Category Archives: Cell phones

S.D.Ohio: Affidavit alleged only that drug dealers use cell phones, and that’s not PC; but GFE saves it

The affidavit for warrant for a cell phone relies entirely on the general use of cell phones in the drug trade. There’s no more, and that’s not probable cause. Still, however, the good faith exception saves it. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Affidavit alleged only that drug dealers use cell phones, and that’s not PC; but GFE saves it

S.D.Ga.: Def’s car in driveway next to sidewalk was not on curtilage

Defendant’s vehicle in his driveway 2-3 steps from the sidewalk was not on the curtilage. United States v. Polk, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 238708 (S.D. Ga. Oct. 19, 2026). “The Court finds, based on the totality of the circumstances, that … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Curtilage, Nexus | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Def’s car in driveway next to sidewalk was not on curtilage

USA Today: Cell phone SW for cause of crash

USA Today: Woman accused of searching porn site before deadly crash by Julia Gomez (search warrant for cell phone seeking cause of accident).

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on USA Today: Cell phone SW for cause of crash

N.D.Ga.: A Customs forensic search of a cell phone away from the border was still a border search

Defendant’s cell phone was seized at ATL Customs for a border search, and it went elsewhere for a forensic search. That search was still a border search. United States v. Vereen, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 238218 (N.D. Ga. Sep. 1, … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Excessive force, Nexus | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: A Customs forensic search of a cell phone away from the border was still a border search

E.D.Mich.: Second SW for cell phone data retained by govt was valid

This is a second motion to suppress a cell phone search, the first having been denied. A copy of the phone remains with the government, the phone having been returned. The first warrant to review the contents was for human … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell, Stop and frisk, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Second SW for cell phone data retained by govt was valid

W.D.Pa.: SW for cell phone on def at time of drug arrest was particular

Defendant’s cell phone particularity objection to the warrant fails because it showed (1) crime involved, (2) ID’ed them as found on him at time with a gun and drugs, and (3) showed nexus. Also, the good faith exception would apply. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: SW for cell phone on def at time of drug arrest was particular

Reason: Are Warrantless Phone Searches at the Border Constitutional? The Supreme Court May Soon Decide.

Reason: Are Warrantless Phone Searches at the Border Constitutional? The Supreme Court May Soon Decide. by Amy Piekoff:

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Reason: Are Warrantless Phone Searches at the Border Constitutional? The Supreme Court May Soon Decide.

CA2: Cell phone search reasonable at the border

At the border, defendant’s cell phone was first manually searched and then forensically searched. Neither was unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Robinson, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 30035 (2d Cir. Oct. 1, 2026), following United States v. Alisigwe, … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, First Amendment, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: Cell phone search reasonable at the border

Reason: Border Agents Nabbed Their Phones. These Two Floridians Are Fighting Back.

Reason: Border Agents Nabbed Their Phones. These Two Floridians Are Fighting Back. by Matthew Petti (“Jalal ‘Jay’ Shehadeh had no reason to believe he was under suspicion from the government. A former assistant state attorney in Florida, he traveled frequently … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on Reason: Border Agents Nabbed Their Phones. These Two Floridians Are Fighting Back.

Reason: Border Agents Search Phones Without Warrants. This Case Asks the Supreme Court if That’s Constitutional

Reason: Border Agents Search Phones Without Warrants. This Case Asks the Supreme Court if That’s Constitutional by Tosin Akintola (“Federal appeals courts differ on whether the Fourth Amendment protects your cellphone at the border. A Texas lawyer is asking the … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on Reason: Border Agents Search Phones Without Warrants. This Case Asks the Supreme Court if That’s Constitutional

MN: Risk of destruction of evidence was exigency for seizure of cell phone

The exigency for seizure of defendant’s cell phone pending getting a warrant was risk of destruction of evidence. State v. Laflex, 2026 Minn. LEXIS 592 (Sep. 23, 2026). Furtive movements add to reasonable suspicion. Ex parte Lucio, 2026 Tex. Crim. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Dog sniff, Emergency / exigency, Mail and packages, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MN: Risk of destruction of evidence was exigency for seizure of cell phone

GA: No case says SW required to ask for cell phone password

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not arguing that a warrant was required for a request for a cell phone password. No case anywhere says that’s required. Reynolds v. State, 2026 Ga. LEXIS 303 (Sep. 22, 2026). The inventory search of … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Inventory, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on GA: No case says SW required to ask for cell phone password

S.D.W.Va.: Warrantless arrest at door for CSAM didn’t support plain view seizure of cell phone

Officers came to defendant’s house without an arrest or search warrant to arrest him for a CSAM offense. He answered the door in his underwear. They asked about cell phone and saw it and seized it. Payton applies, and the … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Good faith exception, immigration stops, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Warrantless arrest at door for CSAM didn’t support plain view seizure of cell phone

CA2: Warrantless cell phone border search valid

Defendant, a permanent resident, was suspected of a multimillion dollar fraud with false identities. He was stopped at JFK coming back and his phone was seized and searched helping make the case against him. No warrant was needed for the … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstention, Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on CA2: Warrantless cell phone border search valid

NC: Standing to contest search of hotel room doesn’t include other guest’s cell phone

As a guest of a guest, defendant had standing to contest the search of the hotel room, but he didn’t have standing to contest the search of the other tenant’s cell phone. State v. Miller, 2026 N.C. App. LEXIS 763 … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on NC: Standing to contest search of hotel room doesn’t include other guest’s cell phone

S.D.Tex.: PayPal records were mere third-party records

Records from PayPal and Block were mere third-party records under Miller. The search of his cell phone at Customs at the Houston airport was a routine border search. Child pornography was found on it. United States v. Flores, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras, Border search, Cell phones, Motion to suppress, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: PayPal records were mere third-party records

E.D.Mich.: Person a cell phone was given to as gift could consent to search

Defendant gave an old cell phone to his niece. On it, she found child pornography, and she took it to the police who she showed images and texts. The officer didn’t search. She had apparent authority to consent to search … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Apparent authority, Cell phones, Consent, Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Person a cell phone was given to as gift could consent to search

KS: Running warrants on a passed out person is reasonable

Defendant was passed out under a bridge, and the fire department and police were called. Firemen got her name and police ran a warrants check, finding one, and they arrested her. That was reasonable. State v. Willard, 2026 Kan. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on KS: Running warrants on a passed out person is reasonable

M.D.Fla.: Unidentified pills in driver’s lap may have been RS but it wasn’t PC for arrest

Defendant was stopped for speeding, and he was arrested for drugs based on unidentified pills found in his lap when the officer looked in. That might have been reasonable suspicion, but it wasn’t probable cause. Therefore, the arrest and car … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Cell phones, Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Unidentified pills in driver’s lap may have been RS but it wasn’t PC for arrest

Reason: Border Agents Searched His Phone 5 Times Without a Warrant. He’s Asking the Supreme Court To Put a Stop to It.

Reason: Border Agents Searched His Phone 5 Times Without a Warrant. He’s Asking the Supreme Court To Put a Stop to It. by Elizabeth Nolan Brown (“The Fourth Amendment says authorities can’t search you or your things without probable cause … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on Reason: Border Agents Searched His Phone 5 Times Without a Warrant. He’s Asking the Supreme Court To Put a Stop to It.