Category Archives: Consent

D.C.Cir.: Ptf stated 1A retaliation claim over civil investigative demand

Media Matters stated a claim in D.C. for First Amendment retaliation by the Texas Attorney General’s civil investigative demand for records based on not liking their reporting. Injunction affirmed. Media Matters for America v. Paxton, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 13155 … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Private search, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: Ptf stated 1A retaliation claim over civil investigative demand

D.Kan.: Can invoke Randolph objection to consent without objecting

Defendant’s live-in girlfriend consented to a search of their apartment when he was arrested and removed. He can’t invoke Randolph because he never objected. United States v. Lee, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100923 (D. Kan. May 28, 2025). Defendant’s refusal … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Particularity, Privileges | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Can invoke Randolph objection to consent without objecting

MT: Use of a flashlight to look in a parked car was not 4A violation

Police use of a flashlight to look in a car in a parking lot the officer was interested in because the operator was on probation was reasonable. State v. Roberts, 2025 MT 110, 2025 Mont. LEXIS 567 (May 27, 2025). … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search incident | Comments Off on MT: Use of a flashlight to look in a parked car was not 4A violation

MI: Taking and searching def’s cell phone after DA’s interview was not by consent

Defendant was questioned under a prosecutor’s subpoena, and they decided to take his phone to search it. The state’s argument of consent fails because he was told they were taking it and had probable cause but they didn’t. People v. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on MI: Taking and searching def’s cell phone after DA’s interview was not by consent

MI: Exigency for seeking cell phone consent doesn’t require actual knowledge def might destroy evidence on it

Defendant consented to seizure of his cell phone after officers learned there might be child sexual abuse material on it. A search warrant later issued. All this was reasonable. The officer doesn’t have to have evidence that defendant might delete … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MI: Exigency for seeking cell phone consent doesn’t require actual knowledge def might destroy evidence on it

CA3: Nodding yes to a request to search was consent

Defendant’s nodding yes to a request to search was consent to search the car. The officers might have believed he didn’t have standing since he was a mere passenger at the time. He didn’t mention facts supporting standing until at … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Consent, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA3: Nodding yes to a request to search was consent

CA9: Electronic monitoring condition of pretrial release was essentially a contract between def and court, thus consent

The Superior Court of San Francisco imposes electronic monitoring as a condition of pretrial release. Because it’s essentially a contract between the defendant and court, it’s consent to EM for release. It also does not violate state separation of powers. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, GPS / Tracking Data, Inventory, Private search, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA9: Electronic monitoring condition of pretrial release was essentially a contract between def and court, thus consent

CA7: Post search statement of promise for consent didn’t affect consent to search

“Marcure also asserts that an officer coerced his consent by promising him that no charges would be filed, but even if a statement like this can be coercive, the complaint states that the promise occurred ‘[a]fter the search was finished.’ … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Post search statement of promise for consent didn’t affect consent to search

E.D.Wis.: Affidavit’s statement def was in surveillance video was reasonable and not reckless

Officer’s statement that defendant was in a surveillance video was a reasonable conclusion, and not a reckless overstatement for Franks. United States v. Warren, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70293 (E.D. Wis. Apr. 14, 2025).* Defendant passed up a conditional plea … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Affidavit’s statement def was in surveillance video was reasonable and not reckless

NJ recognizes right to advice of counsel before request for consent

The right to advice of counsel under the Fifth Amendment has to be read together with the Fourth Amendment and a request for consent. Other states do not, but New Jersey does. Defendant was asked for consent inside his own … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on NJ recognizes right to advice of counsel before request for consent

MD: When asked if def “minded” to consent to a frisk, he consented

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, and the officer asked about whether he was armed and whether he “minded” to consent to a frisk. He argued that he had no choice but to answer, but he did have a … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Curtilage, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MD: When asked if def “minded” to consent to a frisk, he consented

E.D.Ky.: SW affidavit failed to show PC for search of house, but it wasn’t so lacking the GFE doesn’t apply

The affidavit for search warrant here was based on suspicious circumstances but doesn’t show nexus to defendant’s house that he was engaging in drug trafficking from there just from living there. “Ultimately, the evidence in the affidavit did not create … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Reasonableness, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: SW affidavit failed to show PC for search of house, but it wasn’t so lacking the GFE doesn’t apply

MT: SW obviates implied consent for BAC test

The police having obtained a search warrant for defendant’s BAC, the implied consent statute doesn’t apply. State v. Clinkenbeard, 2025 MT 54 (Mar. 25, 2025). Defendant’s long standing drug trafficking was not stale. 2022 information was refreshed by 2023 information. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Independent source, Staleness, Waiver | Comments Off on MT: SW obviates implied consent for BAC test

S.D.N.Y.:The fact that the Government intends to prove that the property belongs to Defendant does not establish standing

“The fact that the Government intends to prove that the property belongs to Defendant does not establish standing. See, United States v. Watson, 404 F.3d 163, 166 (2d Cir. 2005) (‘[D]efendant could not challenge the search of a residence merely … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Custody, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.:The fact that the Government intends to prove that the property belongs to Defendant does not establish standing

S.D.W.Va.: Def’s agreement to let police see his firearm isn’t implied consent to enter his house

Defendant’s agreement to let police see his firearm isn’t implied consent to enter his house. United States v. Arthur, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51621 (S.D. W. Va. Mar. 20, 2025). Defendant failed to plead standing in his motion to suppress … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Def’s agreement to let police see his firearm isn’t implied consent to enter his house

PA: Entry of curtilage to inquire of a chop shop in operation was reasonable

Officers saw defendant “dissecting a motor vehicle in his driveway,” i.e., running a chop shop, which they already suspected him of. They could enter the curtilage to inquire. Commonwealth v. Ewida, 2025 PA Super 67, 2025 Pa. Super. LEXIS 128 … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Curtilage, Probable cause | Comments Off on PA: Entry of curtilage to inquire of a chop shop in operation was reasonable

AK: Public court filings violate no REP

“Herndon’s argument that her rights under the Fourth Amendment were violated when the superior court ‘commingled [her] private filings making it public’ is without merit. Herndon has no reasonable expectation of privacy in information that she voluntarily submitted to the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AK: Public court filings violate no REP

VI: Wife had apparent authority to consent to search for firearm in bedroom, even if they didn’t share it

Defendant’s wife had apparent common authority to consent to a police entry while defendant slept. She led police into the home and directed them to the handgun in defendant’s bedroom closet. This satisfied co-occupant consent. They lived together, she knew … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Privileges | Comments Off on VI: Wife had apparent authority to consent to search for firearm in bedroom, even if they didn’t share it

CA10: Shooting yourself and calling 911 is consent to removing the bullet

Defendant reported he was shot by an intruder and called 911. He went to the hospital and a surgeon removed the bullet. The search warrant for his office for evidence of him shooting himself was specific and the good faith … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA10: Shooting yourself and calling 911 is consent to removing the bullet

WA: Warning of right to refuse consent search only applies to knock-and-talk

Warning of a right to refuse a consent search is only required for knock-and-talk. This was an animal cruelty case, and officers had been there repeatedly to observe horses with consent. Finally, they got a warrant to enter the enclosure … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Knock and talk, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on WA: Warning of right to refuse consent search only applies to knock-and-talk