N.D.Ga.: OnStar’s data collection survives motion to dismiss, at least for now

In a case over OnStar’s data collection of driving information, GM’s motion to dismiss at this stage of the litigation is denied. While there is no reasonable expectation of privacy of what is seen on the highways, more is involved in this data collection. In re Consumer Vehicle Driving Data Tracking Collection, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88272 (N.D. Ga. Apr. 22, 2026)*:

Continue reading
Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: OnStar’s data collection survives motion to dismiss, at least for now

MA: Two isolated controlled buys 20 days before SW issued were stale

The officer’s false statement he was present for a third controlled buy satisfied Franks and was excised. Defense counsel showed that it couldn’t have happened. The remainder says two controlled buys, and these were found to be isolated transactions, the last was 20 days before the warrant issued. Because drugs dissipate relatively quickly, the warrant was stale when it issued. Suppression affirmed. Commonwealth v. Mallory, 106 Mass. App. Ct. 689 (Apr. 21, 2026).

State habeas petitioner’s Fourth Amendment claim was barred by Stone because he had the opportunity to raise it in state court. Gardiner v. Howard, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 11124 (6th Cir. Apr. 17, 2026).*

In a tax case, there was nexus to defendant’s home office for a warrant for records. The tax business operated from there. United States v. Conner, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85414 (D. Colo. Apr. 17, 2026).*

Defendant’s arrest for a hand-to-hand drug sale justified a search incident. Guzman v. State, 2026 Md. App. LEXIS 456 (App. Apr. 17, 2026).*

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Nexus, Search incident, Staleness | Comments Off on MA: Two isolated controlled buys 20 days before SW issued were stale

SCOTUS: Geofence warrant oral argument Monday

Chatrie v. United States, 25-112 (cert. granted Jan. 16, 2026; argument April 27, 2026) (ScotusBlog). Question presented: Whether the execution of the geofence warrant violated the Fourth Amendment.

It can be heard live at https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_audio/2025 10 am EDT.

Posted in geofence, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Geofence warrant oral argument Monday

CA6: Calling def a “fugitive” in the warrant affidavit wasn’t a Franks violation

The use of the word “fugitive” to describe defendant wasn’t shown to be a Franks violation. He insisted he wasn’t a fugitive. It wasn’t shown to be reckless or knowing. United States v. Brown, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 11017 (6th Cir. Apr. 17, 2026).*

Defendant’s stop was with reasonable suspicion. The warrant for his house was based on a CI whose information was corroborated. United States v. Sheehan, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 11013 (6th Cir. Apr. 17, 2026).*

“Even if Officer Tapia’s act of opening the door constituted a Fourth Amendment violation, suppression would not be warranted because the challenged evidence was discovered through an independent source:” plain view. United States v. Aguirre, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 11090 (9th Cir. Apr. 20, 2026).*

Posted in Independent source, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Calling def a “fugitive” in the warrant affidavit wasn’t a Franks violation

SCOTUS: Call about suspicious vehicle led to passengers’ flight and bad driving, and that was RS for a stop

The officer had reasonable suspicion to stop defendant because, already on alert from the late-night dispatch call about a suspicious vehicle, the officer observed every person in defendant’s car respond strangely to an approaching police car as two passengers took off running and defendant, who was in the driver’s seat, began backing out of the parking space, ignoring the car’s open back door. Defendant’s own actions, combined with the panicked flight of his companions, strongly suggested that he was engaged in unlawful conduct he wished to hide from police. District of Columbia v. R.W., 2026 U.S. LEXIS 1858 (Apr. 20, 2026) (per curiam)

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Call about suspicious vehicle led to passengers’ flight and bad driving, and that was RS for a stop

VA: 12 second question about drugs didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop that was going to take a while anyway

This was a traffic stop, and defendant had a suspended license. She was able to call her son to come to drive her and the car home, and she would not be arrested. The officer’s taking 12 seconds to ask about drugs didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop. It was going to take a while longer anyway. Commonwealth v. Knight-Walker, 2026 Va. LEXIS 27 (Apr. 16, 2026).

