Category Archives: Ineffective assistance

S.D.Tex.: Govt can’t raise new 4A exception in motion to reconsider

While executing a search warrant, officers compelled defendant to provide the passcode to the safe. The court suppressed the contents of the safe because it was not a valid consent. The government doesn’t get to argue inevitable discovery on a … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Govt can’t raise new 4A exception in motion to reconsider

D.N.M.: Checking VIN number during traffic stop is reasonable

During a traffic stop, asking for identification and about travel plans and checking the VIN is reasonable under N.Y. v. Class. United States v. Sanchez, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 223586 (D.N.M. Sep. 30, 2026). Defendant was a passenger in a … Continue reading →

Posted in Custody, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Checking VIN number during traffic stop is reasonable

TN: Bailbond bounty hunter not state actor

Bailbonding agent’s bounty hunters were not state actors in capturing defendant and searching his car. State v. Dragg, 2026 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 637 (Sep. 24, 2026). Defendant’s post-conviction petition argues defense counsel applied the wrong standard of review but … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on TN: Bailbond bounty hunter not state actor

MS: Execution style murder in public in broad daylight was exigency to get suspect’s CSLI

Defendant’s allegedly committing an execution style murder in public in broad daylight was exigency to get his CSLI at that moment to locate him. Carpenter recognized exigency exceptions. Anderson v. State, 2026 Miss. App. LEXIS 406 (Sep. 15, 2026). Defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on MS: Execution style murder in public in broad daylight was exigency to get suspect’s CSLI

NC: Standing to contest search of hotel room doesn’t include other guest’s cell phone

As a guest of a guest, defendant had standing to contest the search of the hotel room, but he didn’t have standing to contest the search of the other tenant’s cell phone. State v. Miller, 2026 N.C. App. LEXIS 763 … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on NC: Standing to contest search of hotel room doesn’t include other guest’s cell phone

W.D.Wash.: No 2255 discovery of SW materials based on mere speculation

In this 2255, petitioner doesn’t get discovery of his search warrant materials. “The Government responds that Wilson ‘has failed to provide good cause as to why he is entitled to the materials that he requests’ and instead, he ‘only speculates … Continue reading →

Posted in Discovery, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: No 2255 discovery of SW materials based on mere speculation

CA8: SW affidavit can’t be supplemented, but a revised one can be filed

In the Eighth Circuit at least, the government can’t supplement a search warrant affidavit. Here, however, they submitted a revised affidavit which clarified what amounts to an immaterial fact. Affirmed. United States v. Smith, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 26544 (8th … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Oath or affirmation, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: SW affidavit can’t be supplemented, but a revised one can be filed

KY: Consent to blood draw was not voluntary under totality

Defendant’s consent to a blood draw was not voluntary under the totality of circumstances. “The facts at hand demonstrate why a totality-of-the-circumstances analysis is crucial. McCarthy and Haney provide that being read a coercive implied consent warning is but one … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on KY: Consent to blood draw was not voluntary under totality

CA6: No interlocutory appeal of denial of motion to suppress

There is no interlocutory appeal of denial of a motion to suppress in the federal system. United States v. Cox, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 25677 (6th Cir. Aug. 24, 2026). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not making a frivolous motion … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress, Nexus | Comments Off on CA6: No interlocutory appeal of denial of motion to suppress

W.D.Mo.: Not exactly following the inventory policy doesn’t make it unreasonable under 4A

Not exactly following the inventory policy doesn’t make it unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Maldonadochavarria, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180956 (W.D. Mo. July 13, 2026). “Here, King was placed in handcuffs and moved from the Rite Shop … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Not exactly following the inventory policy doesn’t make it unreasonable under 4A

D.N.M.: 2¼ hour detention was still with RS despite 10th Cir.’s 90-minute limit

“Defendant was detained from approximately 4:45 a.m. until his release at around 7:00 a.m., a total duration of two hours and 15 minutes. … Having concluded that the initial detention was lawful, the Court must next address whether the detention … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: 2¼ hour detention was still with RS despite 10th Cir.’s 90-minute limit

Cal.1: Search condition for mental health diversion was within court’s discretion

The trial court acted within its statutory discretion imposing a search condition on defendant during his mental health diversion. His criminal history justified it. Thompson v. Superior Court, 2026 Cal. App. LEXIS 459 (1st Dist. July 30, 2026). One defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on Cal.1: Search condition for mental health diversion was within court’s discretion

FL5: State failed to show justification for delay for dog sniff

This being a warrantless search during a traffic stop with a drug dog, the state bore the burden of proof on justification for detention for the dog sniff, and it failed to show that the stop was lawfully continued. Reversed. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell phones, Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on FL5: State failed to show justification for delay for dog sniff

IL: A backpack is not as personal a repository of stuff as a purse or wallet; officers ordered it left in vehicle for safety reasons and it was inventoried

Defendant’s backpack is not as much a personal repository as a wallet or purse. When officers ordered the occupants out of the car, the backpack was at defendant’s feet, and he was ordered to leave it behind. The inventory was … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Inventory, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IL: A backpack is not as personal a repository of stuff as a purse or wallet; officers ordered it left in vehicle for safety reasons and it was inventoried

E.D.Ark.: Facts underlying QI will be submitted to jury

In a qualified immunity order, the court decides to submit underlying fact questions to the jury to decide it. Steelman v. City of Shannon Hills, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118665 (E.D. Ark. May 29, 2026). 2255 petitioner’s claim about his … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Facts underlying QI will be submitted to jury

CA8: Def’s 20 prior arrests helped show voluntariness of consent

Despite the lack of a Miranda warning, defendant consented to the search. After all, she’d been arrested about 20 times before this one. United States v. Marr, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 15161 (8th Cir. May 28, 2026). A Bivens action … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Voluntariness | Comments Off on CA8: Def’s 20 prior arrests helped show voluntariness of consent

RI: Challenge to one sentence of 8-page cell phone records SW fails; totality has to be considered

Defendant’s challenge to the search warrant for his cell phone records focused on one sentence adding nothing to the calculus. On the totality, the 8-page affidavit showed probable cause for the cell phone records. State v. Pinkerton, 2026 R.I. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on RI: Challenge to one sentence of 8-page cell phone records SW fails; totality has to be considered

TX14: Affidavit for SW gets deferential standard of review by both the trial court and appellate court

The affidavit for search warrant gets a deferential standard of review by both the trial court and appellate court. Gaither v. State, 2026 Tex. App. LEXIS 4588 (Tex. App. – Houston (14th Dist.) May 19, 2026). “The federal district court … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Nexus, Pole cameras, Probable cause, Standards of review | Comments Off on TX14: Affidavit for SW gets deferential standard of review by both the trial court and appellate court

N.D.Cal.: Collateral estoppel bars relitigation in federal court of 4A claim lost in state court

Plaintiff fully litigated his Fourth Amendment claim in state court and lost. Collateral estoppel bars him from pursuing a federal claim for the same thing. Pelton v. Amador, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98995 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2026). Defendant faults … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Collateral estoppel bars relitigation in federal court of 4A claim lost in state court

LA5: SW for cell phone including “cloud based storage accessible by the device” not overbroad

The search warrant for defendant’s cell phone included “or within cloud based storage accessible by the device.” The warrant was not overbroad. State v. Pampas, 2026 La. App. LEXIS 848 (La. App. 5 Cir May 5, 2026). Defense counsel’s failure … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance, Overbreadth, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA5: SW for cell phone including “cloud based storage accessible by the device” not overbroad