Category Archives: Dog sniff

CA8: Dog’s instinctive head in the car window wasn’t a trespass

The dog touching the car was instinctive and not handler directed. Therefore, it’s not a trespass. There’s some doubt in the existing rule in this circuit, but not here. United States v. Munoz, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 8808 (8th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Trespass | Comments Off on CA8: Dog’s instinctive head in the car window wasn’t a trespass

W.D.La.: Request for consent during stop came after RS developed

Defendant’s traffic stop was reasonable because of a cracked windshield on his truck, and a question about consent to search near the end of the ticket writing process didn’t unlawfully extend it. United States v. Calderon, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Request for consent during stop came after RS developed

GA: Dog sniff of car while citation being filled out did not extend stop; suppression reversed

While the stopping officer was filling out the citation, a second officer arrived. The dog sniff occurred while the citation was still being filled out, so it didn’t extend the stop. Grant of motion to suppress reversed. State v. Dean, … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GA: Dog sniff of car while citation being filled out did not extend stop; suppression reversed

CA9: Failure to tell def of precise reason for arrest when no warrant in hand did not warrant suppression

Suppression of defendant’s statements is not warranted for FBI agents’ violation of Fed. R. Crim. P. 4(c)(3)(A), which provides that an arresting officer who does not possess a copy of the arrest warrant “must inform the defendant of the warrant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Exclusionary rule, Foreign searches, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Failure to tell def of precise reason for arrest when no warrant in hand did not warrant suppression

CA8: Dog sniff at apt door was reasonable under existing precedent

A drug dog sniff at defendant’s apartment door was reasonable under well-established circuit precedent. There’s no evidence the dog’s nose went under the door. United States v. Peck, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 5710 (8th Cir. Mar. 12, 2025). Plaintiff’s condition … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Excessive force, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA8: Dog sniff at apt door was reasonable under existing precedent

ID: Officer’s subjective belief drug dog alerted can be sufficient for PC

The officer’s subjective belief the drug dog alerted can be sufficient for probable cause. Here, it’s based on the officer’s training and experience. State v. Morgan, 2025 Ida. App. LEXIS 6 (Feb. 12, 2025):

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on ID: Officer’s subjective belief drug dog alerted can be sufficient for PC

CO: Opening car door to aid drug dog sniff was a search

The drug dog officer facilitated the drug-detection dog’s entry into Pham’s vehicle by leaving the door open and partially closing and reopening it to allow the dog to enter. That constituted a search under the Fourth Amendment, following Felders v. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Search | Comments Off on CO: Opening car door to aid drug dog sniff was a search

OH5: Drug dog officer’s touching car to redirect dog wasn’t a search

The officer’s briefly touching the vehicle’s exterior to redirect the canine’s focus did not constitute a search. The dog’s certification and training were sufficient to establish its reliability, absent conflicting evidence from the defendant. This traffic stop was not unconstitutionally … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Search, Staleness | Comments Off on OH5: Drug dog officer’s touching car to redirect dog wasn’t a search

FL5: Dog alert on MJ before case law said it wasn’t PC anymore was in good faith

Newer cases hold that a drug dog can’t differentiate between legal and illegal marijuana, so a dog alert doesn’t provide probable cause. Where the dog sniff occurred before that holding, however, it was reasonable under the good faith exception. Ford … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on FL5: Dog alert on MJ before case law said it wasn’t PC anymore was in good faith

E.D.Mo.: No claim where no damages shown for alleged unreasonable dog sniff; nothing was found, detention was otherwise reasonable

Officers were surveilling a van that they believed might have a connection to an unsolved homicide. They observed what appeared to be hand-to-hand drug transactions, and the van’s LPN was expired. They approached. There were others around the van, and … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Dog sniff, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: No claim where no damages shown for alleged unreasonable dog sniff; nothing was found, detention was otherwise reasonable

S.D.Ga.: USMJ recommends suppression of search after dog alert because dog prompted and window entered

USMJ recommends motion to suppress car search based on a dog alert should be granted because the handler prompted the dog and both the handler and dog entered the window and then the car before the dog alert. As to … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: USMJ recommends suppression of search after dog alert because dog prompted and window entered

Motor Biscuit: Police hope you don’t know the “K9 unit” loophole used to search your car illegally

Motor Biscuit: Police hope you don’t know the “K9 unit” loophole used to search your car illegally by Henry Cesar (“Imagine getting pulled over for a broken taillight. The cop checks your license, hands you a ticket, and starts to … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on Motor Biscuit: Police hope you don’t know the “K9 unit” loophole used to search your car illegally

MN: Dog sniff inside car a search

A dog sniff inside a car is a search. But here it was with probable cause. State v. Johnson, 2024 Minn. App. LEXIS 537 (Dec. 23, 2024):

Posted in Dog sniff, Search | Comments Off on MN: Dog sniff inside car a search

W.D.La.: Dog sniff at door of commercial rented storage unit violated no REP

A dog sniff at the door to a rented commercial storage unit violated no reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Harris, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 224506 (W.D. La. Nov. 4, 2024). There’s no reasonable expectation of privacy in one’s … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Dog sniff at door of commercial rented storage unit violated no REP

Drug dog nose into a car window

“The drug dog’s fleeting touch of the passenger door and de minimus intrusion into the vehicle cabin through a window left open by a passenger does not justify the exclusion of evidence under the Supreme Court’s Fourth Amendment jurisprudence.” It … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on Drug dog nose into a car window

ND: Calling 911 about OD’g child in your house is exigency for entry

Calling 911 that the child you’re caring for OD’ed on your fentanyl is consent to their emergency entry. State v. Gothberg, 2024 ND 217, 2024 N.D. LEXIS 221 (Dec. 5, 2024). 2255 petitioner pled guilty knowing the facts of the … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on ND: Calling 911 about OD’g child in your house is exigency for entry

CA10: Gant permits search for DL in car when def fails to identify himself

Gant search incident permits a search for a driver’s real driver’s license in a car when he fails to properly identify himself. United States v. Pinder, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 29995 (10th Cir. Nov. 26, 2024). Complaining generally about a … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance, Search incident | Comments Off on CA10: Gant permits search for DL in car when def fails to identify himself

CA6: A rarity: No RS found for dog sniff on the highway

Defendant was stopped for speeding, and the officer ultimately called for a drug dog. No drugs, but he’s a felon in possession. The court finds no reasonable suspicion for extending the stop. The government proffered travel plans, criminal history, and … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: A rarity: No RS found for dog sniff on the highway

S.D.Cal.: Def counsel’s failure to file a motion to suppress that might have been plausible isn’t IAC per se

“That a motion to suppress or an objection based on trial testimony regarding the aerial surveillance video might have been reasonable falls short of establishing deficient performance by counsel. United States v. Reyes, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134866, 2012 WL … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Def counsel’s failure to file a motion to suppress that might have been plausible isn’t IAC per se

E.D.Mich.: Ordering passenger from car in an uneventful traffic stop required RS; his assault on officer was intervening act

The traffic stop was uneventful at first, and the driver provided all the information and papers necessary. After that, the officers focused on the passenger and ordered him from the car, but that required reasonable suspicion. His assault of the … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Dog sniff, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Ordering passenger from car in an uneventful traffic stop required RS; his assault on officer was intervening act