Category Archives: Particularity

CT: John Doe DNA arrest warrant based on touch DNA is too general to satisfy the particularity requirement

A John Doe DNA arrest warrant based on touch DNA is too general to satisfy the particularity requirement. State v. Terrance Police, 2022 Conn. LEXIS 123 (May 10, 2022):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, DNA, Particularity | Comments Off on CT: John Doe DNA arrest warrant based on touch DNA is too general to satisfy the particularity requirement

D.Idaho: To claim GFE, govt at least should have shown the officers read the inadequate affidavit to show reasonable reliance

The affidavit for the search warrant here was for evidence of rioting issued months after the riot, and it led to finding a weapon and some drugs and a cell phone seizure and search. To invoke the good faith exception, … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Idaho: To claim GFE, govt at least should have shown the officers read the inadequate affidavit to show reasonable reliance

MO: Def’s actions when coming upon a ruse checkpoint on I-44 was RS

“[T]he procedures of the ruse drug checkpoint, coupled with Defendant’s conduct of abruptly changing lanes and taking Exit 33 at the last second, meets the standard for individualized suspicion required by Edmond and Mack.” State v. Barnum, 2022 Mo. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on MO: Def’s actions when coming upon a ruse checkpoint on I-44 was RS

NY3: SW address for 1013 Pleasant second floor permitted search when it was actually 1015 Pleasant

The address of the place to be searched in the warrant was 1013 Pleasant Street, second floor. The second floor, however, was 1015 Pleasant Street, and it was searched. The warrant is not to be view hypertechnically, and it adequately … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Particularity, Staleness | Comments Off on NY3: SW address for 1013 Pleasant second floor permitted search when it was actually 1015 Pleasant

TX: Affidavit incorporated in SW had specific description and saves SW from overbreadth argument

“The issue before us is whether the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment is satisfied if a warrant describes the place to be searched as a fraternity house as a whole without specifying a suspect’s actual room in the house, … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Particularity, Warrant papers | Comments Off on TX: Affidavit incorporated in SW had specific description and saves SW from overbreadth argument

D.C.Cir.: Admin. law: 4A claims must be brought at agency level first

In an action before the Board for Correction of Naval Records, the service member had to raise his Fourth Amendment claim before the agency or it is waived, which is what happened here. McPherson v. Del Toro, Sec’y of the … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Particularity, Waiver | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: Admin. law: 4A claims must be brought at agency level first

E.D.Ky.: Coming out of car with hands up adds to RS

“Next, Grant’s behavior once the traffic stop occurred gave police additional reasons to suspect that he was involved in criminal activity. King’s testimony and the video evidence presented during the hearing support the conclusion that Defendant Grant was attempting to … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Coming out of car with hands up adds to RS

CA8: SW not needed for parked car just driven there

A dog alert on a parked Yukon did not require a search warrant before the search. It was parked on the property of a storage facility, and it was just driven to that spot while officers were getting a warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Particularity | Comments Off on CA8: SW not needed for parked car just driven there

VA Cir.: Proposed geofence warrant lacks PC and particularity

This proposed geofence warrant fails both probable cause for what it seeks to capture and particularity. In re Info. Stored at the Premises Controlled by Google, 2022 Va. Cir. LEXIS 12 (Fairfax Co. Feb. 24, 2022):

Posted in geofence, Particularity | Comments Off on VA Cir.: Proposed geofence warrant lacks PC and particularity

W.D.Pa.: SW for what turned out to be multiunit apts is suppressed, and no GFE

The multi-unit character of the property being searched under a warrant wasn’t immediately apparent to the officers, or so they said. The court doesn’t credit that because they knew defendant was in “apartment 3” on the third floor. Post-search follow-up … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: SW for what turned out to be multiunit apts is suppressed, and no GFE

D.Conn.: This drug case SW was broad but the attachments narrowed it enough

“The warrant here, although broad, did not lack particularity in terms of data to be searched. The warrant incorporated two attachments relevant to this inquiry. See Groh v. Ramirez, 540 U.S. 551, 557-58 (2004) (establishing that a court may construe … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Conn.: This drug case SW was broad but the attachments narrowed it enough

IN: Even with a typo in the address of the place to be searched in the warrant, the correct otherwise particularly described place was searched

The address on the search warrant was wrong, but the physical description for defendant’s place was different than place with the wrong address. Defendant’s place was the target and it was searched under the warrant. The search warrant was sufficiently … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Particularity, Voluntariness, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on IN: Even with a typo in the address of the place to be searched in the warrant, the correct otherwise particularly described place was searched

PA: Cell phone SW has to protect privacy, but an internet-based crime will permit a broad search

Because of the nature of the invasion into privacy, a cell phone search has to be as limited as the search of a home, and the probable cause defines the scope of the search. All they had for starters was … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity | Comments Off on PA: Cell phone SW has to protect privacy, but an internet-based crime will permit a broad search

CA10: Cell phone search for evidence of sex trafficking could be broad; this was particular enough

The cell phone search warrant in this sex trafficking case allowed search of everything on the phone that could contain evidence of sex trafficking as defined under Oklahoma law. It was not overboard because the information sought could have taken … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity | Comments Off on CA10: Cell phone search for evidence of sex trafficking could be broad; this was particular enough

NY Queens: Cell phone SW with no time restriction overbroad

The search warrant for defendant’s cell phone sought everything on it when a limited time period was at issue. The law is settled in New York. “Here, the search warrant issued allows for an essentially unrestrained search of defendant’s cell … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NY Queens: Cell phone SW with no time restriction overbroad

CA2: SW for premises was particular despite claim part of it was multifamily

The search warrant application didn’t mention that the premises was actually a multifamily dwelling. It appeared not to be, and the IP information for a child pornography search warrant came back to that address as a whole. “Regardless of whether … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Particularity, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA2: SW for premises was particular despite claim part of it was multifamily

TX5: SW for firearms in a vehicle permitted search and seizure of GSR although not specified

Officers had a search warrant for defendant’s car for firearms, but they also searched for gunshot residue which was not particularly described. Still, searching for GSR is reasonable on execution of the warrant. Brown v. State, 2021 Tex. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Scope of search | Comments Off on TX5: SW for firearms in a vehicle permitted search and seizure of GSR although not specified

D.Nev.: Important case: SW affidavit didn’t support the breadth of cell phone search

Defendant was arrested for sex trafficking child in a reverse sting operation, and the court finds the search warrant for his telephone lacked probable cause to search it for child pornography. “That Lofstead may have attempted to purchase commercial sex … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Important case: SW affidavit didn’t support the breadth of cell phone search

WV: Witness recantation doesn’t per se eliminate PC; it is a factor to consider

A witness’s recantation is a factor for the prosecutor to consider in deciding whether to pursue charges. It does not mean that all probable cause is gone. Fall v. Ames, 2021 W. Va. LEXIS 640 (Nov. 19, 2021). The particularity … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WV: Witness recantation doesn’t per se eliminate PC; it is a factor to consider

D.Kan.: Word processing error in affidavit didn’t make a Franks issue

The reference to another unknown person in the search warrant affidavit appears to be a word processing mistake and not a material false statement for Franks purposes. Denied. United States v. Moss, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 221619 (D.Kan. Nov. 17, … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Word processing error in affidavit didn’t make a Franks issue