Category Archives: Franks doctrine

Cal.1: Search condition for mental health diversion was within court’s discretion

The trial court acted within its statutory discretion imposing a search condition on defendant during his mental health diversion. His criminal history justified it. Thompson v. Superior Court, 2026 Cal. App. LEXIS 459 (1st Dist. July 30, 2026). One defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on Cal.1: Search condition for mental health diversion was within court’s discretion

PA: For resisting arrest on a warrant, the state has to prove the warrant valid

“To prove the lawful arrest element of resisting arrest where the resisted arrest is premised on an arrest or bench warrant, the Commonwealth must produce evidence of the validity of a warrant beyond its mere existence. Because the Commonwealth failed … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on PA: For resisting arrest on a warrant, the state has to prove the warrant valid

PA: Private hunting lands were not open fields under state constitution

The Pennsylvania Constitution’s search and seizure provision extends to “possessions,” something broader than “effects” under the Fourth Amendment. The Pennsylvania court concludes that private hunting lands were not blanket open fields where wildlife officers could just enter. The court also … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Open fields, State constitution | Comments Off on PA: Private hunting lands were not open fields under state constitution

E.D.Pa.: Voluntary statement during search that “everything is mine” was admissible

Voluntary statement from the handcuffed defendant during the search of his house when he saw his handcuffed girlfriend crying that “everything is mine” were admissible. United States v. Espinosa, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160387 (E.D. Pa. July 20, 2026). Defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Custody, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Voluntary statement during search that “everything is mine” was admissible

LA5: Nervousness and avoiding getting on airplane to LAX (a source city) was RS

DEA and State DTF officers had reasonable suspicion to stop defendant departing the NOLA airport for LAX (a source city) when he saw them as they looked all nervous and then walked away from boarding the airplane. State v. Wells, … Continue reading

Posted in Airport searches, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA5: Nervousness and avoiding getting on airplane to LAX (a source city) was RS

DC: Officers were a good ways away from def when he fled without any apparent reason

“We now hold that the officers had the requisite reasonable articulable suspicion to justify their seizure of D.W. when they grabbed his leg. We reach that conclusion largely because D.W. ran upon the mere sight of police officers approaching from … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DC: Officers were a good ways away from def when he fled without any apparent reason

N.D.Ga.: Standing has to be shown for the time of the search, not at some time in the past

“Earl was required to show, not that he had an expectation of privacy in the home at some time, but that he had that expectation at the time of the search. United States v. Brazel, 102 F.3d 1120, 1148 (11th … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Standing has to be shown for the time of the search, not at some time in the past

E.D.N.Y.: Flight out a window is exigency for police to enter

Defendant was wanted for a shooting incident in Flatbush, Brooklyn caught on video. When they came to where they suspected he was, he attempted to flee out a window. That gave exigency to enter. United States v. Richard, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Flight out a window is exigency for police to enter

FL: Violation of knock-and-announce statute doesn’t require exclusion

A violation of the knock-and-announce statute for serving search warrants doesn’t require exclusion of the evidence under Hudson, which is followed. State v. Times, 2026 Fla. LEXIS 982 (June 25, 2026). “Idling” is not a crime for a passenger vehicle … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Knock and announce, Scope of search | Comments Off on FL: Violation of knock-and-announce statute doesn’t require exclusion

N.D.Ala.: SW not invalid because issuing judge previously represented the target

A search warrant isn’t invalid just because the issuing magistrate previously represented the defendant in a drug case as a defense lawyer. The judge didn’t violate the state’s Code of Judicial Conduct either. Besides, the good faith exception applies because … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: SW not invalid because issuing judge previously represented the target

Cal.4: SW not needed to test DNA abandoned in a rape

Defendant’s DNA left at the scene of two rapes was abandoned, and the state didn’t need a warrant to search it. People v. Konther, 2026 Cal. App. LEXIS 369 (4th Dist. June 12, 2026). In a drug case bench trial, … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Admissibility of evidence, DNA, Franks doctrine, Protective sweep | Comments Off on Cal.4: SW not needed to test DNA abandoned in a rape

