional overnight guest in his ex-girlfriend’s apartment when he was there when the police arrived to arrest him. The search of another room was neither valid as a search incident or protective sweep. Motion to … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Search incident, Standards of review | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Search of room adjoining arrest wasn’t valid as SI or protective sweep

CA6: Govt. waived PC argument, but GFE carries the day

The government waived reliance on probable cause in the district court, but its good faith exception was presented and supports the search. United States v. Scales, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 18324 (6th Cir. July 21, 2025).* The magistrate’s R&R finding … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on CA6: Govt. waived PC argument, but GFE carries the day

E.D.N.Y.: Re-search of email in 2024 on a 2022 SW was unreasonable and not protected by GFE

The government seized seven years of defendants’ email records in 2022 but the FBI’s computer somehow lost it. So they re-searched the data in 2024. “The Government asserts that it accessed the full return of data received pursuant to the … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Good faith exception, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Re-search of email in 2024 on a 2022 SW was unreasonable and not protected by GFE

N.D.Iowa: Protective sweep during SW execution not confined by the warrant, if otherwise justified

While the question is close here, the protective sweep of defendant’s house during a search warrant was reasonable on the totality. Essentially, the search warrant doesn’t define the scope of a justified protective sweep. “[T]he Fourth Amendment permits law enforcement … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inevitable discovery, Protective sweep, Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Protective sweep during SW execution not confined by the warrant, if otherwise justified

NE: PBT unnecessary for PC if it’s apparent def under influence

The officer didn’t need a PBT to have probable cause for defendant’s DUI arrest. His observation of defendant was enough. State v. Porter, 33 Neb. App. 453 (Feb. 25, 2025).* Inevitable discovery applied. The community caretaking function allowed seizure of … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, FISA, Inevitable discovery, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on NE: PBT unnecessary for PC if it’s apparent def under influence