Category Archives: Admissibility of evidence

CA1: Video of SW execution sufficiently authenticated for trial

The video of execution of the search warrant was sufficiently authenticated to be admissible at trial despite coming in through a witness other than the one who took it. United States v. Reyes-Rosario, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 16316 (1st Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Private search, Probable cause, Search incident, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA1: Video of SW execution sufficiently authenticated for trial

NY4: First search missed cache of drugs, so police came back for a second search; first search admissible at trial

Officers got a search warrant for defendant’s premises and searched. Two days later, they discovered through a source that they missed a cache of drugs in the house. They came back with another. The results of the first search were … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on NY4: First search missed cache of drugs, so police came back for a second search; first search admissible at trial

GA: SW affidavit came in at trial; argument waived

Defendant’s argument about admission of a search warrant affidavit at trial was deemed abandoned even for plain error review. Coston v. State, 2025 Ga. LEXIS 123 (June 10, 2025).* (Caution readers: I had this issue just this year: The prosecution … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search, Scope of search | Comments Off on GA: SW affidavit came in at trial; argument waived

AR: Use of a CI for a SW creates no confrontation issue

The use of a CI for a search warrant creates no confrontation issue. Williams v. State, 2025 Ark. App. 252, 2025 Ark. App. LEXIS 254 (Apr. 23, 2025). It was appellate counsel’s choice to not pursue defendant’s search claim on … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Anticipatory warrant, Ineffective assistance, Privileges | Comments Off on AR: Use of a CI for a SW creates no confrontation issue

W.D.La.: Product of uncharged search of house comes in under 404(b)

Defendant was indicted for possession of drugs in a storage unit, but drugs and cash were also found in his house. That can come in under 404(b). United States v. Harris, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75696 (W.D. La. Apr. 21, … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Product of uncharged search of house comes in under 404(b)

M.D.Fla.: In civil rights prosecution, 4A training information admitted for willfulness, not to prove a constitutional violation

In an excessive force civil rights prosecution, evidence of training on use of force was relevant and, here, admitted for a limited purpose. “So Martin’s testimony was relevant to willfulness, and the Court’s instructions—instructions Defendant and the Government jointly proposed—made … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Excessive force | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: In civil rights prosecution, 4A training information admitted for willfulness, not to prove a constitutional violation

CA6: By testifying at trial searches were based on false evidence, def violated proffer agreement; govt should have objected, not violated it, too

Defendant’s trial testimony about his searches being based on falsities violated his proffer agreement, but, rather than objecting, the government’s putting in more evidence violated it, too. (But harmless error.) United States v. Grogan, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 7094 (6th … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence | Comments Off on CA6: By testifying at trial searches were based on false evidence, def violated proffer agreement; govt should have objected, not violated it, too

E.D.La.: Def’s presence at another SW execution admissible under 404(b)

Defendant’s presence at a drug house when another search warrant was served is admissible under 404(b). United States v. Holmes, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55926 (E.D. La. Mar. 26, 2025).* Defendant’s performance on SFSTs was probable cause for his arrest … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Def’s presence at another SW execution admissible under 404(b)

OH2: Motion to suppress not proper to challenge authentication of a record for trial

A motion to suppress doesn’t lie just because the defense thinks that a record can be authenticated under Rule 901. State v. Wolfe, 2025-Ohio-866 (2d Dist. Mar. 14, 2025). “Because Phillips did not make a contemporaneous objection to either the … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on OH2: Motion to suppress not proper to challenge authentication of a record for trial

CA11: Refusal to cooperate in taking DNA by SW permitted adverse inference at trial

“The record here demonstrates that the district court did not plainly err by allowing the jury to draw an adverse inference of guilt from Gonzalez’s refusal to provide his DNA even though his counsel was not present. When the government … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, DNA, Inventory | Comments Off on CA11: Refusal to cooperate in taking DNA by SW permitted adverse inference at trial

CA2: Alleged inconsistencies in dog handler’s testimony didn’t necessarily make him unbelievable

“Any inconsistent testimony Fisher gave as to the dog’s ‘alerts’ and ‘indications’ arose out of a confusion of vocabulary rather than lack of credibility, as made evident by the district court’s request that Fisher clarify and not conflate the terms. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: Alleged inconsistencies in dog handler’s testimony didn’t necessarily make him unbelievable

NV: Not IAC to not object to CSLI business records after motion to suppress lost

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not objecting to the CSLI records which were coming in in any event as business records. He’d objected before trial to the search and lost, and that was argued on direct appeal and lost. State … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NV: Not IAC to not object to CSLI business records after motion to suppress lost

CA6: Impeaching def’s trial testimony about the search of his property using his proffer agreement was prejudicial, but harmless

Impeaching defendant’s trial testimony about the search of his property using his proffer agreement was prejudicial, but it was harmless on this record. They could have cross-examined without it. United States v. Grogan, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 2354 (6th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Inventory, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Impeaching def’s trial testimony about the search of his property using his proffer agreement was prejudicial, but harmless

AR: Questions about legality of search before jury properly excluded under 403

Where the trial court denied the pretrial motion to suppress, cross-examination of the officer about the legality of the search was properly denied on objection by the state as potentially misleading to the jury. Damon v. State, 2025 Ark. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on AR: Questions about legality of search before jury properly excluded under 403

CA8: Drugs on person admissible under 404(b) despite being outside indictment

Drugs on defendant’s person at the time of arrest were admissible under 404(b) despite being outside the time of the indictment. United States v. Hodo, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 1796 (8th Cir. Jan. 28, 2025). Defendant was on supervised release … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA8: Drugs on person admissible under 404(b) despite being outside indictment

N.D.Ohio: Alleged mishandling of drugs during execution of SW didn’t make them inadmissible

Even if the officers (mis)handled the drugs during the search, they’d still come into evidence at trial. United States v. McDonald, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11844 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 22, 2025). The trial court suppressed this cell phone search as … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Alleged mishandling of drugs during execution of SW didn’t make them inadmissible

E.D.N.Y.: Anonymous report of man threatening others with a gun didn’t provide RS

The anonymous report about a man threatening others in Queens adequately described defendant but it provided nothing to show that there was a crime in the offing. The stop and search was without reasonable suspicion. “On this record, it is … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Anonymous report of man threatening others with a gun didn’t provide RS

D.R.I.: Motion in limine about SW is denied; govt can refer to search in trial

Defendant’s motion in limine about whether a search warrant was utilized is denied. The government can refer incidentally to the search. United States v. Djan, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8285 (D.R.I. Jan. 10, 2025). Officers had reasonable suspicion for the … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on D.R.I.: Motion in limine about SW is denied; govt can refer to search in trial

D.Minn.: Photographs could be taken during execution of SW

Photographs could be taken during execution of a search warrant. United States v. Schultz, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 236848 (D. Minn. Dec. 2, 2024), adopted, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4918 (D. Minn. Jan. 10, 2025). In a case involving whether … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Photographs could be taken during execution of SW

E.D.Mich.: Officer seizing notebooks couldn’t authenticate them as exhibits at trial

The seizing officer could not authenticate defendant’s notebooks as evidence at the trial. He had no knowledge about how they came into being. United States v. Sherman, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5696 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 12, 2025). Defendant’s admission at … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Officer seizing notebooks couldn’t authenticate them as exhibits at trial