Category Archives: Standing

KY: Unrelated questions during ongoing traffic stop didn’t extend it under Rodriguez

While the officer asked unrelated questions during the traffic stop, the mission of the stop was ongoing throughout. Therefore, the questions didn’t really extend the stop. Miller v. Commonwealth, 2026 Ky. App. LEXIS 64 (July 2, 2026). The officer saw … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on KY: Unrelated questions during ongoing traffic stop didn’t extend it under Rodriguez

TX1: Defendant had no REP in a package of drugs he never possessed and on another person

Defendant lacked standing to suppress 4,100 grams of ketamine seized from Brown because he never possessed the package, had no reasonable expectation of privacy in package of drugs carried by Brown, and the ketamine was recovered away from him during … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on TX1: Defendant had no REP in a package of drugs he never possessed and on another person

SC: Police didn’t need a SW to access def’s bondsman’s GPS monitoring of him because he agreed to GPS monitoring for release

Defendant submitted to GPS monitoring by his bondsman as a condition of bail, and the police could call the bondsman for the GPS information to connect defendant to a new crime without a warrant. State v. Eberhart, 2026 S.C. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Private search, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on SC: Police didn’t need a SW to access def’s bondsman’s GPS monitoring of him because he agreed to GPS monitoring for release

N.D.Ga.: Standing has to be shown for the time of the search, not at some time in the past

“Earl was required to show, not that he had an expectation of privacy in the home at some time, but that he had that expectation at the time of the search. United States v. Brazel, 102 F.3d 1120, 1148 (11th … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Standing has to be shown for the time of the search, not at some time in the past

Fed.Cir.: VA’s determination here for mandatory in-home reassessment visits did not violate 4A under Wyman v. James

The VA’s determination here for mandatory in-home reassessment visits did not violate the Fourth Amendment under Wyman v. James. The statute gives the VA that discretion. Latham v. Sec’y of Veterans Affairs, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 17328 (Fed. Cir. June … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on Fed.Cir.: VA’s determination here for mandatory in-home reassessment visits did not violate 4A under Wyman v. James

TX1: Def has a duty to make his record on PC and the SW; missing affidavit was on him

Defendant objected to admission of his vehicle’s black box (event data recorder) for lack of a warrant. The state produced the warrant and affidavit in support. The trial court admitted the warrant but not the affidavit. Without it, defendant can’t … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Prison and jail searches, Standing | Comments Off on TX1: Def has a duty to make his record on PC and the SW; missing affidavit was on him

D.D.C.: SW of house for clothing used in crime didn’t violate 4A

There was probable cause for search of defendant’s house for clothing that was worn in the crime. What happens outside the house can create an inference that what’s sought is inside. (The good faith exception would also apply.) United States … Continue reading

Posted in Airport searches, Consent, Nexus, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on D.D.C.: SW of house for clothing used in crime didn’t violate 4A

DE: Warrantless entry in DUI case unreasonable

Warrantless entry to detain a DUI suspect was unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. Claiming exigency isn’t enough. State v. Beasley, 2026 Del. C.P. LEXIS 8 (Del. C.P. June 16, 2026). This defendant has no reasonable expectation of privacy in someone … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on DE: Warrantless entry in DUI case unreasonable

E.D.Ark.: Ptf stated claim for SW entry without proper announcement

The search target’s shooting death case can proceed on an excessive force claim and failure to properly announce entry in an ATF raid. Malinowski v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134589 (E.D. Ark. June 17, 2026). “Harris fails to … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Apparent authority, Consent, Knock and announce, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Ptf stated claim for SW entry without proper announcement

CA8: Def’s connection to property searched was so tenuous he had no standing; no one claimed to know him

“Where the only witness testifying that defendant was an overnight guest (1) initially denied knowing defendant on the day of arrest, (2) had a prior conviction for filing a false police report, (3) could not provide basic information about defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Immigration arrests, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: Def’s connection to property searched was so tenuous he had no standing; no one claimed to know him

MO: When officers came with an arrest warrant, def’s admission he had a firearm justified the entry

