Category Archives: Abandonment

IL: No state privacy interest in personal identifying information

“Rather, in light of the foregoing authorities, we conclude defendant has failed to establish he has a legitimate privacy interest in the personal information—e.g., his name, date of birth, height, weight, hair color, and eye color—compiled on his identification card. … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: No state privacy interest in personal identifying information

CA11: NCMEC’s cybertips are reliable enough to support PC and the GFE

NCMEC’s cybertips are reliable enough to support probable cause and the good faith exception. United States v. Gibbs, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 28546 (11th Cir. Sep. 17, 2026). Even if plaintiff could show that the official’s conduct was wrongful and … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Exclusionary rule, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: NCMEC’s cybertips are reliable enough to support PC and the GFE

D.N.J.: Pretrial detainee’s cell search and seizure of papers caused no prejudice nor revealed legal strategies

Defendant was in a federal detention center pending trial, and his cell was searched and legal materials for trial were seized. His Fourth Amendment claim fails on its face. His Sixth Amendment claim also fails because a BOP attorney screened … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Prison and jail searches, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Pretrial detainee’s cell search and seizure of papers caused no prejudice nor revealed legal strategies

CO: DNA could be seized from trash

Collecting defendant’s DNA from his trash out for collection didn’t violate the Fourth Amendment or the Colorado Constitution. People v. Anderson, 2026 COA 64 (Aug. 20, 2026) (2-1 on the state issue; a warrant should be required). Plaintiff’s claim that … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, DNA, Dog sniff, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CO: DNA could be seized from trash

D.Ariz.: SW for firearm didn’t go stale

This search warrant for a firearm wasn’t stale because firearms are kept. In any event, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Cherry, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178900 (D. Ariz. Aug. 11, 2026).* Defendant’s failure to file a post-trial … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Burden of pleading, Staleness, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: SW for firearm didn’t go stale

IN: Officers leaving car door open to facilitate drug dog entry into car violated 4A

During a traffic stop, officers left defendant’s car door open apparently so the drug dog would go in, and it did. This entry violated the Fourth Amendment. Boyd v. State, 2026 Ind. App. LEXIS 263 (Aug. 5, 2026). The inventory … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Dog sniff, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN: Officers leaving car door open to facilitate drug dog entry into car violated 4A

CA7: Controlled buy justified stop, dog sniff, and search

The controlled buy off defendant gave probable cause to search his car after he left it, irrespective of an alleged pretextual traffic stop and use of a drug dog. United States v. Randle, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 22657 (7th Cir. … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Automobile exception, Dog sniff, Issue preclusion, Privileges, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA7: Controlled buy justified stop, dog sniff, and search

FL: Violation of knock-and-announce statute doesn’t require exclusion

A violation of the knock-and-announce statute for serving search warrants doesn’t require exclusion of the evidence under Hudson, which is followed. State v. Times, 2026 Fla. LEXIS 982 (June 25, 2026). “Idling” is not a crime for a passenger vehicle … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Knock and announce, Scope of search | Comments Off on FL: Violation of knock-and-announce statute doesn’t require exclusion

Cal.4: SW not needed to test DNA abandoned in a rape

Defendant’s DNA left at the scene of two rapes was abandoned, and the state didn’t need a warrant to search it. People v. Konther, 2026 Cal. App. LEXIS 369 (4th Dist. June 12, 2026). In a drug case bench trial, … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Admissibility of evidence, DNA, Franks doctrine, Protective sweep | Comments Off on Cal.4: SW not needed to test DNA abandoned in a rape

D.Haw.: It wasn’t objectively reasonable that def’s bag had been abandoned

It was not objectively reasonable for officers to believe that defendant’s blue bag was abandoned property when it was searched. They didn’t even have a good faith belief it was abandoned, so the motion to suppress is granted. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment | Comments Off on D.Haw.: It wasn’t objectively reasonable that def’s bag had been abandoned