Under the totality of circumstances, the use of deadly force here was unreasonable under clearly established law. The district court didn’t have Barnes v. Felix, 605 U.S. 73, 80-83 (2025), to rely on, but no matter. Byers v. Painter, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 10976 (4th Cir. Apr. 17, 2026).*

The state showed logical nexus between defendant’s cell phone and his girlfriend’s murder he was accused of. The state established that the phone was with him all the time before and after it happened, so it was a valid inference he had it then. Heck v. State, 2026 Del. LEXIS 160 (Apr. 17, 2026).*

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on VA: 12 second question about drugs didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop that was going to take a while anyway

E.D.Tenn.: Application for SW was considered in detention ruling

Here, the application for the search warrant was considered on the detention question. No motion to suppress yet filed (or would one be?). United States v. Evans, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31755 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 17, 2026).

Defendant’s valid stop was for a loud muffler, confirmed by the bodycam. State v. Crowley, 2026-Ohio-1402 (5th Dist. Apr. 17, 2026).*

The USMJ found in the R&R that petitioner had meaningful review of his Fourth Amendment claim in state court. His objections to the USDJ are too general to be meaningful. Mendonca v. Warden, Madison Corr. Inst., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84785 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 17, 2026).*

Defendant was stopped for driving too long in the passing lane without passing anyone. The district court found the stop reasonable. The stop was extended from the smell of marijuana [in Colorado]. Ultimately defendant consented to a search, which was found voluntary. People v. McGee, 2026 Colo. App. LEXIS 614 (Apr. 2, 2026).*

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Consent, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Application for SW was considered in detention ruling

TN: RS didn’t develop to continue stop; second stop based on first suppressed

Defendant was subjected to two stops. The first was for suspicion of disorderly conduct, but no arrest was made and he was released because no further reasonable suspicion developed. A second stop was based on the first, and there still was no reasonable suspicion. State v. Smith, 2026 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 214 (Apr. 17, 2026).

The trial court abused its discretion in suppressing defendant’s statements made in his front yard while a search was going on inside his house. He was not in custody. State v. Russell, 2026 OK CR 15 (Apr. 16, 2026).*

Defendant claimed ineffective assistance of counsel for defense counsel not telling him that the same judge that denied the motion to suppress with adverse credibility determinations would be trying his bench trial. Denied. United States v. Murphy, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84139 (D.N.J. Apr. 16, 2026).*

Successor petitioner’s claim that he subsequently learned of allegedly new information to challenge his search is denied. He knew back in the beginning. In re Mendoza, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 10941 (11th Cir. Apr. 16, 2026).*

Posted in Custody, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: RS didn’t develop to continue stop; second stop based on first suppressed

CA4: Traffic stop immediately became firearms investigation; suppressed

The officer immediately launching into an inquiry about firearms during a traffic stop violated Rodriguez. United States v. Martin, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 10979 (4th Cir. Apr. 17, 2026):

Continue reading
Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: Traffic stop immediately became firearms investigation; suppressed

CA10: Disagreement over spelling of street name didn’t make warrant fail particularity; GFE at least would apply

“The warrant authorized a search of 10 McGinnis Street, Eufaula, OK 74432. The correct address, Mr. Davis said, was 10 Meginnis Street, Eufaula, OK 74432. And beyond the address, the warrant contained no description of the house.” The suppression hearing was over whether the warrant failed particularity. No party put in evidence a street sign. Google maps didn’t recognize McGinnis. The District Court had no definitive answer, and the good faith exception applied. The officers didn’t search the wrong place. United States v. Davis, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 10859 (10th Cir. Apr. 16, 2026).

