Category Archives: Dog sniff

D.P.R.: Getting out of car and running away from it on seeing the police is abandonment

Defendant didn’t file a declaration under penalty of perjury contesting the facts alleged in his criminal complaint. He also fails to show even a subjective reasonable expectation of privacy in the place searched to give him standing. He abandoned his … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Dog sniff, Search | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Getting out of car and running away from it on seeing the police is abandonment

FL1: Screen shot of of meth on a scale on driver’s cell phone permitted dog sniff during writing of traffic ticket

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, and he was unusually nervous. Sitting on his left leg was a cell phone with the screen on showing a picture of meth on a scale. That justified a dog sniff while a … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Standards of review | Comments Off on FL1: Screen shot of of meth on a scale on driver’s cell phone permitted dog sniff during writing of traffic ticket

OH5: Def’s inordinate delay in finding car insurance card enabled reasonable dog sniff

The stop was delayed by defendant being unable to produce his proof of insurance, so the officer did not extend the stop to run a dog around the car during the wait. State v. Newman, 2021-Ohio-119, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Dog sniff, Good faith exception | Comments Off on OH5: Def’s inordinate delay in finding car insurance card enabled reasonable dog sniff

CA9: The fact CBP had RS doesn’t mean it’s required for a border dog sniff

“The fact that Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) officers had reasonable suspicion cannot serve to heighten the standard attached to the border search.” The use of a drug dog at the border doesn’t require reasonable suspicion. United States v. Meraz-Campos, … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Border search, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: The fact CBP had RS doesn’t mean it’s required for a border dog sniff

D.Utah: Govt had burden on proving RS to continue stop and failed to put on justification; suppressed

The government carried the burden on the basis for the stop but not why it was continued, and the record tells the court nothing about the first 65 minutes of delay. “[T]he court concludes that the dog’s entry into the … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Utah: Govt had burden on proving RS to continue stop and failed to put on justification; suppressed

DE: Actual presence of accused not required for suppression hearing and video appearance constitutional

A virtual suppression hearing that was a mixed question of law and fact didn’t require the actual presence of the accused under the Sixth Amendment’s confrontation clause, following United States v. Rosenschein, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129889 (D.N.M. July 23, … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on DE: Actual presence of accused not required for suppression hearing and video appearance constitutional

W.D.Pa.: Opening car door and drug dog jumping in wasn’t encouraging the dog

During a dog sniff, the officer opened the car door, and the dog jumped in. The officer did not encourage the dog to enter [merely by opening the door], so this was not a search. The court notes that the … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Opening car door and drug dog jumping in wasn’t encouraging the dog

FL4: Dog sniff of passenger in car stopped with RS was reasonable

“We address an issue of first impression: the propriety of using a drug dog to sniff the passenger of a vehicle during a traffic stop based on a reasonable and articulable suspicion the passenger possesses drugs, where the sniff itself … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL4: Dog sniff of passenger in car stopped with RS was reasonable

OH12: Drug dog’s alert to residual odor of drugs is not a lack of PC

A drug dog’s alert to the residual odor of drugs isn’t a lack of probable cause. “Accordingly, the fact that Mox [the drug dog] could have alerted to a residual odor of drugs does not mean that there was not … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Dog sniff, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH12: Drug dog’s alert to residual odor of drugs is not a lack of PC

W.D.Ky.: When there is PC and the automobile exception applies, the 4A doesn’t require a drug dog be used

The officer had probable cause on the totality for a vehicle search under the automobile exception. It wasn’t required that the drug dog that was there be used, too. United States v. Moralez, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206109 (W.D. Ky. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Dog sniff, Knock and talk | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: When there is PC and the automobile exception applies, the 4A doesn’t require a drug dog be used

KY: Traffic stop was unreasonably delayed for drug dog

The officers delayed the stop to get the drug dog to the scene. The court of appeals erred, however, in not determining reasonable suspicion. Commonwealth v. Mitchell, 2020 Ky. LEXIS 394 (Oct. 29, 2020):

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on KY: Traffic stop was unreasonably delayed for drug dog

TX5: HIPAA doesn’t create REP in blood toxicology for medical treatment later used in DUI

HIPAA doesn’t create a reasonable expectation of privacy in one’s blood sample obtained for medical treatment. HIPAA recognizes criminal process to obtain it. Consuelo v. State, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 8460 (Tex. App. – Dallas Oct. 27, 2020). Any lack … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Particularity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on TX5: HIPAA doesn’t create REP in blood toxicology for medical treatment later used in DUI

D.S.D.: Failure to bring affidavit for SW to scene of search doesn’t obviate GFE

The affidavit for this search warrant was based on probable cause. “Law enforcement’s failure to bring the affidavit in support of the search warrant to the scene of the search is not fatal to the good-faith exception’s application. … The … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Failure to bring affidavit for SW to scene of search doesn’t obviate GFE

NY1: Failure to get a ruling on search issue in trial court is waiver

Failure to get a ruling on a search claim in the trial court is waiver of the issue for appeal. People v. Collins, 2020 NY Slip Op 04517, 2020 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4610 (1st Dept. Aug. 13, 2020). Drug … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Search, Staleness, Waiver | Comments Off on NY1: Failure to get a ruling on search issue in trial court is waiver

CO: Traffic stop was objectively reasonable even though officer cited wrong statute

Defendant’s stop was objectively reasonable, even though the officer cited the wrong statute. People v. Ambrose, 2020 COA 112, 2020 Colo. App. LEXIS 1384 (July 23, 2020). “[W]e need not address Salas’s argument that a slight delay to conduct a … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CO: Traffic stop was objectively reasonable even though officer cited wrong statute

D.Haw.: 4A IAC requires showing standing, too

Defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim for a search issue has to show that he had standing to even make the Fourth Amendment challenge, which he doesn’t. It’s an integral part of the merits claim. United States v. Scher, 2020 … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on D.Haw.: 4A IAC requires showing standing, too