Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

D.Minn.: State law permits POs to conduct “unannounced visits” and that includes unannounced warrantless searches

State law gives parole officers the power to conduct “unannounced visits.” They also don’t have to announce warrantless searches. United States v. McClendon, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186498 (D. Minn. Aug. 15, 2024).* Defendant’s trembling hands were enough to pass … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: State law permits POs to conduct “unannounced visits” and that includes unannounced warrantless searches

OH: Even when the driver isn’t the owner with a suspended DL, it’s not unreasonable to ask for his DL

The stop was because the vehicle owner had an expired DL. When the officer discovers the driver is not the owner, the officer does not act unreasonably in asking for the driver’s DL. State v. Dunlap, 2024-Ohio-4821, 2024 Ohio LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OH: Even when the driver isn’t the owner with a suspended DL, it’s not unreasonable to ask for his DL

S.D.W.Va.: Reasonable during a traffic stop to ask about firearms in the car

The traffic stop was reasonable, and it was also reasonable for the officer to just ask whether there was a gun in the car for safety reasons because carrying in legal in this state. United States v. Martin, 2024 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Reasonable during a traffic stop to ask about firearms in the car

UT: NCMEC didn’t look at the CP this time, but it had this case, and that’s enough

The fact the hash value of defendant’s material was known to be child pornography, it didn’t matter that NCMEC didn’t view the material before passing it on to the police who did. There was a prior private search. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Private search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on UT: NCMEC didn’t look at the CP this time, but it had this case, and that’s enough

NY1: Vehicle being involved in recent prior crime was RS for stop

There was reasonable suspicion for the stop of defendant’s car just because the police had information that the car had previously been involved in a potential crime. People v. Zubidi, 2024 NY Slip Op 04824, 2024 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY1: Vehicle being involved in recent prior crime was RS for stop

OH1: “Suspicious vehicle” report didn’t justify stop when it drove off as officers were looking at it

Officers had a report of a suspicious vehicle on an apartment complex parking lot. They stopped and shined lights on it and looked. After about a minute, the vehicle drove off. The stop was without reasonable suspicion and was a … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH1: “Suspicious vehicle” report didn’t justify stop when it drove off as officers were looking at it

AL: Officer being unable to differentiate smell of MJ and hemp doesn’t negate PC

“Because probable cause does not require certainty, but only probability, we agree with the trial court that the fact that officers cannot distinguish between hemp and marijuana based on odor alone ‘does not void probable cause.’ … Other jurisdictions have … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AL: Officer being unable to differentiate smell of MJ and hemp doesn’t negate PC

AK: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil cases

The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil cases in Alaska. Alaska R.E. 412. O’Brien v. Delaplain, 2024 Alas. LEXIS 99 n.35(Sep. 27, 2024). The officer’s observations on a table near the door from outside the dwelling during a knock-and-talk provided … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Exclusionary rule, Knock and talk, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AK: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil cases

OR: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to criminally dangerous person civil commitments

Neither the state nor federal exclusionary rule does not apply in criminal dangerous person civil commitments. State v. T.L.B. (In re T.L.B.), 335 Or. App. 225 (Sep. 25, 2024). The officer here saw defendant walking at night in a neighborhood … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Consent, Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to criminally dangerous person civil commitments

NE: Not IAC to not challenge state’s obtaining phone records

It was settled in this state long ago that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in third-party cell phone records. Therefore, defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging it. State v. Rush, 317 Neb. 622 (Sep. 20, 2024).* On … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on NE: Not IAC to not challenge state’s obtaining phone records

D.Minn.: Even if stop was without RS, eluding police gave it

Even if there was no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop, his new offense of eluding the police justified it. United States v. Denton, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170669 (D. Minn. Sep. 23, 2024).* The affidavit for this warrant shows probable … Continue reading

Posted in Independent source, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Even if stop was without RS, eluding police gave it

WY: Dog sniff of already parked car didn’t require RS

Defendant left his car at a convenience store’s gas pumps for 30-40 minutes. The police dog sniff while it was parked was not unreasonable. It was not a stop to be extended. Labbe v. State, 2024 WY 99, 2024 Wyo. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WY: Dog sniff of already parked car didn’t require RS

D.Neb.: SW for property not overbroad and sought in GF; it objectively was a single-family home

The officers did their due diligence before the search warrant and saw only that defendant’s property was a single-family dwelling. That’s how it appeared, that’s what public records said. Therefore, they searched in good faith. United States v. Rice, 2024 … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Neb.: SW for property not overbroad and sought in GF; it objectively was a single-family home

CA9: Inventory of backpack of just released suspect was still reasonable

Defendant was arrested on suspicion of murder, and his backpack was put in the police car. His backpack was briefly searched and nothing was found. He was released after questioning, but his backpack was subjected to a later inventory which … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Informant hearsay, Inventory, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Inventory of backpack of just released suspect was still reasonable

CA11: Being on a no-fly list wasn’t RS on highway

Plaintiff’s being on a no-fly list wasn’t reasonable suspicion to detain him on the highway. Meshal v. Commissioner, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 23486 (11th Cir. Sep. 16, 2024). “[T]he officer did not violate the Fourth Amendment because his warrantless entry … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: Being on a no-fly list wasn’t RS on highway

W.D.Mo.: Use of stop sticks was a reasonable seizure and with RS

“The Court finds that when Officers Zinn and Jasso placed the stop sticks and attempted to remove the subject from his vehicle, they had a reasonable, articulable suspicion that the individual behind the wheel of the Dodge Charger was involved … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Use of stop sticks was a reasonable seizure and with RS

N.D.Ind.: Cell phones are “tools of the trade” of drug dealing, so nexus is minimal [actually, practically non-existent]

While cell phones are “tools of the trade” of drug dealing, they usually can be swept up in a search warrant for the premises. While that works in drug cases, there should be caution in other types of cases. United … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Cell phones are “tools of the trade” of drug dealing, so nexus is minimal [actually, practically non-existent]

CA9: Kneeling on arrestee’s back so he can’t breathe violates clearly established law

The officers’ kneeling on plaintiff’s back to secure him to the point plaintiff complained he couldn’t breathe violated clearly established law. Spencer v. Pew, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 23463 (9th Cir. Sep. 16, 2024). The dash cam shows that defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Kneeling on arrestee’s back so he can’t breathe violates clearly established law

FL6: Handicapped parking violation justified stop

Illegally parking [actually standing] in a handicapped spot was an objective basis for defendant’s stop. State v. Diaz, 2024 Fla. App. LEXIS 7143 (Fla. 6th DCA Sep. 13, 2024).* Defendant’s mother’s consent was validly obtained just as a protective sweep … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL6: Handicapped parking violation justified stop

N.D.Tex.: PC and GFE questions were close, and that’s good enough

The search warrant survives both a finding of probable cause and application of the good faith exception: “Here, the Court agrees with Defendant that the affidavit at issue presents a ‘close call’ as to whether the good-faith exception applies and … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: PC and GFE questions were close, and that’s good enough