Category Archives: Issue preclusion

E.D.Tenn.: Application for SW was considered in detention ruling

Here, the application for the search warrant was considered on the detention question. No motion to suppress yet filed (or would one be?). United States v. Evans, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31755 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 17, 2026). Defendant’s valid stop … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Consent, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Application for SW was considered in detention ruling

MS: Failure to include SW materials anywhere in record was waiver of issues about it

Failure to include the search warrant materials anywhere in the record, either as an attachment to the motion or an exhibit at a hearing, is waiver for appeal on whether the warrant was properly issued. Burdine v. State, 2026 Miss. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Computer and cloud searches, Issue preclusion, Protective sweep, Warrant papers | Comments Off on MS: Failure to include SW materials anywhere in record was waiver of issues about it

CA6: 3 days between controlled buy and SW execution not stale

This search warrant didn’t go stale in the three days between the controlled buy and its execution. United States v. Lawrence, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 9780 (6th Cir. Apr. 3, 2026).* The BAC blood draw statute includes drawing and testing, … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Issue preclusion, Staleness | Comments Off on CA6: 3 days between controlled buy and SW execution not stale

CA8: Password note near domestic partner’s computer was RS def on probation used that computer, too

Passwords near a computer seen in a probation search around defendant’s domestic partner’s computer was reasonable suspicion defendant could have too. United States v. Berry, 24-2337 (8th Cir. April 3, 2026).* Mandamus doesn’t lie to remedy petitioner’s constitutional claims. He … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Issue preclusion, Probation / Parole search, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA8: Password note near domestic partner’s computer was RS def on probation used that computer, too

OH9: Arrest warrant for a co-occupant of the house permitted entry under Payton

Officers had an arrest warrant for a co-occupant of the house, and that permitted their entry under Payton. State v. Cecil, 2026-Ohio-1100 (9th Dist. Mar. 30, 2026). The record on who actually consented or had apparent authority is incomplete, and … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of proof, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on OH9: Arrest warrant for a co-occupant of the house permitted entry under Payton

ID: POs may do protective sweeps of a house same any other officer

“Having considered the rationale justifying protective sweeps, we hold, as a matter of first impression, that probation officers conducting lawful compliance checks in a residence may conduct a protective sweep to the same extent and are subject to the same … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Probation / Parole search, Protective sweep | Comments Off on ID: POs may do protective sweeps of a house same any other officer

E.D.La.: RS def was armed in a NOLA firearms free zone

The officer had reasonable suspicion defendant was armed, but also in a firearm-free zone during Mardi Gras which was reasonably determined. United States v. Bryant, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62869 (E.D. La. Mar. 25, 2026).* 2255 petitioner’s guilty plea waived … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.La.: RS def was armed in a NOLA firearms free zone

N.D.Ind.: Police arriving during ongoing 911 call justified entry on exigency

Officers arrived at the house the subject of an open 911 call during the emergency, and that authorized entry. United States v. Bray, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63142 (N.D. Ind. Mar. 25, 2026).* The court can’t tell from the body … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Emergency / exigency, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Police arriving during ongoing 911 call justified entry on exigency

CA9: 48-hour delay in getting a warrant for a mailed package wasn’t unreasonable

A 48 hour delay in getting a warrant for a mailed package wasn’t unreasonable. United States v. Garza, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 8714 (9th Cir. Mar. 25, 2026). Petitioner’s bank records were obtained by search warrant. They are third party … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Issue preclusion, Mail and packages, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA9: 48-hour delay in getting a warrant for a mailed package wasn’t unreasonable

RI: Trial stipulation DNA on blanket was def’s obviates search claim

Defendant wasn’t prejudiced by defense counsel not moving to suppress DNA off a blanket found on a road when he’d stipulated to it being his DNA. [There’s also an obvious abandonment issue not even mentioned.] Tassone v. State, 2026 R.I. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, DNA, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Nexus | Comments Off on RI: Trial stipulation DNA on blanket was def’s obviates search claim

