W.D.N.Y.: No IAC for not challenging search without standing

“In view of Dunnigan’s self-professed lack of any interest in or connection to the premises searched, Dunnigan’s attorney cannot be faulted for failing to challenge a search for which his client lacked standing to challenge.” United States v. Dunnigan, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80506 (W.D.N.Y. Apr. 13, 2026).

Officers executing a search warrant could seize property they believed to be stolen that they saw in plaintiff’s place by plain view. Alexander v. Arceneaux, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 10524 (5th Cir. Apr. 13, 2026).*

Fleeing police and then bailing from the car and running abandons what was in the car. United States v. Pierre, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79746 (N.D. Ga. Apr. 13, 2026).*

The seizure of plaintiff’s car for unpaid tickets was reasonable. Clark v. Phila. Parking Auth., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79701 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 13, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Abandonment, Plain view, feel, smell, Seizure, Standing, Warrant execution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.