Category Archives: Franks doctrine

D.D.C.: Use of biometrics to access a cell phone is not testimonial

The use of biometrics to access a cell phone is not testimonial. United States v. Blythe, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231852 (D.D.C. Nov. 23, 2025) (interesting read). Just because defense counsel didn’t appeal a losing Fourth Amendment issue doesn’t make … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Privileges | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Use of biometrics to access a cell phone is not testimonial

E.D.Ky.: Fact drug dog wasn’t trained on fentanyl wasn’t defect when he alerted on it and cocaine

The drug dog wasn’t trained on fentanyl but alerted on it. It was trained on cocaine and did alert on it. That doesn’t make the dog unreliable. After probable cause developed, using the key fob to open the car wasn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Fact drug dog wasn’t trained on fentanyl wasn’t defect when he alerted on it and cocaine

CA5: Overnight guest’s stuff subject to search under warrant for premises

Defendant was an overnight guest at the place searched, and the officers executing a warrant were authorized to search her stuff, too. United States v. Inyang, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 30148 (5th Cir. Nov. 18, 2025). Undercover officer’s recording in … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA5: Overnight guest’s stuff subject to search under warrant for premises

KS: KHP power for administrative searches of truck can’t be delegated to sheriffs

Under Kansas statute, only KHP officers can randomly stop regulated trucks for inspection, and it can’t be delegated to county sheriffs by an MOU. “There is no dispute here that regulation of commercial motor carriers triggers a substantial government interest.” … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches, Waiver | Comments Off on KS: KHP power for administrative searches of truck can’t be delegated to sheriffs

S.D.Fla.: 16 shot ShotSpotter alert confirmed by witnesses was exigency to enter curtilage

A ShotSpotter alert of 16 gunshots from the vicinity of defendant’s home confirmed by witnesses in a car leaving the area was justification for exigent entry onto the curtilage. “Since the addition of the omitted information does not disturb the … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Waiver | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: 16 shot ShotSpotter alert confirmed by witnesses was exigency to enter curtilage

D.D.C.: Govt failed to prove area was “high crime” based on nine gun seizures in four months

When challenged, the government fails to prove that the area of the stop was “high crime.” There were nine gun seizures in four months in a 500 meter radius. “The Government has established, however, that Abass engaged in unprovoked and … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Govt failed to prove area was “high crime” based on nine gun seizures in four months

FL4: Welfare check entry valid despite mixed motives

A welfare check that is objectively reasonable isn’t unreasonable because of a mixed motive to arrest if necessary. State v. Leiby, 2025 Fla. App. LEXIS 8339 (Fla. 4th DCA Nov. 5, 2025). The police had (plenty) of probable cause to … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Foreign searches, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL4: Welfare check entry valid despite mixed motives

E.D.N.Y.: No standing in husband’s cell phone searched in Syria; no REP in NCEM database

“Defendant Halima Salman is charged with receiving military type training from a foreign terrorist organization in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2339D.” The government maintains a database of who is involved in military activities overseas: NMEC. Defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: No standing in husband’s cell phone searched in Syria; no REP in NCEM database

E.D.N.Y.: Some assistance to foreign police under MLAT doesn’t require suppression

Defendants are accused to a cocaine conspiracy of trafficking from South America to Europe through the US. The government obtained information from European counties via MLAT, and whatever assistance they gave to help gather information didn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. … Continue reading

Posted in Foreign searches, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Some assistance to foreign police under MLAT doesn’t require suppression

DE: Def was not denied confrontation by not getting to cross-examine about pictures attached to warrant application

Defendant was not denied confrontation of the CI who took photographs of his property used to get the search warrant. When the state offered them at trial, defendant successfully objected, so there was nothing to confront. State v. McCurdy, 2025 … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Waiver, Warrant papers | Comments Off on DE: Def was not denied confrontation by not getting to cross-examine about pictures attached to warrant application

LA: Forensic search of cell phone can occur any time before trial

The forensic search of a cell phone can occur anytime between seizure and trial and still be timely. State v. Lowry, 2025 La. LEXIS 1481 (La. Oct. 25, 2025). 2255 ineffective assistance of counsel challenge for Franks violation fails for … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on LA: Forensic search of cell phone can occur any time before trial

A prosecution of a police officer for perjury during a Franks hearing

United States v. Johnson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 203218 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 15, 2025) involved prosecution of a police officer for perjury during a Franks hearing:

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on A prosecution of a police officer for perjury during a Franks hearing

OH5: Typo on SW date could be overlooked if it can be otherwise figured out

The warrant said without the blanks filled in: “‘Sworn to and subscribed in my presence this ___ day of August 2024. Time ___.’ The warrant also contained a partially pre-filled date line which read ‘Dated this ___ day of August … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Staleness | Comments Off on OH5: Typo on SW date could be overlooked if it can be otherwise figured out

CA5: A trespasser has no REP

A trespasser has no reasonable expectation of privacy when on the property trespassed upon. Here, there were numerous signs for the TX DOT saying “no trespassing.” United States v. Parkerson, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 26220 (5th Cir. Oct. 8, 2025). … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: A trespasser has no REP

OH1: With legalization of marijuana, the smell of marijuana is no longer probable cause in itself

With legalization of marijuana, the smell of marijuana is no longer probable cause in itself. “While the smell of marijuana remains a relevant factor under the totality of the circumstances to a probable-cause analysis, it is no longer sufficient, standing … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH1: With legalization of marijuana, the smell of marijuana is no longer probable cause in itself

HI: No REP in IP information

There is no Fourth Amendment protection in one’s subscriber information provided to a third-party internet service provider and its link to an IP address. State v. Brown, 2025 Haw. LEXIS 268 (Sep. 30, 2025).* The state contends defendant had no … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on HI: No REP in IP information

LA1: Accelerant detection dog’s alert supported PC despite negative lab test

The fact the accelerant detection dog alerted supports probable cause despite later negative lab tests. State v. Hale, 2025 La. App. LEXIS 1749 (La. App. 1 Cir Sep. 19, 2025). Officers did not violate curtilage by observing shell casings in … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Knock and talk | Comments Off on LA1: Accelerant detection dog’s alert supported PC despite negative lab test

E.D.Ark.: Parole search waiver included curtilage of house

Plaintiff’s parole search waiver for his house includes his curtilage. Kennedy v. White Cty., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180862 (E.D. Ark. Sep. 16, 2025). Admission of a photograph of defendant’s house taken from off the property did not violate the … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Parole search waiver included curtilage of house

OR: PC for one computer isn’t PC for another

The computer search here wasn’t authorized by the probable cause showing, and it wasn’t harmless error. Probable cause for one device doesn’t permit search of all. State v. Schult, 343 Or. App. 376 (Sep. 10, 2025). “Here, Boudreau’s Franks argument … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on OR: PC for one computer isn’t PC for another

S.D.Cal.: Handcuffing DV detainee was reasonable, but search of his bag was without RS

Officers responding to a 911 call about alleged domestic violence in public handcuffed defendant. This was reasonable at the time. Reasonable suspicion for a search of the cross body bag on him was lacking. He was handcuffed, there was no … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Handcuffing DV detainee was reasonable, but search of his bag was without RS