Category Archives: Suppression hearings

HI: Failure to argue PC at suppression hearing was waiver for appeal

Where the defense didn’t argue a lack of probable cause at the suppression hearing, that could not be raised on appeal. State v. Arbogast, 2025 Haw. App. LEXIS 617 (Dec. 23, 2025) (unpublished).* Defendant’s stop was reasonable and his spontaneous … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings, Waiver | Comments Off on HI: Failure to argue PC at suppression hearing was waiver for appeal

C.D.Ill.: Easily entered iPhone moots how passcode was obtained

Even if the passcode was obtained unreasonably, this iPhone would have been gotten into anyway. The officer had done it before on these earlier models, and that’s inevitable discovery. United States v. Fassero, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 265273 (C.D. Ill. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Inventory, Neutral and detached magistrate, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Easily entered iPhone moots how passcode was obtained

CA8: Merely handling bag on a Greyhound Bus at a stop wasn’t a search or seizure

The officer’s handling defendant’s suitcase on a Greyhound Bus for five seconds to remove it from the bus, just as the driver or baggage handlers would, before asking him for consent was not unreasonable. Defendant validly consented to its search. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Search, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA8: Merely handling bag on a Greyhound Bus at a stop wasn’t a search or seizure

D.P.R.: No suppression hearing required when there’s no factual dispute

You don’t get a hearing on a motion to suppress without showing a factual dispute to be resolved. United States v. Figueroa-Figueroa, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218467 (D.P.R. Nov. 4, 2025). “A claim that a law enforcement official used excessive … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on D.P.R.: No suppression hearing required when there’s no factual dispute

CA1: Video of SW execution sufficiently authenticated for trial

The video of execution of the search warrant was sufficiently authenticated to be admissible at trial despite coming in through a witness other than the one who took it. United States v. Reyes-Rosario, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 16316 (1st Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Private search, Probable cause, Search incident, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA1: Video of SW execution sufficiently authenticated for trial

CO: Incorporation of SW affidavit saves warrant from lack of particularity

“[T]he warrant in this case authorized collection of location data and certain message content surrounding the crimes. While the warrant could have been more particular by limiting each category using the language ‘related to the crimes,’ the warrant’s incorporation of … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Arrest or entry on arrest, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CO: Incorporation of SW affidavit saves warrant from lack of particularity

D.Alaska: Recklessly omitted text messages were material to PC finding; suppression granted

Omitted text messages were material to the probable cause finding, and the officer was at least reckless in not including them. Franks satisfied: “Therefore, the Court agrees with Judge Scoble’s reasoning, adopts his analysis, and finds that, had Detective Ruble … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standards of review, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on D.Alaska: Recklessly omitted text messages were material to PC finding; suppression granted

VA: Suppression in a potential criminal case not a civil court remedy

Plaintiff has a turkey hunting plot of land with 100 no trespassing signs around it. Virginia wildlife officers entered the land, found trail cameras and seized them to look at the pictures. Plaintiff sued under the state constitution and statute. … Continue reading

Posted in Open fields, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on VA: Suppression in a potential criminal case not a civil court remedy

D.D.C.: Multiple counts of things seized under SW not severed

In a motion to sever counts for trial, it was significant that the stuff was seized under the same search warrant. United States v. Lewis, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 217086 (D.D.C. Dec. 2, 2024). There was probable cause and nexus … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Nexus, Prison and jail searches, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Multiple counts of things seized under SW not severed

CA8: Pro se def’s standby counsel not ineffective at suppression hearing; not counsel’s role

Defendant chose to go pro se at the suppression hearing, grudgingly accepting standby counsel. After the motion to suppress was denied, he claimed ineffective assistance by standby counsel for not doing more. But that’s not standby counsel’s role. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA8: Pro se def’s standby counsel not ineffective at suppression hearing; not counsel’s role

