Category Archives: Dog sniff

PR: No REP in property where def not entitled to be

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in property where the defendant isn’t entitled to be, abandoned or otherwise unoccupied. El Pueblo v. Rondón, 2025 TSPR 113 (Nov. 4, 2025). (translation by Lexis) The stop of this known felon was … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Dog sniff, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PR: No REP in property where def not entitled to be

SCOTUSBlog: The dog sniff at the center of a Supreme Court petition

SCOTUSBlog: The dog sniff at the center of a Supreme Court petition by Kelsey Dallas:

Posted in Dog sniff, Trespass | Comments Off on SCOTUSBlog: The dog sniff at the center of a Supreme Court petition

LA1: Accelerant detection dog’s alert supported PC despite negative lab test

The fact the accelerant detection dog alerted supports probable cause despite later negative lab tests. State v. Hale, 2025 La. App. LEXIS 1749 (La. App. 1 Cir Sep. 19, 2025). Officers did not violate curtilage by observing shell casings in … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Knock and talk | Comments Off on LA1: Accelerant detection dog’s alert supported PC despite negative lab test

ID: Drug dog’s nose touching a car door handle was not a search

Drug dog’s nose touching a car door handle was not a search. State v. Pendleton, 2025 Ida. App. LEXIS 38 (Aug. 29, 2025). The defendant officer violated no reasonable expectation of privacy by accessing plaintiff’s public Facebook posts. Dicks v. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Trespass | Comments Off on ID: Drug dog’s nose touching a car door handle was not a search

IN: Drug dog’s instinctive entry into car is reasonable, but this was facilitated by the officer and wasn’t

Indiana adopts the drug dog rule that “a K9’s instinctive entry into a vehicle does not implicate the Fourth Amendment so long as it is not directed, encouraged, or facilitated by officers.” This one was, and without probable cause, and … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IN: Drug dog’s instinctive entry into car is reasonable, but this was facilitated by the officer and wasn’t

CA6: Harris drug dog reliability case only applies to warrantless searches

The Harris drug dog reliability case applies only to warrantless searches. Here, Postal Inspectors used a drug dog on a suspicious package at the Cleveland sorting center, and then got warrant when the dog alerted. Harris is not an exception … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Waiver | Comments Off on CA6: Harris drug dog reliability case only applies to warrantless searches

VA: Dog repeatedly jumping onto the vehicle during the dog sniff was a search

The drug-sniffing dog’s repeatedly jumping onto and placing paws on a vehicle during a drug sniff constitutes a physical trespass for the purpose of obtaining information, and therefore qualifies as a search under the Fourth Amendment. Commonwealth v. Wiggins, 2025 … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Search, Trespass | Comments Off on VA: Dog repeatedly jumping onto the vehicle during the dog sniff was a search

CA4: Dog sniff at apt. door here violated no REP

A dog sniff at defendant’s apartment door in a multi-unit complex didn’t violate any reasonable expectation of privacy. (Two unpublished cases in this circuit said that; this one’s published.) United States v. Johnson, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 19648 (4th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness, Search incident | Comments Off on CA4: Dog sniff at apt. door here violated no REP

C.D.Cal. denies stay in immigration stops without RS

Perdomo v. Noem, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137993 (C.D. Cal. July 17, 2025), posted here, holds that reasonable suspicion is required for immigration stops and race alone isn’t enough. The government’s motion for stay pending appeal is denied. Without more … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Immigration arrests, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on C.D.Cal. denies stay in immigration stops without RS

IA: Video shows officers didn’t slow walk traffic stop for dog sniff

On de novo review, the officers didn’t slow walk the traffic citation to get more time to do the dog sniff. State v. Cox, 2025 Iowa App. LEXIS 567 (July 2, 2025)*:

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: Video shows officers didn’t slow walk traffic stop for dog sniff

E.D.Ark.: Reacting defensively to request for consent contributed to RS

[While it was thin,] The officer had reasonable suspicion for a dog sniff, including “react[ing] defensively when asked for consent to search the Sentra by making a facial expression, flailing his arms to the side, and offering unprompted explanations as … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Reacting defensively to request for consent contributed to RS

ID: Flicking a cigarette butt to the ground in a bar parking lot was not RS

Flicking a cigarette butt to the ground in a bar parking lot was not reasonable suspicion for a stop. State v. Popp, 2025 Ida. LEXIS 69 (June 27, 2025). Idaho declines to impose higher standards for dog sniffs under state … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on ID: Flicking a cigarette butt to the ground in a bar parking lot was not RS

GA: Dog sniff during the first part of the stop while computer checks going on didn’t prolong it

“[T]he trial court was entitled to find that the questioning and free-air dog sniff were done concurrently with other tasks related to the mission of the traffic stop and therefore did not impermissibly prolong the stop.” Avant v. State, 2025 … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on GA: Dog sniff during the first part of the stop while computer checks going on didn’t prolong it

CA11: Using BitTorrent to enter def’s computer peer-to-peer wasn’t an unreasonable search

Using BitTorrent to access defendant’s open child pornography files peer-to-peer on his computer was not a digital trespass and did not violate any reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Ewing, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 15437 (11th Cir. June 23, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Digital privacy, Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Inventory, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Trespass | Comments Off on CA11: Using BitTorrent to enter def’s computer peer-to-peer wasn’t an unreasonable search

OH1: Drug dog’s instinctive jump into car window wasn’t unreasonable

The drug dog’s instinctive jump into the window of defendant’s car wasn’t initiated by the handler, so it wasn’t unreasonable. State v. Barton, 2025-Ohio-1904 (1st Dist. May 28, 2025) (2-1). “As already discussed, Parr had reason to believe Defendant was … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH1: Drug dog’s instinctive jump into car window wasn’t unreasonable

NY3: Judge who issued SW not barred from handling trial

Defendant’s claim that the judge issuing the search warrant couldn’t preside at the trial was not preserved because there was no objection. It would have failed anyway. People v Coston, 2025 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3046 (3d Dept. May 15, … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Neutral and detached magistrate, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on NY3: Judge who issued SW not barred from handling trial

OH1: “reasonable suspicion to stop a suspect is not necessarily reasonable suspicion to search them.”

“But reasonable suspicion to stop a suspect is not necessarily reasonable suspicion to search them.” State v. Hall, 2025-Ohio-1644, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS 1640 (1st Dist. May 8, 2025). The home owner consented to a complete search, and the defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on OH1: “reasonable suspicion to stop a suspect is not necessarily reasonable suspicion to search them.”

CA4: SW affidavit not required to name an offender

A search warrant is about whether evidence would be found in the place to be searched, not whether there’s an offender. United States v. Johnson, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 10138 (4th Cir. Apr. 28, 2025). 2255 petitioner’s Franks ineffective assistance … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Curtilage, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA4: SW affidavit not required to name an offender

CA8: Dog’s instinctive head in the car window wasn’t a trespass

The dog touching the car was instinctive and not handler directed. Therefore, it’s not a trespass. There’s some doubt in the existing rule in this circuit, but not here. United States v. Munoz, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 8808 (8th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Trespass | Comments Off on CA8: Dog’s instinctive head in the car window wasn’t a trespass

W.D.La.: Request for consent during stop came after RS developed

Defendant’s traffic stop was reasonable because of a cracked windshield on his truck, and a question about consent to search near the end of the ticket writing process didn’t unlawfully extend it. United States v. Calderon, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Request for consent during stop came after RS developed