Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

PR: No REP in property where def not entitled to be

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in property where the defendant isn’t entitled to be, abandoned or otherwise unoccupied. El Pueblo v. Rondón, 2025 TSPR 113 (Nov. 4, 2025). (translation by Lexis) The stop of this known felon was … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Dog sniff, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PR: No REP in property where def not entitled to be

CA11: TSA officers are LEOs for searches under the FTCA

TSA officers are law enforcement officers for searches under the FTCA. Five other circuits hold that. Koletas v. United States, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 29609 (11th Cir. Nov. 12, 2025). While each factor here isn’t reasonable suspicion on its own, … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: TSA officers are LEOs for searches under the FTCA

IA: Refusing to get out of the car when directed is RS

Note to sov cits: Refusing to get out of the car when directed is reasonable suspicion. State v. Carter, 2025 Iowa App. LEXIS 983 (Nov. 13, 2025).* “Even the most seemingly trivial traffic infraction or equipment violation gives a peace … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IA: Refusing to get out of the car when directed is RS

D.D.C.: Govt failed to prove area was “high crime” based on nine gun seizures in four months

When challenged, the government fails to prove that the area of the stop was “high crime.” There were nine gun seizures in four months in a 500 meter radius. “The Government has established, however, that Abass engaged in unprovoked and … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Govt failed to prove area was “high crime” based on nine gun seizures in four months

TX1: Pervasiveness of cell phone use is nexus in a home invasion case where victim knew def

The CSLI “affidavit showed a fair probability that the cell-site location data associated with Frazier’s cell phone would further incriminate Frazier (an identified suspect in the crime at issue) by confirming that he was in the vicinity of the crime … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell site location information, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX1: Pervasiveness of cell phone use is nexus in a home invasion case where victim knew def

CA6: Entrapment is not a defense to a search warrant

Entrapment is not a defense to a search warrant, so CoA denied. Neeley v. United States, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 29144 (6th Cir. Nov. 5, 2025). The motion to suppress for lack of jurisdiction to serve warrants is denied. It’s … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA6: Entrapment is not a defense to a search warrant

D.N.D.: Tactical decision not to raise every 4A issue def can think up

Not raising before conviction all the conceivable Fourth Amendment claims defendant thought were useful was a reasonable tactical decision. Perez v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 220629 (D.N.D. Nov. 7, 2025). “As the trial court noted, approximately one minute … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.D.: Tactical decision not to raise every 4A issue def can think up

FL4: Welfare check entry valid despite mixed motives

A welfare check that is objectively reasonable isn’t unreasonable because of a mixed motive to arrest if necessary. State v. Leiby, 2025 Fla. App. LEXIS 8339 (Fla. 4th DCA Nov. 5, 2025). The police had (plenty) of probable cause to … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Foreign searches, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL4: Welfare check entry valid despite mixed motives

E.D.N.Y.: No standing in husband’s cell phone searched in Syria; no REP in NCEM database

“Defendant Halima Salman is charged with receiving military type training from a foreign terrorist organization in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2339D.” The government maintains a database of who is involved in military activities overseas: NMEC. Defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: No standing in husband’s cell phone searched in Syria; no REP in NCEM database

techdirt: The Kavanaugh Stop’s Legacy: 50 Days, 170+ Detained Citizens, Zero Answers

techdirt: The Kavanaugh Stop’s Legacy: 50 Days, 170+ Detained Citizens, Zero Answers:

Posted in Immigration arrests, Reasonable suspicion, SCOTUS | Comments Off on techdirt: The Kavanaugh Stop’s Legacy: 50 Days, 170+ Detained Citizens, Zero Answers

D.N.M.: Running LPN after handcuffing failed inevitable discovery

On the totality, defendant’s stop was without reasonable suspicion. Only after he was handcuffed did an officer run the LPN finding a warrant. The government fails on inevitable discovery here. United States v. Warner, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 210974 (D.N.M. … Continue reading

Posted in Discovery, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Running LPN after handcuffing failed inevitable discovery

W.D.Tex.: Frequency of cell searches not a 4A claim

“Plaintiff complains of cell searches that are unscheduled or more frequent than she believes they should be. Such a claim does not state a constitutional violation. Even assuming that TDCJ policy dictates the frequency of searches, additional searches are not … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Frequency of cell searches not a 4A claim

LA: Forensic search of cell phone can occur any time before trial

The forensic search of a cell phone can occur anytime between seizure and trial and still be timely. State v. Lowry, 2025 La. LEXIS 1481 (La. Oct. 25, 2025). 2255 ineffective assistance of counsel challenge for Franks violation fails for … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on LA: Forensic search of cell phone can occur any time before trial

D.P.R.: USMJ doesn’t buy officer’s RS story

USMJ just doesn’t buy that the officer could see drugs in defendant’s hand when he was running. After the stop, they were all in his pockets. United States v. Méndez-Rodríguez, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209314 (D.P.R. Oct. 22, 2025)*:

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.P.R.: USMJ doesn’t buy officer’s RS story

CA5: A-C privilege review of seized email doesn’t have to be perfect

In this bank fraud case, the attorney-client privilege review of defendant’s email was “imperfect” but not so bad that the indictment should be dismissed. It clearly doesn’t rise to the level of “outrageous.” Yes, the review could have been done … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, E-mail, Privileges, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: A-C privilege review of seized email doesn’t have to be perfect

D.S.C.: RS is based on objective reasonableness, and don’t argue subjective intent contradictorily

For reasonable suspicion the standard is objective reasonableness. Here, the defendant argued subjective intent two ways: embracing it and rejecting it. United States v. Duggan, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206037 (D.S.C. Oct. 20, 2025)*:

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.S.C.: RS is based on objective reasonableness, and don’t argue subjective intent contradictorily

S.D.N.Y.: Accidental seizure of attorney-client jail calls doesn’t lead to exclusion of non-legal calls

Use of plaintiff’s non-privileged prison calls as evidence was not a Fourth Amendment violation. The fact attorney-client calls were also seized but were segregated and not used as evidence doesn’t state a claim. Criscuolo v. Brandow, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Accidental seizure of attorney-client jail calls doesn’t lead to exclusion of non-legal calls

E.D.Ark.: There is no 4A claim by a dead person

There is no Fourth Amendment claim by a dead person. “Because the investigation failures and denial of access to the Courts are based on facts alleged to have occurred entirely after decedent’s death, Plaintiff cannot assert these claims either on … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: There is no 4A claim by a dead person

MSNBC: Just how many ‘Kavanaugh stops’ have American citizens been forced to endure?

MSNBC: Just how many ‘Kavanaugh stops’ have American citizens been forced to endure? by Steve Benen (“Many American citizens have been detained recently by ICE agents who thought they might be undocumented immigrants. But how many is ‘many’? When the … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MSNBC: Just how many ‘Kavanaugh stops’ have American citizens been forced to endure?

S.D.N.Y.: No REP in one’s talking to oneself in a building elevator that security cameras picked up

Plaintiff had no reasonable expectation of privacy in talking to himself in his building elevator. Therefore, Title III didn’t apply. He knew there was video recording but not audio. “While in the elevator, Plaintiff writes that that is when he … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: No REP in one’s talking to oneself in a building elevator that security cameras picked up