Category Archives: Inventory

OH4: Inventory found pretextual

The inventory here was found pretextual by the way the officer conducted it; e.g., not using gloves until something was found [which says nothing to me]. State v. Clark, 2026-Ohio-447, 2026 Ohio App. LEXIS 510 (4th Dist. Feb. 5, 2026). … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Franks doctrine, Inventory, Pretext, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on OH4: Inventory found pretextual

D.Neb.: SI valid even though def handcuffed face down

Being handcuffed on the ground doesn’t negate search incident to arrest. United States v. Dominguez, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24803 (D. Neb. Feb. 6, 2026). On arrest on I-235, defendant’s vehicle was subject to being towed and inventoried. The court … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Search incident | Comments Off on D.Neb.: SI valid even though def handcuffed face down

S.D.N.Y.: Mangione’s backpack subject to safety search and inventory on his arrest in a McDonald’s

Luigi Mangione’s backpack was properly searched both as a safety search and an inventory yet incident to his arrest at an Altoona, PA McDonald’s. He was the subject of a multistate manhunt for gunning down an insurance executive in broad … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Mangione’s backpack subject to safety search and inventory on his arrest in a McDonald’s

E.D.Mo.: Listing in inventory only things of some value didn’t make it unreasonable

The officer’s inventory policy was to inventory before towing and then list only that which has value. Things of little value were omitted. Still, his body cam caught it all, so there is a record. This inventory was valid. United … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Listing in inventory only things of some value didn’t make it unreasonable

D.N.M.: Impoundment of backpack not shown proper under police procedures

The impoundment of defendant’s car and his backpack from an apartment complex parking lot was not shown to be within the standardized procedures of the department. That’s the government’s burden. Motion to suppress granted. United States v. Majedi, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Impoundment of backpack not shown proper under police procedures

D.D.C.: A private tow didn’t violate US Capitol Police inventory policy or 4A

The US Capitol Police inventory policy was followed here, and the motion to suppress is denied. The fact a private company towed the vehicle is of no moment to the policy or the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Johnson, 2026 … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Inventory | Comments Off on D.D.C.: A private tow didn’t violate US Capitol Police inventory policy or 4A

UT: Inventory policy needs somehow to be in evidence to challenge scope of search

If you’re challenging whether the officer exceeded an inventory policy, it needs to be in evidence. Here there was only testimony about the written policy, and the court could rely on that. Here, the claim was that inventorying a backpack … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inventory, Scope of search | Comments Off on UT: Inventory policy needs somehow to be in evidence to challenge scope of search

C.D.Ill.: Easily entered iPhone moots how passcode was obtained

Even if the passcode was obtained unreasonably, this iPhone would have been gotten into anyway. The officer had done it before on these earlier models, and that’s inevitable discovery. United States v. Fassero, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 265273 (C.D. Ill. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Inventory, Neutral and detached magistrate, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Easily entered iPhone moots how passcode was obtained

S.D.Cal.: ICE detention of asylum claimant was without PC and due process and it’s unrebutted

Petitioner is an Iranian national here under a claim of asylum. He was arrested and detained by ICE agents on the street. His Fourth Amendment and due process claims over his detention are unrebutted by the government and taken as … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Immigration arrests, Inventory, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: ICE detention of asylum claimant was without PC and due process and it’s unrebutted

CA10: Loud exhaust stop led to valid, albeit mixed motive, warrant arrest and inventory

Defendant’s loud exhaust led to his stop and then finding a warrant which led to his arrest and inventory which turned up fentanyl and a gun. “And although the officers decided to arrest Ulibarri for two reasons-properly for the bench … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: Loud exhaust stop led to valid, albeit mixed motive, warrant arrest and inventory

CA1: Lying in wait to stop and inventory an unlicensed vehicle driven off wasn’t unreasonable

Officers see a car they’re interested in that was uninsured, unregistered, and with an invalid license plate. They watched and waited for someone to drive off, and then they pulled it over just to impound and inventory it. That wasn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on CA1: Lying in wait to stop and inventory an unlicensed vehicle driven off wasn’t unreasonable

WA: Probation searches don’t violate WA Const.