Officers came to defendant’s house with an arrest warrant. When they entered they asked him about any weapons in the house before a protective sweep. He directed them to a gun in the bedroom. That was all reasonable and inevitable … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Protective sweep, Standing | Comments Off on MO: When officers came with an arrest warrant, def’s admission he had a firearm justified the entry

TN: Def lived in a van left wide open in a public area, but it didn’t belong to him, so no REP as to interior

“In this case, the evidence was that, although the Defendant lived in the van, the van was registered to someone else, and the vehicle registration indicated the same. The doors to the van were wide open and it was parked … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on TN: Def lived in a van left wide open in a public area, but it didn’t belong to him, so no REP as to interior

TX1: No standing to challenge seizure of ketamine off co-def, but PC was lacking for his own arrest

Defendant didn’t have standing to challenge the seizure of ketamine off a codefendant. [Even better for him,] There was no probable cause for his warrantless arrest. Akinrinlola v. State, 2026 Tex. App. LEXIS 4935 (Tex. App. – Houston (1st Dist.) … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, GPS / Tracking Data, Standing | Comments Off on TX1: No standing to challenge seizure of ketamine off co-def, but PC was lacking for his own arrest

KS: Petr’s disclaimer of seized cash was a lack of standing in a forfeiture

Claimant’s disclaimer in the money should have been decided first, not the merits of the search. It’s essentially a lack of standing. State ex rel. Kansas Highway Patrol v. $381,620 in U.S. Currency, 2026 Kan. LEXIS 125 (May 15, 2026). … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Forfeiture, Standing | Comments Off on KS: Petr’s disclaimer of seized cash was a lack of standing in a forfeiture

CA1 declines to get into whether undocumented persons are “people” with 4A rights

The First Circuit declines to get into the issue of whether an undocumented person here is part of the “people” with Fourth Amendment rights, instead deciding he loses on the merits. United States v. Vizcaíno-Peguero, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 13000 … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Immigration arrests, immigration searches, Standing | Comments Off on CA1 declines to get into whether undocumented persons are “people” with 4A rights

M.D.Ala.: Officer’s adhering to particularity wasn’t a failure to uncover Brady information

“To the contrary, this testimony confirms only that Agent Evans’s forensic examination was circumscribed by the legal boundaries of the search warrant. Cox’s attempt to equate the examiner’s adherence to those boundaries with a failure to uncover exculpatory evidence is … Continue reading

Posted in Due process, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Officer’s adhering to particularity wasn’t a failure to uncover Brady information

W.D.N.Y.: No IAC for not challenging search without standing

“In view of Dunnigan’s self-professed lack of any interest in or connection to the premises searched, Dunnigan’s attorney cannot be faulted for failing to challenge a search for which his client lacked standing to challenge.” United States v. Dunnigan, 2026 … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Plain view, feel, smell, Seizure, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: No IAC for not challenging search without standing

D.P.R.: Def can lack standing in the place yet still be in possession to be convicted

“Furthermore, there is nothing impermissible with the Government arguing that a defendant does not have an expectation of privacy in a place to assert a Fourth Amendment violation, while arguing that the defendant possessed the evidence seized in that same … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Standing | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Def can lack standing in the place yet still be in possession to be convicted

MS: By denying living at the place searched, def lacked standing to challenge its search

By denying living at the place searched, defendant lacked standing to challenge its search. Armstrong v. State, 2026 Miss. App. LEXIS 151 (Mar. 31, 2026). In addition, “Bailey’s non-compliance with the deputies’ commands and expressions of suicidal intent—with an alleged … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on MS: By denying living at the place searched, def lacked standing to challenge its search

CA6: Occasionally spending the night at the place searched doesn’t give standing

Occasionally spending the night at the place searched doesn’t give standing. United States v. Carney, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 8792 (6th Cir. Mar. 24, 2026). There was no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s frisk, and the gun found is suppressed. United … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Standing | Comments Off on CA6: Occasionally spending the night at the place searched doesn’t give standing