Category Archives: Good faith exception

CA10: Disagreement over spelling of street name didn’t make warrant fail particularity; GFE at least would apply

“The warrant authorized a search of 10 McGinnis Street, Eufaula, OK 74432. The correct address, Mr. Davis said, was 10 Meginnis Street, Eufaula, OK 74432. And beyond the address, the warrant contained no description of the house.” The suppression hearing … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Particularity, Protective sweep, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA10: Disagreement over spelling of street name didn’t make warrant fail particularity; GFE at least would apply

CA10: Apple SW was insufficiently particular, but GFE still applies

“We agree with Kimberley that the Apple search warrant was insufficiently particularized in violation of the Fourth Amendment. However, we hold that, in the circumstances of this case, the Government has shown the good faith exception to the warrant requirement … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Nighttime search, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: Apple SW was insufficiently particular, but GFE still applies

CA5: Affidavit for SW here was thin, but not bare bones boilerplate; suppression reversed

The affidavit for warrant here was thin, but not bare bones boilerplate. There was something to go on, and it’s enough for the good faith exception to apply. The district court erred in suppressing. United States v. Weaver, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA5: Affidavit for SW here was thin, but not bare bones boilerplate; suppression reversed

S.D.Ind.: No IAC for not better arguing GFE

Failure to better confront the good faith exception before conviction wasn’t ineffective assistance. Ramirez-Prado v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68941 (S.D. Ind. Mar. 31, 2026):

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: No IAC for not better arguing GFE

AL: No RS for pulling up behind legally parked car with blue lights on to inquire; smell of MJ suppressed

There was no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop in a residential neighborhood when he was lawfully parked and doing nothing wrong. The officer pulled behind him with emergency lights on. That’s not always a seizure, but here it was. When … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on AL: No RS for pulling up behind legally parked car with blue lights on to inquire; smell of MJ suppressed

S.D.Fla.: Privacy Protection Act has a border search exception

The Privacy Protection Act has a border search exception. Madaio v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64418 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 26, 2026). When defendant was stopped, the officers had reasonable suspicion the car had been involved in a shooting … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Privacy Protection Act has a border search exception

CA5: No REP against license plate readers

License plate readers violate no reasonable expectation of privacy. Also, the stop was supported by reasonable suspicion. United States v. Porter, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 7888 (5th Cir. Mar. 17, 2026). The informant’s information was sufficient to show probable cause … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Search incident, Seizure | Comments Off on CA5: No REP against license plate readers

D.Kan.: SW application with expired notary stamp doesn’t violate 4A

A search warrant application that was notarized with an expired notary stamp was not a Fourth Amendment violation. McAlister v. Kansas, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55139 (D. Kan. Mar. 17, 2026). 2255 petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim for not … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on D.Kan.: SW application with expired notary stamp doesn’t violate 4A

DC: Alleged violation of Rule 41(b) for “property located within the district” not subject to exclusionary rule when property is moving

A warrant to ping a cell phone in the DC Metro area which is three jurisdictions (DC, MD, VA) to find defendant to arrest him was with probable cause and good faith despite an alleged violation of Rule 41(b).“Rule 41(b) … Continue reading

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Good faith exception | Comments Off on DC: Alleged violation of Rule 41(b) for “property located within the district” not subject to exclusionary rule when property is moving

ND: Dog sniff occurred before the Rodriguez moment and was reasonable

The dog sniff occurred before the Rodriguez moment and was thus reasonable. State v. Cooper, 2026 ND 68, 2026 N.D. LEXIS 99 (Mar. 12, 2026) On the totality of circumstances, there was reasonable suspicion as to defendant as the subject … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ND: Dog sniff occurred before the Rodriguez moment and was reasonable

CA10: Ptfs pled enough to get past QI on PC showing for social media warrant

Plaintiffs pled enough to overcome qualified immunity that the search warrants at issue here were objectively without probable cause including a social media warrant. Armendariz v. City of Colo. Springs, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 7362 (10th Cir. Mar. 12, 2026). … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Qualified immunity, Social media warrants, Standing | Comments Off on CA10: Ptfs pled enough to get past QI on PC showing for social media warrant

D.Neb.: Just because the state seizes a cell phone doesn’t mean they know the Brady implications of the contents

Just because the state seizes a cell phone doesn’t mean they know the Brady implications of the contents. Moss v. Jeffreys, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45716 (D. Neb. Mar. 4, 2026) (§ 60.58 n.2) 2255 petitioner’s claim that defense counsel … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell phones, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Just because the state seizes a cell phone doesn’t mean they know the Brady implications of the contents

CA7: Ptf has burden to adequately respond to 4A qualified immunity claim when made by defense

Plaintiff didn’t sufficiently plead a Fourth Amendment violation and overcoming qualified immunity from the officer’s seizing his notebook and perusing it and handing it to another officer. It’s his burden to deal with qualified immunity, and he didn’t adequately respond. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell site location information, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Ptf has burden to adequately respond to 4A qualified immunity claim when made by defense

W.D.Tenn.: No standing in GPS locator of car rented by another; also private search

Defendant had no standing to challenge the state’s use of a rental car’s GPS where another person rented the car. It was also private action. United States v. Busby, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27276 (W.D. Tenn. Feb. 10, 2026). This … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Prison and jail searches, Private search, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: No standing in GPS locator of car rented by another; also private search

KS: Geofence warrant valid under GFE

This geofence warrant was valid by the good faith exception. State v. Mitchell-Pennington, 2026 Kan. App. LEXIS 6 (Jan. 23, 2026). The omitted facts merely clarified, not defeated, probable cause. The motion to suppress was properly denied. Urrutia v. State, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Consent, Franks doctrine, geofence, Good faith exception | Comments Off on KS: Geofence warrant valid under GFE

CA10: Nexus subject to GFE

The charge was impersonating an FBI agent at a school student pickup line. A warrant was issued for defendant’s house and computers to see if he bought faux FBI paraphernalia online.* The district court suppressed for lack of nexus. Reversed; … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on CA10: Nexus subject to GFE

MN: GFE does not apply to after search changes in law that were obviously coming

“The good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule does not apply to a warrantless vehicle search based solely on the smell of marijuana that occurred before we issued our opinion in State v. Torgerson, 995 N.W.2d 164 (Minn. 2023), which held … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Nexus, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on MN: GFE does not apply to after search changes in law that were obviously coming

CA6: Student not entitled to warning before school search

The search of this student was reasonable, and the student had no right to be warned before it was going to happen. Halasz v. Cass City Pub. Sch., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 33093 (6th Cir. Dec. 18, 2025). There was … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, School searches | Comments Off on CA6: Student not entitled to warning before school search

TN: 2009 DNA seizure that should have been purged and wasn’t could be relied on in GF and then another order issued

Defendant’s DNA was seized in 2009 and should have been purged, but it wasn’t. He’s later charged with another crime. A confirmatory test was run. The good faith exception applies to the DNA that wasn’t purged like it was supposed … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on TN: 2009 DNA seizure that should have been purged and wasn’t could be relied on in GF and then another order issued

TX7: SW sworn to before wrong official still in good faith

While the search warrant affidavit was not sworn to before the correct official as required by statute, the good faith exception is enough to sustain this search. There was probable cause, and it was particular. All constitutional requirements were met. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on TX7: SW sworn to before wrong official still in good faith