Category Archives: Reasonableness

W.D.Mich.: State law violation in search irrelevant in federal prosecution

Defense counsel can’t be ineffective for not arguing that state law was violated by the search in his federal case. Clark v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219107 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 4, 2024).* Defense counsel could not be ineffective … Continue reading

Posted in Conflict of laws, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Mich.: State law violation in search irrelevant in federal prosecution

CA9: Arrest on mistaken warrant was objectively reasonable

Defendant’s arrest on a mistaken warrant was still objectively reasonable. The officer did all he could to verify defendant was the right guy. United States v. Nomee, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 30533 (9th Cir. Dec. 4, 2024):

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA9: Arrest on mistaken warrant was objectively reasonable

Leftovers

2255 petitioner fails to show grounds for a CoA from his search claims, without telling us the rationale. United States v. Renteria, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 30239 (5th Cir. Nov. 26, 2024).* Defendant’s stop and frisk was without reasonable suspicion. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Stop and frisk, Strip search | Comments Off on Leftovers

IL: Arrest on recalled AW not suppressed where officers checked and rechecked it

Officers checked a law enforcement database and found an arrest warrant on defendant. They rechecked. Afterward, it turned out the warrant had been recalled but was still in the system due to a clerical error. The court will not suppress … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IL: Arrest on recalled AW not suppressed where officers checked and rechecked it

MO: Plain error doesn’t revive a waived search claim

Defendant didn’t object pretrial or at trial to the search, and he can’t argue plain error now. State v. Lane, 2024 Mo. App. LEXIS 837 (Nov. 19, 2024). The finding defendant was stopped because of a seatbelt violation is not … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Mistake of law, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness, Waiver | Comments Off on MO: Plain error doesn’t revive a waived search claim

FL3: There is a lower expectation of privacy in a boat than in a car; stop for license, registration, and safety inspection was reasonable

“The [Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission officers] had authority to stop the boat to inspect licenses, registration, and safety equipment. State v. Casal, 410 So. 2d 152, 155 (Fla. 1982) (‘In sum we find that the state’s interest in random … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness | Comments Off on FL3: There is a lower expectation of privacy in a boat than in a car; stop for license, registration, and safety inspection was reasonable

TX12: Texas livestock officer lacked general law enforcement powers

A special ranger employed by the Texas & Southwest Cattle Raisers Association (TSCRA) recognized as part of the Texas DPS held himself out to be a law enforcement officer. Special rangers are limited to livestock and limited offenses. Instead, he … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Exclusionary rule, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on TX12: Texas livestock officer lacked general law enforcement powers

CA2: 4A doesn’t incorporate state procedural rules and statutes

The constitution doesn’t incorporate state criminal procedural rules and statutes, and a violation of them doesn’t make a Fourth Amendment violation. See Virginia v. Moore. McCullough v. Graves, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 27503 (2d Cir. Oct. 30, 2024). The address … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA2: 4A doesn’t incorporate state procedural rules and statutes

N.D.Cal.: Checking DMV and criminal history during a traffic stop not unreasonable

Checking DMV and criminal history during a traffic stop is not unreasonable. United States v. Daniels, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190101 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2024). Defendant “argues that the bodycam evidence refutes Trooper Myer’s testimony that the truck and … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Informant hearsay, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Checking DMV and criminal history during a traffic stop not unreasonable

S.D.W.Va.: The fact officers planned to stop def doesn’t mean they weren’t credible when they said he committed a traffic violation to justify it

Just because officers planned to stop defendant if they had a traffic offense to justify it doesn’t mean that they weren’t credible when they testified there was a traffic violation. United States v. Murphy, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189184 (S.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext, Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: The fact officers planned to stop def doesn’t mean they weren’t credible when they said he committed a traffic violation to justify it

D.Colo.: Failure to produce paperwork promptly justifies an extension of the stop

Defendant’s failure to promptly produce the insurance information and registration on his car justified ordering him out of the car and reasonably extended the stop. United States v. Malone, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188452 (D. Colo. Oct. 16, 2024).* 2254 … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on D.Colo.: Failure to produce paperwork promptly justifies an extension of the stop

CA5: The 4A doesn’t limit the number of officers that show up for an administrative search

This administrative search was valid. The number of officers showing up to do it isn’t a constitutional question. “Nor does the number of officers conducting the search change the inquiry. Hershner asserts no jurisprudential authority for the proposition that a … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Privileges, Protective sweep, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA5: The 4A doesn’t limit the number of officers that show up for an administrative search

CA10: State officers investigating murder on an Indian reservation without jurisdiction does not lead to suppression of evidence

State law enforcement officers investigated a murder on the Muscogee Creek Reservation which at the time was not necessarily legal but two years later was not. The murder was prosecuted in federal court. There is no dispute the officers lacked … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA10: State officers investigating murder on an Indian reservation without jurisdiction does not lead to suppression of evidence

CT: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil cases, here one over animal neglect

The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to civil cases, here an action over who gets possession of neglected animals. State ex rel. Dunn v. Connelly, 2024 Conn. App. LEXIS 268 (Oct. 8, 2024). This is a DUI on federal property. Even … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CT: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil cases, here one over animal neglect

D.Md.: Waiting for backup doesn’t unreasonably extend a stop under Rodriguez

Waiting for backup is for legitimate safety concerns and does not unreasonably extend a stop under Rodriguez. United States v. Bagayoko, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185066 (D. Md. Oct. 9, 2024):

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Md.: Waiting for backup doesn’t unreasonably extend a stop under Rodriguez

OH: Even when the driver isn’t the owner with a suspended DL, it’s not unreasonable to ask for his DL

The stop was because the vehicle owner had an expired DL. When the officer discovers the driver is not the owner, the officer does not act unreasonably in asking for the driver’s DL. State v. Dunlap, 2024-Ohio-4821, 2024 Ohio LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OH: Even when the driver isn’t the owner with a suspended DL, it’s not unreasonable to ask for his DL

D.P.R.: Officer’s construction of traffic law was “ardous” and unreasonable under Heien

The officer’s conclusion defendant violated a U-turn statute was unreasonable, and the motion to suppress is granted. “While mistakes of law based on arduous questions of statutory interpretation may justify an officer’s judgment, a poor study of the law cannot … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Private search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Officer’s construction of traffic law was “ardous” and unreasonable under Heien

D.N.H.: Federal case can rely on state SW

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not challenging the search warrant in his federal case that was issued by a state court judge because it wouldn’t win. Lessard v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180669 (D.N.H. Oct. 3, 2024).* … Continue reading

Posted in Due process, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.N.H.: Federal case can rely on state SW

MN: Order for buccal swab during pendency of case requires SW

A search warrant is required for a buccal swab after a criminal case is proceeding. State v. Steeprock, 2024 Minn. App. LEXIS 345 (July 29, 2024); State v. Jones, 2024 Minn. App. LEXIS 412 (Aug. 29, 2024). The search warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, DNA, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on MN: Order for buccal swab during pendency of case requires SW

D.S.D.: Misidentifying cell phone make in SW no error where number and pass code were correct

Misidentifying defendant’s cell phone for a search warrant as a Motorola when it was a Samsung is a mistake that can be overlooked. It had the phone number in the warrant and defendant’s pass code opened it. Finally, the good … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Prison and jail searches, Reasonableness, Waiver, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Misidentifying cell phone make in SW no error where number and pass code were correct