D.Minn.: Extending stop to run ALPR information on car was with RS

Here, the officer in a traffic stop wanted to run defendant’s LPN through ALPRs to determine whether the travel was as stated. There was reasonable suspicion to continue the stop 15 minutes for that. United States v. Moore, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Abandonment, Automatic license plate readers, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Extending stop to run ALPR information on car was with RS

D.D.C.: Placing firearm on wheel of parked car was abandonment

Police observed defendant place a firearm on the wheel of a parked car where it remained in plain view, and he was later arrested. The firearm was abandoned property, not subject to the search incident doctrine, and the DNA warrant … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Placing firearm on wheel of parked car was abandonment

CA4: Backpack dumped in flight in grandmother’s yard was abandoned

Defendant fled the police and tried dumping his backpack at his grandmother’s house. She opened the door, saw what was happening, and shut the door. Continuing to flee, he dumped the backpack on her curtilage. It was found abandoned. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment | Comments Off on CA4: Backpack dumped in flight in grandmother’s yard was abandoned

W.D.N.Y.: No IAC for not challenging search without standing

“In view of Dunnigan’s self-professed lack of any interest in or connection to the premises searched, Dunnigan’s attorney cannot be faulted for failing to challenge a search for which his client lacked standing to challenge.” United States v. Dunnigan, 2026 … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Plain view, feel, smell, Seizure, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: No IAC for not challenging search without standing

CO: Incorporated and attached affidavit to SW narrowed its scope

The warrant included the application for it as defining its scope and it was attached. That limited the time and subject matter of the search. People v. Stauch, 2026 COA 22 (Apr. 2, 2026). The inventory of defendant’s car was … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Independent source, Inventory, Particularity, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CO: Incorporated and attached affidavit to SW narrowed its scope

NY Tompkins Co.: SW used for inventory of safe in a vehicle

An ALPR told officers that the owner had a suspended DL, and that justified the stop. The passenger had an arrest warrant on him. The vehicle was impounded. Behind an unsecured panel, a digital safe was found, and it was … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY Tompkins Co.: SW used for inventory of safe in a vehicle

IN: State rule that consent to search carries with it a right to consult counsel doesn’t apply to police in another state acting on their own

Conflict of laws: Indiana’s Pirtle rule that consent searches afford a right to consult with counsel doesn’t apply to police in another state that encounter defendant and get consent to search. Mendenhall v. State, 2026 Ind. App. LEXIS 81 (Mar. … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Conflict of laws, Consent, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on IN: State rule that consent to search carries with it a right to consult counsel doesn’t apply to police in another state acting on their own

TX6: Seizing thermometer’s protective sleeve from hospital waste for DNA was reasonable

The officer getting the protective sleeve from a hospital thermometer to test for defendant’s DNA wasn’t unreasonable. Mundt v. State, 2026 Tex. App. LEXIS 2126 (Tex. App. – Texarkana Mar. 6, 2026) (unpublished). After an initial inspection of this vessel, … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, DNA, Forfeiture, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX6: Seizing thermometer’s protective sleeve from hospital waste for DNA was reasonable

E.D.Tenn.: Traffic stop with shots fired call led to valid protective sweep of car for weapon on RS

“After reviewing the evidence, the arguments of the parties, and the relevant law, the undersigned finds that the officers had both probable cause to believe Defendant had committed traffic violations and reasonable suspicion to stop the vehicle in connection with … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Traffic stop with shots fired call led to valid protective sweep of car for weapon on RS

CA6: Administrative search that is a ruse for a criminal search was clearly established as 4A violation

An administrative search that is a ruse for a criminal search was clearly established at the time this one happened. Qualified immunity denied. Generis Ent., LLC v. Donley, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 5197 (6th Cir. Feb. 19, 2026). Not the … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Administrative search, Franks doctrine, Pretext | Comments Off on CA6: Administrative search that is a ruse for a criminal search was clearly established as 4A violation