Category Archives: Reasonableness

WA: There was an objective basis for this stop even if with pretext

There was an objective basis for defendant’s stop, even if the officer had subjective motives. State v. Olson, 2025 Wash. App. LEXIS 423 (Mar. 11, 2025).* Defendant was in prison for about 20 years and there were phone calls between … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on WA: There was an objective basis for this stop even if with pretext

M.D.Tenn.: State court’s order permitting entry past a privacy fence to serve civil process made entry reasonable

A state court order that gave officers permission to enter past plaintiff’s privacy fence to serve him with a summons was sufficient to grant them at least qualified immunity or was reasonable for the entry alleged to be in violation … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: State court’s order permitting entry past a privacy fence to serve civil process made entry reasonable

CA11: The questions that extended the stop were for officer safety and thus reasonable

The questions here alleged to have prolonged the stop were primarily related to officer safety and weapons and not drugs. Therefore, they were reasonable. United States v. Green, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 3856 (11th Cir. Feb. 20, 2025). There was … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA11: The questions that extended the stop were for officer safety and thus reasonable

OK: Officer outside territorial jurisdiction isn’t a 4A issue

An officer outside his territorial jurisdiction making an arrest does not implicate the Fourth Amendment. Virginia v. Moore. “As previously stated, Appellant does not challenge that Morgan had probable cause to stop him, or that the search of his vehicle … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OK: Officer outside territorial jurisdiction isn’t a 4A issue

CA7: No “rule of thumb” for the Rodriguez moment

There’s no specific amount of time to elapse for a stop to be unreasonable under Rodriguez. All things considered, this was reasonable for six minutes. Other cases in this circuit have upheld them at 14 minutes. United States v. Devalois, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA7: No “rule of thumb” for the Rodriguez moment

NV: Not IAC to not object to CSLI business records after motion to suppress lost

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not objecting to the CSLI records which were coming in in any event as business records. He’d objected before trial to the search and lost, and that was argued on direct appeal and lost. State … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NV: Not IAC to not object to CSLI business records after motion to suppress lost

D.P.R.: State nighttime search rule on state warrant inapplicable in federal court

The fact a state nighttime search warrant doesn’t comply with state law doesn’t matter in federal court. It’s whether Rule 41 and the Fourth Amendment were complied with. Then, the defendant has to show prejudice. Also, the fact defendant had … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Issue preclusion, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on D.P.R.: State nighttime search rule on state warrant inapplicable in federal court

S.D.Ala.: Failure to timely make SW return under state law not a 4A issue

The fact the search warrant paperwork wasn’t returned on time which made it void under state law isn’t relevant under the Fourth Amendment in federal court. Jackson v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 235912 (S.D. Ala. Dec. 4, 2024), … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonableness, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d), Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.Ala.: Failure to timely make SW return under state law not a 4A issue

E.D.Mo.: No claim where no damages shown for alleged unreasonable dog sniff; nothing was found, detention was otherwise reasonable

Officers were surveilling a van that they believed might have a connection to an unsolved homicide. They observed what appeared to be hand-to-hand drug transactions, and the van’s LPN was expired. They approached. There were others around the van, and … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Dog sniff, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: No claim where no damages shown for alleged unreasonable dog sniff; nothing was found, detention was otherwise reasonable

N.D.Cal.: Violation of CalECPA has nothing to do with federal rights

Violation of CalECPA has nothing to do with federal rights. United States v. Wenger, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1331 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2025). At the time of the warrant, it was not established that the accused had to have … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Violation of CalECPA has nothing to do with federal rights

KY: Stop based on a statute not yet in effect isn’t a reasonable mistake of law

Defendant’s stop based on a vehicle equipment law that had not yet gone into effect was not saved by Heien. As in: when the law’s not yet law, there can’t be a reasonable mistake about its application. “An officer cannot … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on KY: Stop based on a statute not yet in effect isn’t a reasonable mistake of law

D.Mass.: 17-day delay between seizure and SW was reasonable

“[T]he government’s seventeen-day delay between the warrantless seizure of Thompson’s property and the issuance of the search warrants was reasonable. The first factor favors the government because seventeen days—eleven of which were business days—is relatively short and far shorter than … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Mass.: 17-day delay between seizure and SW was reasonable

CA6: 4A’s “reasonable officer” “is a hypothetical construct of the law, one that no district court can cross-examine”

“But the Fourth Amendment’s ‘reasonable officer’ is not a real officer with real subjective thoughts and feelings. It is a hypothetical construct of the law, one that no district court can cross-examine.” United States v. Urraca, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA6: 4A’s “reasonable officer” “is a hypothetical construct of the law, one that no district court can cross-examine”

E.D.Pa.: Cover story at time of justified stop didn’t make it unreasonable

Months of electronic surveillance gave probable cause for defendant’s stop and search. Police use of a cover story for the stop was reasonable to prevent other co-conspirators from finding out. United States v. Arrington, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 222969 (E.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Cover story at time of justified stop didn’t make it unreasonable

W.D.Mich.: State law violation in search irrelevant in federal prosecution

Defense counsel can’t be ineffective for not arguing that state law was violated by the search in his federal case. Clark v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219107 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 4, 2024).* Defense counsel could not be ineffective … Continue reading

Posted in Conflict of laws, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Mich.: State law violation in search irrelevant in federal prosecution

CA9: Arrest on mistaken warrant was objectively reasonable

Defendant’s arrest on a mistaken warrant was still objectively reasonable. The officer did all he could to verify defendant was the right guy. United States v. Nomee, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 30533 (9th Cir. Dec. 4, 2024):

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA9: Arrest on mistaken warrant was objectively reasonable

Leftovers

2255 petitioner fails to show grounds for a CoA from his search claims, without telling us the rationale. United States v. Renteria, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 30239 (5th Cir. Nov. 26, 2024).* Defendant’s stop and frisk was without reasonable suspicion. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Stop and frisk, Strip search | Comments Off on Leftovers

IL: Arrest on recalled AW not suppressed where officers checked and rechecked it

Officers checked a law enforcement database and found an arrest warrant on defendant. They rechecked. Afterward, it turned out the warrant had been recalled but was still in the system due to a clerical error. The court will not suppress … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IL: Arrest on recalled AW not suppressed where officers checked and rechecked it

MO: Plain error doesn’t revive a waived search claim

Defendant didn’t object pretrial or at trial to the search, and he can’t argue plain error now. State v. Lane, 2024 Mo. App. LEXIS 837 (Nov. 19, 2024). The finding defendant was stopped because of a seatbelt violation is not … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Mistake of law, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness, Waiver | Comments Off on MO: Plain error doesn’t revive a waived search claim

FL3: There is a lower expectation of privacy in a boat than in a car; stop for license, registration, and safety inspection was reasonable

“The [Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission officers] had authority to stop the boat to inspect licenses, registration, and safety equipment. State v. Casal, 410 So. 2d 152, 155 (Fla. 1982) (‘In sum we find that the state’s interest in random … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness | Comments Off on FL3: There is a lower expectation of privacy in a boat than in a car; stop for license, registration, and safety inspection was reasonable