Category Archives: Dog sniff

OH5: Drug dog officer’s touching car to redirect dog wasn’t a search

The officer’s briefly touching the vehicle’s exterior to redirect the canine’s focus did not constitute a search. The dog’s certification and training were sufficient to establish its reliability, absent conflicting evidence from the defendant. This traffic stop was not unconstitutionally … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Search, Staleness | Comments Off on OH5: Drug dog officer’s touching car to redirect dog wasn’t a search

FL5: Dog alert on MJ before case law said it wasn’t PC anymore was in good faith

Newer cases hold that a drug dog can’t differentiate between legal and illegal marijuana, so a dog alert doesn’t provide probable cause. Where the dog sniff occurred before that holding, however, it was reasonable under the good faith exception. Ford … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on FL5: Dog alert on MJ before case law said it wasn’t PC anymore was in good faith

E.D.Mo.: No claim where no damages shown for alleged unreasonable dog sniff; nothing was found, detention was otherwise reasonable

Officers were surveilling a van that they believed might have a connection to an unsolved homicide. They observed what appeared to be hand-to-hand drug transactions, and the van’s LPN was expired. They approached. There were others around the van, and … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Dog sniff, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: No claim where no damages shown for alleged unreasonable dog sniff; nothing was found, detention was otherwise reasonable

S.D.Ga.: USMJ recommends suppression of search after dog alert because dog prompted and window entered

USMJ recommends motion to suppress car search based on a dog alert should be granted because the handler prompted the dog and both the handler and dog entered the window and then the car before the dog alert. As to … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: USMJ recommends suppression of search after dog alert because dog prompted and window entered

Motor Biscuit: Police hope you don’t know the “K9 unit” loophole used to search your car illegally

Motor Biscuit: Police hope you don’t know the “K9 unit” loophole used to search your car illegally by Henry Cesar (“Imagine getting pulled over for a broken taillight. The cop checks your license, hands you a ticket, and starts to … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on Motor Biscuit: Police hope you don’t know the “K9 unit” loophole used to search your car illegally

MN: Dog sniff inside car a search

A dog sniff inside a car is a search. But here it was with probable cause. State v. Johnson, 2024 Minn. App. LEXIS 537 (Dec. 23, 2024):

Posted in Dog sniff, Search | Comments Off on MN: Dog sniff inside car a search

W.D.La.: Dog sniff at door of commercial rented storage unit violated no REP

A dog sniff at the door to a rented commercial storage unit violated no reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Harris, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 224506 (W.D. La. Nov. 4, 2024). There’s no reasonable expectation of privacy in one’s … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Dog sniff at door of commercial rented storage unit violated no REP

Drug dog nose into a car window

“The drug dog’s fleeting touch of the passenger door and de minimus intrusion into the vehicle cabin through a window left open by a passenger does not justify the exclusion of evidence under the Supreme Court’s Fourth Amendment jurisprudence.” It … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on Drug dog nose into a car window

ND: Calling 911 about OD’g child in your house is exigency for entry

Calling 911 that the child you’re caring for OD’ed on your fentanyl is consent to their emergency entry. State v. Gothberg, 2024 ND 217, 2024 N.D. LEXIS 221 (Dec. 5, 2024). 2255 petitioner pled guilty knowing the facts of the … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on ND: Calling 911 about OD’g child in your house is exigency for entry

CA10: Gant permits search for DL in car when def fails to identify himself

Gant search incident permits a search for a driver’s real driver’s license in a car when he fails to properly identify himself. United States v. Pinder, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 29995 (10th Cir. Nov. 26, 2024). Complaining generally about a … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance, Search incident | Comments Off on CA10: Gant permits search for DL in car when def fails to identify himself

CA6: A rarity: No RS found for dog sniff on the highway

Defendant was stopped for speeding, and the officer ultimately called for a drug dog. No drugs, but he’s a felon in possession. The court finds no reasonable suspicion for extending the stop. The government proffered travel plans, criminal history, and … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: A rarity: No RS found for dog sniff on the highway

S.D.Cal.: Def counsel’s failure to file a motion to suppress that might have been plausible isn’t IAC per se

“That a motion to suppress or an objection based on trial testimony regarding the aerial surveillance video might have been reasonable falls short of establishing deficient performance by counsel. United States v. Reyes, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134866, 2012 WL … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Def counsel’s failure to file a motion to suppress that might have been plausible isn’t IAC per se

E.D.Mich.: Ordering passenger from car in an uneventful traffic stop required RS; his assault on officer was intervening act

The traffic stop was uneventful at first, and the driver provided all the information and papers necessary. After that, the officers focused on the passenger and ordered him from the car, but that required reasonable suspicion. His assault of the … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Dog sniff, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Ordering passenger from car in an uneventful traffic stop required RS; his assault on officer was intervening act

N.D.Iowa: There was PC before the dog stuck his nose through the window

The dog sticking his nose through the window was a search, but the officers already had probable cause by then. Therefore, no exclusionary. United States v. Newberry, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 195271 (N.D. Iowa Oct. 28, 2024). On the government’s … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: There was PC before the dog stuck his nose through the window

W.D.La.: Def counsel’s failure to object to GFE in R&R not IAC where it couldn’t win anyway

The R&R also decided the good faith exception applied to this search, but defense counsel didn’t object. It’s a meritless issue, so defense counsel can’t be ineffective for not objecting. United States v. Harp, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 194730 (W.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Pole cameras | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Def counsel’s failure to object to GFE in R&R not IAC where it couldn’t win anyway

IN: Warrantless pulling on a loose car door panel was with PC and reasonable

The officer’s warrantless pulling on a loose car door panel with probable cause was not an unreasonable search under the Fourth Amendment or state constitution. Young v. State, 2024 Ind. App. LEXIS 279 (Oct. 4, 2024). The arrival of drug … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Dog sniff, Forfeiture | Comments Off on IN: Warrantless pulling on a loose car door panel was with PC and reasonable

WY: Dog sniff of already parked car didn’t require RS

Defendant left his car at a convenience store’s gas pumps for 30-40 minutes. The police dog sniff while it was parked was not unreasonable. It was not a stop to be extended. Labbe v. State, 2024 WY 99, 2024 Wyo. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WY: Dog sniff of already parked car didn’t require RS

CA9: Inventory of backpack of just released suspect was still reasonable

Defendant was arrested on suspicion of murder, and his backpack was put in the police car. His backpack was briefly searched and nothing was found. He was released after questioning, but his backpack was subjected to a later inventory which … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Informant hearsay, Inventory, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Inventory of backpack of just released suspect was still reasonable

GA: Swabbing handcuffed arrestee’s hands for DNA valid as SI

Swabbing defendant’s hands for DNA while he was handcuffed in an interrogation room was valid as search incident. The DNA was easily destroyed. (Thus exigency too.) Gonzalez v. State, 2024 Ga. LEXIS 203 (Sep. 17, 2024). An warrant still in … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, DNA, Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Search incident | Comments Off on GA: Swabbing handcuffed arrestee’s hands for DNA valid as SI

CA8: 4A requires no particular type of drug dog alert

“Collier also questions how Raptor alerted, suggesting that its alert was insufficiently ‘profound.’ … Our ‘probable cause inquiry is always fact specific.’ … Every dog is unique, and a dog that smells illicit drugs is not required to communicate with … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA8: 4A requires no particular type of drug dog alert