Category Archives: Plain view, feel, smell

D.N.M.: Obtaining def’s juvenile records by subpoena is not a “search”; no REP

The government’s subpoena for defendant’s juvenile case records is granted. The government can show relevance and admissibility at trial. Defendant focuses on his Fourth Amendment claim which is rejected. No case says there is a reasonable expectation of privacy against … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Obtaining def’s juvenile records by subpoena is not a “search”; no REP

W.D.N.Y.: Possibility of co-conspirators in mass murder justified emergency disclosure request to Apple, Verizon, and Facebook

In the Buffalo Tops Grocery mass shooting, the emergency disclosure request to Apple, Facebook, and Verizon was based on the possibility there were coconspirators. Even though defendant’s manifesto said he was acting alone, investigators didn’t have to take that at … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell, Prison and jail searches, Social media warrants | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Possibility of co-conspirators in mass murder justified emergency disclosure request to Apple, Verizon, and Facebook

D.Ariz.: Looking over ptf’s fence violated no REP

Looking over a fence into plaintiff’s yard violated no reasonable expectation of privacy. Henry v. Pinal Cty. Cmty. Coll. Dist., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97301 (D. Ariz. May 4, 2026). Defendant was arrested on an outstanding murder warrant, and the … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Looking over ptf’s fence violated no REP

CA3: Smell of MJ but none found can still be PC

The smell of marijuana is probable cause even if none is found in the subsequent search. The absence of marijuana only mitigates the probable cause, not eliminate it. United States v. Loveings, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 17330 (3d Cir. June … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA3: Smell of MJ but none found can still be PC

CA6: The smell of burnt MJ in a car is still PC for driving under influence even where personal possession is legal.

“Possession of recreational marijuana may be legal in Missouri, but ‘[o]perating or being in physical control of any motor vehicle … while under the influence of marijuana’ is not. Mo. Const. art. XIV § 2(3)(1)(d). Considering the strong odor of … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: The smell of burnt MJ in a car is still PC for driving under influence even where personal possession is legal.

MA: When a likely Franks violation comes out at trial, def gets to reopen the suppression issue

When a likely Franks violation comes out at trial, defendant gets to reopen the suppression issue. Here, the officer’s false statement he was present for a third controlled buy satisfied Franks and was excised. Defense counsel showed that it couldn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Neutral and detached magistrate, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on MA: When a likely Franks violation comes out at trial, def gets to reopen the suppression issue

D.Ariz.: No constitutional obligation for officers to keep investigating past having PC

“To the extent that Plaintiffs’ claim is based on Defendant Pelham’s failure to conduct a more thorough investigation before seeking a warrant, it likewise fails. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants ‘failed to undertake minimally adequate investigative steps before seeking a warrant[.]’ … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: No constitutional obligation for officers to keep investigating past having PC

CA10: Officer’s peering through 1″ gap in curtains from outside was plain view

Denial of rehearing en banc: United States v. Watkins, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 13495 (10th Cir. May 11, 2026),* denial of rehearing en banc from United States v. Watkins, 156 F.4th 1049 (10th Cir. 2025):

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA10: Officer’s peering through 1″ gap in curtains from outside was plain view

D.D.C.: PO’s alleged violation of probation regulations doesn’t warrant suppression if a reasonable mistake

Even if GPS monitoring by a Community Supervision Officer under D.C. law violated regulations, a reasonable mistake of law (Heien) overcomes the violation, and it is not suppressed. United States v. White, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92214 (D.D.C. Apr. 27, … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Staleness | Comments Off on D.D.C.: PO’s alleged violation of probation regulations doesn’t warrant suppression if a reasonable mistake

E.D.Okla.: Plain view of firearms under protective sweep sustained under Buie’s first prong

The plain view of firearms occurred under Buie’s first scenario, but not the second because it involved a search for a person and continued thereafter. Still, it’s sustained. United States v. McCary, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91328 (E.D. Okla. Apr. … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep | Comments Off on E.D.Okla.: Plain view of firearms under protective sweep sustained under Buie’s first prong

