Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

CA2: Mental health seizure for danger to self or others requires PC and exigency

“[A] ‘warrantless seizure for the purpose of involuntary hospitalization may be made only upon probable cause, that is, only if there are reasonable grounds for believing that the person seized is dangerous to [him]self or to others.” Singh v. City … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Inventory, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: Mental health seizure for danger to self or others requires PC and exigency

D.Minn.: Photographs could be taken during execution of SW

Photographs could be taken during execution of a search warrant. United States v. Schultz, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 236848 (D. Minn. Dec. 2, 2024), adopted, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4918 (D. Minn. Jan. 10, 2025). In a case involving whether … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Photographs could be taken during execution of SW

ID: DV NCO denies def standing in premises

Issuance of an NCO on defendant denies him standing when he was found in the premises he was ordered from. He has no reasonable expectation of privacy once ordered away. Prior cases in accord are not overruled. State v. Ortiz, … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on ID: DV NCO denies def standing in premises

FL3: With a change in statute, mere possession of a firearm in a high crime area wasn’t RS

“While the officer observed Sheppard with a concealed weapon in a high crime area, under the revised statute making non-licensure an element of the crime of concealed carry, Sheppard’s mere possession of the concealed weapon did not constitute criminal activity. … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on FL3: With a change in statute, mere possession of a firearm in a high crime area wasn’t RS

E.D.Mo.: No claim where no damages shown for alleged unreasonable dog sniff; nothing was found, detention was otherwise reasonable

Officers were surveilling a van that they believed might have a connection to an unsolved homicide. They observed what appeared to be hand-to-hand drug transactions, and the van’s LPN was expired. They approached. There were others around the van, and … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Dog sniff, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: No claim where no damages shown for alleged unreasonable dog sniff; nothing was found, detention was otherwise reasonable

TN: Def’s yelling “police” and turning back from door justified immediate entry on fear of destruction of evidence

When police knocked at defendant’s door, he yelled “police” and turned back inside the house, they feared to warn others or destroy evidence. “Here, based upon the totality of the circumstances, the record shows that the officer had a reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: Def’s yelling “police” and turning back from door justified immediate entry on fear of destruction of evidence

N.D.Ind.: Criminal complaint can’t be challenged under Franks after indictment

A criminal complaint can’t be challenged under Franks after indictment. United States v. Sole, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 908 (N.D. Ind. Jan. 3, 2025).* Defendant’s stop for clearly overtinted windows was reasonable. Disagreement by witnesses over minor details didn’t matter. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Criminal complaint can’t be challenged under Franks after indictment

OR: REP in cell phone lost when it was loaned to another

Defendant waived any reasonable expectation of privacy in this smartphone by loaning it to another [even under Oregon’s more stringent abandonment standards]. Here, it was completely out of his control because he loaned it to a young woman, and her … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: REP in cell phone lost when it was loaned to another

N.D.Okla.: Flashing a fake badge in public doesn’t support SW for house

Defendant was indicted for impersonating an officer and flashing a fake badge at a school pickup line. The search warrant for his house for more evidence of that is suppressed. No nexus is ever shown between that offense and his … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Flashing a fake badge in public doesn’t support SW for house

W.D.N.Y.: Incorrect AUSA assertion about which phone was searched had to be promptly clarified, not when he or she felt like it

Here, the AUSA was apparently confused in pleadings as to which cell phone was searched, a white or black one. When the AUSA learned that the wrong one was spoken of, he or she had a duty to promptly clarify–not … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver, Warrant papers | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Incorrect AUSA assertion about which phone was searched had to be promptly clarified, not when he or she felt like it

TN: SW didn’t say blood to be taken and seized could be tested, but it could be under common sense reading

“Although the warrant did not specifically state that the blood was to be ‘tested,’ ‘analyzed,’ or ‘examined’ for such intoxicants, a logical, commonsense reading of the warrant shows that the warrant was meant to authorize such analysis because an intoxicating … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on TN: SW didn’t say blood to be taken and seized could be tested, but it could be under common sense reading

IN: Facebook SW production authenticated records for trial

The search warrant production helped authenticate defendant’s Facebook records for trial. Anderson v. State, 2024 Ind. App. LEXIS 351 (Dec. 20, 2024). The fog line statute requires a driver to stay “as nearly as practicable entirely within a single lane” … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN: Facebook SW production authenticated records for trial

NV: No suppression for a delayed return of SW

State law says that the product of search warrants can be suppressed when they were wrongfully executed. That says nothing about a delayed return, and the search won’t be suppressed for that reason. Alvarez v. State, 2024 Nev. LEXIS 69 … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on NV: No suppression for a delayed return of SW

KY: Stop based on a statute not yet in effect isn’t a reasonable mistake of law

Defendant’s stop based on a vehicle equipment law that had not yet gone into effect was not saved by Heien. As in: when the law’s not yet law, there can’t be a reasonable mistake about its application. “An officer cannot … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on KY: Stop based on a statute not yet in effect isn’t a reasonable mistake of law

NC: Smell of dead animal led police to exigency of finding dogs in distress

The officer responded to a neighbor’s call that there was the smell of a dead animal coming from defendant’s property. The officer walked up the driveway and could see chained obviously sickly dogs with no food or water. The smell … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on NC: Smell of dead animal led police to exigency of finding dogs in distress

NC: Drug dog alert on def’s car isn’t RS to frisk his person

A drug dog alert on defendant’s car isn’t reasonable suspicion to frisk his person. State v. Stollings, 2024 N.C. App. LEXIS 1006 (Dec. 17, 2024). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not further challenging the search warrant issued after an entry … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NC: Drug dog alert on def’s car isn’t RS to frisk his person

D.Mass.: 17-day delay between seizure and SW was reasonable

“[T]he government’s seventeen-day delay between the warrantless seizure of Thompson’s property and the issuance of the search warrants was reasonable. The first factor favors the government because seventeen days—eleven of which were business days—is relatively short and far shorter than … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Mass.: 17-day delay between seizure and SW was reasonable

MT: Search of electronics under SW needs to start by SW expiration, not be completed

The search warrant for numerous electronic devices (phones and tablets) was served within ten days but the search couldn’t be completed for longer than that. The grant of the motion to suppress because of the delay is reversed. The warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MT: Search of electronics under SW needs to start by SW expiration, not be completed

CA2: Plain view seizure of cell phone established by officers’ knowledge of role of cell phones in crime

The evidentiary value of a cell phone for plain view was established here because, when officers saw the phone, they’d been investigating a conspiracy involving cell phone for months. United States v. Kurland, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 32177 (2d Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: Plain view seizure of cell phone established by officers’ knowledge of role of cell phones in crime

OH10: Foundation for Facebook exhibits provided by seizing officer

The evidentiary foundation for Facebook messages under rule 901 was established by the officer obtaining the Facebook warrant. State v. Lathon, 2024-Ohio-5886, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 4539 (10th Dist. Dec. 18, 2024). Officers had neither probable cause nor reasonable suspicion … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH10: Foundation for Facebook exhibits provided by seizing officer