Disclosure of the CI has nothing to do with the proof at trial, and the warrant was issued with probable cause. This isn’t a ground for 2255 relief. McKinney v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34995 (M.D. Ala. Feb. 20, 2026).*

The Fourth Amendment does not prohibit the government from obtaining the user of IP addresses. United States v. Grace, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82715 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 13, 2026).*

The defendant was wanted for murder, and the warrantless protective sweep of his place before a search warrant was obtained was reasonable because officers still had reason to believe other dangerous persons could be there. United States v. Flores, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 10890 (6th Cir. Apr. 15, 2026).*

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Particularity, Protective sweep, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA10: Disagreement over spelling of street name didn’t make warrant fail particularity; GFE at least would apply

VA: Statutory requirement to provide SW papers only applies to “places of abode”

Defendant sold drugs in a store in a controlled buy. The statute on providing a warrant and affidavit to the occupant only applies to places of abode. Blow v. Commonwealth, 2026 Va. LEXIS 29 (Apr. 16, 2026).

A narcotics officer who pistol whipped a handcuffed non-resisting suspect was convicted of excessive force on the suspect, and then lying about it. Affirmed. United States v. Cartagena, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 10703 (1st Cir. Apr. 15, 2026).*

The USDJ can’t simply override the credibility determinations of the USMJ conducting the suppression hearing. Here it was on whether one officer smelled marijuana when one did not. United States v. Calhoun, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82173 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 15, 2026).*

Defendant’s quick and apparently repeated round trips to California supported reasonable suspicion. United States v. Oakes, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82999 (D. Kan. Apr. 15, 2026).*

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on VA: Statutory requirement to provide SW papers only applies to “places of abode”

D.Idaho: Not unreasonable for PO to hand over def’s cell phone to LEO for extraction after RS developed from Snapchat app

Defendant missed a PO visit, and they went to his house. There, they got his cell phone and looked at his Snapchat app finding messages between him and a 14 year old. It was not unreasonable for them to hand the phone over to police to conduct a warrantless Cellebrite extraction of the phone. United States v. Lewis, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82689 (D. Idaho Apr. 13, 2026).

Defendant’s 5½ year old conviction is affirmed. The citizen informant was believable. People v. Flores, 2026 NY Slip Op 02215 (1st Dept. Apr. 14, 2026).*

The community caretaking function supported entering defendant’s car. He was slumped over his steering wheel in the parking lot of a closed convenience store that police were called about. Morrow v. State, 2026 Tex. App. LEXIS 3461 (Tex. App. – San Antonio Apr. 15, 2026).*

Body cavity searches in prison violate no Fourth Amendment rights unless they are punitive or excessive. Walker v. Arnold, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 10701 (9th Cir. Apr. 15, 2026).*

Posted in Body searches, Cell phones, Community caretaking function, Informant hearsay, Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Not unreasonable for PO to hand over def’s cell phone to LEO for extraction after RS developed from Snapchat app

AtL: Sotomayor Apologizes For Possibly Hurting Kavanaugh’s Feelings Over The Racial Profiling He Invented

Above the Law: Sotomayor Apologizes For Possibly Hurting Kavanaugh’s Feelings Over The Racial Profiling He Invented by Joe Patrice

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on AtL: Sotomayor Apologizes For Possibly Hurting Kavanaugh’s Feelings Over The Racial Profiling He Invented

MN: Geofence warrant was not particular

The Minnesota Constitution doesn’t categorically prohibit geofence warrants, but here the warrant was not particular as to all those swept up. Reversed and remanded to the court of appeals (rev’g State v. Contreras-Sanchez, 5 N.W.3d 151 (Minn. App. 2024)). State v. Contreras-Sanchez, 2026 Minn. LEXIS 172 (Apr. 15, 2026):

Continue reading
Posted in geofence, Particularity | Comments Off on MN: Geofence warrant was not particular

IA: Bodycam and dashcam videos undermined claim of plain view

The bodycam and dashcam videos show that the officer could not have made the plain view he claims he did of a portion of a gallon-sized Ziplock bag in defendant’s waistband. A clear video can even undermine trial court credibility determinations that are otherwise unassailable. State v. Hoskins, 2026 Iowa App. LEXIS 369 (Apr. 15, 2026) (2-1):

Continue reading
Posted in Body cameras, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on IA: Bodycam and dashcam videos undermined claim of plain view

