Category Archives: Particularity

CA11: Body slam of slighter built resisting arrestee was reasonable force

The officer’s body slam of a resisting minor suspect about half his weight was entitled to qualified immunity. “But even if the facts of our case did fit Richmond, the statement that ‘less force is appropriate’ would not put every … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Particularity | Comments Off on CA11: Body slam of slighter built resisting arrestee was reasonable force

D.S.D.: SW for 11 years of iCloud lacked all particularity and GFE didn’t save it

The warrant here authorized search of defendant’s iCloud account for 11 years worth of information despite the probable cause being limited to one event in 2022. The warrant was based on a template that authorized search of the entire account, … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on D.S.D.: SW for 11 years of iCloud lacked all particularity and GFE didn’t save it

OR: SW not particular for wholesale digital searches

The electronic search categories any digital storage devices in this search warrant are not particular under the state constitution. Remanded for determination of remedy. State v. Curry, 336 Or. App. 72 (Nov. 6, 2024):

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Particularity, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: SW not particular for wholesale digital searches

E.D.Pa.: Remedy for illegal search is to move to suppress, not to dismiss the case

A ground to suppress a search belongs in a motion to suppress, not to dismiss the indictment. United States v. Bailey, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 198707 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 31, 2024). The search warrant didn’t provide the address of the … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Motion to suppress, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Remedy for illegal search is to move to suppress, not to dismiss the case

E.D.N.C.: Search incident of bag of handcuffed suspect surrounded by six officers was unreasonable

Search incident of bag of a handcuffed defendant surrounded by six officers and being attended by paramedics was unreasonable. “The Government argues that Allen could have slipped free of his handcuffs and lunged for the bags, but such gymnastics are … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Probable cause, Search incident | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Search incident of bag of handcuffed suspect surrounded by six officers was unreasonable

CA2: 4A doesn’t incorporate state procedural rules and statutes

The constitution doesn’t incorporate state criminal procedural rules and statutes, and a violation of them doesn’t make a Fourth Amendment violation. See Virginia v. Moore. McCullough v. Graves, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 27503 (2d Cir. Oct. 30, 2024). The address … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA2: 4A doesn’t incorporate state procedural rules and statutes

NC: Defendant abandoned this real property

Defendant abandoned this real property. State v. Moore, 2024 N.C. App. LEXIS 806 (Oct. 15, 2024). Failure to renew a motion to suppress when the evidence is offered is waiver in this state. State v. Rowdy, 2024 N.C. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Particularity, Scope of search | Comments Off on NC: Defendant abandoned this real property

CA1: Church rectory was objectively a single family dwelling; it had common living areas

It was reasonable for officers seeking a search warrant for a church rectory for child pornography to consider it a single-family dwelling. All the objective information was that it was single family residence. It turned out to be a residence … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA1: Church rectory was objectively a single family dwelling; it had common living areas

D.Neb.: SW for property not overbroad and sought in GF; it objectively was a single-family home

The officers did their due diligence before the search warrant and saw only that defendant’s property was a single-family dwelling. That’s how it appeared, that’s what public records said. Therefore, they searched in good faith. United States v. Rice, 2024 … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Neb.: SW for property not overbroad and sought in GF; it objectively was a single-family home

OR: The burden on whether the affidavit was with the warrant at the search is on defendant

When the affidavit satisfies particularity but the defendant alleges the warrant doesn’t, he has the burden of proving that both were not attached to each other or at the scene of the search for guidance. State v. Goode, 335 Or. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell site location information, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on OR: The burden on whether the affidavit was with the warrant at the search is on defendant

D.Minn.: “Cars on the property” was particular enough for SW

“Cars on the property” was particular enough for the search warrant for defendant’s property. United States v. Stucky, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166040 (D. Minn. Sep. 16, 2024). Plaintiff inmate stated enough to proceed that he was subjected to harassing … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on D.Minn.: “Cars on the property” was particular enough for SW

N.D.Cal.: iCloud SW was particular as to subject and time

This iCloud warrant was based on probable cause and was particular and had a specific time limit. “Certain of the categories of evidence authorized for seizure by the February iCloud Warrant may appear overbroad in isolation but are sufficiently particular … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Particularity | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: iCloud SW was particular as to subject and time

CA4: Def left car door open in traffic stop and that enabled plain view

Defendant’s stop was valid, and he got out of the car leaving the door open. The officer could see the firearm in the car, and that’s plain view. United States v. Bailey, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 20336 (4th Cir. Aug. … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Particularity, Plain view, feel, smell, Waiver | Comments Off on CA4: Def left car door open in traffic stop and that enabled plain view

E.D.Mich.: Without showing no PC on remainder of affidavit, Franks challenge fails

Defendant’s Franks challenge fails because he doesn’t show that the affidavit does not show probable cause on the remainder. United States v. Chappell, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140479 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 7, 2024).* The officers apparently didn’t know that the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Particularity, Plain view, feel, smell, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Without showing no PC on remainder of affidavit, Franks challenge fails

NY2: Stopping car for flashing headlights was properly taken as a possible distress call; but stop was excessive

Defendant’s flashing his high beams at a patrol car was legitimately taken as a likely distress call, but the state failed to prove there was any distress, so the continued questioning was unreasonable. People v. Serrano, 2024 NY Slip Op … Continue reading

Posted in Digital Searches, Good faith exception, Particularity, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on NY2: Stopping car for flashing headlights was properly taken as a possible distress call; but stop was excessive

WA: Using software to search a cell phone doesn’t violate particularity

Use of software to search a cell phone did not violate the particularity of the warrant. The Fourth Amendment and the state constitution are intended to prevent a general rummaging, and the use of software facilitates people not looking at … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Informant hearsay, Particularity | Comments Off on WA: Using software to search a cell phone doesn’t violate particularity

E.D.N.C.: Military command authorized search for CP on electronics was valid; listing IP addresses of devices not required

Defendant was in the Marine Corps and a Command Authorized Search and Seizure (CASS) for his electronic devices was executed for child pornography. It was sufficiently particular to satisfy the Fourth Amendment. “In this case, the challenged warrant did not … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Military searches, Particularity, Pretext | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Military command authorized search for CP on electronics was valid; listing IP addresses of devices not required

NY4: Cell phone SW suppressed for no showing of PC or particularity

“Here, the search warrant authorized and directed the police to search for, inter alia, ‘cellular phones (including contents)’ located in defendant’s vehicle. Significantly, the search was not restricted by reference to any particular crime. Thus, the search warrant failed to … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on NY4: Cell phone SW suppressed for no showing of PC or particularity

DE: Def counsel’s failure to challenge PC and particularity in cell phone search warrants post-conviction relief

Defendant sufficiently stated grounds for ineffective assistance of counsel from defense counsel’s failure to challenge the search warrant for lack of probable cause and particularity. “Postconviction relief due to ineffectiveness of counsel must be granted in circumstances where the Court … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Custody, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on DE: Def counsel’s failure to challenge PC and particularity in cell phone search warrants post-conviction relief

CA10: State SW for place in Indian country was done in good faith and is not suppressed

A state search warrant issued by a Tulsa state judge for a place in Indian country was done in good faith at the time under McGirt and would not be suppressed. United States v. Bailey, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 15210 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA10: State SW for place in Indian country was done in good faith and is not suppressed