Monthly Archives: April 2026

CA10: SW for gun three weeks after road rage incident wasn’t stale

Search warrant for a gun in defendant’s house allegedly involved in a road rage incident three weeks earlier was not stale. United States v. Becker, 168 F.4th 1337 (10th Cir. Mar. 9, 2026). Defendant’s December 2019 conviction is affirmed. Reviewing … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on CA10: SW for gun three weeks after road rage incident wasn’t stale

OH10: Parole search of cell phone can occur even when it’s taken from the property room at jail

Defendant was in jail, and his PO went to the jail and got his phone from the property room to search it. This was a reasonable search under his parole search condition. State ex rel. Woodard v. Hoying, 2026-Ohio-1351 (10th … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH10: Parole search of cell phone can occur even when it’s taken from the property room at jail

TX14: No REP in location information on bondsman’s GPS monitor

In the third opinion in this case, all with the same outcome, a defendant on GPS monitoring by his bondsman as a condition of release had no reasonable expectation of privacy that the information would never be given to law … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on TX14: No REP in location information on bondsman’s GPS monitor

W.D.N.Y.: No IAC for not challenging search without standing

“In view of Dunnigan’s self-professed lack of any interest in or connection to the premises searched, Dunnigan’s attorney cannot be faulted for failing to challenge a search for which his client lacked standing to challenge.” United States v. Dunnigan, 2026 … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Plain view, feel, smell, Seizure, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: No IAC for not challenging search without standing

CAAF: Victim’s 4A rights were at issue, too

The military court had to also consider the Fourth Amendment rights of the victim to sensitive information the accused sought access to for trial. All things considered, even if the court martial judge was wrong denying it, it was harmless … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Military searches, Nexus, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CAAF: Victim’s 4A rights were at issue, too

D.D.C.: It took the govt years to search def’s computers, and the court has to balance that huge delay with the truth-seeking function in resolving it

In a fraud case, the government took years to search the computers. A second warrant was obtained for some. The government doesn’t get to undo the delay by a new warrant, but the deterrence rationale of the exclusionary rule applies. … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine, Inventory, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.D.C.: It took the govt years to search def’s computers, and the court has to balance that huge delay with the truth-seeking function in resolving it

OH3: Cell phone search can extend to cloud storage it’s connected to

Defendant gave consent to search his cell phone, and the court notes, without deciding, that other courts have held that such consent would reach his data stored on the cloud or another server. That issue doesn’t, however, have to be … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Curtilage, Dog sniff, Scope of search | Comments Off on OH3: Cell phone search can extend to cloud storage it’s connected to

CA4: PIT maneuver with unmarked car for detectives making a stop could be excessive force

Using an unmarked police car to stop plaintiff with a PIT maneuver requested by detectives without warning here raised sufficient factual disputes that the officers do not get summary judgment nor qualified immunity on an excessive force claim in his … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Dog sniff, Excessive force, Nexus, Seizure | Comments Off on CA4: PIT maneuver with unmarked car for detectives making a stop could be excessive force

CA4: Ptf student’s cell phone properly searched at school under T.L.O.

Plaintiff student’s cell phone was properly searched at school under T.L.O. when he was heard bragging about having explicit photographs on it at school. O.W. v. Carr, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 10241 (4th Cir. Apr. 9, 2026). Plaintiff made a … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, School searches | Comments Off on CA4: Ptf student’s cell phone properly searched at school under T.L.O.

D.Me.: Entering passcode into cell phone to see if it works is not a search

Defendant’s cell phone was seized and a warrant obtained to search it, but it was protected by a passcode and the phone was not searched. So, a couple of months later, they tried again with a new warrant. The information … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, DNA, Informant hearsay, Mail and packages, Prison and jail searches, Search | Comments Off on D.Me.: Entering passcode into cell phone to see if it works is not a search

CA10: Use of flashlight to aid a drone is still plain view

Officers were waiting for a search warrant to enter premises to look for a person. With consent of a neighbor, an officer climbed higher to use a flashlight to aid an overhead drone at night, seeing a gun on the … Continue reading

Posted in Drones, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA10: Use of flashlight to aid a drone is still plain view

D.P.R.: Def can lack standing in the place yet still be in possession to be convicted

“Furthermore, there is nothing impermissible with the Government arguing that a defendant does not have an expectation of privacy in a place to assert a Fourth Amendment violation, while arguing that the defendant possessed the evidence seized in that same … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Standing | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Def can lack standing in the place yet still be in possession to be convicted

VA: No REP in ALPR

Flock ALPR systems can’t be compared to Carpenter’s “near perfect surveillance.” Motion to suppress properly denied. There’s no reasonable expectation of privacy of public movement on the roads. Robinson v. Commonwealth, 2026 Va. App. LEXIS 199 (Apr. 7, 2026). In … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Consent, Dog sniff, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on VA: No REP in ALPR

LA4: Bodycams of warrant execution could be considered where not in evidence but parties agreed court could look

The court asked to see the bodycams about execution of the search warrant, and both sides agreed but they weren’t put into evidence. The court could still consider them. There was probable cause for a vehicle search because it was … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings, Warrant execution | Comments Off on LA4: Bodycams of warrant execution could be considered where not in evidence but parties agreed court could look

MS: Failure to include SW materials anywhere in record was waiver of issues about it

Failure to include the search warrant materials anywhere in the record, either as an attachment to the motion or an exhibit at a hearing, is waiver for appeal on whether the warrant was properly issued. Burdine v. State, 2026 Miss. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Computer and cloud searches, Issue preclusion, Protective sweep, Warrant papers | Comments Off on MS: Failure to include SW materials anywhere in record was waiver of issues about it

WaPo: Police explore teaming up with a new crime-fighting partner: AI

WaPo: Police explore teaming up with a new crime-fighting partner: AI by Katie Mettler (“The Oklahoma City Police Department is one of 35 law enforcement agencies across the country in the early stages of adopting Longeye, which its San Francisco-based … Continue reading

Posted in AI, Facial recognition, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Police explore teaming up with a new crime-fighting partner: AI

Reason: The Supreme Court’s Next Big Fourth Amendment Case

Reason: The Supreme Court’s Next Big Fourth Amendment Case by Damon Root (“At issue in the April 27 oral arguments in Chatrie v. United States is something known as a geofence warrant. It’s a law enforcement tool in which a … Continue reading

Posted in geofence | Comments Off on Reason: The Supreme Court’s Next Big Fourth Amendment Case

D.Mass.: A failed attempt at an admin warrant and Franks violation

A contractor doing remodeling to a Bearded Dragon online business told the City about health code violations on the premises after he walked off the job. A health department officer walked through with permission and noted no violations. Later, an … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Nexus, Nighttime search | Comments Off on D.Mass.: A failed attempt at an admin warrant and Franks violation

CA10: Ptf’s dismissed murder case for overlooked exculpatory evidence was still based on PC

Plaintiff was arrested for murder of his wife, but the case was dismissed without prejudice. He claimed a civil Franks violation. There was still arguable probable cause even with that which was omitted. No claim. Morphew v. Chaffee Cty., 2026 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: Ptf’s dismissed murder case for overlooked exculpatory evidence was still based on PC

CA10: Apple SW was insufficiently particular, but GFE still applies

“We agree with Kimberley that the Apple search warrant was insufficiently particularized in violation of the Fourth Amendment. However, we hold that, in the circumstances of this case, the Government has shown the good faith exception to the warrant requirement … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Nighttime search, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: Apple SW was insufficiently particular, but GFE still applies