Category Archives: Standing

VI: Smell of MJ no longer PC in VI since legalization

Since marijuana is legal in the Virgin Islands, the smell of marijuana from a car is no longer probable cause for a search. People v. Thomas, 2026 V.I. LEXIS 44 (Super. Ct. Oct. 6, 2026). Petitioner does not get a … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on VI: Smell of MJ no longer PC in VI since legalization

D.P.R.: Mere possession of a car doesn’t show standing

Just having possession of a car doesn’t show standing. How did it come to be? United States v. Luna-Irizarry, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 232412 (D.P.R. Oct. 8, 2026):

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Mere possession of a car doesn’t show standing

S.D.Ill.: Witness’s memory failure on the stand at trial didn’t support a Franks challenge

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not raising a Franks challenge mid-trial when a participant in the search warrant process had a memory failure on the stand as to something. Offutt v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231418 (S.D. Ill. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inevitable discovery, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Witness’s memory failure on the stand at trial didn’t support a Franks challenge

CA10: No standing in real property defs attempted to buy but didn’t and then wouldn’t leave

Defendants lacked standing in the real property they were attempting to buy but the deal fell through. They knew they had to leave and hadn’t yet. They essentially were trespassers, not tenants. United States v. Wahhaj, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Standing | Comments Off on CA10: No standing in real property defs attempted to buy but didn’t and then wouldn’t leave

S.D.Tex.: Govt can’t raise new 4A exception in motion to reconsider

While executing a search warrant, officers compelled defendant to provide the passcode to the safe. The court suppressed the contents of the safe because it was not a valid consent. The government doesn’t get to argue inevitable discovery on a … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Govt can’t raise new 4A exception in motion to reconsider

W.D.Pa.: Def can’t repackage a losing 4A standing claim into a due process claim

A defendant can’t repackage a losing Fourth Amendment standing claim into a due process claim, at least via a 2255. United States v. Vega, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 214580 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 22, 2026):

Posted in Due process, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Def can’t repackage a losing 4A standing claim into a due process claim

CA11: NCMEC’s cybertips are reliable enough to support PC and the GFE

NCMEC’s cybertips are reliable enough to support probable cause and the good faith exception. United States v. Gibbs, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 28546 (11th Cir. Sep. 17, 2026). Even if plaintiff could show that the official’s conduct was wrongful and … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Exclusionary rule, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: NCMEC’s cybertips are reliable enough to support PC and the GFE

NC: Standing to contest search of hotel room doesn’t include other guest’s cell phone

As a guest of a guest, defendant had standing to contest the search of the hotel room, but he didn’t have standing to contest the search of the other tenant’s cell phone. State v. Miller, 2026 N.C. App. LEXIS 763 … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on NC: Standing to contest search of hotel room doesn’t include other guest’s cell phone

GA: Facebook warrant was way overbroad and should have been suppressed, but harmless on whole record

The search warrant for defendant’s Facebook account was overbroad where it sought ten months of information where the alleged crime was only over a couple of days and covered “illegal activities.” Despite the illegal search, the conviction is affirmed because … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Overbreadth, Particularity, Probable cause, Social media warrants, Standing | Comments Off on GA: Facebook warrant was way overbroad and should have been suppressed, but harmless on whole record

CA11: SD card in a video voyeur device placed in another’s bedroom has no REP

“This appeal is about the reasonable expectation of privacy–or the lack thereof. Kenneth Mininger secretly placed video cameras in shared rooms in his ex-wife’s house. He used these cameras to record his ex-wife’s minor daughter undressing. The police examined the … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: SD card in a video voyeur device placed in another’s bedroom has no REP

CA9: Ptfs didn’t meet burden of showing administrative subpoena was 4A violation or in bad faith

Bad faith administrative subpoenas are grounded in the Fourth Amendment, but the burden is high in showing bad faith, and plaintiffs didn’t meet it. Queerdoc, PLLC v. DOJ, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 24567 (9th Cir. Aug. 14, 2026) (“The prohibition … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Standing, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on CA9: Ptfs didn’t meet burden of showing administrative subpoena was 4A violation or in bad faith

Cal.1: Search condition for mental health diversion was within court’s discretion

The trial court acted within its statutory discretion imposing a search condition on defendant during his mental health diversion. His criminal history justified it. Thompson v. Superior Court, 2026 Cal. App. LEXIS 459 (1st Dist. July 30, 2026). One defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on Cal.1: Search condition for mental health diversion was within court’s discretion

KY: Unrelated questions during ongoing traffic stop didn’t extend it under Rodriguez

While the officer asked unrelated questions during the traffic stop, the mission of the stop was ongoing throughout. Therefore, the questions didn’t really extend the stop. Miller v. Commonwealth, 2026 Ky. App. LEXIS 64 (July 2, 2026). The officer saw … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on KY: Unrelated questions during ongoing traffic stop didn’t extend it under Rodriguez

TX1: Defendant had no REP in a package of drugs he never possessed and on another person

Defendant lacked standing to suppress 4,100 grams of ketamine seized from Brown because he never possessed the package, had no reasonable expectation of privacy in package of drugs carried by Brown, and the ketamine was recovered away from him during … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on TX1: Defendant had no REP in a package of drugs he never possessed and on another person

SC: Police didn’t need a SW to access def’s bondsman’s GPS monitoring of him because he agreed to GPS monitoring for release

Defendant submitted to GPS monitoring by his bondsman as a condition of bail, and the police could call the bondsman for the GPS information to connect defendant to a new crime without a warrant. State v. Eberhart, 2026 S.C. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Private search, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on SC: Police didn’t need a SW to access def’s bondsman’s GPS monitoring of him because he agreed to GPS monitoring for release

N.D.Ga.: Standing has to be shown for the time of the search, not at some time in the past

“Earl was required to show, not that he had an expectation of privacy in the home at some time, but that he had that expectation at the time of the search. United States v. Brazel, 102 F.3d 1120, 1148 (11th … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Standing has to be shown for the time of the search, not at some time in the past

Fed.Cir.: VA’s determination here for mandatory in-home reassessment visits did not violate 4A under Wyman v. James

The VA’s determination here for mandatory in-home reassessment visits did not violate the Fourth Amendment under Wyman v. James. The statute gives the VA that discretion. Latham v. Sec’y of Veterans Affairs, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 17328 (Fed. Cir. June … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on Fed.Cir.: VA’s determination here for mandatory in-home reassessment visits did not violate 4A under Wyman v. James

TX1: Def has a duty to make his record on PC and the SW; missing affidavit was on him

Defendant objected to admission of his vehicle’s black box (event data recorder) for lack of a warrant. The state produced the warrant and affidavit in support. The trial court admitted the warrant but not the affidavit. Without it, defendant can’t … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Prison and jail searches, Standing | Comments Off on TX1: Def has a duty to make his record on PC and the SW; missing affidavit was on him

D.D.C.: SW of house for clothing used in crime didn’t violate 4A

There was probable cause for search of defendant’s house for clothing that was worn in the crime. What happens outside the house can create an inference that what’s sought is inside. (The good faith exception would also apply.) United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Airport searches, Consent, Nexus, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on D.D.C.: SW of house for clothing used in crime didn’t violate 4A

DE: Warrantless entry in DUI case unreasonable

Warrantless entry to detain a DUI suspect was unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. Claiming exigency isn’t enough. State v. Beasley, 2026 Del. C.P. LEXIS 8 (Del. C.P. June 16, 2026). This defendant has no reasonable expectation of privacy in someone … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on DE: Warrantless entry in DUI case unreasonable