MA: Waiting 24 hours after the alleged traffic violation to make a stop was unreasonable

Waiting 24 hours after the alleged traffic violation to make a stop was unreasonable under the state constitution. Commonwealth v. Arias, 2026 Mass. LEXIS 161 (Apr. 15, 2026):

Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on MA: Waiting 24 hours after the alleged traffic violation to make a stop was unreasonable

CA10: SW for gun three weeks after road rage incident wasn’t stale

Search warrant for a gun in defendant’s house allegedly involved in a road rage incident three weeks earlier was not stale. United States v. Becker, 168 F.4th 1337 (10th Cir. Mar. 9, 2026).

Defendant’s December 2019 conviction is affirmed. Reviewing the sealed search warrant materials, there was probable cause for the search. People v. Kinsey, 2026 NY Slip Op 02218 (1st Dept. Apr. 14, 2026).* (6½ years to get an appeal decided?)

It is not ineffective assistance of counsel to withdraw a motion to suppress in favor of a plea agreement. Lanier v. Warden, Noble Corr. Inst., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81400 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 14, 2026).*

Defendant’s detention arguments about the absence of evidence of controlled buys is for a suppression motion, not for detention. United States v. Hardison, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81423 (E.D. Tenn. Apr. 14, 2026).*

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on CA10: SW for gun three weeks after road rage incident wasn’t stale

OH10: Parole search of cell phone can occur even when it’s taken from the property room at jail

Defendant was in jail, and his PO went to the jail and got his phone from the property room to search it. This was a reasonable search under his parole search condition. State ex rel. Woodard v. Hoying, 2026-Ohio-1351 (10th Dist. Apr. 13, 2026).

The alleged private search of defendant’s phone by his wife was by joint authority, so no Fourth Amendment search claim. Ortego v. State, 2026 Tex. App. LEXIS 3421 (Tex. App. – Houston (1st Dist.) Apr. 14, 2026).*

The odor of marijuana coming off the juvenile’s person was the valid reason for his stop. In re State in the Interst of T.Q., 2026 La. App. LEXIS 666 (La. App. 1 Cir Apr. 13, 2026).*

Officers approached a group smoking pot outside a housing project, and they dispersed. Walking away can be suggestive of supporting reasonable suspicion. Defendant was grabbed and his backpack was frisked for a weapon, too. Washington v. Commonwealth, 2026 Va. App. LEXIS 213 (Apr. 14, 2026).*

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH10: Parole search of cell phone can occur even when it’s taken from the property room at jail

TX14: No REP in location information on bondsman’s GPS monitor

In the third opinion in this case, all with the same outcome, a defendant on GPS monitoring by his bondsman as a condition of release had no reasonable expectation of privacy that the information would never be given to law enforcement. Hawkins v. State, 2026 Tex. App. LEXIS 3412 (Tex. App. – Houston (14th Dist.) Apr. 14, 2026) [prior opinion, 2026 Tex. App. LEXIS 1874 (Tex. App. – Houston (14th Dist.) Feb. 26, 2026), withdrawn]:

Continue reading
Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on TX14: No REP in location information on bondsman’s GPS monitor

W.D.N.Y.: No IAC for not challenging search without standing

“In view of Dunnigan’s self-professed lack of any interest in or connection to the premises searched, Dunnigan’s attorney cannot be faulted for failing to challenge a search for which his client lacked standing to challenge.” United States v. Dunnigan, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80506 (W.D.N.Y. Apr. 13, 2026).

Officers executing a search warrant could seize property they believed to be stolen that they saw in plaintiff’s place by plain view. Alexander v. Arceneaux, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 10524 (5th Cir. Apr. 13, 2026).*

Fleeing police and then bailing from the car and running abandons what was in the car. United States v. Pierre, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79746 (N.D. Ga. Apr. 13, 2026).*

The seizure of plaintiff’s car for unpaid tickets was reasonable. Clark v. Phila. Parking Auth., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79701 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 13, 2026).*

Posted in Abandonment, Plain view, feel, smell, Seizure, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: No IAC for not challenging search without standing