NM: Trial courts can raise search issues on their own

A trial judge in New Mexico noticed that there were an unusual number of suspect warrantless searches going unchallenged by the defense. She set suppression hearings and several cases were nolle prossed. A few survived to be heard. On certification … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Motion to suppress, Probation / Parole search, Suppression hearings, Waiver | Comments Off on NM: Trial courts can raise search issues on their own

NY1: Failure to controvert any facts or make an argument justifies denying suppression hearing

“Although the felony complaint, indictment, voluntary disclosure form, arraignment transcript, and search warrant affidavit disclosed to defendant provided him with ‘detailed information about the sequence of events leading up to his arrest’ …, he failed to controvert the specific information … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on NY1: Failure to controvert any facts or make an argument justifies denying suppression hearing

LA5: SW support was thin, but def didn’t carry burden to overcome presumption of validity

Here the affidavit had a gratuitous statement that there were federal wiretaps, but they didn’t involve defendant. Still, it made it into the affidavit for warrant along with identification information. There were also observations of him going into suspect premises. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Probable cause, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on LA5: SW support was thin, but def didn’t carry burden to overcome presumption of validity

DE: Def counsel’s failure to challenge PC and particularity in cell phone search warrants post-conviction relief

Defendant sufficiently stated grounds for ineffective assistance of counsel from defense counsel’s failure to challenge the search warrant for lack of probable cause and particularity. “Postconviction relief due to ineffectiveness of counsel must be granted in circumstances where the Court … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Custody, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on DE: Def counsel’s failure to challenge PC and particularity in cell phone search warrants post-conviction relief

CADC: When searching a cell phone and officers find it belonged to someone else, a new SW isn’t required; SWs are directed at things, places, and people and owner doesn’t matter for PC

Officers seized a cell phone from Thorne, a suspected narcotics and firearms trafficker. In a search under a warrant, the officers found out the phone actually belonged to defendant. Warrants are directed at things, and that didn’t require them to … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CADC: When searching a cell phone and officers find it belonged to someone else, a new SW isn’t required; SWs are directed at things, places, and people and owner doesn’t matter for PC

OH5: A replevin action can’t be used to suppress evidence seized by SW

A replevin action can’t be used to suppress evidence seized by search warrant. Glass v. Del. Cty. Sheriff’s Office, 2024-Ohio-1301, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 1235 (5th Dist. Apr. 4, 2024). Defendant fails his Franks burden, and the warrant wasn’t stale. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Independent source, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on OH5: A replevin action can’t be used to suppress evidence seized by SW

NC: Lack of findings for denial of motion to suppress precludes review; remanded

After a suppression hearing, the trial court orally denied the motion to suppress after hearing conflicting evidence. The state was to prepare findings and didn’t. After defendant was convicted on that evidence, there was nothing for the appeal. Remanded for … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Plain view, feel, smell, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on NC: Lack of findings for denial of motion to suppress precludes review; remanded

PA: PO could send parolee’s GPS tracking to CID

Defendant was on parole for armed robbery, wearing a GPS tracker. It was reasonable for parole to send his tracking information to a detective investigating him for another robbery. Commonwealth v. Rosendary, 2024 PA Super 51, 2024 Pa. Super. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on PA: PO could send parolee’s GPS tracking to CID

IL: A detention hearing right after arrest is not the place for a suppression hearing

A detention hearing right after arrest is not the place for a suppression hearing. Thus, the detention hearing court did not err in not considering Fourth Amendment issues. People v. Parker, 2024 IL App (1st) 232164, 2024 Ill. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings, Warrant papers | Comments Off on IL: A detention hearing right after arrest is not the place for a suppression hearing

E.D.Mich.: Def showed enough to reopen his suppression hearing which is usually frowned on

Defendant’s motion to reopen his suppression hearing is granted. “To resolve Defendant’s motion, the Court must determine whether Defendant has provided a sufficient explanation for failing to present at the suppression hearing the evidence that Defendant now wishes to introduce. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Def showed enough to reopen his suppression hearing which is usually frowned on