IA: Bodycam and dashcam videos undermined claim of plain view

The bodycam and dashcam videos show that the officer could not have made the plain view he claims he did of a portion of a gallon-sized Ziplock bag in defendant’s waistband. A clear video can even undermine trial court credibility … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on IA: Bodycam and dashcam videos undermined claim of plain view

W.D.N.Y.: No IAC for not challenging search without standing

“In view of Dunnigan’s self-professed lack of any interest in or connection to the premises searched, Dunnigan’s attorney cannot be faulted for failing to challenge a search for which his client lacked standing to challenge.” United States v. Dunnigan, 2026 … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Plain view, feel, smell, Seizure, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: No IAC for not challenging search without standing

AL: No RS for pulling up behind legally parked car with blue lights on to inquire; smell of MJ suppressed

There was no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop in a residential neighborhood when he was lawfully parked and doing nothing wrong. The officer pulled behind him with emergency lights on. That’s not always a seizure, but here it was. When … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on AL: No RS for pulling up behind legally parked car with blue lights on to inquire; smell of MJ suppressed

OH8: Smell of MJ in car alone no longer PC

The smell of marijuana in a car alone isn’t probable cause in Ohio anymore because of legalization, quoting State v. Gray, 2025-Ohio-4607, ¶ 61 (1st Dist. Oct. 3, 2025). State v. Tucker, 2026-Ohio-1045 (8th Dist. Mar. 26, 2026). Challenging only … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH8: Smell of MJ in car alone no longer PC

MD: Waiting 20 days to get cell phone SW after seizure was reasonable here

Police seized defendant’s cell phone and sought to have it examined. It went into the queue at the forensic unit, and, when it was ready to be searched, they then sought a warrant. They waited because they believed there was … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MD: Waiting 20 days to get cell phone SW after seizure was reasonable here

MT: Owner of a stolen car can’t consent to search of defendant’s stuff in it

Defendant stole Dempsey’s car. The trial court decided he had no standing in a stolen car. The supreme court held that Dempsey’s third-party consent to search defendant’s stuff was invalid. State v. Flores-Reyes, 2026 MT 56 (Mar. 17, 2026). [Generally, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on MT: Owner of a stolen car can’t consent to search of defendant’s stuff in it

E.D.Tenn.: Traffic stop with shots fired call led to valid protective sweep of car for weapon on RS

“After reviewing the evidence, the arguments of the parties, and the relevant law, the undersigned finds that the officers had both probable cause to believe Defendant had committed traffic violations and reasonable suspicion to stop the vehicle in connection with … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Traffic stop with shots fired call led to valid protective sweep of car for weapon on RS

OH9: Smell of burnt MJ justified search even though officers found none

The smell of burnt marijuana justified the search of defendant’s car even though none was found. State v. Dejournett, 2026-Ohio-640 (9th Dist. Feb. 25, 2026).* An empty beer can in the beverage holder doesn’t justify a search of the car. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH9: Smell of burnt MJ justified search even though officers found none

W.D.Okla.: Def bears no burden on applying crime-fraud exception to his cell phone search

The government seized this Oklahoman’s cell phone and searched it with a warrant. Oklahoma is largely marijuana legal. Pleading the crime-fraud exception, the government bears the burden of segregating the valid conversations from the federal conspiracy allegations. Defendant bears no … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell, Privileges, Probable cause, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: Def bears no burden on applying crime-fraud exception to his cell phone search

CA9: Asking whether occupant of car was armed took three seconds and didn’t unreasonably extend stop

“The district court correctly held that the officers did not violate Torres’s Fourth Amendment rights by asking him whether he was armed. The officer’s question to Torres, which took no more than three seconds to ask and answer, did not … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Asking whether occupant of car was armed took three seconds and didn’t unreasonably extend stop