Probation searches are a codified exception to the warrant requirement and not in violation of the Washington constitution. State v. Smith, 2025 Wash. App. LEXIS 1418 (July 21, 2025). Leaving defendant’s vehicle on a parking lot potentially for days was … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Reasonableness, State constitution | Comments Off on WA: Probation searches don’t violate WA Const.

PA: Protective sweep doesn’t permit searching dresser drawers

The protective sweep was valid, but it did not permit going into dresser drawers. Commonwealth v. Hightower, 2025 PA Super 129, 2025 Pa. Super. LEXIS 277 (June 25, 2025); Commonwealth v. Layer, 2025 PA Super 128, 2025 Pa. Super. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Franks doctrine, Inventory, Protective sweep, Scope of search | Comments Off on PA: Protective sweep doesn’t permit searching dresser drawers

CA11: Using BitTorrent to enter def’s computer peer-to-peer wasn’t an unreasonable search

Using BitTorrent to access defendant’s open child pornography files peer-to-peer on his computer was not a digital trespass and did not violate any reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Ewing, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 15437 (11th Cir. June 23, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Digital privacy, Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Inventory, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Trespass | Comments Off on CA11: Using BitTorrent to enter def’s computer peer-to-peer wasn’t an unreasonable search

N.D.Ohio: Visitor getting high and passing out on couch doesn’t give standing to challenge search of premises

Defendant got high and fell asleep on the couch, and he was there when the raid occurred. He didn’t have standing. United States v. Taylor, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103820 (N.D. Ohio June 2, 2025). The government’s motion to reconsider … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Private search, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Visitor getting high and passing out on couch doesn’t give standing to challenge search of premises

E.D.La.: Def still a danger to community after grant of motion to suppress; reopening detention hearing denied

After defendant’s motion to suppress was granted, he moved to reopen his detention hearing. It’s denied. The government superseded the indictment, and he’s still found to be a danger to the community. “The Court may thus properly consider suppressed evidence … Continue reading

Posted in Independent source, Inventory, Motion to suppress, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Def still a danger to community after grant of motion to suppress; reopening detention hearing denied

CA9: Electronic monitoring condition of pretrial release was essentially a contract between def and court, thus consent

The Superior Court of San Francisco imposes electronic monitoring as a condition of pretrial release. Because it’s essentially a contract between the defendant and court, it’s consent to EM for release. It also does not violate state separation of powers. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, GPS / Tracking Data, Inventory, Private search, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA9: Electronic monitoring condition of pretrial release was essentially a contract between def and court, thus consent

CA10: Disabled vehicle left parked along a highway is subject to impoundment

A disabled vehicle left parked along a highway is subject to impoundment. Jones v. Woodrow, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 8419 (10th Cir. Apr. 10, 2025).* Defendant’s stop was valid because of a defective LPN light. This led to discovering a … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: Disabled vehicle left parked along a highway is subject to impoundment

CA5: Officer’s responding to “open structure call” and entering was reasonable as community caretaking function

“When Dean responded to the ‘open structure call’ he was performing a community caretaking function. Community caretaking functions are ‘totally divorced from the detection, investigation, or acquisition of evidence relating to the violation of a criminal statute.’ … Here, even … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Franks doctrine, Inventory, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on CA5: Officer’s responding to “open structure call” and entering was reasonable as community caretaking function

NY3: Inventory doesn’t have to be everything, just meaningful things

The inventory papers and the body cam video show that the officer inventoried all the meaningful things in the vehicle, so it complied with policy and was reasonable. People v. Craddock, 2025 NY Slip Op 01016, 2025 N.Y. App. Div. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Inventory, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on NY3: Inventory doesn’t have to be everything, just meaningful things