Category Archives: Probation / Parole search

NY3: No REP in parole GPS monitoring as to police

“Here, defendant’s affidavit in support of his motion to suppress contended that he had a reasonable expectation of privacy from a search and seizure by the police because, although he knew his location was being tracked by his parole officer … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NY3: No REP in parole GPS monitoring as to police

W.D.La.: Gant search incident permitted for arrest for violation of supervised release terms

Defendant was stopped for a warrant for violation of the terms of his supervised release. A search incident of his car was permissible under Gant. United States v. Briggs, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 242751 (W.D. La. Oct. 22, 2026). Defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Probation / Parole search, Search incident, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Gant search incident permitted for arrest for violation of supervised release terms

WI: During a traffic stop, officers can run the criminal history of passengers

During a traffic stop, officers can run the criminal history of passengers. State v. Pantle, 2026 Wisc. App. LEXIS 1138 (Oct. 14, 2026). Defendant’s conditional release search one week before the end of his term was based on reasonable suspicion … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Inventory, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WI: During a traffic stop, officers can run the criminal history of passengers

CA2: Car not named in SW could be seized and searched incident to forfeiture

The warrant here was for defendant’s house and grounds. No vehicles were mentioned even though officers had knowledge defendant dealt drugs at least from one. On executing the warrant, they found the vehicle and seized it for forfeiture. Searching it … Continue reading →

Posted in Forfeiture, Particularity, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA2: Car not named in SW could be seized and searched incident to forfeiture

CA2: Cell phone search reasonable at the border

At the border, defendant’s cell phone was first manually searched and then forensically searched. Neither was unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Robinson, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 30035 (2d Cir. Oct. 1, 2026), following United States v. Alisigwe, … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, First Amendment, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: Cell phone search reasonable at the border

Jail searches: (1) body scan led to SW for body cavity search and (2) biometric scans reasonable

Plaintiff was subjected to an electronic body scan that led to a body cavity search with a warrant for an apparent mass inside him. This search was reasonable. Brown v. Suess, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 220823 (W.D.N.Y. Sep. 28, 2026). … Continue reading →

Posted in Facial recognition, GPS / Tracking Data, Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Jail searches: (1) body scan led to SW for body cavity search and (2) biometric scans reasonable

NM: Trial court’s finding of consent is reversed because the court engaged in its own internet investigation beyond what the parties provided

The suppression order for defendant on coerced consent is reversed. The trial court engaged in its own research into facts to make the decision on acquiring the affidavit for a later warrant, the distance between things, and the temperature at … Continue reading →

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate, Probation / Parole search, Standards of review | Comments Off on NM: Trial court’s finding of consent is reversed because the court engaged in its own internet investigation beyond what the parties provided

CA3: Ptfs pled a 4A claim for CPS workers demanding entry without sufficient exigency

Plaintiffs plausibly pled violations of the Fourth Amendment for child protective services demanding and gaining entry into the home without a sufficient showing of exigency to protect the children. Also, the special needs doctrine doesn’t apply here. O’Bryant v. N.J. … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: Ptfs pled a 4A claim for CPS workers demanding entry without sufficient exigency

ID: Violation of statute in parole arrest doesn’t require suppression

While defendant’s parole arrest by a police officer violated state statute, neither the Fourth Amendment nor state constitution require suppression. State v. Satterfield, 2026 Ida. LEXIS 129 (Sep. 11, 2026):

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on ID: Violation of statute in parole arrest doesn’t require suppression

D.Utah: Younger abstention applies to a person with common interest

Younger abstention applies to a person with common interest with a person who had their case adjudicated adversely in state court. Valdez v. City of Provo, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 204752 (D. Utah Sep. 9, 2026). Information that defendant has … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, GPS / Tracking Data, Issue preclusion, Probation / Parole search, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Utah: Younger abstention applies to a person with common interest

DC: Def on supervision before sentencing had no REP in GPS monitoring

Defendant was on high intensity supervision with GPS for his current conviction, but he hadn’t yet been sentenced. Officers didn’t need a warrant to obtain his GPS data. “This case involves a defendant who had been adjudicated guilty, and PSA … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search, Scope of search, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on DC: Def on supervision before sentencing had no REP in GPS monitoring

CA9: Ptfs didn’t meet burden of showing administrative subpoena was 4A violation or in bad faith

Bad faith administrative subpoenas are grounded in the Fourth Amendment, but the burden is high in showing bad faith, and plaintiffs didn’t meet it. Queerdoc, PLLC v. DOJ, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 24567 (9th Cir. Aug. 14, 2026) (“The prohibition … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Standing, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on CA9: Ptfs didn’t meet burden of showing administrative subpoena was 4A violation or in bad faith

S.D.W.Va.: Admission to a little marijuana in backpack didn’t justify search of her car trunk

Defendant’s admission to the officers she had a little marijuana in her backpack didn’t justify a search of the trunk. United States v. Bowling, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169576 (S.D. W. Va. July 30, 2026). Plaintiff’s § 1983 false arrest … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Burden of pleading, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Admission to a little marijuana in backpack didn’t justify search of her car trunk

Cal.1: Search condition for mental health diversion was within court’s discretion

The trial court acted within its statutory discretion imposing a search condition on defendant during his mental health diversion. His criminal history justified it. Thompson v. Superior Court, 2026 Cal. App. LEXIS 459 (1st Dist. July 30, 2026). One defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on Cal.1: Search condition for mental health diversion was within court’s discretion

NY1: 911 call about shooting in apartment building led officers to def’s apartment and exigency justified entry

“The record supports the court’s conclusion that the warrantless entry into defendant’s apartment was justified under the emergency doctrine …. The officers received a 911 call reporting that someone was shot in the building; found a bullet on the floor … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NY1: 911 call about shooting in apartment building led officers to def’s apartment and exigency justified entry

E.D.Cal.: Supervised release search condition permitted cell phone search

The warrantless search of defendant’s cell phone was reasonable because he was a supervised release. The timing of the search after the seizure of the phone was also reasonable. United States v. Yama, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160332 (E.D. Cal. … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Computer and cloud searches, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Supervised release search condition permitted cell phone search

MT: Exigency is found in the totality of circumstances

In a domestic dispute, officers had exigent circumstances to enter on the totality of circumstances. Defendant challenged them one-by-one, but the totality applies. State v. Friscia, 2026 MT 158 (July 21, 2026). It was not reasonably subject to dispute that … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on MT: Exigency is found in the totality of circumstances

CA6: Despite two guns being suppressed from arrest on bare-bones arrest affidavit, third gun was later validly seized by independent source

The first search warrant was based on a bare-bones arrest affidavit. Two guns were seized and a third left behind. The seizure of the third gun was valid by the independent source doctrine. “Because investigators would have sought and obtained … Continue reading →

Posted in Independent source, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA6: Despite two guns being suppressed from arrest on bare-bones arrest affidavit, third gun was later validly seized by independent source

ND: Probation search of cell phone was reasonable

Probation search of defendant’s cell phone, whether he owned it or merely possessed it, was reasonable. He claimed it was someone else’s he had with permission. State v. Warner, 2026 ND 133 (July 9, 2026). Habeas petitioner’s Fourth Amendment ineffective … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Cell phones, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on ND: Probation search of cell phone was reasonable

CA11: Yahoo not a govt actor in scanning emails for CSAM

Yahoo and NCMEC didn’t act as government agents when they scanned defendant’s email account for hash values of CSAM. They were not required to do so, but did so and warned customers they would. NCMEC passed on the information to … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on CA11: Yahoo not a govt actor in scanning emails for CSAM