Category Archives: Stop and frisk

VA: Second frisk was still with RS

Defendant’s second frisk was valid, despite a prior frisk not finding anything. “We have no doubt that the situation here presented such circumstances, on the heels of a possible armed robbery with suspects on the scene and the whereabouts of … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Privileges, Standing, Stop and frisk, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on VA: Second frisk was still with RS

M.D.Fla.: In a false arrest case, the sheriff involved admitted no 4A training

In this false arrest case, the sheriff admitted he had no training in the Fourth Amendment. Harris v. Breeden, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 225584 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 17, 2025). The frisk here was without reasonable suspicion, including the bag defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standing, Stop and frisk, Warrant execution | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: In a false arrest case, the sheriff involved admitted no 4A training

E.D.Mich.: Frisk that went inside defendant’s pants was unreasonable

A frisk that went inside defendant’s pants was unreasonable. United States v. Davis, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202764 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 20, 2025). When a stop revealed a holster when the defendant got out of the vehicle, a further intrusion … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Frisk that went inside defendant’s pants was unreasonable

D.D.C.: Handcuffing def resisting patdown didn’t make it an arrest

Officers had reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop and patdown. His resistance justified handcuffs, and it still did not become an arrest until the gun was found. United States v. Gatling, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 171825 (D.D.C. Sep. 2, 2025)*:

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Handcuffing def resisting patdown didn’t make it an arrest

ATL: a “search so obviously unconstitutional that a ‘high school student’ would know it’s illegal”

ATL: Federal Judge Slams The ‘Lawlessness’ Of Trump’s D.C. Takeover by Kathryn Rubino. These guys think they have Art. II license to violate the law?

Posted in Immigration arrests, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on ATL: a “search so obviously unconstitutional that a ‘high school student’ would know it’s illegal”

OH5: Trial court erred in finding no standing when the state didn’t even raise it

The trial court erred in finding no standing when the state didn’t even raise it. State v. Reynolds, 2025-Ohio-2347, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS 2332 (5th Dist. July 2, 2025). During the stop, the driver could be ordered out of the … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Standing, Stop and frisk, Waiver | Comments Off on OH5: Trial court erred in finding no standing when the state didn’t even raise it

MA: Defendant fled his allegedly illegal stop, so he can’t argue attenuation when he discarded contraband in flight

The trial court erred in applying the attenuation doctrine here. Defendant claimed he was illegally stopped, but he fled and discarded contraband in flight. Commonwealth v. Diaz, 2025 Mass. LEXIS 300 (June 27, 2025). This geofence warrant was supported by … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Franks doctrine, geofence, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MA: Defendant fled his allegedly illegal stop, so he can’t argue attenuation when he discarded contraband in flight

D.N.H.: Extended border search of men on bicycles was valid

Defendant was stopped on a bicycle with backpack and bedroll with another in New Hampshire by a CBP officer who suspected they’d illegally crossed the border. They admitted they had. Suspecting they were involved with human smugglers, the officers searched … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.N.H.: Extended border search of men on bicycles was valid

S.D.Tex.: Judge shopping SW request noted, and denied again

It appears to this USMJ that the government is judge shopping. After denial of a warrant request, the government reapplied which was first assigned to another USMJ who transferred it here. Rejected again for the same reason. Defect not cured. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonableness, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Judge shopping SW request noted, and denied again

DE: There was RS for handcuffing and frisk of visitor during a probation search

Defendant was a visitor in a home subjected to a probation search, and his movements and words justified handcuffing him to maintain the status quo and then patting him down. “Therefore, Roane’s behavior created both reasonable, articulable suspicion regarding both … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Probation / Parole search, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on DE: There was RS for handcuffing and frisk of visitor during a probation search

ABA: Stop and Frisk: Appropriate or Unconstitutional?

ABA: Stop and Frisk: Appropriate or Unconstitutional? by Oran Lott Bullock & Yolanda Means (“Stop and frisk is both a symbol of proactive policing and a flashpoint for civil liberties advocates. Central to the debate is the threshold of ‘reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on ABA: Stop and Frisk: Appropriate or Unconstitutional?

CA3: Plain feel of apparent drugs supported seizure from def’s pocket

Defendant doesn’t challenge the stop or the frisk, just the seizure of the baggie of drugs that the officer felt in his “watch pocket.” The officer could tell what it was by its feel. Affirmed. United States v. Williams, 2025 … Continue reading

Posted in Foreign searches, Plain view, feel, smell, Private search, Qualified immunity, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA3: Plain feel of apparent drugs supported seizure from def’s pocket

MD: When asked if def “minded” to consent to a frisk, he consented

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, and the officer asked about whether he was armed and whether he “minded” to consent to a frisk. He argued that he had no choice but to answer, but he did have a … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Curtilage, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MD: When asked if def “minded” to consent to a frisk, he consented

CA6: Mandamus doesn’t lie to force grant of a motion to suppress

Mandamus doesn’t lie to compel a district court to grant a motion to suppress and dismiss an indictment because of an alleged change in the dates of the charge to cover up an illegal search. There’s a possible remedy in … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Qualified immunity, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA6: Mandamus doesn’t lie to force grant of a motion to suppress

NYT: The Persistent Problem of Stop and Frisk

NYT: The Persistent Problem of Stop and Frisk by Shayla Colon (“New York Police Department supervisors failed to rein in unlawful stops, frisks and searches by anti-crime units in 2023, a monitor said in a new report.”)

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on NYT: The Persistent Problem of Stop and Frisk

D.Minn.: That officers could have been more careful and detailed in monitoring the CI doesn’t show a lack of PC

“Mr. Turner is correct that the use of a CRI during drug investigations is common. Moreover, the Court does not disagree that officers could have taken additional steps to yield an even higher degree of confidence that Mr. Turner was … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.Minn.: That officers could have been more careful and detailed in monitoring the CI doesn’t show a lack of PC

OH3: Going right into pockets was an invalid frisk

The state failed to prove the necessity for a stop and frisk because the video shows the officer going right into defendant’s pockets and not frisking. State v. Barnes, 2024-Ohio-5865, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 4519 (3d Dist. Dec. 16, 2024). … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Scope of search, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH3: Going right into pockets was an invalid frisk

MI: Leatherman tool on belt could be considered weapon for frisk

Defendant was well-known to be a meth abuser, and when he was stopped for a traffic offense and had a Leatherman tool on him, that could be considered usable as a weapon. People v. Babcock, 2024 Mich. App. LEXIS 9506 … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Seizure, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MI: Leatherman tool on belt could be considered weapon for frisk

Leftovers

2255 petitioner fails to show grounds for a CoA from his search claims, without telling us the rationale. United States v. Renteria, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 30239 (5th Cir. Nov. 26, 2024).* Defendant’s stop and frisk was without reasonable suspicion. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Stop and frisk, Strip search | Comments Off on Leftovers

CA7: 13 months of pole camera surveillance was not unreasonable

Thirteen months of pole camera surveillance of the public areas outside defendant’s home were reasonable under United States v. Tuggle, 4 F.4th 505, 511 (7th Cir. 2021), and the court declines to reconsider that case. The officers saw no more … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Pole cameras, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA7: 13 months of pole camera surveillance was not unreasonable