Category Archives: § 1983 / Bivens

E.D.Ark.: There is no 4A claim by a dead person

There is no Fourth Amendment claim by a dead person. “Because the investigation failures and denial of access to the Courts are based on facts alleged to have occurred entirely after decedent’s death, Plaintiff cannot assert these claims either on … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: There is no 4A claim by a dead person

CA7: No property damage claim from executing SW

Relying on Johnson v. Manitowoc County, 635 F.3d 331 (7th Cir. 2011), plaintiff’s claim for property damage from executing a search warrant is foreclosed. Hadley v. City of South Bend, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 26040 (7th Cir. Oct. 7, 2025). … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Pretext, Private search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA7: No property damage claim from executing SW

CO: In a civil case, legal justification for a warrantless search is an affirmative defense

“In a case of first impression, a division of the court of appeals holds that legal justification for a warrantless search is an affirmative defense that the defendant must prove in a civil action under section 13-21-131, C.R.S. 2025. The … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CO: In a civil case, legal justification for a warrantless search is an affirmative defense

OH5: SW saved by GFE even if issuing court lacked jurisdiction

The good faith exception applies even if the Common Pleas court lacked jurisdiction to issue a warrant for a Dropbox account in another jurisdiction. State v. Wharton, 2025-Ohio-4485, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS 3295 (5th Dist. Sep. 25, 2025). Summary judgment … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Emergency / exigency, Good faith exception, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on OH5: SW saved by GFE even if issuing court lacked jurisdiction

CA11: Officers reasonably concluded that this was one residence without apartments

“At the time the officers swore out and executed the warrant, the officers believed 4279 Violet Circle was a single-family home that Schmitz occupied.” The officers’ investigation for months never indicated that the premises included three efficiency apartments. “In sum, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception, Particularity, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA11: Officers reasonably concluded that this was one residence without apartments

W.D.Wis.: § 1983 search claim producing $4,000 damages verdict supported $84,690 in attorneys fees

Plaintiff’s § 1983 search claim produced a damages verdict for $500 compensatory and $3500 punitive. The attorney’s fees award of $84,690.00 is granted. Pfalzgraf v. Reisner, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168405 (W.D. Wis. Aug. 28, 2025). Cracked windshield and tinted … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Strip search | Comments Off on W.D.Wis.: § 1983 search claim producing $4,000 damages verdict supported $84,690 in attorneys fees

CA6: No REP in LPN

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in license plate information. Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not raising that. Williams v. United States, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 21583 (6th Cir. Aug. 22, 2025). While a sexual assault examination of a … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of pleading, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA6: No REP in LPN

NJ: Seeing def enter phone passcode in officer’s presence wasn’t unreasonable seizure

Officer seeing defendant enter cell phone passcode violated no reasonable expectation of privacy or Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. State v. Ellison, 2025 N.J. Super. LEXIS 60 (Aug. 19, 2025). Update: NJ Panel Upholds Use Of Phone Passcode Seen By … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Consent, Privileges, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NJ: Seeing def enter phone passcode in officer’s presence wasn’t unreasonable seizure

CA8: A state police officer, a part of a federal task force, could lie to cause an arrest to protect a federal witness

“We have decided this question before: ‘whether a St. Paul police officer acted under color of state law when she allegedly lied to protect a federal witness while serving on a federal task force.’ Yassin v. Weyker, 39 F.4th 1086, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Administrative search, Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA8: A state police officer, a part of a federal task force, could lie to cause an arrest to protect a federal witness

CA11: Ptf’s four arrests didn’t lack PC

Plaintiff was arrested four times in nine months, but he doesn’t plausibly allege that the arrests lacked probable cause. Hernandez v. Sheriff of Manatee Cty., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 17342 (11th Cir. July 14, 2025)*:

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA11: Ptf’s four arrests didn’t lack PC

CA7: Skeletal 4A claim doesn’t support relief

A caution about pleading in a § 1983 Fourth Amendment case: Plaintiff loses because of his skeletal claims in the complaint. “We express no opinion on whether the officers needed to handcuff Petersen, transport him in a police vehicle to … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of pleading, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA7: Skeletal 4A claim doesn’t support relief

CA1: Notable Bivens dismissal by its dissent: retired Justice Breyer

A Bivens claim, not specifically a Fourth Amendment claim, fails because of a different context from existing caselaw. The claim fails 2-1. What’s interesting is that retired Justice Breyer was on the panel, and he dissented that the claim should … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA1: Notable Bivens dismissal by its dissent: retired Justice Breyer

N.D.Ala.: Lack of a SW signature cured by GFE

“Defendant argues that the warrant is facially deficient because the affidavit lacked a signature, a panel of the Eleventh Circuit has considered and rejected this argument. See United States v. Gordon, 686 F. App’x 702, 704 (11th Cir. 2017) (holding … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Forfeiture, Good faith exception, Neutral and detached magistrate, Plain view, feel, smell, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: Lack of a SW signature cured by GFE

CA7: Cautionary tale in § 1983 case: “this appeal is a mess”

A confusing case presented from both sides, a cautionary tale: “this appeal is a mess.” Cave v. Valenti, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 9405 (7th Cir. Apr. 21, 2025):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of pleading | Comments Off on CA7: Cautionary tale in § 1983 case: “this appeal is a mess”

CA2: In getting arrest warrant, defenses don’t have to be considered

In a false arrest claim, the officer procuring the warrant doesn’t have to negate plaintiff’s defenses beforehand. Glover v. Onondaga Cty., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 8436 (2d Cir. Apr. 10, 2025)*:

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA2: In getting arrest warrant, defenses don’t have to be considered

CA5: Just because Bivens might become a dead letter doesn’t mean that the officers didn’t violate the 4A

Just because Bivens might become a dead letter doesn’t mean that the officers didn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. Villarreal v. City of Laredo, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 8241 (5th Cir. Apr. 8, 2025). My words, not the court’s but that’s … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Just because Bivens might become a dead letter doesn’t mean that the officers didn’t violate the 4A

MD: When asked if def “minded” to consent to a frisk, he consented

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, and the officer asked about whether he was armed and whether he “minded” to consent to a frisk. He argued that he had no choice but to answer, but he did have a … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Curtilage, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MD: When asked if def “minded” to consent to a frisk, he consented

C.D.Cal.: Suit over NYC DA’s subpoena for possession of a stolen antiquity is dismissed

The defendant here is Alvin Bragg, the District Attorney of New York County, NY (Manhattan). He’s sued in the Central District of California over his office’s investigation into antiquity art theft where plaintiff purchased a statue, the Bronze Male, for … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Due process, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Suit over NYC DA’s subpoena for possession of a stolen antiquity is dismissed

D.Kan.: § 1983 complaint questions state conviction and is barred by Heck

Plaintiff’s 242 paragraph § 1983 complaint calls into question his criminal conviction, so it’s barred by Heck. Turner v. Kansas Court of Appeals, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55052 (D. Kan. Mar. 25, 2025).* “Here, Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment unlawful imprisonment and … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Kan.: § 1983 complaint questions state conviction and is barred by Heck

S.D.Cal.: Officer doesn’t need a window tint meter in hand to justify a stop for overtinted windows

“But clearing the low bar of reasonable suspicion requires little more. Police need not ‘carry around and use burdensome equipment to measure light transmittance.” United States v. Wallace, 213 F.3d 1216, 1220 (9th Cir. 2000) (quoting People v. Niebauer, 263 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Officer doesn’t need a window tint meter in hand to justify a stop for overtinted windows