Daily Archives: April 28, 2026

CA3: In seeking arrest warrants, officers need not present all exculpatory evidence to issuing magistrate unless it’s “conclusive”

Being tried and acquitted of murder, plaintiff sued the police who arrested her. She had an affirmative defense which led to the acquittal. Failure to present conclusive evidence of an affirmative defense to the issuing magistrate would be a probable … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Neutral and detached magistrate, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA3: In seeking arrest warrants, officers need not present all exculpatory evidence to issuing magistrate unless it’s “conclusive”

D.Idaho: Trial references to SW not barred, but govt limited in what it can say

Defendant’s motion to preclude the government from referring to being in his house on a search warrant is granted in part and denied in part under F.R.E. 403. The government cannot suggest that issuance of a warrant means any judicial … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Trial references to SW not barred, but govt limited in what it can say

D.D.C.: PO’s alleged violation of probation regulations doesn’t warrant suppression if a reasonable mistake

Even if GPS monitoring by a Community Supervision Officer under D.C. law violated regulations, a reasonable mistake of law (Heien) overcomes the violation, and it is not suppressed. United States v. White, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92214 (D.D.C. Apr. 27, … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Staleness | Comments Off on D.D.C.: PO’s alleged violation of probation regulations doesn’t warrant suppression if a reasonable mistake

E.D.N.C.: SW not required to look in def’s jail property bag and retrieve car keys

Inserting a key in a lock to see if it worked wasn’t a search. The key was in his jail property and lawfully taken from there. A warrant wasn’t required to get into his property bag. United States v. Miller, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Exclusionary rule, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: SW not required to look in def’s jail property bag and retrieve car keys

D.N.M.: Consent attenuated unreasonable search

Opening a box in defendant’s car was an unreasonable search, and it likely violated the Fourth Amendment. Defendant was later Mirandized and consented. After a thorough discussion of the caselaw, the court finds that the constitutional violation was slight [what … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Consent | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Consent attenuated unreasonable search