DC: Officer’s unreasonable mistake of law did not make the stop reasonable under Heien

The officer’s unreasonable mistake of law on windshield tint (“can’t have tint at all” v. it can have some) did not make the stop reasonable under Heien. Griffin v. United States, 2026 D.C. App. LEXIS 95 (Mar. 19, 2026). Defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on DC: Officer’s unreasonable mistake of law did not make the stop reasonable under Heien

IN: State rule that consent to search carries with it a right to consult counsel doesn’t apply to police in another state acting on their own

Conflict of laws: Indiana’s Pirtle rule that consent searches afford a right to consult with counsel doesn’t apply to police in another state that encounter defendant and get consent to search. Mendenhall v. State, 2026 Ind. App. LEXIS 81 (Mar. … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Conflict of laws, Consent, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on IN: State rule that consent to search carries with it a right to consult counsel doesn’t apply to police in another state acting on their own

D.N.H.: Private entrance to third-floor apartment’s curtilage is the hallway leading to it

Plaintiff lived in a third-floor apartment in a building where only he had a key and access, and that was his curtilage. (Apparently the door was unlocked when this entry occurred.) The individual official entered without knocking and getting permission … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on D.N.H.: Private entrance to third-floor apartment’s curtilage is the hallway leading to it

DE: Second warrant after first general warrant was independent source for search

The trial court held the warrant for defendant’s cell phone was a general warrant for overbreadth but the independent source doctrine saved the second search warrant after the first search. “All Delaware Superior Court cases addressing the instant issue support … Continue reading

Posted in General warrant, Independent source, Issue preclusion, Nexus | Comments Off on DE: Second warrant after first general warrant was independent source for search

CA8: Police with arrest warrant could enter third-party premises to arrest defendant

Police with a warrant for defendant could enter a third party’s premises to arrest him on probable cause that he was present. Under Steagald, defendant had no more reasonable expectation of privacy in the third party’s premises than the owner … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Police with arrest warrant could enter third-party premises to arrest defendant

D.Ariz.: Alleged perjury at state suppression hearing doesn’t overcome Stone bar

2254 petitioner’s claim the officer perjured himself during his suppression hearing doesn’t overcome the Stone bar. Soliven v. Thornell, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45209 (D. Ariz. Mar. 5, 2026). 2254 petitioner’s effort to include an “inadvertently omitted” Fourth Amendment claim … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Alleged perjury at state suppression hearing doesn’t overcome Stone bar

S.D.Ohio: Two on Stone

“Because Stone v. Powell prohibits this Court’s consideration of Petitioner’s Fourth Amendment claim, the Magistrate Judge’s denial of expansion of the record to include the dash cam footage is affirmed because consideration of that footage is prohibited by Stone. The … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Two on Stone

CA4: Error to deny suppression motion without hearing where there’s disputed facts

The district court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress without a hearing when there were disputed facts. United States v. Moore, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 6196 (4th Cir. Mar. 3, 2026). Defendant consented orally and in writing to search … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Issue preclusion, Nexus, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA4: Error to deny suppression motion without hearing where there’s disputed facts

W.D.Pa.: Younger doctrine didn’t apply when plaintiff’s criminal case was over

Younger doctrine didn’t apply when plaintiff’s criminal case was over. Harris v. Trent, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42416 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 2, 2026). “Here, assuming the factual disputes in Franke’s favor, the relevant question is whether it was clearly established … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Younger doctrine didn’t apply when plaintiff’s criminal case was over

D.N.M.: Suit over search in pending criminal case barred by Heck

Plaintiff’s first Fourth Amendment claim failed under Heck. He amended the complaint and still doesn’t overcome it. His claim of failure to train in serving search warrants is conclusory and doesn’t state a claim either. Flores v. Wood, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Suit over search in pending criminal case barred by Heck