OH10: Parole search of cell phone can occur even when it’s taken from the property room at jail

Defendant was in jail, and his PO went to the jail and got his phone from the property room to search it. This was a reasonable search under his parole search condition. State ex rel. Woodard v. Hoying, 2026-Ohio-1351 (10th Dist. Apr. 13, 2026).

The alleged private search of defendant’s phone by his wife was by joint authority, so no Fourth Amendment search claim. Ortego v. State, 2026 Tex. App. LEXIS 3421 (Tex. App. – Houston (1st Dist.) Apr. 14, 2026).*

The odor of marijuana coming off the juvenile’s person was the valid reason for his stop. In re State in the Interst of T.Q., 2026 La. App. LEXIS 666 (La. App. 1 Cir Apr. 13, 2026).*

Officers approached a group smoking pot outside a housing project, and they dispersed. Walking away can be suggestive of supporting reasonable suspicion. Defendant was grabbed and his backpack was frisked for a weapon, too. Washington v. Commonwealth, 2026 Va. App. LEXIS 213 (Apr. 14, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Consent, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.