Author Archives: Hall

TN: RS didn’t develop to continue stop; second stop based on first suppressed

Defendant was subjected to two stops. The first was for suspicion of disorderly conduct, but no arrest was made and he was released because no further reasonable suspicion developed. A second stop was based on the first, and there still … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: RS didn’t develop to continue stop; second stop based on first suppressed

CA4: Traffic stop immediately became firearms investigation; suppressed

The officer immediately launching into an inquiry about firearms during a traffic stop violated Rodriguez. United States v. Martin, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 10979 (4th Cir. Apr. 17, 2026):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: Traffic stop immediately became firearms investigation; suppressed

CA10: Disagreement over spelling of street name didn’t make warrant fail particularity; GFE at least would apply

“The warrant authorized a search of 10 McGinnis Street, Eufaula, OK 74432. The correct address, Mr. Davis said, was 10 Meginnis Street, Eufaula, OK 74432. And beyond the address, the warrant contained no description of the house.” The suppression hearing … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Particularity, Protective sweep, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA10: Disagreement over spelling of street name didn’t make warrant fail particularity; GFE at least would apply

VA: Statutory requirement to provide SW papers only applies to “places of abode”

Defendant sold drugs in a store in a controlled buy. The statute on providing a warrant and affidavit to the occupant only applies to places of abode. Blow v. Commonwealth, 2026 Va. LEXIS 29 (Apr. 16, 2026). A narcotics officer … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on VA: Statutory requirement to provide SW papers only applies to “places of abode”

D.Idaho: Not unreasonable for PO to hand over def’s cell phone to LEO for extraction after RS developed from Snapchat app

Defendant missed a PO visit, and they went to his house. There, they got his cell phone and looked at his Snapchat app finding messages between him and a 14 year old. It was not unreasonable for them to hand … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Cell phones, Community caretaking function, Informant hearsay, Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Not unreasonable for PO to hand over def’s cell phone to LEO for extraction after RS developed from Snapchat app

AtL: Sotomayor Apologizes For Possibly Hurting Kavanaugh’s Feelings Over The Racial Profiling He Invented

Above the Law: Sotomayor Apologizes For Possibly Hurting Kavanaugh’s Feelings Over The Racial Profiling He Invented by Joe Patrice

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on AtL: Sotomayor Apologizes For Possibly Hurting Kavanaugh’s Feelings Over The Racial Profiling He Invented

MN: Geofence warrant was not particular

The Minnesota Constitution doesn’t categorically prohibit geofence warrants, but here the warrant was not particular as to all those swept up. Reversed and remanded to the court of appeals (rev’g State v. Contreras-Sanchez, 5 N.W.3d 151 (Minn. App. 2024)). State … Continue reading

Posted in geofence, Particularity | Comments Off on MN: Geofence warrant was not particular

IA: Bodycam and dashcam videos undermined claim of plain view

The bodycam and dashcam videos show that the officer could not have made the plain view he claims he did of a portion of a gallon-sized Ziplock bag in defendant’s waistband. A clear video can even undermine trial court credibility … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on IA: Bodycam and dashcam videos undermined claim of plain view

MA: Waiting 24 hours after the alleged traffic violation to make a stop was unreasonable

Waiting 24 hours after the alleged traffic violation to make a stop was unreasonable under the state constitution. Commonwealth v. Arias, 2026 Mass. LEXIS 161 (Apr. 15, 2026):

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on MA: Waiting 24 hours after the alleged traffic violation to make a stop was unreasonable

CA10: SW for gun three weeks after road rage incident wasn’t stale

Search warrant for a gun in defendant’s house allegedly involved in a road rage incident three weeks earlier was not stale. United States v. Becker, 168 F.4th 1337 (10th Cir. Mar. 9, 2026). Defendant’s December 2019 conviction is affirmed. Reviewing … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on CA10: SW for gun three weeks after road rage incident wasn’t stale

OH10: Parole search of cell phone can occur even when it’s taken from the property room at jail

Defendant was in jail, and his PO went to the jail and got his phone from the property room to search it. This was a reasonable search under his parole search condition. State ex rel. Woodard v. Hoying, 2026-Ohio-1351 (10th … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH10: Parole search of cell phone can occur even when it’s taken from the property room at jail

TX14: No REP in location information on bondsman’s GPS monitor

In the third opinion in this case, all with the same outcome, a defendant on GPS monitoring by his bondsman as a condition of release had no reasonable expectation of privacy that the information would never be given to law … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on TX14: No REP in location information on bondsman’s GPS monitor

W.D.N.Y.: No IAC for not challenging search without standing

“In view of Dunnigan’s self-professed lack of any interest in or connection to the premises searched, Dunnigan’s attorney cannot be faulted for failing to challenge a search for which his client lacked standing to challenge.” United States v. Dunnigan, 2026 … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Plain view, feel, smell, Seizure, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: No IAC for not challenging search without standing

CAAF: Victim’s 4A rights were at issue, too

The military court had to also consider the Fourth Amendment rights of the victim to sensitive information the accused sought access to for trial. All things considered, even if the court martial judge was wrong denying it, it was harmless … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Military searches, Nexus, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CAAF: Victim’s 4A rights were at issue, too

D.D.C.: It took the govt years to search def’s computers, and the court has to balance that huge delay with the truth-seeking function in resolving it

In a fraud case, the government took years to search the computers. A second warrant was obtained for some. The government doesn’t get to undo the delay by a new warrant, but the deterrence rationale of the exclusionary rule applies. … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine, Inventory, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.D.C.: It took the govt years to search def’s computers, and the court has to balance that huge delay with the truth-seeking function in resolving it

OH3: Cell phone search can extend to cloud storage it’s connected to

Defendant gave consent to search his cell phone, and the court notes, without deciding, that other courts have held that such consent would reach his data stored on the cloud or another server. That issue doesn’t, however, have to be … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Curtilage, Dog sniff, Scope of search | Comments Off on OH3: Cell phone search can extend to cloud storage it’s connected to

CA4: PIT maneuver with unmarked car for detectives making a stop could be excessive force

Using an unmarked police car to stop plaintiff with a PIT maneuver requested by detectives without warning here raised sufficient factual disputes that the officers do not get summary judgment nor qualified immunity on an excessive force claim in his … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Dog sniff, Excessive force, Nexus, Seizure | Comments Off on CA4: PIT maneuver with unmarked car for detectives making a stop could be excessive force

CA4: Ptf student’s cell phone properly searched at school under T.L.O.

Plaintiff student’s cell phone was properly searched at school under T.L.O. when he was heard bragging about having explicit photographs on it at school. O.W. v. Carr, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 10241 (4th Cir. Apr. 9, 2026). Plaintiff made a … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, School searches | Comments Off on CA4: Ptf student’s cell phone properly searched at school under T.L.O.

D.Me.: Entering passcode into cell phone to see if it works is not a search

Defendant’s cell phone was seized and a warrant obtained to search it, but it was protected by a passcode and the phone was not searched. So, a couple of months later, they tried again with a new warrant. The information … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, DNA, Informant hearsay, Mail and packages, Prison and jail searches, Search | Comments Off on D.Me.: Entering passcode into cell phone to see if it works is not a search

CA10: Use of flashlight to aid a drone is still plain view

Officers were waiting for a search warrant to enter premises to look for a person. With consent of a neighbor, an officer climbed higher to use a flashlight to aid an overhead drone at night, seeing a gun on the … Continue reading

Posted in Drones, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA10: Use of flashlight to aid a drone is still plain view