D.R.I.: Defense attorney’s affidavit for Franks motion was insufficient for lack of personal knowledge

The defense attorney’s affidavit for defendant’s Franks motion is insufficient because he had no direct knowledge. There was probable cause for the warrant. United States v. Rosario, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125981 (D.R.I. June 8, 2026). Protective sweep for a … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Protective sweep | Comments Off on D.R.I.: Defense attorney’s affidavit for Franks motion was insufficient for lack of personal knowledge

IL: A backpack is not as personal a repository of stuff as a purse or wallet; officers ordered it left in vehicle for safety reasons and it was inventoried

Defendant’s backpack is not as much a personal repository as a wallet or purse. When officers ordered the occupants out of the car, the backpack was at defendant’s feet, and he was ordered to leave it behind. The inventory was … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Inventory, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IL: A backpack is not as personal a repository of stuff as a purse or wallet; officers ordered it left in vehicle for safety reasons and it was inventoried

N.D.Ohio: Failure to serve state SW within state mandated time not 4A violation

The state search warrant in this case was not served within three days as required by Ohio law. That did not violate the Fourth Amendment, and he shows no prejudice. United States v. Calhoun, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121202 (N.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Seizure, State constitution, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Failure to serve state SW within state mandated time not 4A violation

TN: Def lived in a van left wide open in a public area, but it didn’t belong to him, so no REP as to interior

“In this case, the evidence was that, although the Defendant lived in the van, the van was registered to someone else, and the vehicle registration indicated the same. The doors to the van were wide open and it was parked … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on TN: Def lived in a van left wide open in a public area, but it didn’t belong to him, so no REP as to interior

LA4: Acting like carrying a gun and wearing a ski mask in New Orleans in June was RS

The juvenile here acted like he was carrying a weapon and he had on a ski mask in June in New Orleans. That was reasonable suspicion. State In the Int. of L.V., 2026 La. App. LEXIS 1070 (La. App. 4 … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on LA4: Acting like carrying a gun and wearing a ski mask in New Orleans in June was RS

TX1: No standing to challenge seizure of ketamine off co-def, but PC was lacking for his own arrest

Defendant didn’t have standing to challenge the seizure of ketamine off a codefendant. [Even better for him,] There was no probable cause for his warrantless arrest. Akinrinlola v. State, 2026 Tex. App. LEXIS 4935 (Tex. App. – Houston (1st Dist.) … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, GPS / Tracking Data, Standing | Comments Off on TX1: No standing to challenge seizure of ketamine off co-def, but PC was lacking for his own arrest

MA: When a likely Franks violation comes out at trial, def gets to reopen the suppression issue

When a likely Franks violation comes out at trial, defendant gets to reopen the suppression issue. Here, the officer’s false statement he was present for a third controlled buy satisfied Franks and was excised. Defense counsel showed that it couldn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Neutral and detached magistrate, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on MA: When a likely Franks violation comes out at trial, def gets to reopen the suppression issue

CA2: Taking 3-day-old son from mother affected father’s 4A & 14A rights too

Plaintiff stated a claim for relief under the due process clause and Fourth Amendment for the City taking his 3-day-old son from his mother based on actions of her other boyfriends without any court order. He was three years getting … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Due process, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA2: Taking 3-day-old son from mother affected father’s 4A & 14A rights too

D.Md.: Mere delay in opening hotel door for arrest warrant didn’t justify protective sweep under the mattress

The protective sweep of defendant’s room is suppressed because the government articulates no reasonable suspicion to believe anyone else was in there. Delay in opening the door isn’t it. Searching between the mattress and box springs was also unreasonable. Waiting … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Franks doctrine, Protective sweep | Comments Off on D.Md.: Mere delay in opening hotel door for arrest warrant didn’t justify protective sweep under the mattress